Category: cuckservatives

Rotten Orange News: King Cuck Keeps On A’ Cuckin

The anti-White leftist Donald J. Trump.

Do any of the Trump fanboys ever ask why such a petition is even necessary?  Why aren’t the God Emperor and America’s (ex) Senator leading the battle against globalist-leftist terrorist thugs, you know the ones who are attacking the God Emperor’s own supporters in the streets?

Do Ivanka and Jared disapprove?

You know, the same “montstrous government” that doesn’t life a finger to use its legal power to act against Antifa.  I’m not sure who is the biggest joke: the Trump/Session ultra-cucks, or globalist thugs who think they act against the System in “protest” while they are actually an integral part of that same System.

Painful truth: Trump and Antifa are on the same side. They’re both part of the anti-White System.

And, by the, way, “kinetic beauty” can go in both directions, in many forms. Personally, I think Nathan Damigo’s first has a great deal of “kinetic beauty.”

Even Mudshark Annie is displeased with the God Emperor.

Rotten Orange News and Sailer the Cuck

Two morons.

The Rotten Orange: The fat slob moron is now saying that we need to make trade concessions to China in order to get the Chinese to “help” deal with North Korea’s nuclear program.  Can we think of anything more Neocon cuck-like than that?  Look, Fat Don, if the Chinese, who share a border with North Korea, cannot be bothered to deal with this on their own initiative, for the own self-interest, then perhaps America, separated from these Asiatic aliens by an ocean, shouldn’t get so worked up about it?

Yes, we’ll be told that America is still technically at war with North Korea, while China is their ally; to which I say: it’s time to sign a real peace treaty with North Korea and let the South Koreans fend for themselves. The South can develop their own nuclear deterrent, and Japan as well, and America can worry more about Americans, defending our economic interests from voracious Asiatics, and defending our borders from Colored invaders.

And, yes, true, an ocean of separation doesn’t make a difference to ICBMs and SLBMs, but, you know, the missiles can fly in both directions. Ultimately, we cannot dictate to other nations what their military can be; we need to build our own nuclear arsenal, make clear that any attack against the USA will met with a devastating response, and let Asians take care of their own business.

We see Sailer continuing to promote the anti-White ultracucking of “citizenism” and then we have this:

My contribution perhaps is to explain the inevitability of identity politics and to recommend prudent policies for moderating their impact.

That is exactly the opposite of what we need.  Moderate the impact of identity politics? No, no, no!  Instead we must do everything to exacerbate identity politics, we need to promote group animus, and we must have more division, more hatred, more chaos, more balkanization, and more extremism.

Do we need any more evidence that Sailer is part of the System, and that the Alt Lite/Alt Wrong is an enemy and not an ally.

Rotten Orange News: Trump Chumps the Chumps

Introducing Rotten Orange News.

Rotten Orange News: Stories that chronicle Der Movement’s humiliation by the betrayal of their latest “man on white horse.”

Let’s not deport those “dreamers.”  After all, White American citizens don’t have their own dreams; no, they have to live the nightmare of the illegal invasion just so that insectivore-faced Ivanka can bask in her moral righteousness.

Border wall?  We don’t need no stinkin’ border wall!

Necon in foreign policy; Neocon in economic policy.

Behold the Ultra Cuck

First rule of Trump Club: the buffoonish race cuck will betray his base at every opportunity.

Read here, excerpts, emphasis added:

Young immigrants brought to the U.S. as children and now here illegally can “rest easy,” President Donald Trump said Friday, telling the “dreamers” they will not be targets for deportation under his immigration policies.

Trump, in a wide-ranging interview with The Associated Press, said his administration is “not after the dreamers…The president said Friday he spent his first 100 days laying the “foundation” for progress later in his administration, including by building relationships with foreign leaders. He cited German Chancellor Angela Merkel as a leader he was surprised to have developed strong chemistry with, given that he has been critical of her handling of immigration policies.

As a candidate, Trump strongly criticized President Barack Obama for “illegal executive amnesties,” including actions to spare from deportation young people who were brought to the country as children and now are here illegally. But after the election, Trump started speaking more favorably about these immigrants, popularly dubbed “dreamers.” On Friday, he said that when it comes to them, “This is a case of heart.”

