Debate, or the lack thereof?
Did you ever notice:
That news shows (the PBS NewsHour is the undisputed master of this), whenever they have a “debate” or “discussion” on any topic touching on race, immigration, multiculturalism, culture, hate speech, free speech, etc., NEVER include any viewpoints further to the right of Jeb Bush?
In fact, they often have “debates” between people who are in basic agreement on the fundamentals of an issue, always of course promoting a left-of-center anti-White viewpoint.
So, for example, if there was a discussion on immigration to the USA, they would include the following three debaters:
1. Someone who favors more legal immigration and wants to give a full amnesty to illegals, including citizenship.
2. Someone who favors more legal immigration and wants to give a partial amnesty to illegals, including permanent residency but not citizenship.
3. Someone who favors more legal immigration and is not sure about amnesty, but who wants to make illegal immigration irrelevant by a total open borders policy.
How about changing American demographics and an impeding White minority?
A classic debate between someone who thinks White minority status would be a great thing and that it will cause no problems vs. someone who thinks White minority status would be a great thing but there will be a problem with White racism and a White backlash.
Race relations in America?
A Black who blames everything on White racism and that Whites should be exterminated vs. a White who blames everything on White racism but all we need are more hate speech laws (White extermination optional).
Anti-Semitism in America?
A debate between the ADL, the SPLC, and the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
eginotes 