Also: comic book art, McSpencer, and other items.
Watch this. If you want the executive summary, start watching from 27:50. The video also punctures some fantasies about the Oriental Gods. HBDers weep bitter tears.
This is another example of Sallis being right. After Rushton died, Johnson censored my negative comments about Rushton from Counter-Currents (I was not “banned” from that platform at that time) when there was a Rushtonite hagiography going on there. After all, we are not allowed to question the dogma – and “Rushton was a messiah” is part of the dogma. However, Dutton (“one of the boys”) researched Rushton’s life and work, and Dutton’s conclusions about Rushton are even harsher than mine were. Sallis right, Johnson wrong. You can copy and paste that last phrase to explain just about everything.
Trump is “going to look into it.” Who knows, perhaps the horse is Jewish. Just look at its nose!
…if Der Movement is co-opted and subsumed by the Alt-Right, and if the Alt-Right itself is co-opted by the HBD Alt-Wrong, then White Nationalism becomes effectively replaced by a cult worshiping Jewish and Asian IQ. This need not be immediately overt and obvious, a shallow facade of cardboard racialism could be put up as a front, with the ironclad edifice of Jewish/Asian supremacy setting the agenda just behind that facade and manipulating all the “latrine flies” against their own racial interests. That is not far-fetched if you consider that the described scenario represents what is already going on in certain precincts of the “movement.”
And now, years later, we see Alt Right heroes throwing their lot in with the Jewish anti-WN HBDer Unz. Prediction correct.
All of this bears close watching, close monitoring. I would advise a double strategy: on the narrower, intra-Alt Right level, the WN Alt-Right needs to fully and definitively separate from the HBD Alt-Wrong.
Instead, after the collapse of the Alt Right, they allowed themselves to be bought off for thirty shekels of silver.
On the broader “movement”-scale level, there needs to be a critical mass of quality activists who remain separate from the Alt-Right (although there may of course be cooperation between these activists and the hardcore WN Alt-Right action).
They didn’t listen, did they?
If that doesn’t happen, I fear that all the eggs in that basket of deplorables will end up being clones of Humpty Dumpty. And we’re all headed for a great fall.
Which took place. Sallis prescient again – or is using “Sallis” and “prescient” together in the same sentence a superfluous redundancy?
In my opinion, this is the single greatest panel in comic book history.
Now, the Jew Kirby has (with justification) been given great credit for his work. However, Joe Sinnott as the inker has been relatively neglected in all the praise and Sinnott’s role needs to be explicitly acknowledged.
Some artist-inker combinations work well; others do not. Kirby-Sinnott was classic; Bucker-Sinnott was excellent as well. But Sinnott did not gel well with John Buscema, and I believe Buscema eventually requested his younger brother Sal to do his inking. Sal Buscema eventually became an important artist for Marvel, perhaps ultimately eclipsing John.
This brings up another issue. Artists, at least Marvel artists in the Silver and Bronze ages, all had distinctive styles, in some cases, very highly distinctive styles. Kirby, for example. Think Ditko, Trimpe, Tuska, and others. Probably none were as distinctive as Sal Buscema. I immediately knew that Sal Buscema was the artist of a comic book just from a brief look at some panels. Truth be told, at that time, I was not a fan of Sal’s art, particularly with respect to The Incredible Hulk, for which I was used to the art of Trimpe; in general, at that time, I preferred the smooth and rich lines of Kirby (with Sinnott) and the similar “roundness” of Trimpe, as opposed to the harsh lines and clenched-fist faces of Sal Buscema.
However, in the intervening years, my view has changed, and I now view Sal Buscema as an outstanding artist, one of the Marvel Pantheon, with a style more realistic than that of the more “roundness” artists – although in some ways I still prefer the latter. I still am not a fan of Sal Buscema’s depiction of the Hulk specifically, but in general Sal’s art was excellent.
Further, this is all in contrast to the horror seen in comic books today. In general, the art today is terrible, and in some cases unbelievably bad, and the stories are unimaginative and mostly SJW.
Listen to this. So, it seems that the hypothesis – broached here – of a possible falling out between Spencer and Friberg is essentially not correct. Assuming that is so, we come back to the question of Johnson’s sudden embrace of the Yang Gang – can it just be Johnson’s ego about UBI?
Spencer is correct about the power of censorship – and he’s more realistic than some folks who say “all will be well, just send in the ‘D’Nations” – and I note he admitted that the Alt Right never took any of it seriously. Too many drunken podcasts, I suppose. Spencer is being a bit naïve about “speed limits” for the rules of censorship. Eventually the “speed limit” will be adjusted to eliminate all pro-White content. What then?
Spencer is correct that Trump will likely do nothing about deplatforming and censorship, but I disagree that the “Alts” has much to do with Trump’s election, and, as stated above, he’s being stunningly naïve to believe that social media/tech regulation would leave loopholes that can be exploited by pro-Whites.
Spencer about AIM and infiltration – absolutely correct. Friberg makes a good point about how “hate speech laws” exerts selective pressure to force the Far Right to tighten their propaganda and arguments, but this argument – and Spencer’s agreement with this – only goes so far. Eventually, the laws will be adjusted to narrow the opening for discourse to such an extent that you’ll be left only with the safety valve of mainstream conservatism. You cannot adjust forever without exerting pressure of your own. I’ve made suggestions about that on this site; this post is not the place to discuss those details.
About the Ukraine – look, at that time I supported the Ukrainian nationalists, but I was not under any illusions about their long term independence from the Neocons. On the other hand, Putin’s Russia is multiculturalist as well, and given the Ukraine’s tragic history I thought it appropriate to at least give the Ukrainian Right a chance to make things right – even if there was little chance of success. Maybe that was just foolish nativete on my part. I’m not perfect. Are you? And would the Ukrainians be better off losing their soul and becoming part of a growing Eurasianist-Yellow/Brown-Islamic empire?
The Way of the World organizing – good idea in theory, but the “rules” put in place for safety will not work in my opinion. The Left is too skilled at infiltration, and the Right is too dumb to prevent it, for all of this to effectively function.
Trump takes decisive action! After all, that’s why his base voted for him, right?
Is it possible for the “movement” to be this stupid? Is it possible for water to be wet?