How’s that “4-D chess” coming along, Roissy?

Any of the fanboys perturbed that pink-frilled Republican Neocon Miss Lindsey Graham is “all in” (an interesting choice of words) with Trump? Lindsey and Roissy can imagine themselves as little girls lying in the grass together dreaming of the Big Orange “Alpha” in the White House.

Cuckadoodledoo!

King Cuck?

Where’s the EGI?

KMacD wrote up something about Steve King’s recent comments, and I have some comments of my own about it.  Emphasis added:

However, in explaining what he meant in a follow-up interview (where super liberal Cuomo states “[America is]known … as a bastion of diversity and it is an unqualified strength for us”), King makes it clear that he is all about cultural and genetic assimilation — that he opposes setting up of isolated ethnic/religious enclaves that remain isolated from the rest of society even after 2 or 3 generations. Indeed he looks forward to the day when all Americans look the same as a result of intermarriage, presumably some shade of brown, with genetically recessive blondness entirely eradicated. 

One can make all sorts of hand-waving excuses for King, but that is really inexcusable. Cuomo we know is a hardcore leftist – the over-rated and unassimilated son of an over-rated and unassimilated father. But for King to say such things is pathetic, and puts the latest “behold the King!” Alt Right hero worship in its proper perspective.  If we are going to have Third Worlders, better they remain in their enclaves than to mix their genes (and their bizarre and alien cultural mores) with White America.  

I’m of a mixed mind with respect to King’s comments with respect to the long-term strategic effects. On the one hand, on balance, his comments are a net positive, shifting the discussion in a more “rightward” direction than anything uttered by the “God Emperor: himself.  On the other hand, King’s cucked Alt Lite culturalism harms European genetic interests and diminishes the positive value of his original comments.  Criticism of King – even with the constraints he no doubt believes he has in speaking his mind – is justified since no one asked him to make the comments to begin with.  He decided to broach the subject and he has the responsibility for the direction he takes those comments, and he is thus responsible if the discussion does into a sterile cul-de-sac of cucked civic nationalism and aracial culturalism.  If he believes he will be “compromised” by going too far, then he could have hedged a bit more artfully, without throwing genetic interests completely out the window.  If he’s not capable of being artful and cagey when discussing these matters, then he should keep his mouth shut and his tweets off the Internet.

Here is where the “EGI Firewall” could have been helpful.  If King (and others) had an understanding of genetic interests and if he – and others – internalized the attitude that genetic interests are ultimate interests and that defense of those interests are fundamental and non-negotiable, then he would not have gone off in the aracial civic nationalist Alt Lite culturalist direction.  The EGI Firewall would have blocked off any temptation to throw race and blood “under the bus.”  He would realize that genetic assimilation, intermarriage, and the “browning” of White America were completely incompatible with the most important and basic considerations for the interests of his people.  He would have the theoretical underpinning to reject maladaptive memes, giving him the confidence and moral courage to defend the primacy of race and blood.  Ultimately, there is why Salter’s work is so important: if one internalizes the EGI worldview, then one will never put culture, economic growth, cognitive elitism, or any other proximate interests above the ultimate interest of biological fitness.  Thus, the “movement’s” relative disregard for Salter’s work proves destructive.  If the “movement” was immersed in EGI, then it would have percolated into the Alt Right and from there 

Perhaps, given his original comments, his views are closer to ours than he dares (publicly) admit; however, if so, he perhaps should have considered whether if it was worth making the comments to begin with if he was not willing to go all the way with them.  As I said, I see it as a net positive, but still, there’s some negativity mixed with the positive and the negativity could have been avoided if King had refrained from commenting to begin with if he was not ready to fully and unconditionally assert the primacy of a biocentric view.  It would seem that this will be the job of someone else, in the future, someone who will take the baton from King and run further (to the “right”) with it.

