Category: hypocrisy

Silk Road News: More Asian Whining

Asian, Asians, and more Asians.

More Asian racial whining, and more anti-White racial solidarity with Negroes.

Whining Indians who believe America should be an open door cash cow for their numberless hordes

Then we have “Kumiko” at AltRight.com, which I initially commented on in a previous posts. A few more points.  First, as I said before, she threatens Whites that “armed” Coloreds – including Asians – will wage race war if Whites try and expel them from the US.  Putting aside how this tells us what a mistake it was to let Asians in in the first place, what makes this idiot think that all these Asian parasites would even be willing to all move to her proposed Asian-Hispanic SW USA homeland? Entitled and arrogant Orientals will pull up roots in, say, NY’s Chinatown and move out West?  Any racial separation is going to be opposed, probably by violence.  And unlike Blacks, and, possibly Hispanics-Amerindians in old Mexican territory, Asians don’t have even the slightest historical or moral claim to any New World territory.

Then she gets semi-offended by Silver’s rough language toward her – language which I say is justified – which is the height of hypocrisy, since her own writing at MR, particularly in response to some of my own past criticisms, made liberal use of the “F word”; meanwhile, her associate accused me of “sucking Jewish cock” simply because I oppose Asian colonization of White lands (which most Jews are very likely to favor, by the way).  But let’s not offend the potty-mouthed delicate Oriental flower at AltRight.com!  For shame!

Then the specimen asserts that Whites and Asians do not have a “shared destiny” (I agree) – but of course MR promotes Silk Road White nationalism that is characterized by strong associations between Whites and Asians, with the former subservient to the latter.  And, of course, she talks about “British Asians” who are “loyal to the flag.”  So – no shared destiny?Don’t expect any sense or consistency – it’s all a Jew-like dual morality that promotes Asian interests at every opportunity.

Behold the Ultra Cuck

First rule of Trump Club: the buffoonish race cuck will betray his base at every opportunity.

Read here, excerpts, emphasis added:

Young immigrants brought to the U.S. as children and now here illegally can “rest easy,” President Donald Trump said Friday, telling the “dreamers” they will not be targets for deportation under his immigration policies.

Trump, in a wide-ranging interview with The Associated Press, said his administration is “not after the dreamers…The president said Friday he spent his first 100 days laying the “foundation” for progress later in his administration, including by building relationships with foreign leaders. He cited German Chancellor Angela Merkel as a leader he was surprised to have developed strong chemistry with, given that he has been critical of her handling of immigration policies.

As a candidate, Trump strongly criticized President Barack Obama for “illegal executive amnesties,” including actions to spare from deportation young people who were brought to the country as children and now are here illegally. But after the election, Trump started speaking more favorably about these immigrants, popularly dubbed “dreamers.” On Friday, he said that when it comes to them, “This is a case of heart.”

How’s that “4-D chess” coming along, Roissy?

Any of the fanboys perturbed that pink-frilled Republican Neocon Miss Lindsey Graham is “all in” (an interesting choice of words) with Trump? Lindsey and Roissy can imagine themselves as little girls lying in the grass together dreaming of the Big Orange “Alpha” in the White House.

Cuckadoodledoo!

Silk Road News: Outrageous Hypocrisy

Colored is as colored does.

Get this spewing of outrageous anti-White hypocrisy:

See, this is the thing. The Americans don’t really have the right to tell Japan to stop propagating Nihonjinron narratives.
Japan is basically a place for Japanese (and Zainichi Koreans too, who also belong) to live. Others may be admitted, but only the Japanese state can decide that.
To have any White person try to redefine the identity of the country by force from the outside would be a form of neocolonial imposition which should not be tolerated.

This is the most outrageous hypocrisy imaginable.  At the same time, this diseased Oriental lives in a White nation, believes that “British Asians” (of which she is one, presumably) are legitimate, hectors Whites on pro-White blogs, lectures Whites on pro-White blogs on how Whites should behave, transformed Majority Rights into a “safe space” for Asian supremacy, and criticizes Australia’s attempts to protect itself from invasion.

Majority Rights must rank high among the leading anti-White hate sites on the Internet. Ultimately, I blame the White males (not men) at that barren wasteland for putting up with this; if they had any testicular fortitude, they’d kick this alien the hell off of what used to be a pro-White blog and return it to its proper roots.  And that goes for the lulzing commentators as well as for blog owners and posters.

