Category: accountability

Scandza Fiasco

Surprise! 

Greg Johnson arrested in Norway, re: the Scandza conference. Despite my differences with Greg Johnson, obviously I oppose this and denounce it in the strongest terms possible. I do not want my ideological opponents silenced and censored; instead I want to engage them (something Johnson should consider with respect to his “banning” of people from his blog – what goes around comes around, I suppose).

The optimal thing from my perspective would be for Johnson to speak and for the transcript of the talk to be published at Counter-Currents, after which I can perform a thorough fisking of it.  One hopes that Johnson will publish the text of what he was going to say when he gets back. Since the conference was, I believe, promoting the anti-White, pro-Jewish, treasonous, yellow supremacist HBD cult, no doubt there would be plenty to criticize. Again, even though I consider the conference to have been a genocidal attack against White interests, we should respect free speech and let the yellow supremacists speak. Let them expose themselves, after which they can be criticized.

Thus, the action of the Norwegian authorities is despicable, and EGI Notes supports, 100%, Johnson’s right to attend and speak at Scandza, despite that I expect I would disagree with what he would say.  But that’s what free speech is all about, and if EGI Notes supports free speech, it has to be for everyone…even Johnson.

Perhaps at this point Johnson will realize that I (and Hood) are correct and that metapolitics without politics is a dead end.  Let us assume for the moment (and I know that this is a stretch) that Johnson’s speech would have been unvarnished truth, something of the highest utility.  It doesn’t matter. The System in Norway has the monopoly of force and there is no one there, no real opposition with any political power whatsoever, who is able to effectively intervene on his behalf.

Metapolitics and politics must be synergistic.  You have to have both. The metapolitics assists in the success in the political realm, and success in the political realm creates the environment in which metapolitical work can be more effective. The cycle has to begin at some point however, and gibbering about Yogi Bear and the Men Who Can’t Tell Time is not the way to do it.

What would be a better way?

At the moment, we are therefore looking at the possibility of taking legal action against Filter Nyheter.

Actually, that is something I would actually support all you guys giving “D’Nations” for – the only thing in fact.  That is at least practical political action, politics in its broadest sense as activity in relation to power.  Filter Nyheter engaged in politics in getting Johnson barred from the conference, arrested, and presumably deported.  Johnson should therefore engage in politics in taking action against Filter Nyheter.  That’s politics.  If Filter Nyheter merely criticized Johnson’s views, and, for example, challenged him to a debate, that would be metapolitics; on the other hand, utilizing the power of the state to silence Johnson is politics.  A response of legal action would also be politics.  Truth and facts are insufficient if the other side is willing, and able, to use force to silence that truth and censor those facts.

See this.

Scandza triple vets its attendees…

1. Are you Nordic?

2. Are you Swedish?

3. Are you Northwest European?

Extra bonus question: Can you fog a mirror held up to your nose?

Seriously though, something is wrong there.  The “triple vetting” is a failure or you got a mole or Antifa is so entrenched in society that they have the venue or other third party actors tipping them off.  The first two probabilities are more likely.

…to ensure that the venue is kept confidential but both in Copenhagen and in Oslo, the word appears to have got out.

You think?

As I have recently written, there is a time-honored method for identifying leaks.  It’s no secret. There’s a Wikipedia page on the method.  I’m sure all you big-brained societal consensus guys can figure it out. Unless some of those guys themselves are also infiltrators – how high up is the rot?  Start reading or watching (the miniseries not the move) Tinker Taylor Soldier Spy.  Either the “triple vetting” is majestically flawed or you got a mole, guys. Or both.

SINCERITY.net
I did not feel safe to enter the Copenhagen Scandza meeting. I could have gotten a police escort to get in. I was, though, concerned about how to get back out of the conference, and about being recognized, photographed, and targeted. Antifa is known to beat up people on their way back home, on railway stations etc. I lost time and expenses of a 3 day trip to Copenhagen, plus conference fees, without joining. I can imagine that Oslo could become worse.
It is shocking that Antifa is organized enough to get their spies among the highly vetted people and arrive in force before the actually invited people can make it. In spite of precautions like secret service spy meeting, with several intermediate stops and last moment further email messages.
If there are reports and videos out from last meeting, please send me the info here. We are also mirroring Colin Flaherty videos to vk DOT com/colinflaherty and to bitchute. We hope Scandza also will not put all their stakes into youtube.

