Category: hypocrisy

Joan of Arc(hed Eyebrows)

And Spencer’s elbowing.

Another Greg Johnson Joan of Arc here.

Yeastbucket express!  Diabetes?  Is the yeast feeding off the excess sugar?

Excellent gamester comment:

The question of women boils down to aptitude, Women’s Aptitude. How skilled are they really?
Historically, most men thinkers have slammed women’s ability to think. There have been a lot of ways to categorize this, from “they’re like children” to “they’re intellectual copycats”. But I think the best way is this:
When I go around in my life, I listen to other people talking. Countless times I’ve heard guys discussing things like computers, business, music. I can’t recall ONCE — NOT ONCE — hearing two women discussing a world of ideas. If the world of ideas is a beach with waves of thought coming in, women are far inland in the jungle.

In this thread, the Left tries to justify “punching a Nazi.” The questions I would ask them are as follows. Since even leftist “watchdog” groups label the Nation of Islam and the New Black Panther Party as “hate groups,” how come no Antifa heroes ever attempt to sucker-punch (or elbow) a Black nationalist leader? How come they don’t try and break up a Black nationalist meeting or rally? How come they don’t physically confront all those “Black Israelites” screaming on street corners?

Cutting through the hand-waving (or silence), the answer to all those questions is two-fold. First, the violent left is not against “hatred, bigotry, and fascism” – they are simply anti-White.  Second, and more importantly, they are rightfully afraid. They know if they try any of that they’ll get a big Black fist in the face (likely worse), and, after they get out of the hospital, the same “White supremacist system” that ignores or supports attacks against the likes of Spencer would indict, convict, and imprison them for assaulting a Negro leader, after which they can end up in the prison hospital for surgery to repair a torn anal sphincter.

So, no viral videos of Black nationalists being elbowed in the face.  So how about this – NO ONE gets elbowed or sucker-punched or whatever for expressing their political opinions?  I mean, yes, for now, the System protects its street shock troops, but no one can say what the future holds.  Think of it as enlightened self-interest.

Advertisements

Stonehenge: No, No, a Thousand Times, No!

In der news.

Read this; excerpts, emphasis added:

Researchers compared DNA extracted from Neolithic human remains found across Britain with that of people alive at the same time in Europe.
The Neolithic inhabitants were descended from populations originating in Anatolia (modern Turkey) that moved to Iberia before heading north.
They reached Britain in about 4,000BC.
DNA reveals that Neolithic Britons were largely descended from groups who took the Mediterranean route, either hugging the coast or hopping from island-to-island on boats. Some British groups had a minor amount of ancestry from groups that followed the Danube route.
Although Britain was inhabited by groups of “western hunter-gatherers” when the farmers arrived in about 4,000BC, DNA shows that the two groups did not mix very much at all.

I guess the “high trust hunter gatherers” weren’t that “high trust” after all.

The British hunter-gatherers were almost completely replaced by the Neolithic farmers, apart from one group in western Scotland, where the Neolithic inhabitants had elevated local ancestry.
Genetic analysis shows that the Neolithic farmers, by contrast, were paler-skinned with brown eyes and black or dark-brown hair.

No, no, a thousand times, no!

Towards the end of the Neolithic, in about 2,450BC, the descendants of the first farmers were themselves almost entirely replaced when a new population – called the Bell Beaker people – migrated from mainland Europe. So Britain saw two extreme genetic shifts in the space of a few thousand years.

Well, they’re certainly undergoing an extreme genetic change right now.  Anyway, at least they got rid of those swarthy Neolithics – except of course for Tom Jones, very “Silurian,” he is.

Der Movement’s reaction to this news.

In Trump We Trust!

Hmm...read this.

In 2015 and 2016, we won enormous victories by attacking the enemy’s weakest points from a position of strength. In 2017 we suffered enormous defeats because we thought we could attack our enemy’s strongest points from a position of weakness. These defeats were entirely predictable, but the wrong people were making decisions.

Indeed, wrong people just like Greg Johnson.  Affirmative action cases, Quota Queens, wholly without merit.  And what were those “enormous victories” of 2015 or 2016?  Answer: None.  Nothing. This is wholly a figment of the Alt Right imagination.  As and far as “entirely predictable” goes, it was Sallis who predicted it, while Johnson and all the rest were firmly on the Alt Right bandwagon.

Since then, the consensus has been to return to what worked: metapolitics, which includes community building, online propaganda, and Identitarian-style activism, which aims to maximize impacts on the public mind while minimizing risks and costs to activists. We can’t outgun the enemy. We can’t outspend them. But we can out-argue them. We can be cooler, cleverer, and funnier.