Silk Road News: Chinese Hypocrisy and Anti-White Hatred

Asians hate, hate, hate Whites.

Read here, emphasis added:

I ask them what they think about blacks being so far below whites and Asians. Almost without exception, they cite the arguments made by the American Left: “It’s because of white racism,” “It’s because of European colonialism,” “It’s because they have bad nutrition,” or “It’s because they don’t have proper education.” 

I was initially shocked by this. I couldn’t imagine how they’d been trained to say these things when they spent their whole lives in Chinese schools. Many of them say their teachers taught them Africa was poor because white people stole all the natural resources. It seems that racial egalitarianism has spread farther and deeper than most of us would have imagined. 

Part of this can be blamed on Chinese government media (which is almost all media). In an effort to delegitimize American society and inspire nationalism, the authorities portray the United States in a bad light. This includes reporting on gun violence, and constant coverage of “police shootings of young black men,” which they portray as evidence of American “racism.” At the same time, Chinese seem to equate globalism with Western culture and, especially, Americanism. All things American are fashionable and cool. 

Increasing Chinese globalization will probably accentuate these contradictory trends, and the Chinese government is not consistent on race. It teaches that America is evil because of “racism,” while simultaneously making it impossible for non-Chinese foreigners to get permanent residency. Allegedly, there is a way to get it, but no one, to my knowledge, has ever successfully done so. The government condemns Europe for not taking in more refugees while enforcing some of the strictest border controls and visa restrictions in the world. To us foreign residents, this is highly hypocritical. 

My students sometimes claim America and Europe are “racist” for not allowing mass immigration, or they suggest I must be “prejudiced” against Mr. Obama because he’s black. When I ask them if they want the Chinese president to be black, or China to invite millions of Japanese immigrants, they react with horror and bewilderment. Their common response is something timid and confused, such as, “That’s just not the Chinese way.”

Well, here is something that is “the Chinese way” – acting like rioting Negroes, expressing the venomous hatred of Whites and the West exhibited by Asians the world over.

Let us never forget one of the major themes – or should we say memes – of this blog:


The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.

Without Whites Asians – like the Jews who they resemble in behavior and anti-European bias – would fall onto each other in their own internal hatreds (indeed the Amren article discusses Chinese animus toward the Japanese), but, hey, as long as the hated White man is around, we can have at least a superficial Asian solidarity – at least among the Asian imperialists – so as to attack White interests at every opportunity.

Asians: The greatest long-term threat to “European EGI.” 

Movement Madness, 2/20/17

More “movement” cluelessness.

Someone at Amren asks why it’s considered bad to say “I’m proud to be White.”  There’s a number of reasons for that, some touched upon in that essay and some not.  One thing’s for sure: Der Movement’s enthusiastic embrace of freakishness and hypocrisy of all kinds is not helping.

Speaking of hypocrites and Amren, here’s someone embraced by the Amren crowd.

Derbyfogle has the nerve to ask:

 
Well, all that is a problem for Chinese people. But why is it any problem for us?

And answers it:

I’ve been living among Chinese people for forty-five years. I’ve been married to one for thirty years.

Yeah, Derb, it is a “problem for us” because we have Chinese living in this country.  You’ve contributed to the problem by bringing “Rosie” – who you yourself have admitted is an ethnocentric Chinese – to the USA.  This guy’s mindnumbingly clueless hypocrisy is simply astounding.

But I love my country…

If you’re talking about England, then go back (sans “Rosie” and the kids, who can go to China or Taiwan) and try to help.  As for America, you’re a former illegal alien who has contributed to the Chinese problem you are posting about, so “my country” should not apply for the USA.

German madness – Germany is “not a Western nation.”  What stupidity is this?  Some sort of “Red Fascism/National Bolshevik” nonsense to identity Germany to the East as a “young, non-Western” nation?  As sane people are aware, Germany is one cornerstone of the West (along with the other major Western European nations identified by Yockey); indeed, Germans may have contributed more to Western culture (as defined by Spengler/Yockey) more than any other people.