Note: “It is shocking that Antifa is organized enough to get their spies among the highly vetted people and arrive in force before the actually invited people can make it.”

Note how the Left infiltrates the Far Right with ease…the “extreme triple vetting” means nothing – it is as if there is no vetting at all. This tells me that A) the vetting is flawed (from the analog and/or digital perspective) and/or B) the infiltration goes way up the ladder, perhaps including people doing the vetting and organizing. There are leaks somewhere, there is an error in the operational security somewhere.  I would suggest that dealing with this is the first priority.  Also note that the Right is not only helpless in preventing its own infiltration, but is helpless when it comes to infiltrating the Left (a seeming impossibility for the Right to achieve).  Further note that Frodi’s assurances that the Copenhagen fiasco was a special case because a Danish political figure was invited, and that we should not assume Antifa would show the same interest elsewhere, seems to be, not surprisingly, completely wrong.

Accountability?  Or are we so used to these guys being wrong all the time – always, always wrong, about virtually everything – that we just give it a pass?

A Brief Riposte to Johnson

Joan of Arc, Joan of Arc, my hobbit hole for a Joan of Arc!

Greg Johnson

Posted October 26, 2019 at 5:49 am | Permalink

The entire female sex is indicted because some women send love letters to serial killers.

The entire male sex is somehow not indicted because of the serial killers, however.

There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper. – Camile Paglia

I don’t know, Greg, for every male serial killer imprisoned – obviously a defect condemned by society – there are dozens (hundreds?) of “normal” women sending him love letters.  And we are still waiting for the female Mozart to compensate.

Any rational person understands the difference between the very rare phenomenon of isolated murderous male psychopaths and the much larger numbers of “normal” women – people we interact with on a daily basis, I’m sure – obsessively infatuated with those defective killers. Johnson is (as usual) just being an obtuse jackass here.

By the way, this is directly relevant to the issue at hand, because if women become involved in racial activism because of their schoolgirl infatuation with some Alt Right Beavis or Butthead “bad boy,” instead of having a deep ideological commitment, she’s more likely to turn apostate and do real damage.

I would have responded to you directly on your (pitifully regressing) blog, but I’m “banned” there, don’t you know.

Justice for the Embittered

Fisking Johnson.

Laugh at this, emphasis added:

First, what does it even mean to ban women from a largely anonymous online movement, which lacks any barriers to entry or standards of membership?

Sound like the “extreme vetting” at a Counter-Currents meeting. Isn’t that part of the problem Greg?  That there are no “barriers to entry or standards of membership?” Shouldn’t those things exist, and be based on merit and behavior and not on an affirmative action program or the mirror test (if someone can fog a mirror held up to their nose, they’re in)?

We can’t ban women from the internet.

Too bad, huh?

We can’t ban women from reading our websites, listening to our podcasts, watching our YouTube videos, etc. We can’t ban women from writing for our websites…

Actually you could ban known women from writing, which you choose not to do.

…commenting on our websites, or donating to them if they simply use pen names. (For all I know, the person who sent in the question is a woman.)

Well, we certainly don’t want to decrease potential “D,Nations” now, do we?

Of course some parts of the movement can exclude women. I don’t think we should accept the essentially feminist assumption that all organizations and realms of society should admit women, much less aim for male/female parity. I also think that it is quite natural for radical politics to attract more men than women. And just as combat units and police forces function better without women, so might some White Nationalist political organizations.

Uh, yes.

But even if it were possible to entirely exclude women from White Nationalist politics, doing so would be dumb and self-defeating.

Because Greg, with much personal experience in dealing with women, says so. The defenders of women need to answer certain questions.  Why do men who are serial killers, mass murderers, men who kill their families, when in prison, get inundated with love letters – often containing photos of the nude or scantily-clad nubile women who wrote the letters – and pleading offers of marriage?  Why do men with a criminal record have more female sexual partners than law-abiding men?  A sex hard-wired for crazed sociopathy is not the best material for a “movement” desperate for an increase in personal quality.  Think about it.

