Category: Twitter

Lulz Lulz Lulz

Yes…tell me again how much better ‘White nationalism 2.0” is than the “Boomer 1.0 version.”

See this.

1. ADL Publishes false information about the shooter without police confirmation and based on a 4Chan prank.
2. Everyone calls the shooter a white nationalist.
3. Turns out that information was false.
4. No one will ever see the correction, will continue thinking he’s WN.

Here’s the thing: you cannot base a real social and political movement on trolling, lulzing, Pepe, and Kek.  No one is going to man the ramparts for cheap laughs or a cartoon frog.  When people are activists just to be offensive, for the “lulz,” to be “edgy” or whatever, these are the same individuals who’ll turn traitor once they “get a nice Black friend” or “find a nice Asian girlfriend” (albeit the last bit seems compatible with the Alt Right in every sense).

But, to be fair: the rise of the Dolt Right is in direct proportion to the monumental failures of “White nationalism 1.0.”  The problem is that the “cure” is exactly the same as the disease: stupidity, affirmative action quota queen leadership, freakishness, a complete lack of any long term vision or strategic plan, “acting out,” fossilized dogma, etc.  It just has a superficial veneer of Millennial nonsense crudely brushed on top.  Underneath it’s the same rusted pile of junk.

So, yes, have your fun.  Let it backfire again and again.

Lulz.

Advertisements

Against the Twitter Purge

A brief statement of principle.

I’m going to postpone the post I had planned for today; instead, I want to make a statement about the ongoing Alt Right deplatforming, now manifested in a Twitter Purge of some on the Far-Right, including Taylor and Amren (as well as others, and one can expect the list to expand in coming days).

Readers of this blog know I have my differences with American Renaissance, and with some of the other “movement” precincts that have been, or will be, banned from social media.  That’s not relevant here.  Regardless of what I think of these individuals, organizations, and their work, I fully, and without reservation, support their rights of free speech, of free expression, and I unalterably oppose what has happened, what is happening.

Nitwits will of course start the song and dance that “Twitter is a private company, so they can do as they please here.”  Two points.  First, Twitter, Amazon, Google, PayPal and all the rest have become, basically, akin to public utilities and should be regulated as such. While I’m sure the SJWs think that Alt Righters should be deprived of electricity, heat, water, telephone service, medical care, etc. most reasonable people would disagree.  In the digital age of global communication and commerce, the aforementioned digital entities are analogous to analog service utilities and thus the issue should not merely be one of private preference.  Second, the hypocrisy here is breathless, in that bakers – private businesses! – are being forced to service homosexual marriages, and the same progressive have no problem with freedom of association being violated in that case (or in the case of race, for example – why can’t realtors or property owners discriminate based on race with respect who they sell to or rent to?).

I may also add that Twitter’s rationale that Amren promotes “violence” against “citizens” is ludicrous.  Taylor denounced Spencer merely for Hailgate – how do a bunch of suit-and-tie HBDers threaten “violence” to anyone?  All these Alt Right types are actually the victims of leftist violence, not the perpetrators of any sort of attacks.

The whole thing is a travesty.

But, this looks like the future.  Despite my disagreements with Der Movement, I oppose it being censored.  After all, from the broad perspective, I’m involved as well.  At times like this, all the “heroes” of the “movement” need to put aside their petty feuds and figure out approaches to bypass dependence upon a System that is opposed to all of us on the Far-Right.

The money and resources are available for this, as I’ve written many times, and apparently, KMacD agrees (emphasis added):

We have to hope that racially conscious Whites will eventually create an infrastructure that begins to match the multicultural, anti-White infrastructure that is already in place. The money is certainly there and the situation on the ground can only convince more and more Whites that Rep. Mo Brooks is right — that there is indeed a war against them.

More money for real projects and less money for “frilly things” for mudsharks and less money for happy penguins to live the good life, and maybe we’ll be getting somewhere.

Topic For Spencer’s Book

Twitter.

On Twitter, Spencer asks what should be a topic for his book.

How about this: a full-blasted, no apologies defense of Big Europe pan-Europeanism as opposed to petty nationalist ethnonationalism.

Make a comprehensive statement on the matter.  Future generations of the peoples of Europe will thank you.

Reynolds Has The Bunker Syndrome

Big talk, little action.

Now, I have sympathy for Reynold’s tweet.  In a sane and just world, protesters blocking highways would be dealt with, legally and justly, like this.  But we do not live in such a world. Just talking about running down precious pavement apes, much less actually doing it, brings down the fury of the System.  It is just Blowhard Bunkerism, folks letting off steam without actually doing anything politically useful.

