The blind leading the blind.
Our buddy Silver writes about this essay:
I would urge readers unfamiliar with him to peruse his essay “The Preservationist Imperative,” which appeared in the June 1995 issue of American Renaissance. In that piece, McCulloch succinctly answers almost every ‘deep’ objection that opponents of separation throw up…
That was 23 years ago! Thus, Silver neatly makes my point for me: all this wonderful work has achieved absolutely nothing in the full generation that has passed meantime. “Movement” propaganda is an utter failure. There are White activists today who weren’t even born yet in 1995, all this time has passed, and today the current level of discourse is Pepe, Kek, and chugging gallons of milk so as to annoy the NY Times and politically motivated population geneticists (note that I was right about that too – virtually all population geneticists are subjective, dishonest shills for leftist politics).
With all the mutual admiration society at TOO, and the delusional nitpicking over timetables, the elephant in the room is ignored – how fantastical and unrealistic it all is. Peaceful, orderly separation is not going to happen. Newsflash: even if you were able to convince a majority – the requisite large majority – of White Americans to support peaceful separation (and to get that large majority would require all those nasty allegedly “ethnocentric outer Hajnal” White ethnics Der Movement despises), peaceful separation would be insufficient. Fact is that the majority of the world’s population believes it has an innate right to live in America, so what do you think Colored “Americans” think? They all believe that they not only have the right to live in America, but live wherever they please, and that means with Whitey. Separatism would be to be enforced, it will not be voluntary – and all the pie-in-the-sky optimists really know this, which is why they state that once “hearts and minds” are won among Whites, other races would not be able to resist. Regardless of whether that last point is true or not, the implication is that there will be resistance. Thus, the separation will not be peaceful and it will not be voluntary. Thus, you have to “win the hearts and minds of Whites” for the more extreme necessity of enforced separation; in other words ethnic cleansing and possible race war. Now, I agree that separation is necessary, so I’m not shying away from the consequences. But that’s me – a Nutzi “lunatic” and an “outer Hajnal” nasty. How you are going to convince the great unwashed of Cuck America to agree to all of that, while many of them today support deplatforming of “racists” and cheer Antifa attacks, is unclear to me. And it’s not only the masses, one has to convince elites, including White military officers and soldiers, who have become as cucked as the rest of White society, with adherence to “diversity” now a prerequisite for promotion. And then, if you achieve that, you have to deal with the Colored fraction of the US military. Can the White portion – sufficiently awakened – defeat the Colored portion? Certainly, no doubt, but we are not talking about some peaceful and orderly separation, enacted after an election, bloodlessly actualized via trucking people and their belongings around the country.
We are talking about hard necessity (and I’m not even getting into the foreign policy implications – what’s China going to be doing when this is going on? Will they allow their co-ethnics to be cleansed?). Again, I agree that the necessity is worth it, but I can tell you, with zero chance of being wrong, that the vast majority of Whites currently disagree. All your decades–long efforts to convince them otherwise have failed.
So, perhaps, instead of debating about timetables, it may be more prudent to face reality and realize that the only way to have even the slightest chance of achieving your objectives will require a complete overhaul of the “movement”- an overhaul no doubt to be opposed by rent-seeking “leaders” desperate to preserve their sinecures.