Category: Silver

Der Movement Roundup: 7/28/17

Der Movement marches on.

Someone gets it right

Trump is proving another theory correct: namely, that he is an incompetent and politically unreliable buffoon. He is not loyal to people who risk their reputations for him, and his promises are worthless. The wall isn’t going to be built, and Mexico isn’t going to pay for it.

I seem to recall someone on the Far Right labeling Trump a “buffoon” from the very beginning.  Who was that, I wonder?  Probably just some crazy and bitter nogoodnik who should be safely ignored.  Hail Pepe!  Hail Kek!  Hail the God Emperor!

Sailer channels Silver. Not a feather-in-the-cap for either one of them, I think.

Some confusion about branding.

The Alt Right “brand” was a White Nationalist entryist and outreach project from the very start. But the Alt Right worked best for White Nationalists by not being exclusively associated with White Nationalism. Normies would never try the Alt Right on for size if it were an exclusively White Nationalist movement….

At other times. we’ve been told by leading Alt Righters that the Alt Right IS White nationalism (and vice versa), an equation vehemently opposed by some on the Far Right who dislike the Alt Right brand.

The Alt Right has to be one of the most ill-defined political brands in American history.

Meanwhile, “watchdog groups” are crowing about the upcoming Amren conference that will be “electric” because of the co-attendance of Richard Spencer, the “reclusive” Greg Johnson, and Sam Dickson.  As always, the anti-White Far Left enjoys schadenfreude at WN expense.

Advertisements

Ignorant Buffoon Jr

Touchback Jr. 

I essentially agree with Spencer’s analysis.  Did Jr do anything illegal?  I don’t see it. Treason?  Absurd (*).  On the other hand, let’s not let him off the hook that easily.

The bottom line is that Trump Jr is as stupid and politically clumsy as his father. Do you go personally to this meeting?  Ever hear of plausible deniability?  How about using cut-outs? Or…whatever – if you are the son of a Presidential candidate who is vehemently opposed by the media and the entire Establishment, you had better at least superficially keep up appearances. Let others, several layers removed, do the “dirty work.”  It doesn’t matter that he did nothing wrong; in politics, appearance means as much (or more) than reality. Come on, Donnie Jr was on Celebrity Apprentice with dear old dad, doesn’t he know the power of appearance?

One thing Spencer could have mentioned – of all of Trump’s children, Don Jr seems the most right-wing and the most in tune with an at least Alt Lite right-wing populism, another reason to be targeted by the Deep State.

A side note: I’m certainly no phenotypist, but on the other hand, unlike what some of my detractors believe, I certainly do acknowledge the importance of racial phenotype (it just has to take a back seat to the genotype). This “Russian lawyer” – is she actually an ethnic Russian?  She looks like she could be ¼ or even ½ Chinese.  Raciology alert!  Maybe – hopefully – she is a non-Russian “Russian citizen.”

When all is said and done, Trump is an embarrassment.  Relevance to EGI? Thanks to the Alt Right, Trump’s civic nationalist phony right-wing populism has been connected in the public mind with Der Movement, so, like it or not, the outcome of the Trump Presidency will, in some manner, influence the direction of American activism.  Hopefully, we can all survive the damage being done by this lumbering buffoon.

In all honesty, the “crazy and bitter” Ted Sallis could do a better job as President.  Sallis in 2020!  Who should be my VP choice – Durocher or Silver?

*In the early 19th century, the US government was unable to convict Aaron Burr of treason, despite Burr’s plans (and activities) in attempting to establish an empire out of the USA’s western territories and Mexico (both to be seized by force).  Now, in the early 21st century, we are told that Don Jr’s meeting with Suzie Chopsticks to get “dirt” on Hillary Clinton (certainly low-hanging fruit if there ever was) is “treason.”  Yeah…who was levying war against the United States?  Who are the two witnesses to Don Jr levying war or assisting in such levying?  As Spencer points out, the USA and Russia are not at war.

Fair is Fair, 12/16/16

Celebrating some reasonableness.

I have been critical of Durocher in the past (and will no doubt be so in the future), but one must be fair, and I see nothing at all wrong with this – actually, I would strongly endorse most of it.  It is of course interesting that he chooses Radix – the site of Richard “Big Europe” Spencer – to promote this very pan-European vision, but never mind.

Of course, there are some commentators who are unable to distinguish a confederation of autonomous states from a “Roman Empire,” but then extreme ethnonationalists have never been a very impressive lot.  Who says Bavaria can’t have its own local autonomy?  The point is, without Europe, Bavaria is virtually meaningless on the world stage. Rest assured, China cares not one bit about the bucolic charms of various European locales (even though they may want to copy them in a bizarre fashion to make a buck), and would not hesitate to move against atomized micro-states.  And if “the people just want to be left alone” then why don’t they vote that way?  To start with, the Germans, including all those wanna-be autonomous Bavarians, can stop voting for Merkel and start voting for Alternative for Germany (putting aside why they never supported the NPD).

Further, not only has Durocher written a reasonable post, Silver has written reasonable comments to that post.  What’s the world coming to?  Anyway, fair is fair, I must encourage reasonableness as well as discourage unreasonableness.  I’m still very wary and suspicious, however.

