In der news.
Serious question – is it possible for someone to be so fundamentally dishonest that they lose their humanity? If so, one can ask – has Greg Johnson reached that point? See the following (emphasis added):
People keep asking me for my predictions for the 2020 US Presidential elections. It is really impossible to say…This election is the Democrats’ to lose. I have been saying that for years.But they may just be stupid enough to lose it by running a ticket of the creepy, senile Joe Biden and any of the shortlist of crazed black women he is considering for VP.In short, given the instability of America today, anything can happen in the next three months. The election could even be postponed or called off entirely. So I simply have no idea who will be the next President of the United States.
Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what…He will lose in a landslide.No matter what…but then “It is really impossible to say…the Democrats…may just be stupid enough to lose it… anything can happen in the next three months…I simply have no idea who will be the next President of the United States.”
So, by dogmatically and absolutelyasserting “Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what…He will lose in a landslide” the hysterical and unbalanced Johnson once again demonstrated horrifically bad judgment…which he now makes believe never happened as he presents a more balanced and nuanced view, which the rest of us knew was the correct call from the very beginning.
Now, if Johnson, in his second piece, had simply admitted being wrong, simply admitted demonstrating terrible judgment, that would not have been dishonest. One could at least respect the candor. But no. He couldn’t bring himself to do the right thing.
Johnson is simply the most dishonest person I have ever known in my life. That’s not defamation; it is a simple declaration of fact – I am the only one who knows the levels of dishonesty I have encountered in my life, and so I express an opinion based on my personal experience. Lying by omission is typically considered to be dishonesty – and omission applies in this case.
Therefore my statement is a perfectly reasonable blend of an accepted definition combined with a personal opinion.
Laugh at this comment left in response to Johnson’s post:
Lord ShangPosted August 3, 2020 at 4:24 pm | PermalinkDr. Johnson’s unwillingness to venture a prediction on the election is the mature position. No one really has any idea…
Indeed, I agree. No one really has any idea, and stating such is the “mature position.” Too bad no one told that to Johnson back in August 2019, when making a prediction was even more outrageously ludicrous, immature, and reflecting bad judgment than doing so today.
If you think this analysis too harsh, then consider. If it is impossible to predict the outcome of a November 2020 election in August 2020, then how can any sensible person make an absolute, dogmatic, smugly certain prediction about that election in August 2019? Answer – they cannot, and anyone who does so is not sensible. These sort of non-sensible snap judgments (always with no accountability) by your “leadership” is why your “movement” has gone from one tragic failure to another for decades. That’s how you get Patrik Hermansson giving a keynote address about infiltrators, and how “Dave Lewis, movie critic” gets a free pass after “David Lewis, writer for The Stranger” was rejected.
I was obsessed with Scandinavia due to my passion for heavy metal and my own Danish roots…
That’s great. How about you stay away from Eastern Europe and away from Eastern European women then? Ethnonationalism!
Was Hadley the Chief Mouser of the National Office?
Interestingly, the Zodiac killer was almost caught after the Stine murder, but was not due to police incompetence. What is even more interesting is that the police description describes the killer (or the man they thought was he*) of having the “general appearance” of “Welsh ancestry.”
1969: “The suspect that was observed by officer Fouke was a WMA 35-45 Yrs about five-foot, ten inches, 180-200 pounds. Medium heavy build- Barrel chested- Medium complexion- Light-colored hair possibly greying in rear (May have been lighting that caused this effect.) Crew cut- wearing glasses- Dressed in dark blue waist length zipper type jacket (Navy or royal blue) Elastic cuffs and waist band zipped part way up. Brown wool pants pleated type baggy in rear (Rust brown) May have been wearing low cut shoes. Subject at no time appeared to be in a hurry walking with a shuffling lope, Slightly bent forward. The subject’s general appearance- Welsh ancestry.”
While the wanted poster composite does reflect (at least to my eyes) an individual of likely Northwest European Celto-Germanic ancestry (high trust!), how can anyone say that the appearance is specifically “Welsh?” How can anyone be so specific? Are Welsh phenotypes so distinctive that one can distinguish an individual in that manner? Did the police officer have much experience with people of Welsh ancestry? His surname could be Welsh I suppose.
*Given that the police description closely matches that of the witnesses to the murder, and since the Zodiac himself mentioned the police interaction (the exact nature of which is controversial – the Zodiac claimed conversation that the police denied), it is overwhelmingly likely, but of course not 100% definitively certain, that the individual encountered was the Zodiac.
I was recently cross-referencing Spencer and Johnson posts here and came across an interesting correlation.
First, see this:
FYI: I hope I’m not speaking out of turn here, but it has been brought to my attention that Richard has been privately approached by respected Alt-Right figures about the increasingly erratic, destructive behaviour of a certain Alt-Right writer (on display in this comment thread below), and has been urged to distance himself and the brand from him.