If women want to contribute their money, ideas, time, and social capital to the movement, that makes us stronger, not weaker. Beyond that, we are never going to actually win unless we can convince a substantial percentage of the female population that we represent their real interests. And we will never do that if we allow the tone of the movement to be set by embittered misogynists, to say nothing of people who proclaim “White Sharia” and “Islam is Right About Women.”

Yeah, Greg, those memes – that I agree are stupid – are promoted by people who you enthusiastically declared as “the new voices of WN 3.0.”  What does that say about your judgment – or absolute lack thereof?

Leftists love to dismiss realism about racial differences as racial hatred. But that’s not necessarily true. Feminists love to dismiss realism about sexual differences as misogyny, the hatred of women. But that’s not necessarily true either.

Yes, see above.  Women: A sociopathic sex that rewards the worst among men with the most sexual access.

However, just as there really are people in our movement who hate other races, there are people in our movement who genuinely hate women.

Just as the goal of our movement should be to drain the swamp of diversity in which race-hate breeds, we should also try to address the underlying causes of hatred between the sexes.

And just as we will not achieve our goal in the racial sphere if we allow simple race hatred to define our movement, we will not achieve our goals in the sexual sphere by allowing misogynists to set the tone either.

Are the “goals in the sexual sphere” set by O’Meara and Brendon/Brandon?

White Nationalists are mature enough to recognize that hatred between the races and sexes is the inevitable product of the current system. We also need to be mature enough to recognize that indulging embittered haters will destroy any chance to rectify our problems.

Crazy and bitter!  Johnson’s own obsessive hatred of Richard Spencer, is of course, not based on any bitter personal animus but just plain good sense!  Criticize Johnson though and you are just plain nuts!

Second, talking about excluding all women because of doxers like Katie McHugh makes no sense. Should the movement also exclude all men, because some men are doxers as well? That would put an end to 100% of doxings, but it would also put an end to the movement itself.

And we can’t have that.

Surely we can be a bit more surgical about excluding certain types of people to minimize such problems in the future.

Yes, Greg: Hermansson, Lewis, Brandon/Brendan, Pilleater, most of the people you currently have writing for your blog…

Third, the very same people who want to blame women for problems in the movement also often deny that women exercise any moral agency. But if women have no agency, then they bear no responsibility either. But clearly somebody is to blame for these operational security and public relations disasters, and by their own logic, misogynists would have to blame men.

Yes, exactly, we blame men like Johnson who allowed all sorts of tragicomic lapses in operational security.  We blame Steadman as well.

And in truth, men bear a lot of the blame.

Indeed.

By all accounts, McHugh, Samantha, and another unnamed woman who doxed Coach Finstock were not ordinary women. They were Alt-Right scene groupies. Like rock groupies, they were attracted to an overwhelmingly misogynistic subculture. Women who are drawn to such environments are surely high in masochism and low in self-worth. They then worked their way through the scene, passing over nice guys until they ended up with manipulative sociopaths.

Please Greg tell us – which “movement leader” is not a manipulative sociopath?

But when they realized that masochistic self-indulgence was not making them happy, they bailed out.

Then, once they had become sufficiently embittered to feel justified in harming innocent people, they went to the enemy and started doxing people, including people who had only been kind to them. This is the sort of pure evil that makes people dream of the eternal fires of hell to restore justice to the world.

Oh, yes, and some of us dream of such fires to restore justice to racial activism.  Feeling warm yet Greg?

What makes such evil possible? I think a good part of it can be explained by bitterness. Bitterness takes root when someone is wronged and does not receive justice.

Hmm…then Sallis was wronged and did not receive justice.  Good of you to admit it Greg.

Bitterness turns into a kind of neurosis. Embittered people vent their wrath not on the people who wronged them, but on people who didn’t wrong them but merely remind them of the people who did.

Absolute self-serving bullshit.

And if such people have any pangs of conscience, bitterness easily silences them: “Why should I care about these people’s suffering? Where were they when I was suffering? Who cared about me?”

Nonsense.

So how do we lessen the likelihood of such disasters in the future?

First, we really need to dispel the atmosphere of misogyny in the movement, which attracts damaged people of both sexes. Race realism–yes. Race hate–no. Sex realism–yes. Hatred between the sexes–no. Our movement will never win unless we treat such hatreds as social problems to be solved. And we cannot credibly promise to solve them in society as a whole if we allow them to run rampant in our own ranks.