In any case, I don’t see why a person cannot be, at the same time, a Bavarian and a German and a European.  Where’s the problem with that?

Spencer’s Speech, 11/22/16

Brief comments.

In isolation, nothing wrong with Spencer’s speech.  It was just the wrong place at the wrong time.  At a private meeting, at some other point in history, absolutely nothing wrong with it. But at a public, press-attended meeting, right after Trump’s election, with the media screaming for Bannon’s scalp, this was a bit of poor judgment.  Better to have put something together in more political-Salterian terms: democratic multiculturalism, universal nationalism, the legitimacy of majority interests, etc. I thought the whole point – or at least one major point – of the Alt Right was to be a more moderate “gateway” to hardcore WN. I’m skeptical of the “gateway” hypothesis, but if those guys believe it, better they publicly espouse democratic multiculturalism than do cheap NSDAP imitations.  Further, if you are going to “go radical” then why have the likes of Brimelow and Taylor around? Is there any strategy here, or just – as Der Movement would say – “LARPING?”

And about the leftist thug protestors – that happens at every rightist meeting, and at very meeting it seems like the attendees – and, worse, the organizers – are completely surprised and unprepared for it.  No one ever seems to think: “hey, these things have happened every time before, let us be prepared this time.”  If Der Movement doesn’t like my talk about affirmative action and quota queens then they have no one to blame but themselves.

Then we have this idiot “Ravi” (who Silver of all people effectively answered – fair is fair, I must give credit where credit is due):

Ravi • 2 hours ago

Children of the sun!! – what a load of tripe. So does this White Master race include Slavs as well? What about the Irish, Italians, Spaniards? What is a short, slit-eyed Vietnamese harlot doing in your ranks anyway? Is she white or yellow? So many questions – Do you even understand your own identity?

Let’s fisk:

Children of the sun!! – what a load of tripe

Why?

So does this White Master race include Slavs as well?

Yes it does.  No more and no less than any other European group.  Der Movement may not believe that but I, and others, do.

What about the Irish, Italians, Spaniards?

Yes, them as well.  No more and no less than any other European group.  Der Movement may not believe that but I, and others, do.

What is a short, slit-eyed Vietnamese harlot doing in your ranks anyway? 

A representative of the HBD faction?  Where was Derbyshire?

Is she white or yellow?

Yellow.

Do you even understand your own identity?

Yes, more than you can ever imagine.

Note again (assuming “Ravi” is a South Asian brownster) how hate-filled Asians are to Whites, how desperate Asians are to divide Whites against each other.

In the long-term, it’s the Yellow and Brown Peril from the East that is the biggest racial danger.

Tarnished Silver, 11/6/16

Excerpts, emphasis added.

Silver recently at Radix:

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ  WHAT • 4 hours ago
As exceedingly idiotic as the multicult west is, it’s still preferable to russkie overlordship.

Silver recently at Amren:

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ  John Smith ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ • 2 days ago
I can’t say I’m a fan of Russian-style governance, but goddamit, if that’s what it takes to remove the influence of the complete and utter lunatics who are destroying our countries, then I’ll take Putin any day.

Once again: Silver is a real sanity litmus test for Der Movement and Der Movement “leaders.”  Anyone who allows this obvious trolling fraud on their blogs is an idiot.

Of Breasts and Morons

Got milk?

Here’s something both the HBDers and gamesters can appreciate, male preferences for female breast morphology.  Emphasis added:

The morphology of human female breasts typical for their permanent fat deposits appears to be unique among primates. It has been previously suggested that female breast morphology arose as a result of sexual selection. This is supported by evidence showing that women with larger breasts tend to have higher estrogen levels; breast size may therefore serve as an indicator of potential fertility. However, breasts become less firm with age and parity, and breast shape could thus also serve as a marker of residual fertility. Therefore, cross-culturally, males are hypothesized to prefer breast morphology that indicates both high potential and residual fertility. To test this, we performed a survey on men’s preferences for breast morphology in four different cultures (Brazil, Cameroon, the Czech Republic, Namibia). As stimuli, we used two sets of images varying in breast size (marker of potential fertility) and level of breast firmness (marker of residual fertility). Individual preferences for breast size were variable, but the majority of raters preferred medium sized, followed by large sized breasts. In contrast, we found systematic directional preferences for firm breasts across all four samples. This pattern supports the idea that breast morphology may serve as a residual fertility indicator, but offers more limited support for the potential fertility indicator hypothesis. Future studies should focus on a potential interaction between the two parameters, breast size and firmness, which, taken together, may help to explain the relatively large variation in women’s breast sizes.

Consistent with my anecdotal observations, firmness is a more consistent preference than size.  Indeed, the two may be correlated: the size preference for “medium” may be an evolutionary compromise (see “Future studies”) between increased size = higher fertility and increased size = sagging leading to perception of decreased residual fertility.  I note though that “small” was not a size preference in any of the race-cultures evaluated.  One can imagine the underpinnings for the firmness/residual fertility preference: to put in crudely in gamester terms – sagging breasts translates into “this bitch has hit The Wall and I’m not investing anything in that barren hag.”  I note though no East Asian or South Asian countries included (no, Der Movement, the Czech Republic is not an “East Asian country”).  You’d think the most heavily population nations would be sampled.  Or maybe the authors were afraid the results would be skewed – e.g., East Asian “male” preferences for “female” breast morphology – the torso appearance of a 12 year-old boy.

