Category: genocidal filth

The Other Shoe Has Dropped

Trump unmasked as The Genocide Emperor.

Watch this, focusing on the comments about Trump.

And now, read this, emphasis added:

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he’s now in favor of more legal immigration because of economic gains on his watch.

Trump raised eyebrows in his State of the Union speech Tuesday when he said he wanted people “to come into our country in the largest numbers ever, but they have to come in legally.” His policy positions to date do not reflect that wish. Asked Wednesday during a meeting with regional reporters whether the line represented a change in policy, Trump said it did.

“Largest numbers ever”…Since most – virtually all – of these newcomers will be non-European, this is race replacement, this is genocide, and this is biological, cultural, social, economic, and political dispossession.  Keep in mind that Whites have an increasing death rate, dying from despair, with the dispossession championed by Trump being a key part of that.

Thus: Trump the avatar of White genocide.  Trump the advocate of mass non-White immigration.  Trump the promoter of White Death.  Trump the genocidal lunatic, seething with animus toward European-derived peoples.  Trump the architect of the Great Replacement.

Now, I am sorry, but I need to bring up the past.  Let us make some useful comparisons.

The “movement” about Trump since 2015: The God Emperor, In Trump We Trust, an American Caesar who will stabilize White demographics, the movement won the election, we memed Trump into office – wild, fervent, almost onanistically homoerotic support.

Ted Sallis about Trump since 2015: A fraud, a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negrophilic race cuck, Touchback Trump (as a champion of “touchback” immigration – the illegals can come in as long as they go home first and re-apply), Amnesty Don, can’t be trusted, his only objection to illegal immigration is the illegality – he supports legal immigration, etc.  I also noted that the only reason to support Trump is that his persona and bombastic statements, when coupled to America’s culture of anti-White hysteria, “triggers” the Left, causing division and chaos.  I was right about that as well.

Long time readers of this blog will be familiar with all of this.  But now, it is time to speak plainly. Now that the other shoe has dropped, and Trump is revealed for what he truly is (and even if he “walks back” these comments under pressure, “the cat is out of the bag”), it is time to hold the Trump fanboys accountable.

Thus, I openly call them out. They should RESIGN from the “movement” – or at least RESIGN from any position of “leadership.”  They should shut down their websites and blogs, they should stop panhandling, and they should just go away and ponder their perpetual bad judgment, their inability to admit error, their defective character – all of it.  Now, I know they won’t do it.  Instead, they’ll just continue rolling along, making the same horrendous world historical mistakes over and over and over again.  After all, it’s time to put all our effort into supporting “Tulsi” now, right?  The God Empress!  The Semi-Samoan Hindu Princess who will usher in the White Millennium!

I will not be so crude as to openly name those who should – if they any sense of decency whatsoever – resign. No, but let us instead use euphemistic nicknames.  The following is not an exhaustive list, but gives a “flavor of accountability,” to coin a phrase:

Mr. HuWhite, The High Trust Kid, Hobbit Hole, Lady Raine’s Little Weasel, In Mud We Trust, Mophead and Rosie’s Pet, The Drunken Bard of Alexandria, Gamblin’ Man…well, you get the picture.

Advertisements

Is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez a Racist?

Let us consider this question.

Read this.  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (henceforth, AOC) calls the Negrophilic leftist Trump a “racist” and engages in nonsensical justification for her accusation.  But is AOC herself a racist against White people?  And does she have the moral right to criticize Trump on racial issues?   I argue the answers to those questions are Yes and No.

First, AOC promotes a dishonest and anti-White narrative about Unite the Right – that “Neo-Nazis murdered a woman.” The violence at Unite the Right was initiated by leftists, who were there to use thug tactics to break up a legally convened rally.  The death in question was the direct result of one individual – Fields – who had no direct connection to the organizers of the rally, and the death – regardless of the politicized jury verdict – was possibly not in any way premeditated, not “murder,” and may in part been due to the pre-existing health problems of the individual killed. Any “Neo-Nazis” present had no intention or desire for violence, and to argue otherwise is so fundamentally dishonest as to constitute grand-scale gaslighting. It also suggests an animus toward White people and specifically an animus against those Whites who defend their racial interests in the same manner that non-Whites such as AOC do for their own people.

Second, and more importantly, AOC supports policies on race and immigration that – by the definitions of the UN Genocide Convention – promotes White genocide.  If one takes the UN Genocide Convention seriously, and applies its standards fairly to all people, there can be no other conclusion than what I have just stated.  If this is so, then it is reasonable to further conclude that any person who supports genocidal policies holds a racial animus against the targeted population.

So – is AOC an anti-White racist?  The only conclusion based on all of the above is Yes.

Does AOC have the moral right to criticize Trump on race? Hardly, if the designation of AOC being a genocidal racist holds.  And there is another reason the answer to this second question must be No. Consider the following. Trump has a history of catering to Black interests – such as with “criminal justice reform” or a pardon for the violent abuser Jack Johnson – and a history of associating with Black racial leaders like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. So, AOC, when you establish a history of catering to White interests, and when you establish a history of associating with David Duke and Richard Spencer, then get back to us with your opinions about Trump’s alleged “racism.”  Otherwise, you are nothing but a low rent hypocrite.  And an anti-White racist.