But, hey, Anglin is one of the new voices of WN 3.0, and don’t you forget it!  Johnson is a buffoon.

Also: Hatred against White ethnics is A-OK.

Second, we need to exclude groupies. But we also need to exclude the kinds of sociopathic males they gravitate toward.

You mean like Jeelvy, you hypocrite?

…I am a bad worker. I am often late for work, and when I do arrive, I arrive with the insomniac’s world-contemptuous scowl overlaid against a stubbled jowl. I resolve office politics with threats of violence, and I’ve been known to disappear for hours on end, only to return in a state of mild inebriation. I write monograph-length critiques of TV shows from ten years ago during office hours… my successes are due more to innate charisma and an ability to charm people into forgiving my worst offenses rather than effort or passion. You have to be either crazy or my mother to hire me – in fact, the latter is my employer.

If we stand for the restoration of Western civilization, then we stand for monogamy not polygamy. We stand for fidelity, not adultery. We stand for healthy relationships, not pathological ones. Which means that playboys, sluts, adulterers, and abusers are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Ho ho!  Is that why your response to Pilleater’s complaints was to chuckle about how if Brandon/Brendan thinks some hapless male meeting attendee is “cute,” he’s just going to “flirt” with them?

If someone you know is playing the field, using and discarding movement groupies, he is playing with fire. He is putting his own short-term gratification ahead of the health of our cause. That’s a problem, and you need to say something.

Say something…like Pilleater did.

Third, we need to drain the swamp where bitterness and wrath breed. We have to do something when people in our movement wrong one another. We need to have some sympathy for victims of injustice, even for victims who are not entirely innocent. And the best form of sympathy is to give them justice, which means there have to be punishments for wrongdoers.

So, Greg, when will you resign from the “movement?”

People who dox others are evil and deserve no sympathy today. But if they had received sympathy and justice when they were wronged, things may have worked out differently, and we would all be better off.

The Alt Right in America crashed and burned because it was run by a mafia of drunkards, druggies, sociopaths, and buffoons, as well as swarms of remora-like fanboys, sycophants, and enablers.

Greg, don’t be so hard on yourself.

I fear that we are going to be hearing a lot more such stories from Samantha and people like her for years to come. But the movement for white survival will not falter as long as we treat such disasters as opportunities to learn rather than excuses to quit.

This comically self-unaware post indicates that Greg hasn’t learned yet.

Speaking of women, let us listen to that philosopher Lee Priest.

The HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance, manipulated behind the scenes by Jews, continues onward, as I predicted.

More of an ethnoimperialist invading the nation of another people, demanding sexual access to their women.

Jews promote alien immigration into Italy, just as do dreadlocked German whores, Norwegians, and Richard Gere.  The only thing Lind got wrong with his analysis of “American Tribes” is that he limited it to the USA.  The Nord-Jew-Colored Alliance is international.

While the disgusting “human being” Trump celebrates putting Black criminals back on the streets, Proud Boys members are being sent to prison for self-defense, and the Trump DOJ persecutes the Rise Above Movement.  But he’s a sincere man of greatness, and don’t you forget it!

Victory is inevitable, right Greg?

Chutzpah Apparently Isn’t Only for Jews

The always wrong crowd marches on.

Gotta give Greg credit for chutzpah, quoting Lewis and all.

Any reviews from Hermansson?

To ensure the safety of all participants, we adhere to a strict vetting process for all first-time attendees.

Are you Swedish?  Want to give a speech at our meeting? On the dangers of infiltration!

This chutzpah is made somewhat less admirable by the realization that Johnson well knows that his affirmative action protections allow him to make horrendous error after horrendous error and get away with it.

Anyway, make a joke over your infiltrations.  And keep on laughing, rank-and-file; after all, the joke’s on you.

Speaking of errors – whatever you may think of Forney, he makes good points here.

This whole TRS incident underscores problems with the ”movement” – including the attitude, criticized here previously, of “you work with who you have.” No, No, NO.  The abysmally low quality of people in the “movement,” including “leaders,” is one major problem – the complete lack of judgment, the “handing the keys to the kingdom” to all sorts of questionable people, the laughable “extreme vetting” (are you Swedish?).  Forney is right here as well, “infiltrating the Alt Right is easy, because the Alt Right is run by retards.”  Bad judgment, no background checking – Forney is 100% spot-on correct here.