Cuomo then presses the point, asking if Muslims, Jews, Christians, Italians, etc. are Americans, and asserting that “they are all equal … We don’t need babies from any one of those groups more than from any other of those groups.” Rep. King then seems to say that, although everyone is equal in the eyes of God and equal in the eyes of the law, not all groups contribute equally to society: “Certain individuals contribute more to society than others, and certain groups of people will do more on the productive side than other groups, that’s just a statistical fact.” Cuomo, being your standard liberal, says that these differences are entirely explained by differences in opportunity, whereas King puts the blame squarely on culture. But in any case, according to King, it has nothing to do with race: “It’s the culture, not the blood … it’s never been about race.” If children from other cultures were adopted into American homes (i.e., assimilated American homes), they would all grow up to be good Americans.

Again, I’m of two views here.  I can see the benefit of King stretching the bounds of discourse and making things easier for the next person to make more explicitly racial assertions.  But, still…to make such racially destructive comments, it’s not clear whether King perhaps should have not said anything at all if he couldn’t come out and support the primacy of race and blood.  You see, his comments are a double-edged sword – on the one hand, yes, it possibly eases the way for some future public figure to be more explicitly “racist,” but on the other hand, this scenario can be viewed as setting limits to discourse in that one can only broach these topics if one disavows explicitly biological arguments.  It is not clear, when all is said and done, which interpretation will win out – is King opening the door for race/blood/genetics or is he shutting the door?  I hope the former.  Given my oft-cited note that revolutions more typically occur when repression is suddenly relaxed, rather than when repression is greatest, if King can survive and prosper from his “controversial” comments, that can be viewed as a relaxation of repression making even more “extreme” public comments that much more plausible.

Rep. King is certainly pushing the limits of acceptable discourse in mainstream America. His talk about “other people’s babies” certainly does sound like he is referring to DNA, but he deftly dodged the bullet by framing it in terms of cultural assimilation.

One can give him the benefit of the doubt if we assume his intention is to stretch the discourse in a direction supportive of European racial survival. One wonders what would have happened had he pushed the limits past the boundary of race and DNA.  In the Trump era, it is not clear that the repercussions would be what they could have been before.  After all, the Left views his comments as they currently are as “racist White nationalism” – would their reaction would that much worse if he had gone “full racist?”  Maybe, maybe not…but we’ll need to wait for another incident to test those boundaries.

In the wake of the election, even some liberals, finally realizing this, began to call for an end to identity politics. Those who sow the wind reap the whirlwind. Identity politics is profoundly antithetical to the liberal traditions of the West based on individualism.

This is why they are so intent on shutting down any hint of White Identity.  It is also why the Sallis Strategy of chaos and balkanization is as realistic now than it has ever been,

On the other hand, from an Alt Right perspective Rep. King’s comments fall short of the mark. 

Yes, indeed.

And neither King nor Cuomo deal with the reality of race differences in IQ and impulse control which are so essential to success in navigating the complexities of contemporary society. Within American society, the racial gap in academic achievement continues, unaffected by the hundreds of billions of dollars expended on uplift programs for low-achieving minorities. European societies are now seeing the same pattern with African and Muslim immigrants.

But kinship differences trump (no pun intended) these proximate HBD-style concerns. EGI is more important than levels of achievement, IQ, and impulse control.

Does anyone seriously think that importing millions of Black African converts to Judaism would maintain Israel as a Jewish state?

Despite King’s disclaimers, he seems quite aware that the left is eagerly awaiting the demise of White America. In a radio interview, he stated, referring to people like Latino activist Jorge Ramos, “Their effort here is to be celebrating because the United States is moving towards becoming, the whites becoming a minority, a majority-minority within the country according to what their plan is.”King also recommended that listeners read the novel, The Camp of the Saints, by French author Jean Raspail, “a book about Europe being overcome by immigrants which has also frequently been referenced by top Trump adviser Steve Bannon. The book has been criticized as presenting a racist view of immigration.”

That at least is quite positive.  Note in that book Asians lead the way to the dispossession of Whites. Life follows fiction, as always.

On the whole, then, King would seem to be at least implicitly White and probably, if you got into his heart of hearts, he really does get it. Realizing that non-Whites are eagerly awaiting Whites becoming a minority has a way of doing that.