Here, below, we see Silver again; when you read this keep in mind he previously ranted at Radix in favor of Mitt Romney’s “creative destruction.”  When it comes to defending predatory capitalism, then macroeconomics are all important, when it comes to discouraging someone named “Rocco Manzardo” then a concern for the same macroeconomics is “faggotry.”  Real “faggotry” is any blogmaster tolerating Silver as a commentator.

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ  Rocco Manzardo • an hour ago
Macroeconomics. Can you be a bigger faggot? Economists themselves disagree about no other issue as much as they do macroeconomics. Despite this disagreement, mainstream policy prescriptions lay within the same ballpark, so who cares what Trump thinks about it? (Frankly, I detect the stench of ‘Austrian school’ faggotry in this comment, but perhaps I’m wrong).

Note also: economists disagree about macroeconomics like “no other issue” but at the same time all the “mainstream policy prescriptions lay within the same ballpark.”  He then moves on from that outright inconsistency to say “who cares what Trump thinks about it?” – well, if Trump is against those “mainstream prescriptions” then it is a relevant topic for discussion (just not by guys named “Rocco Manzardo.”  Maybe “Sanjay Patel” would be more to Silver’s liking). Yeah, Silver, also put up more Yugoslavia anecdotes to certify your “balkanoid” bonafides.  I thought you were part Greek also?  Or all Greek?  No, wait, all Serbian?  No wait, a Paki living in London?  No, wait….

Enabling the HBD fraud; Jews and Asians celebrate.

And then we have this:

Getting Trump in office is a start. Changing the dissemination of information in the media about race, economics, and culture towards race-realism, fiscal responsibility, and the benefits of a northwestern European style of society is next. Then maybe we could stop the demographic disappearance of our race. And finally, although I don’t see a realistic scenario of how to do it, end up with a new-northwestern European homeland which does not allow other races residence.

Yeah, moron, and in that “homeland” the 2016 election would have been Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton.  “Klay” apparently is following the old WLP free-riding tradition. Do your own heavy lifting, Klay.  I’m sure all the Midwest cucks will be eager to help out.

Der Movement, 11/4/16

Red font emphasis added in all cases.

This has to be one of the most stupid posts Sailer has ever written:

In the past, white identity politics has been not very practical due to “whites” being defined as a big tent category left over from the past age of white privilege. But if the Obama Administration pares down whiteness to just Europeaness by moving almost all the Muslims into a privileged MENA racial category, suddenly white identity politics looks much doable.

As if people’s identities were ever defined by the official US census categories.  Hey, Breezy, in general, MENAs have never identified as “White” regardless of the census, and the typical promoter of White identity politics has never considered them as “White” either. That whole “problem” was just a figment of your fevered imagination when pitching “citizenism,” a schtick which I guess is wearing thin with the rise of the Alt Right, hence Breezy’s tentative steps to jump on the bandwagon.

What has anyone ever seen in this superficially breezy moron?

It doesn’t look like Dolph Lundgren; therefore it is obviously a fraud.

Spencer writes this:

Trump, whether he knows it or not, is announcing the return of Grand Politics . . . politics on the greatest scale . . . politics as the struggle between races and civilizations…

Trump and Putin—this is the image of two of the three great blocks of the White Race—North America and Russia—finally reaching an understanding. It is a cancellation of the the 20th century…

TRUMP is all of it and more. TRUMP is a thing in itself—intangible, inexpressible, invaluable. TRUMP represents that golden longing for success . . . for power . . . for winning . . . and for indulging in just enough decadence, sex, and arrogance. TRUMP represents that will to power . . . to be great . . . and to be something more than a man.

Silver, trying to curry (no pun intended?) favor with the blogmaster grovels thus:

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ • 11 hours ago

Outstanding piece, Richard. There’s a depth of insight and empathy here – capable of reaching out to other intelligences…

Of course, a couple of days ago, in response to a pro-Trump article written by someone not the blogmaster, we got this from Silver (compare carefully to the Spencer comments that Silver praised):

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ  Princeoftheblood • 2 days ago

Well, you can say those sorts of things here in your little alt right “safe space.” But astonishingly stupid statements like Trump defying everything we knew about history will only get you laughed at when you step out into the real world.

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ  Loetzen • a day ago

No, the actual real world. Be my guest: go around telling everyone Trump’s a world-historical manifestation in whom Greatness inheres and who has defied all that we ever thought we knew about history and society and see what sort of response you get.

And for Silver’s old “friend” and email correspondent Captain Chaos, a list of Europa Terra Nostra’s board:

Chairman

Eriksson, Dan, Sweden

Deputy Chairman

Boviatsos, Konstantinos, Greece

Other Members of the Board

Cospito, Nicola, Italy

Otero, Ramiro, Spain