Hey Reynolds, are you a White nationalist?  Have you read On Genetic Interests?  Do you promote Salter’s work?  Are you working behind the scenes to get pro-White candidates elected? Are you actually doing something to actualize a reality in which the simians will be swept away like trash they are, or are you just doing the equivalent of Archie throwing things at Walter Cronkite on the TV?

These Bunkers who always have to apologize or resign because of ill-advised tweets have it all backwards.

They mistakenly believe that they need to use their (non-existent) freedom of speech to gain power and change society.  In reality, they need to gain power and change society in order to have true freedom of speech.

Do they really need a dumb swarthoid to tell them something as obvious as that?

HBD in the News, 5/23/16

Two items of interest.

A wonderfully succinct and accurate take-down of the HBD nerds by “agnostic.”

Really now, look who represents the HBD worldview: a miscegenating apologist for child porn, a White-hating Jamaican mongrel, an inbred cunt, a senile pseudoscientist, and a boring superficial loser.  Is that ad hominem? Yes it is, but nevertheless a reasonable sampling of the bizarre HBD cult.

Is this a friend of Derbyfogle. or just another Jew?

Twitter and Free Speech

Hypocrisy of democracy.

The crazed leftist view on free speech issues is here:


Twitter has discovered what many proponents of democratic society already knew: censorship is not the opposite of free speech. In fact, so-called free speech can actually be used as a weapon to silence the vulnerable and dispossessed. Ironically, to maintain its position as a platform for free discourse, Twitter must censor its users. 

My first riposte to that stupidity is to state that the “vulnerable and dispossessed” are precisely those people who are having their speech silenced through Twitter censorship. 
And that’s not just an abstract and logical objection, and it is not merely specific to the Twitter case. In the “West” those groups alleged to be “vulnerable and disposed” – minorities of various kinds for example – are allowed to say and do whatever they please, they are allowed to organize in an identitarian fashion to pursue group interests, and their relative proportion of the population is increasing. Those groups – the majority for example, particularly heterosexual men – who are considered “privileged” and “powerful” are those whose speech is censored and in some cases criminalized, who are not allowed to organize on a group basis, and whose proportion of the population is, not surprisingly, declining.  Indeed, for the latter group, complaints about these issues are themselves censored, leading to a negative spiral of disempowerment.
That sort of puts into perspective “vulnerable and dispossessed” doesn’t it?
A commentator at that article expresses the following view (spelling corrected):

I am sorry, but that’s one of the most idiotic claims ever made in ars Technica. 

By definition, censorship is the suppression of speech, which makes speech less free.  

The so-called “hate speech” criteria are one of the reasons why the German and international media engaged in self-censorship about the Cologne sexual attacks resulting in unwillingness to properly report the events. 

In reality, the world isn’t one big liberal-arts college campus, you know?

And my own “free speech primer” is here.
Question: Should a White ethnostate allow free speech to its ideological opponents?  The answer is: no.  Yes, as I outline above, free speech is extremely important. But:

1. Those who deny free speech to others to facilitate the genocide of those others cannot expect the courtesy of free speech extended to them.  Their ACTIONS – not speech – have criminalized them. 
2. In a White ethnostate, any such people would either be no longer under the jurisdiction of the state or they would be put on trial and the slowly tortured to death as punishment for the crimes committed under the present regime. So, the entire question is irrelevant.
3. The sort of White ethnostate I envision and promote would not be a democracy and would not make a pretense of being one, or of hypocritically speaking of “freedom” while denying such freedom to its majority citizens.  It is the current regime – that bases its legitimacy on “freedom” – that has the obligation to free speech.  An openly national socialist regime has no obligation.

4. The only thing that trumps free speech is freedom of association, championed by a White ethnostate.  The current System denies its majority freedom of association, and uses censorship of speech as a weapon to silence opposition to that policy.

Global Warming: a Chinese Invention?

Trump.
Hey!  Trump is criticizing the Chinese here and his immigration plan stands to question the mass import of Chinese and Indian “cognitive elitists” to take over American STEM fields.  For shame!  I wonder if some of Trumps’s support in HBD circles will begin to dry up, if he dares to blaspheme against the Holy Orientals, and if he fails to sacrifice American interests on the Altar of Asia.
After all, any slowing down of the Asian influx means fewer live-action China doll sex toys for semi-autistic White nerd types, and we certainly can’t have that.
As far as “global warming” goes – in the end, it doesn’t matter what it is and what is causing it, we need to switch to a non-fossil fuel energy economy anyway. Instead of giving endless social welfare handouts to chimps and other apes, and instead of endless wars for Israel, a prudent investment in alternative energy research can make a large impact on the human future. And IF man-made global warming is real, this approach would help, and if global warming is a hoax, then this is something we need to do anyway. Does Trump support a strong investment in the American research enterprise?