Also, King’s saying that Western culture is superior does flirt with the possibility that something about European genetic uniqueness fed into the triumph of the West. And if there is indeed something genetically unique about the peoples who created Western society — a genetic basis for Western individualism, then of course one could not recreate European civilization with peoples from a different gene pool. What’s so amazing is that liberals like Cuomo believe with absolute certainty that this could not be the case. It’s an a priori  moral certainty, not subject to debate and immune to all the data from behavior genetics and the long history of ethnic and religious conflict. And if you don’t subscribe to such ideas, you are an evil person — a moral cretin rightly outside of the morally defined ingroup.

This is all true.

Although I’m critical of a strictly “culturalist” view, I certainly am not one of those people who say: “when I hear the word culture, I reach for my gun.”  However, culture is not enough. Indeed, genetic interests are ultimate interests, so that race is more fundamental than culture.  No doubt culture is important, the most important proximate interest.  One cay crudely say: race with culture is vulgar; culture without race is effete.  More to the point is the realty that race and culture, genes and culture, are intertwined. A culture is the product of a specific genepool; however, that genepool is obviously influenced by culture, since the environment, of which culture is one prime component for humans, exerts selective pressure on the genes, hence shaping racial development and ethnogenesis.  It’s foolish for King and the Alt Right to pretend that a culture can thrive and grow with assimilated aliens; on the other hand, Nutzis act like vulgar barbarians when they dismiss out of hand the value of culture.

A Rose By Any Other Name

Labels are not as important as that which is labeled.

A while back, I read this in pamphlet form.

Now, I don’t agree with how the author defines “Right” and “Left” (more about that shortly) and I don’t agree with some of the ideology espoused there. This latter point is – or should be – more important; ideology is more important than the labels used to describe it.  On the one hand, the author is correct in opposing activists who are so obsessed with being considered “right-wing” that they make common cause with viewpoints that are anathema to their own racialist ideology.  On the other hand, he is wrong with trying to obsessively create a similarly false “left-wing” identity for national socialism; he is equally guilty of being overly concerned with labels, with style over substance.

There is a weakness among Whites – most likely due to long being denied the right to embrace their racial and cultural identities – in being so overly emotionally invested in superficial (sometimes “implicitly White”) identities so that this emotionality blinds them to the maladaptive aspects of their behavior.  Whites obsess over sports teams full of arrogant Negro athletes (usually with White wives/girlfriends) and, more to the point, Whites engage in politics as if It was sports, with identification with “our team” and “their team” often independent of real and meaningful ideological content.  Being so concerned with labels that one supports racially destructive memes is an example of maladaptive behavior.  Even being obsessed with labels of constructive memes can be maladaptive if one spends more energy defending the labels than defending the memes.

The mendacious know how to exploit this weakness.  Thus, cuckservatives love to accuse opponents of “not being true conservatives” or “not being Ronald Reagan conservatives” or they accuse the Alt Right of being – gasp! – “leftists” – with the presumable objective of wounding the right-wing self-conception of these opponents, so those people, desperate to recapture their “rightist identity,” will recant their “blasphemy” and plead to be readmitted to the “conservative fold.”  Those accusations are likely even more targeted to third party observers, with the implicit threat of “if you support those populists-racialists-nationalists then you too will be considered as ‘leftists’ and ‘not true conservatives” – a fate worse than death for those whose existential meaning is wrapped up with identification with being “conservative” and “right-wing.”  Similarly, on a blog I was involved with 10-12 years ago, a conservative “social scientist” would try to win arguments (typically against me) by labeling opponents’ opinions as “leftist.”  My response, if I recall, was to simply state: “OK, I’m a leftist, now address the issues.”

True, I typically label my views as “Far-Right” and I do so for two reasons. First, it is for the sake of clarity and convenience when summarizing these views – national socialist, fascist, racial nationalist – in a “political shorthand” that is commonly accepted by most people on the both the “Right” and the “Left.”  This is analogous to using “White” as shorthand for “peoples of European descent.”  Second, and in contrast to the author of the work linked above, I do not define “Right/Left” in terms of reactionary vs. revolutionary, nor do I accept purely economic or political definitions.  A more metapolitical definition that I support – and that is more economical with facts and aligned with how the terms are actualized in reality – is to associate the Right with hierarchy and difference and inequality and the Left with egalitarianism and obsessive equality at any cost and a leveling universalism.  Hence, my ideology is at the far extreme of the “Right” despite the fact that some of my views – on economics for example – are more “leftist.”  But, and this is the key point, I have no emotional investment in my labeling of my views.  It is merely a tool, merely shorthand, merely a consequence of the definitions I use, and if others want to label my views as “leftist” then, fine, I’m a “leftist.” There is a difference between labeling as a tool and labeling as an identity.  The former is a normal part of everyday life; the latter is foolish and childish. In the end, I care about the actual ideology and its consequences with respect to my biocentric view of racial life, not about the labels used to identify the ideology.