And the yeastbucket problem – all budding Joan of Arcs no doubt! – is underscored in that podcast as well.  As well as the obsession with “D’Nations” (including Forney himself, at the end) – that’s what it is all about, eh?

Well, I suppose these are all the “representatives of WN 3.0.”  The voices of WN 3.0!  Hail Victory! These guys are always, always wrong.

Basically, what you should do is whenever you hear “movement leaders” say something or write something – believe the opposite.

And keep this in mind – even IF Forney is 100% wrong here then that is still an indictment of Der Movement – more controversy, more dirty laundry, more freakishness, and more bad judgment from all sides.  ALL these guys are part of Der Movement – regardless of “whose side” you are on, someone here is wrong, someone here is lying, someone here is exhibiting piss-poor judgment.  It’s just a matter of which “movement” personality it is – whether it is one of “your guys” or one of “their guys.”  From my perspective, NONE of these guys are “my guys” – it is just an indictment of the whole scene, which is, and always has been, an unmitigated disaster.

WN 3.0!  WN 2.0!  WN 1.0! – My hobbit hole for WN!  Der Movement is a complete joke.  But, hey, keep on sending in those “D’Nations” and keep on buying dat dere “merchandise!”  The golden age exists today for those who give!  Free shipping!  

And, we know that when Forney criticizes certain people, they respond – “Hey, do you know what Forney does for a living?  He writes term papers for Asians!  He makes his living from White dispossession!”

I have three responses to that:

1. What Forney does for a living is not directly relevant to the truth or falsehood of his assertions.

2. If we want to give Forney a fair hearing, that does not mean we support him or take “his side” in these feuds.

3. What contributes more to “White dispossession” – writing term papers for Asians or being an inept “movement leader” who contributes to the downfall of White racial nationalism?

Remember when Johnson was so eager to “establish contact” with this “Pewdiepie?”

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Of course, this Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg is Swedish.  So, not only are the Quota Queens always wrong, they are also always consistent. Hey, maybe Hermansson can help establish contact.  Mediation by HopeNotHate and the ADL optional.

The Dispossessed White Ethnics

Some accountability to balance the books.

Who was it who wrecked Europe and the entire White world?  Who wrecked the West? [Note – let’s not just blame “the Jews” now, shall we?]. Who was ultimately responsible, ethnically and nationally speaking, for the two World Wars that has put us all on the path to destruction?  What two European nations engaged in a selfish struggle between a rising land power and an established sea power, said struggle leading to the aforementioned wars?  Who is it who lurches from one extreme type of fanaticism to another, from extreme nationalism to extreme universalism, forcing the rest of Europe to go along for the ride?  Who was it who delegitimized racialism, nationalism, and fascism through their uncontrolled lunatic behavior?  Who tainted racialism with the label of genocide, tainted nationalism with the label of hegemonic war, and tainted fascism with the labels of hate, totalitarianism, and wanton destruction? Who refused to follow the cooperative path of the Montreux Conference, and instead had to go on their own way of bloodshed and military conquest (against other Europeans)?  That wasn’t Mussolini and Italy, or Codreanu and Romania. Choose again.  Who today opens the doors of Europe to the Third World?  Who has made the EU into a gulag for Europeans, for a vehicle for European dispossession?  Swarthoids?  Hunkies?  Other such “Outer Hajnal vermin?”  No, choose again, it wasn’t them.  Who was it in America who made common cause with Jews and Negroes for “civil rights” and “racial integration?” Who collaborated with Jews and Coloreds to wreck American cities?  

My critics will accuse me of some sort of animus (projection) or assert that I’m just as much as a divider as those I oppose, with the same sort of narrow ethnic agenda (albeit of a different specific kind). Not at all.  Long time readers of my blog are well aware that I am just as critical, if not more so, of the “ethnics,” even to the point of advocating elimination of fractions (~10-20%) of those populations in order to induce much needed eugenic improvement (of course, this can be achieved via sterilization of that population fraction, which is what practically should be done). However, one must speak the truth about EVERYONE, including Der Movement’s favorite ethnies; there needs to be counter-balance to Der Movement’s fossilized dogmas, to their rigid narratives. There has to be accountability, for a proper balancing of the books.