I really do think Germans had a mass national nervous breakdown after losing WWI and the subsequent period of revolution, instability and inflation, and Weimer degeneration, and have been more or less crazy for the last 100 years or so, veering off from ultra-narrow hegemonic ethnonationalism to ultra-universal pathological altruism, with random nutcases in-between reinventing Western history.  Der Movement had better get over its extreme Teutonophilia until such time that Germany recovers the mental equilibrium it had before November 1918.

Then we have this.

Yeah, the Alt Right can “distance themselves” from Milo all they want, but it’s too late.  Milo and the Alt Right are one in the mind of the public, and the Alt Right can blame themselves for that, with all their talk about “a big tent” and “the usefulness of Milo and the Alt Lite” and “let’s not turn people away from us.”  Net result: more people will end up being turned away than being attracted.

Then we have Roissy:

 
As a White man, I sense that war has been declared on me and my kind. When my enemies bring war to my doorstep, what am I to do?

Well, he has previously answered that for himself:

damn, i’m torn. do i want a thriving society or easier access to sex? yeeeeah… i’ll take the latter and leave the self-sacrifice required of the former for the anti-poolside chumps

Milo and Roissy are two sides of the same coin, one homo and the other hetero (with the exception of Roissy’s comically homoerotic fixation on Donald Trump).  Both are sexual hedonists, snarky and juvenile “shock jock” types, on the periphery of Der Movement, generating self-aggrandizing controversy by flirting with Far Right ideas, but ultimately standing for values anathema to any sane ordering of White society.  Both have influence because of the “big tent” stupidity of Der Movement, which sacrifices standards on the altar of expediency.

Then we have the Silk Roaders, who are becoming increasingly unhinged with their anti-Trumpism. They’ll be addressed in future posts – the only thing to say now for those of you who haven’t been paying attention is that their anti-Trumpism is ALL about Russia.  The Jew/Israeli card is being played to try to appeal to Der Movement’s knee-jerk anti-Semitism. It is hypocrisy, because it we are to criticize everyone groveling to the Jews and Israel, this must include China, India, and all the other lands of the Asian gods.  

I for one long ago identified Trump as a Negrophilic ignorant vulgar buffoon with strong Jewish family connections.  But, he’s not part of Der Movement, is a public mainstream figure, so in this non-“movement” case expediency actually is justification.  What effect does Trump have on White racial interests?  He can be a useful tool.  I’m certainly not going to be anti-Trump solely because Asian nationalists covet the Russian Far East.

The solution to “movement” madness?  How about starting here?

Sunic’s Reasonableness vs. Ethnonationalist Dishonesty

Good sense vs. stupidity.

Tom Sunic makes good points about the need for pan-European cooperation and against narrow and divisive ethnonationalism.

Here are Sunic’s main points:

My main point is that various European national identities should from now on play a secondary role. I argue that our first priority should be to what is sometimes conveniently referred to as our common biocultural identity, or to put it in different words, the salvaging of our common and collective heredity as represented by the broader family of interrelated European peoples…
…it is outdated for the Croats and Serbs, or for the Poles and Germans to wage war with each other or to dwell endlessly on their mutually exclusive historical grievances…
…European small-time nationalisms, with a flurry of national identities of sorts, inherited from the 20th century, must no longer play a crucial role in our new identity building process…This can best be observed in Ukraine and Croatia for instance, where a Croatian or Ukrainian nationalist often continues to frame his national identity on his anti-Serbian or anti-Russian sentiments respectively. Such obsolete and often conflict- prone “negative” identities are no longer acceptable in today’s Europe.

Please note that Sunic accepts the reality of narrow identities and states that such identities should be accepted:

For example a Flemish national cannot be a Walloon national – just as a South Tyrolean nationalist must not be denied freedom to show his German roots to his Italian nationalist colleague.

So, what is the ethnonationalist reaction to Sunic’s reasonable essay?  We get this hysterical comment, emphasis added:


Yes, European cooperation is absolutely necessary. But different ethnic groups banded together to face off predation against other more unified powers, hence England unifying against the Vikings, Germany against the French &c. German dominance of the EU, by virtue of geography, size and industry, is a proof of the continuing legacy of ethnic division of power within Europe. Why should an Englishman want to be legislated for by Albanians or Kosovans, my European ‘brothers’?
These national divisions are reinforced by language. The United States does not contain groups of different nationalities speaking their own languages. Different ethnicities came to the U.S. and formed a new ethnic group, speaking English. If an American goes to Europe, people are not going to identify him as a genericised white, but as an American.