Second, see this:
Counter-Currents @NewRightAmericaHe’s intelligent, but his intellect has been ruined by insanity. I regret tolerating him and people like Parrott as long as I did. Better people saw it as indecent. It harmed my reputation.
Now, perhaps one shouldn’t focus too much on the similarity there (or perhaps not?); nevertheless, at the very least, we see a pattern in which “respected Alt-Right figures” aka “better people” conduct covert behind the scenes whispering campaigns to disparage individuals and to advise “movement leaders” not to have anything to do with such individuals.
This is interesting at many levels. First, the arrogance, the chutzpah, of any of these failed “Alt-Right figures” to deem themselves qualified to talk about “erratic, destructive, insane, indecent” behavior of anyone – clearly a case of the pot calling the kettle black, as well as Frankfurt School-like pathologization of disagreement and criticism.
Second, the complete lack of character to engage in shadowy, cowardly womanly gossiping campaigns, instead of forthrightly and publicly, overtly, expressing the negative opinions in question.
Third, that the same “respected Alt-Right leaders” give positions of importance and discretion to individuals with documented (and in some cases, self-admitted) histories of real mental illness makes one wonder how they can ever believe they have the judgment to accurately gauge “erratic” and “insane” behavior in anyone.
Fourth, there is a “what goes around, comes around” quality here – folks advise Spencer, and then, after Hailgate, we had various “respected Alt-Right figures” trying to beat each other to the punch in their eagerness to disavow Spencer and dissociate from him. One wonders if any of those were the same “respected figures” giving Richie the earlier advice.
How all of this may fit in with the cordon sanitaire around the Sallis Groupuscule I’ll leave to the imagination of the reader.
Comical Nordicist MacDonald still hasn’t gotten the memo that Swift is explicitly an overt SJW anti-White leftist, who has been spewing System bile since Trump’s election. Hypothesis – the real Kevin MacDonald, the author of the Jewish trilogy, was liquidated by the Mossad, and replaced by a cognitively deficient buffoon surgically altered to resemble the real MacDonald, in order to delegitimize his work on the Jews. I’m joking of course, but it is not clear how things would be any different if that scenario actually was true.
The likely breakdown of purchasers of Swift’s work – teenaged White girls with blue hair, BLM t-shirts, and boyfriends who look like an Australopithecus robustus; and male Type I “movement” boomers who get intractable priapisms every time they hear the word “Sweden.”
Everyone knows what it means to be an Italian-American; the Italian-American identity is celebrated across our culture. It’s much cooler and more real to white Americans than Anglo identity.
Yes, that is why Italians are vilified by both the “movement” and by the System. To the “movement” the wops are non-White cringing mongrel subhumans, and to the System, they are bigoted off-White stupid criminal subhumans. Let’s consider the System’s treatment of Italians, using pop culture as a standard. In TV and movies, Italians – in many cases portrayed by obviously non-White actors and actresses – are presented as criminals, crude thugs, mindless bigots, unpleasant dwarves (Danny De Vito), or leering low-IQ droolcups (Tony Danza). Type I Nutzis decry how badly “blonde Nordics” are portrayed in popular culture, but one is hard pressed to identify any group subjected to as much ridicule as are Italians.
Saying you’re not white because you’re Italian or Spanish gives you the chance to escape from the limitations of being white. It may also save you from the moral blackmail non-whites impose on whites.
As far as the second sentence goes, the retard later wrote:
Individual white Americans must decide whether to embrace white identity or flee from whiteness entirely. Our enemies aren’t inclined to honor the second option.
“It may also save you from the moral blackmail non-whites impose on whites…Our enemies aren’t inclined to honor the second option.” Very consistent!
As far as the first sentence goes, two points. First, it is hardly (pure-blooded) “Italians or Spanish” who are the only ones saying that they are “not white.” And it is not only the “Amerimuts” but also many of your high, high trust Herrenvolk.
Second, and more importantly, notice the “bait and switch” regarding race with respect to the White ethnics – a phenomenon that reflects “movement” hypocrisy. You see, the “movement” decries the Jewish tactic of being “we White people” when it suits the Jewish argument, but then identifying as specifically (non-White) Jewish at other times. But let’s look how the “movement” – and, historically, the System itself – racially pins down the White ethnics, and hypocritically does the inverse to the ethnics as the Jews do to themselves. On the one hand, the ethnics are not “White enough” – they are mongrels, low trust Outer Hajnals, moops, swarthoids, etc. But, then, on the other hand, when the Nutzis want to pontificate about White solidarity vs. “the flight from Whiteness,” those same ethnics are accused of trying to “escape from the limitations of being white.” Who knows? Maybe if you didn’t question their “Whiteness” every five seconds, then they wouldn’t be so inclined to reject that label (and they really don’t do so as often as is implied in that piece).