You can be, but you’re not.

White Nationalists win every fair debate.

Except against Sallis. Indeed, Johnson is so good at debating that he “bans” people from his blog for writing things he doesn’t agree with. And as regards the Alt Right as a whole, certainly, screaming “Pepe! Kek!” is a debating style that rivals Lincoln vs. Douglas.

Second, the only way the establishment could censor and deplatform us completely is to shut down the internet…

Nonsense.  China doesn’t “shut down the Internet” but they do a pretty good job of stifling dissent.  Oh well, don’t worry about it…just send in those “D’Nations.”

How’s that Arctic Alliance coming along, Derbyshire? I mean, outside of your bedroom.

Listen to this. I like the part where Kersey says that “White nationalism” shouldn’t be used because it has been demonized.  We need a new label!  As if any term you come up with wouldn’t also be immediately demonized by the Left. 

An online comment to Durocher from a self-declared  “empathetic” minority –

I’m just a random nobody minority that likes to see what White Nationalists (whom I empathize) and White Supremacists are talking about, and one thing I find curious is how enthralled some are by Nordicism. Even the non-Nordics and overall “Euro-mutts” have this fantastical Nordic vision, which is really a channeling of Hitlerism (can’t even call it Nazism because it goes beyond the politic surrounding Germanic Nordicism, but pure obsession with what’s believed to be Aryan – and Hitlerism because he’s the closet to the ideology that most are familiar with).
It’s funny how a certain group of whites have committed to reducing anything good about white people to Nordics.

It’s more funny that lunatics like the plagiarist Andrew Hamilton actually declared that a “movement” fundamentally based on Nordicist doctrine is somehow “anti-Nordicist” (and I suppose the ADL and AIPAC are anti-Jewish).  Meanwhile, sane observers note that Der Movement and Nordicsm are virtually synonymous, and even Patrik Hermansson observed that HopeNotHate leveraged “movement” obsessions by choosing a Swede to do the infiltration. By the way, it was my pointing that out (and my call for accountability for failed “movement” “leaders”) that got me “banned” from Counter-Currents, in case readers of EGI Notes are unaware of that.  You can find that at the comments thread here.  Johnson cannot “fairly debate” that the “movement” got hoist by its Nordicist petard.

A Call for Desegregation and Other Matters

Observations.  In all cases, emphasis added.

The great and good Jew Judge Sand destroyed Yonkers via “desegregation.”  Very well. I agree: We need desegregation!  Homogeneous communities are unacceptable!  I say we start here.

Let’s build some nice low income housing there, and bring in lots of poor Black and Hispanic families.  Mix it up!  The vibrant diversity will flourish in New Square!  Why not?  Can someone explain why New Square must be bereft of diversity?  New Square would also seem to be a perfect place for relocating refugees and other migrants.  Central Americans, Somalis, Syrians…the more the better.  They deserve a chance at a new life, no?  We can have some nice Black boys in New Square to date the Jewish girls, and nice Catholic Hispanic girls for the Jewish boys.  Again, can someone on the Left please explain to us why that should not occur?  Why don’t you go to New Square and not leave – make your stand! – until the community is properly desegregated? 

Notre Dame as an analogy for the fall of the West?  Perhaps. Blame Der Movement for that – squandering the last chance we’ve had to save race and civilization.  Notre Dame crashing and burning – just like the Alt Right. And do you think it would make any difference if the French authorities would find evidence of terrorism there and admit it?  Whites would enthusiastically flock to the streets – to demand more immigration, protect their Muslim “brothers and sisters” from a “backlash,” and vote to turn what’s left of the church into a mosque. 

An example of a stupid bastard.  Whither those big Nord Brains, Durocher?

Agreed (except for the praise of the Unz site):

Niccolo Salo says: • WebsiteNext New Comment

April 15, 2019 at 2:42 pm GMT • 100 Words

Who is this fucking clown? Hilarious shit.

“If there is even a partial biological basis to (northwest) Europeans’ psychology, which in turn underpins Western culture in all its uniqueness, then the genetic replacement and dissolution of this population through immigration will, eventually, mean the end of that psychology and culture.”

Imagine assigning the greatness of Western Civ to Nords like this guy does.

I read Unz Review daily because it does deliver a lot of quality but this piece has to be one of the most embarrassingly bad ones that I’ve ever come across here.

Congrats Monsieur Durocher.