An Incredibly Evil Piece of Despicable Filth

The Derb.
See my recent post on Jayman’s pathetic attempt to delegitimize Salter’s work.  The triracial mongrel Jayman is, like Derbyshire, a HBDer, and, thus, is part of the HBD political agenda to enslave Whites to Asians and Jews. “Awkward squad” Derbyshire, whose life revolves his self-admitted “measured groveling”  to an alien Asiatic, of course praises the anti-White, part-Chinese HBD fanatic who espouses the same insane creed as does Derbyshire himself. That Jayman is now going to blog at the site of a wealthy Jews, who is hostile to White nationalism, and who also hosts the likes of Breezy Steve and “actor on the stage of history” Frost, is also no surprise.
By the way, trolling trash who promote “moderation” also support “racialist (sic) conferences” which give a forum to Derbyshire to spew his anti-Salterian, anti-racialist garbage to an audience he previously referred to as “latrine flies.”
The Codreanu quote here  comes to my mind when I consider how a future White ethnostate should treat all of the aforementioned excrement.

Anti-Bias Brainwashing

A psychometric attack against White racial interests.

“Scientists” are perfecting brainwashing techniques to make Whites “lessen bias.”

Abstract: Although people may endorse egalitarianism and tolerance, social biases can remain operative and drive harmful actions in an unconscious manner. Here, we investigated training to reduce implicit racial and gender bias. Forty participants processed counterstereotype information paired with one sound for each type of bias. Biases were reduced immediately after training. During subsequent slow-wave sleep, one sound was unobtrusively presented to each participant, repeatedly, to reactivate one type of training. Corresponding bias reductions were fortified in comparison with the social bias not externally reactivated during sleep. This advantage remained 1 week later, the magnitude of which was associated with time in slow-wave and rapid-eye-movement sleep after training. We conclude that memory reactivation during sleep enhances counterstereotype training and that maintaining a bias reduction is sleep-dependent.

Here’s a “popular” explanation of this despicably evil Pavlovian, Huxleyian, and Orwellian research.
Emphasis added:
In a computerized program, faces were paired with words that ran contrary to negative stereotypes. For instance, female faces appeared with words associated with math or science, and black faces appeared with words considered pleasant. Paller said two distinctive sounds were played during the training, one associated with the women and science pairs and the other with the black and “pleasant” pairs.
After the training, participants went to sleep. Then, without the participants’ knowledge, scientists repeatedly played one of the sounds with the volume low enough to avoid waking sleeping participants up. 
Paller said the sleep training produced results. He said bias reduction was stronger for the sleep-training group and that the changes were identified as having continued a week later. 
 Emphasis added:
In a commentary, Gordon Feld and Jan Born from the University of Tubingen praised the study saying: “This is the first to demonstrate that this method can be used to break long-lived, highly pervasive response habits deeply rooted in memory.”

But they cautioned that sleep was a vulnerable state in which people did not have “wilful consciousness”.

They added: “However, Aldous Huxley’s description of a dystopian ‘brave new world’ where young children are conditioned to certain values during sleep reminds us that this research also needs to be guided by ethical considerations.” 

Prof Paller said there were similarities to subliminal advertising and that there was an ethical discussion to be had.  

However, he continued: “More importantly, perhaps, is the question of whether people in positions of authority in society, such as judges and police officers, and perhaps people who make hiring decisions, should have their unconscious bias evaluated and perhaps trained to some standard.”

Then we have this excellent critique:

So every subject was white? How could they legitimately test the efficacy of cross-cultural bias abatement using only one cohort? That’s actually quite simple. The experiment isn’t at all about reducing a natural and beneficial concept called bias; it’s about reducing whites. Were it otherwise I quite think all of the clucking about diversity that emanates from the academy would seep into their studies. Practically every Western university has jettisoned principles of merit to accommodate a campus potpourri–and suddenly not a single student of color could be located to participate in critical bias reduction experiments?

This blogger asserts that Paller’s ancestry is reflected here.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it is true, but I will withhold further comment on that until more information is available. I note that the first author has a Chinese surname. No experiments were done to see if this technique would lessen anti-White attitidues among Chinese. Fancy that!
From a proximate interests standpoint, maybe people would – on their own, without brainwashing – associate Blacks with “pleasantness” if that racial group was in fact pleasant, intelligent, disciplined, creative, productive, and law-abiding, instead of being unintelligent, violent, unproductive and generally useless, making the streets of America run red with their criminal proclivities.  Likewise, people may associate women with STEM achievements if in fact that was warranted, but the realty is, men are in general better in those fields. The idea – the lie – promoted by the evil genocidal filth behind this study is that their techniques allow people to “unlearn” the biases they have accumulated from (negative) influences in their lives.  Really?  The truth: the hyper-PC anti-White System (the same folks who fund this research) have been subjecting society to decades of anti-White and anti-male propaganda. In the mass media, Blacks are discriminated-against geniuses, and women are portrayed as far superior to men both intellectually and physically. What “biases” against minorities and women are being “learned” in this manner? If people have “biases” that go in the opposite direction of Paller’s sociopolitical agenda, it is because they have experienced reality, and reality is a harsh mistress indeed. What Hu and Paller want is to brainwash Whites to reject reality in favor of socially engineered fantasy.

And from the ultimate interests standpoint, this is all about disarming Whites in their competition with other groups, to make Whites unconcerned with their genetic and cultural dispossession and race replacement, while also masculinizing women and promoting non-fertile lifestyles for White females. This is, from a racial preservationist standpoint, in its ultimate outcome, the promotion of genocide.

Update: See this.

We are also experimenting with a crowdfunding project on implanting false memories during sleep…


This fellow is more dangerous than a million feral Negroes. More evidence that the ancestry mentioned above is correct.  Heritable ethnic evil…what else could it be?