I also realize that in the end my definition of “Right/Left” is as subjective as all the others.  I believe my definition is more reflective of reality, but there is no hardcore objectivity in political labels.  More important, it shouldn’t really matter.  There are those who – perhaps because of their Asiaphilia – are likely more familiar with Confucius than with Shakespeare and who are not in tune with the attitude behind “a rose by any other name….”   To observe individuals spill gallons of “digital ink” analyzing the use of “Right” vs. “Left” labels, to see ideologically similar individuals engage in acrimonious debate over such labels, to read rambling theses about “White Leftism” – this reflects ideological immaturity.  If one is brought down to the level of endlessly debating the labels to be given to views, it is high time to put the labels aside and concentrate on actual differences in views, ideologies, and proposals – and not in highly abstract theoretical terms but in how these views would be, or should be, actualized into reality.

These people like labels?  Let’s use labels – by wasting time with labels and with academic abstractions, those on the “Right” (a label as defined by me) are constantly outcompeted by those on the “Left” (another label as defined by me), the latter group being more concerned with winning and achieving their objectives than with a juvenile concern with how others label them.  You can label a rose as a sewer and label a sewer as a rose, but that is not going to change how each smells.  There is of course a need for clarity of definition and a need to avoid dangerous mislabeling – if one wants a rose then they don’t want a sewer – but defining terms should be a direct and efficient process for reasonable people.  If there is a need to spend months – or years! – debating definitions and labels then something is wrong.  The people involved are being stupid, stubborn, mendacious, maladaptive, or are engaging in avoidance behavior – engaging in fruitless and sterile argument over abstractions because of an inability or unwillingness to come to grips with harsh reality. When leading troops into battle, one needs to make sure there is agreement over the meaning of labels and definitions, and then one does what they need to do.  Soldiers who endlessly debate the meaning of a “flanking movement” will quickly find themselves outflanked by an enemy who ended their debate long before.  In the end, actualized reality trumps abstract defining and labeling every time, without fail.

Der Movement is Disheartening and Demoralizing

Der Movement on perfect display.

While I do not want to criticize for the sake of criticism, I’m not going to be silent when Der Movement conducts itself in its typically embarrassingly stupid and predictably fetishistic manner.

For example, let’s take the latest example of why Der Movement disgusts me.  When Trump picked Gorsuch for the Supreme Court, the typical “movement” reaction was that as demonstrated here (*) – a real American! Triumph of the WASPs!  Just look at him!  Look at his family! The American archetype!  These guys are so predictable in their comments it is if they are reading off of a pre-prepared script.  Same old, same old…over and over again.

In his predictable homoerotic fashion, Roissy started heavy breathing about Gorsuch’s alpha maleness and his erect posture (contrasted against even the God Emperor, who “slouches at the neck” because of his “age and heavy frame” – a polite way of saying that Der Touchback is old and fat).

Well, that’s all great, except that, again predictably and typically, Gorsuch has started cucking even before being confirmed.

Senators from both sides of the aisle, including Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Ben Sasse (R-NE), have confirmed that Judge Neil Gorsuch said something along the lines of Trump’s comments about a member of the judiciary were “disheartening” and “demoralizing.”

Pat Buchanan, with all his faults, at least has the honesty to speak some truths (emphasis added):

What a wimp. Did our future justice break down crying like Sen. Chuck Schumer? Sorry, this is not Antonin Scalia. 

Yes, this is not Scalia.  He may well be Earl Warren though, who was, no doubt, another real American.

From my perspective, what I want from a Supreme Court Justice is that he (yes, he – not she) be a European-American (of whatever ethnicity) and at least an implicitly White hard conservative (as much as we can expect now).  If that’s a WASP, great.  If it’s a wop, mick, hunkie, frog, squarehead that’s great too.