And dishonest hypocrisy has to be exposed. You have certain European types who blithely go about not only destroying their own nations, but do the same to those of others. And then, when some of these types wake up and become frustrated about the damage done (by their own people) to their nations, they blame others for the situation. It’s dem dere “unassimilable ethnics,” all those three foot tall “needle workers,” who are responsible for dispossessing Americans true majority!  It’s dem dere swarthoids who are endangering “Nordish” preservation!  You have folks whose ability to wreck nations and civilizations rival that of the Jews (although, unlike the Jews, these people also wreck themselves), but they project their frustrations outward and they never accept responsibility for what they have done and are still doing.

I am particularly bemused by the Type Is who leave comments on racialist blogs concerning American White ethnics asserting that – “they have to go back.”  Really?  Go back where? To the nations you destroyed, and are still destroying? You have dreadlocked German whores forcibly invading Italian territory to dump off African migrants. So the American wops should go back where?  Norwegians sail the Mediterranean desperately looking for any Afro-Asiatics they can “rescue” and dump into Southern Europe. The swarthoids should go back where?  Richard Gere can’t wait to aid the invasion of other people’s nations.  Go back where?  Mama Merkel’s pronouncements not only invite the invasion of her own nation but those of the Southern half of Europe. Go back where?  Hey, if you say “they all have to go back,” then maybe you should leave them nations to go back to, instead of actively and avidly wrecking those nations like you’ve wrecked everything else.

Anti-Race, Greg Johnson, Sallis’ Law, and Other News

In der news.

See this to refute leftist lies..  If only Der Movement didn’t have a cordone sanitaire around EGI Notes, it could answer these leftist lies more effectively.

Genetic variation and genetic distance are not the same thing. Anyone claiming that Nigerians are more similar to Scots than they are to other Africans is scientifically illiterate. Any grouping of people will demonstrate more variation within than between – even mixed groups of Whites and Blacks together. That’s meaningless from the perspective of genetic kinship.  Also see Edwards’ “Lewontin’s Fallacy” paper.  Using science and logic is going to be more effective than the equivalent of stammering “but, but, but, it can’t be true, it makes no sense.”  By the way, the fact that population geneticists, who must know better, stay silent when leftist lies are uttered completely supports my contention that those academics are highly politicized on the Left.

We need to examine this quite remarkable comment by Greg Johnson:

Greg Johnson

Posted August 11, 2019 at 11:01 am | Permalink

Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what.

He let demographic replacement and voter fraud go unchecked.

He is now turning against the first and second Amendment rights of his base.

He will lose in a landslide.

By the time the next president comes in, there will be millions of new invaders inside our borders.

Then the race war will kick off in the summer of 2021.

White Nationalists need to ask ourselves if we are going to be among the people who fought against white dispossession who who declared ourselves accelerationists to own Trump and the GOP.

Which course makes it more likely we will be able to lead a genuine revolutionary National Populist movement?

Let’s dissect that:

Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what.

Given that I was wrong in 2016, I’m not making predictions about the 2020 election, at least not so early in the process.  Johnson may of course end up being correct in his prediction; if I was forced to bet money on the election outcome today, I would go with a Trump loss.  But the idea that you can say in August 2019 that “Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what” seems to me to be incredibly foolish.  “No matter what.”  Really? If Trump ends up winning (doubtful of course) then this comment by Johnson will go down the memory hole, and Counter-Currents would pretend it never happened.

He let demographic replacement and voter fraud go unchecked.

I thought he is sincere and a man of genuine greatness?  Gee, what kind of “blackmail” material does Johnson suspect the System has on the MAGA Man?

He is now turning against the first and second Amendment rights of his base.

Isn’t it more likely the man is, and always was, an unprincipled fraud?

He will lose in a landslide.

Maybe he will.  But it is indicative of a certain mindset of “movement leaders” that this is stated so boldly, so absolutely, so confidently, as if there isn’t the slightest possibility of an alternative outcome. Is this the type of prudent leadership a dissident movement requires?

By the time the next president comes in, there will be millions of new invaders inside our borders.

Perhaps.

Then the race war will kick off in the summer of 2021.