I can’t quite see where in Sunic’s essay that he states, suggests, or implies that Englishmen should be legislated for by “Albanians or Kosovans” or anything else. It’s pure invention; unfortunately, someone reading the comment and not the essay would think that Sunic is advocating some sort of highly centralized European super-state smothering national identifies – rather than simply advocating “European cooperation” and accepting national identities. One reason I am so hostile to ethnonationalism is my long experience with ethnonationalists and other opponents of pan-Europeanism who are typically dishonest – fundamentally dishonest.  Lies, distortion, strawmen, illogic, stupidity – the calling cards of the unrepentant ethnonationalist

And the idea that, under pan-European cooperation, Albanians or Kosovans (groups, as mostly Muslim Europeans, may not be part of the European biocultural group as defined by most WNs) are going to be browbeating Englishmen, is ludicrous.  If any group has been dictating to the English, and other Europeans, it is the Germans.  As Sunic states:

The political roots of this morbid “welcoming culture” (at the core of which is the culture of guilt) are not difficult to trace. The roots of these self-destructive policies are legally embedded in the decades following 1945. It is not difficult to imagine that the policy pursued by German Chancellor Merkel was formulated precisely to exorcise the ghosts of the nightmarish past. As a result, she may find herself compelled to shield herself by pursuing what might be called a destructive extremism going in the opposite direction.

But typical “movement” Nutzis are “not allowed” to criticize Germans, so we need to engage in fantasies about “Albanians or Kosovans.”  The idiot quoted above admits that Germans dominate the EU (their industry!  their industry!), but that’s used to justify narrow identity, while the “problem” of EU opposition to national sovereignty is from “Albanians or Kosovans.” Pathetic.

Then we have this stupidity:

The United States does not contain groups of different nationalities speaking their own languages. Different ethnicities came to the U.S. and formed a new ethnic group, speaking English. If an American goes to Europe, people are not going to identify him as a genericised white, but as an American.

What about a Negro “American” speaking English?  So, obviously race is important, the White American will be identified as a White American.   Finally, Sunic is giving a prescriptive argument, not a descriptive one, but don’t think that the ethnonationalists recognize the difference.

Until such time that ethnonationalists can conduct honest and intelligent discussions, they should be ignored and scorned.

Odds and Ends, 2/4/17

Several items.

Online comment:

That’s funny. When Obama was refusing to enforce immigration laws, and States were threatening to take matters into their own hands (AZ, for example), we were told repeatedly that immigration is the EXCLUSIVE domain of the executive branch, and they have wide authority to do whatever they want. Now that the shoe’s on the other foot, it’s suddenly illegal, and the judicial branch has to get involved.

Pleasureman right, Roissy wrong (as usual):

You are confusing 50% + 1 thresholds with 100% political affiliation, and protesting with activism. By and large the conservative base is lethargic and unimaginative, and, judging by the tea party, it is not particularly effective or smart when it does get organized.  That’s also why a feeble Republican establishment ruled them for so long despite having a long record of failure.

Explain to me how conservatives completely ceded higher education, which is broadly distributed throughout the country.  Looking elsewhere, activism within the business world is entirely driven by liberals–including extreme LGBT activism which preceded sheltering legislation and which conservatives watched win while sitting on their fat asses.  (In a few states they had votes. Then liberals outmanuevered them because slow to learn cons thought a vote was the end of the fight.)

What do conservatives do when they get active?  Retarded s**t like trying to erase evolution from bio textbooks.  This is not an indication that organizing them would yield massive dividends.

Conservatives are good for one thing:  turning out and dutifully voting, which is why liberals focus their attention on GOTV operations that bus naggers to their precincts.  Stop making excuses for them.

Roissy stupidly blames it all on “geographical concentrations.”  Look, does the Right organize even small local protests in their own areas of geographical concentration?  No. How about things that do not depend upon geography – such as national boycotts of offending companies?  When the Left does it, the companies cave in immediately, the Left is effective; in contrast, when the Right does it they are laughed at or are ignored, and have no impact whatsoever.  

The Right’s ineffectiveness at organizing at any level higher than going to the voting booth is inherent in some sociopolitical flaw, not due to “geography.”

APF conference summary  Udo Voight summarizes very well the reasons for pan-European cooperation.