Now, from past experience I know that without any clarification (or even with it), my words here will be misused and misinterpreted by Nutzis and fetishists.  So, I’ll say the obvious. Yes, there should be significant representation of founding stock Americans on the Supreme Court.  Yes, the current lack of such representation is a legitimate concern.  Yes, individuals of founding stock ancestry (which I assume both Griffin and Spencer are) should expect ethnic representation.  But that’s not exactly what’s going on here.  Instead, we’re seeing breathless ecstasy solely based on Gorsuch’s background, independent of impacts on White racial interests, and disregarding the warning signs of cuckiness even before Gorsuch’s whining complaints.  And so we see nitwits like Roissy and Derbyshire having second thoughts now, in their post-orgasmic refractory period, both considering the possibility that the alpha-WASP Gorsuch might just be more Lindsey Graham and less Donald Trump.

It is an example of several underlying “movement” problems – the lack of judgment, the rush to embrace Men on White Horse heroes, the affirmative action program, the script-like dogma, etc. There’s no original thinking here. There’s no prudent “wait and see” calculation.  

Of relevance is this article, particularly this quote:

The hard Left has an effective infrastructure. The hard Right is looking to build one.

That’s relevant to the Gorsuch situation because it reflects the same underlying problem. Now, the author of that piece suggests that the advantage of the Left is the legacy of communism and the support given the American Communist Party by the USSR, which created sufficient subversive infrastructure that has been handed down from one generation of leftists to another.  That’s almost as much as an “Occam’s Butterknife” explanation as Roissy’s stupidity about “geography.”  Pleasureman at MPC was more accurate in ascribing the Strong Left vs. Weak Right paradigm to the character flaws of rightists.

Let’s look at the Far Right, shall we?  Revilo Oliver talking about 50 years of ‘movement” failure…in 1969.  One failed project after another…the Klan, Silver Shirts and the Bund, the John Birch Society, followed by various Nutzi antics.  How much money and effort was expended on Pierce and his National Alliance?  Apart from supporting Pierce in his mountaintop serial monogamy with Eastern European women, how did that work out?  How about all the money and effort expended on Duke (casino profits notwithstanding)?  The Right is “looking to build” an infrastructure after endless decades of money and hard work poured out to various quota queens. Yeah, the Left is successful – they have serious, hate-filled, high-IQ Jewboys coupled with the pick of dedicated self-hating White gentiles, and the best of the pick of wherever other racial flotsam and jetsam exist.  The Right on the other hand practices its strict affirmative action programs leading to pathetically incompetent “leadership” that has squandered millions of dollars and continues to do so.  How many millions of dollars have gone to the “happy penguins” over the past decade for example?

White nationalists cannot have such an infrastructure, but Black nationalists, deriving from a race derided as “inferior” by WNs, have indeed developed a reasonable degree of infrastructure. If we consider a people lower on the racial hierarchy than are the Negroes – the wops – we see another example. Low-IQ Afrowop dagoes came to America and established a highly organized criminal enterprise with an integrated infrastructure involving violent coercion (**).  But WNs can’t do it. The “hard Right” in general – with its decades of support and millions of dollars or largesse – cannot do it. These are all direct consequences of the failure of “movement” memes and policies.

On a perhaps not unrelated note, I’m always amused by Der Movement’s interest in Julius Evola (whose work is to me mostly the worst sort of moronic nonsense imaginable).  This breathless pro-Evolaism, coupled to Der Movement’s typical dogma and fetishes represents an extreme case of compartmentalization, cognitive dissonance, or both.  Or perhaps they really do think Evola was a bearded Amish man?

*That coming, ironically enough, from a website/groupuscule that has chosen for tis intellectual linchpin a half-Iranian who babbles NECist historical revisionism and fruitcake pseudoscience.  You can’t make this stuff up.  It’s comedy gold.

**Which has to a large part collapsed because of the assimilation that Der Movement denies exists (imagine if Scalia were a mafia don instead of a Supreme Court Justice, he would have made a formidable criminal mastermind) and the RICO laws (which Trump/Sessions should now use against the Left – we’re waiting).