This is one of the most outrageous and unhinged comments ever made by Johnson.  Of course, in theory, anything is possible.  But is it likely? Do you really believe there is going to be open race war in America within two years?  Think about it. Would you be so confident as to state it as a foregone conclusion, rather than as a (somewhat unlikely) possibility? Even worse, given everything going on today, given the attempts to link White nationalism with “terrorism” and violence, and given the efforts of WNs to argue against that connection, it is the height of absolute foolishness for a “movement leader” to start talking about “the race war” that will “kick off in the summer of 2021.”  If some Nutzi shoots something up in the summer of 2021, don’t you think that quotes like this will be remembered by the System? Can we have leaders who are a bit more prudent and reserved in their proclamations?  

White Nationalists need to ask ourselves if we are going to be among the people who fought against white dispossession who who declared ourselves accelerationists to own Trump and the GOP.

As if the general public is going to know anything other than what the mass media tell them.

Which course makes it more likely we will be able to lead a genuine revolutionary National Populist movement?

These guys can’t even hold a private meeting without it being infiltrated or hold a rally without it disintegrating into chaos and they get chased of college campuses and are physically assaulted in the streets with impunity, they are wrong about almost everything they say, and they have zero prudence in their statements and behavior, but they are going to be leading “a genuine revolutionary National Populist movement?”

Delusion.

My biggest issue with “movement leaders” is their poor judgment, combined with a lack of accountability for the consequences of that poor judgment. I have no confidence in these people. They say or write things without any consideration of the implications, they plan rallies and events without consideration of possibilities and contingencies, they organize private meetings that are easily infiltrated and/or become beset by drug use or sexual harassment, they misjudge public figures (e.g., Trump) and current events, they make bold proclamations and overly confident predictions without consideration of alternative possibilities – there is a lack of prudence, a lack of depth, a lack of strategic planning, a lack of foresight.

Sallis’ Law needs to be extended – it’s not only about “admixture” but about ridicule, overall fetishism, etc.  Supporting Sallis’ Law, and supporting my contention that Der Movement has nothing to offer White ethnics, I offer a few samples from comments threads.

From an Amren article about Salvini and Gere:

What are the three shortest books in history? The book of German humor, the book of Italian war heroes, and the book of the wit and wisdom of the Polish people! Hey, hear the one about the German general and the Italian general? The German general before a battle says to his aid: Bring me my red jacket. The Italian general asks him (You have to do this in a phony Italian accent, btw), “whya doa you a needa red jacket?” The German general replies “because if I am shot, my men will not see the blood and will not lose hope.” Upon hearing this, the Italian general turns to his aid, “Aid, bringa me mya brown pants!” LOL.

Do you know why Italy is shaped like a boot?

Why?

U couldnt get all that sh*t into a sneaker.

You’d think ethnic jokes about Gere would be more appropriate there, but I guess not.

From a Counter-Currents article on The Sopranos:

….the overweening defensiveness about the Sopranos being “Italian” is unnecessary. It’s about a Mafia family, so they’re going to be Sicilian or Calabrese, most likely; goes without saying. One would not discuss a series about a Welsh coalmining family and go off on a pleading tangent about how it’s okay if they’re “British.” God is in the details.

Yes, God is in the details.  How about the details of Gere’s SJW fanaticism or Johnson’s chronic poor judgment?

Trump’s DOJ on the march again.  A man of genuine greatness!

Questions for Greg Johnson

About Trump.

Readers of this blog am aware that I refute Johnson’s take on Trump; for example, see here.

Johnson likes to portray the Trump question as one in which everyone was on “The Trump Train” in 2016 and everyone thought that Trump was sincere back then, and only now are people debating whether or not Trump was sincere, and only now are there disagreements on how to interpret Trump – it’s all after the fact.

But, as readers of this blog well know, I was openly calling Trump a fraud, a vulgar ignorant buffoon, and a Negrophilic race cuck BEFORE the election.  This was my endorsement of Trump the day before the election:

Yes, Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negro-loving beta race cuck civic nationalist with a Jewified family, an overweight imbecile, a lazy and ill-prepared debater, an embarrassment of a political candidate, a blustering clown, and a crass jackass. Nevertheless, as SJW America perceives Trump as being a “racist fascist bigot,” a Trump electoral victory will do a fine job of destabilizing the multicultural consensus, balkanizing society, enraging the Coloreds and the Left, creating chaos, and weakening the System.

