Category: debate

The Native American Ploy

Whites as Amerindians.

A comment often made – frequently observed for example on Yahoo comments threads – by leftists in response to complaints about White American dispossession is to raise the issue of Amerindians – “You guys invaded the lands of the Native Americans and pushed them out and now you are being invaded and pushed out, ha ha, too bad” is a typical example of this genre of comment.

We should be gratified when opponents make such arguments – for not only do they reveal their anti-White aggression, but, more importantly, they are admitting that the displacement of Whites in North America is akin to the displacement of the Amerindians, and we all know how “well” that worked out for the Amerindians.  Indeed, the response to such comments should be to thank the commentator for supporting the argument that White Americans are indeed being subjected to genocidal race replacement, and to note that Whites are under no obligation to let themselves be displaced and replaced.  Indeed, the Amerindians did resist as the frontier “Indian wars” demonstrate – the problem for the Amerindians is that they lacked the numbers, organization, intelligence, and technics to resist White expansion. Whites, on the other hand, could resist displacement if only they would demonstrate the same fighting spirit as the Amerindians.  Finally, another point in response to anti-White comments about “Native Americans” is to ask whether the commentator opposes the replacement of Whites in their native homelands of Europe, a situation that very well matches the Amerindian scenario.  If the “they were here first in their homeland” argument is so important to aggrieved leftists, then they should be among the strongest supporters of the European Far-Right.

Genocidal Mongrels

Hold Back Those Mongrels (proposed title for new racialist novel).

I previously wrote about the “Mixed Race Mentality” – and the same arguments apply to the Taylor debate and Taylor’s opponent.  The mixed race (and their parents – hello, Derb!) have a chip on their shoulder, a smoldering rage against the unmixed (“inbred” and “incest” for example, or always exulting over the proposed future non-existence of persons of native European stock, or even of native Japanese stock), and a desire to make everyone admixed like them.

In this sense, we may get a better perspective on both Jayman and Derbyshire.  And I also did read on Majority Rights some time ago that “Razib” is married to a White woman (I do not know the veracity of that claim).  All the pieces are starting to fit together, and the assembled puzzle turn out to be quite an ugly picture indeed.