I was correct all across the board – about Trump himself and the hysterical leftist reaction to Trump.  And I was critical of Trump in a similar fashion even before that Nov. 7, 2016 post – calling him “Touchback Trump” for his open embrace of “touchback immigration” and other support for legal mass immigration and back-door amnesty for illegals.

Here are a few comments about Trump featured on EGI Notes in the weeks leading up to the election:

How desperate WN activists must have been to consider Donald Trump (of all people!) as some sort of savior. 

A key point here is that Trump is more or less an intellectual empty vessel, so one must take care as to what is poured into him.  

Thus, the current electoral campaign needs to be considered, not because the vulgar buffoon Trump, a negro-loving race cuck, is of importance in and of himself, but because of the possibilities inherent in leveraging the Trump phenomenon for White racial advantage in the dark days to come.

Trump: the leftist, Negro-loving, waffling, indecisive, amnesty-shilling, beta ultra-cuck.  

And within a week of the election, I was accusing Trump of “cucking.”  That was at a time when all the Quota Queens were hysterically hailing Trump and talking about how the “God Emperor” was going to fix American demographics.

I note that Kevin Strom also expressed reservations about Trump before the election.

Questions for Johnson:

What were Strom and I seeing in 2016 about Trump that you people were missing?  Why was I openly labelling Trump a buffoon, a fraud, a race cuck, etc. back in 2016, while you are still claiming – in 2019! – that Trump was sincere and a man of genuine greatness? There must have been SOMETHING that people like me determined about Trump in the past that you still do not recognize today – or pretend not to recognize to protect your reputation. What was it?

Those questions get to the heart of the matter.  It’s not as if everyone was in the same boat back in 2016 but now differ looking back in hindsight.  There were fundamental differences of opinion about Trump precisely at the time when people like Johnson were most enthusiastic about Trump.

So again: What was I (and people like Strom) noticing about Trump that the likes of Johnson were missing?

Occam’s Butterknife: Sallis and Strom were wrong about Trump in 2016 and, by an amazing coincidence, events just happened to work out so that everything they were saying about Trump has become legitimized by how Trump has behaved since being elected. Trump is a man of greatness – genuine greatness! – brought down by some inner flaw, a tragic figure, perhaps being blackmailed by dastardly puppet-masters who forced him into a showdown with Sweden over A$AP Rocky.

Occam’s Razor: Trump in 2016 was transparently showing all the signs of being a crass vulgar ignorant buffoon, a man with deep Jewish connections even in his closest family, a man with a long record of having close personal ties with Negro celebrities, a man with socially liberal views (except for an attachment to “law and order” and a personal animus toward Obama), a man with no real deep inner convictions other than his own ego, a man obviously latching on to right-wing populism to distinguish himself from other GOP candidates who were far more intelligent and qualified and favored to win, a man completely undisciplined and intellectually lazy, a man who values family and friends over ideology and hardcore politics, a blustering blowhard without the inner fire to follow through on hard decisions, a small and mediocre man with enough cunning and showmanship to find a winning formula to victory. And, also, people paying careful attention noticed his civic nationalism even at the peak of his populist rhetoric, and his additions of a “big beautiful door” in “the wall” and his constant refrain of “touchback immigration.”  Perhaps people remembered all of the previous Man on White Horse failures. And, perhaps, just perhaps, those people who lambasted Trump in 2016 were merely demonstrating keen insight and good judgment, qualities sorely lacking in the superficial Pepe crowd who jumped on “The Trump Train” with nary a skeptical thought.

Johnson can try and gaslight you folks all he wants, but the questions asked above remain.  Why were some skeptical of Trump at the height of the Alt Right hysteria over the man?  What were those people noticing?  How did they know that Trump was an insincere fraud?  Why did they pick up on the danger signs of immediate cucking right after the election?  If Trump was sincere why did he strike some people as transparently insincere?  If Trump is a man of genuine greatness why did he immediately strike some people as a moronic buffoon, and why has he acted like a buffoon since being elected?

Most of all, why can’t any of the Quota Queens have the character to admit that they were wrong?