Meet Ron Unz.  Unz:

…few forces that could so easily break America as the coming of white nationalism.

Johnson and Durocher write for this Jew.  Disgusting.  Now, knowing these type, I can imagine their riposte. First, we’ll be told that my comments (from yesterday) about Pierce not tolerating WN 2.0 hijinks is “low information moralizing” because Pierce dealt with the Jew publisher Lyle Stuart.  Next, we’ll be told that Unz criticizes Jews and allows writers at his site to do the same, so any criticism of the Unz site is more “low information moralizing.” Let’s consider each argument in turn.

From what I can gather about Stuart, he was a type often found in his tribe – intentionally provocative and attention seeking.  Under the banner of being an advocate of unrestricted free speech, Stuart published a wide variety of controversial books on many topics. He was not an ideologue, he did not try to steer Far Right thought in any direction, and he certainly didn’t fund individual “thinkers” to promote a specific worldview.  The Unz site,on the other hand, does indeed promote a spexific worldview that is,ultimately congenial to Jewish interests.  And as far as criticism of Jews goes, that’s not what “rightist”-oriented Jews fear. The main enemy  for them is pan-European nationalism that unites all Whites and excludes Jews.  

Allowing criticism of Jews so as to attract “anti-Semites” to participate in the anti-WN and anti-pan-European HBD project is just sound strategy. I suppose the Quota Queens haven’t noticed that Unz and the various “Amren Jews” – Hart. Weissberg, Levin, etc. – all seem to share certain memetic characteristics.  All are HBDers, all are “race realists,” all would tend to praise Jewish and Asian IQ, all have some level of distaste for hardcore White nationalism, all would seem to favor Jeurasian “cognitive elitism” over pan-European nationalism.  Let’s look at some people funded by Unz.  Greg Cochran, who muses that Israel should conquer Italy for Jewish lebensraum and who, if I recall correctly, was skeptical of “Salterism.”  Steve Sailer – anti-WN “citizenist” and prime HBDer.  “Razib” Khan – whose GNXP was a prime opponent of WN, promoter of “cognitive elitism, and which delighted in attacking any and all manifestations of pan-Europeanism in favor of intra-White division. GNXP also featured scurrilous attacks against Salter. “The Unz Review” has columns by the despicable Jayman – a non-White HBDer who – just like GNXP – attacks Salter, attacks White ethnics, and promotes intra-White division.  Then we have the Judeophile Derbyshire, a prime HBDer who thinks Amren conference attendees are “latrine flies” and who has written in support of miscegenation.  See any underlying connection, perhaps?

So…are you still going to equate Unz with Stuart?  Are you still going to argue that Unz is A-OK because some criticism of Jews can sometimes be found at his site?

You are all absolutely despicable.

Genome sequences are known for two archaic hominins-Neanderthals and Denisovans-which interbred with anatomically modern humans as they dispersed out of Africa. We identified high-confidence archaic haplotypes in 161 new genomes spanning 14 island groups in Island Southeast Asia and New Guinea and found large stretches of DNA that are inconsistent with a single introgressing Denisovan origin. Instead, modern Papuans carry hundreds of gene variants from two deeply divergent Denisovan lineages that separated over 350 thousand years ago. Spatial and temporal structure among these lineages suggest that introgression from one of these Denisovan groups predominantly took place east of the Wallace line and continued until near the end of the Pleistocene. A third Denisovan lineage occurs in modern East Asians. This regional mosaic suggests considerable complexity in archaic contact, with modern humans interbreeding with multiple Denisovan groups that were geographically isolated from each other over deep evolutionary time.

Hmmm…read this.

The only concern shown for the white majority is how to keep them placated as their communities are torn apart by immigration, how to keep them silent when they get angry, and how to keep them from feeling racial solidarity in the face of overwhelming hordes of hostile foreign races swarming into the countries of their ancestors without their consent.

Like giving them a $1000 per month handout? I don’t expect folks who sell out to a millionaire Jew to see any inconsistency in their blog’s positions.

Read this. And in the West, demographics are replacing humans with monkeys.

And so it goes.

Odds and Ends

Observations.

On the one hand, White nationalists are routinely mocked as follows – “They’re a bunch of losers who identify with White historical accomplishments because they have no personal accomplishments of their own.” On the other hand, we as a nation enthusiastically celebrate “Black History Month,” and smile benignly as some inarticulate Negro takes pride in the fact that Tyrone Carjacker invented a new brand of malt liquor. Inconsistent much?

Dostoevsky certainly was familiar with Jews and Jewish phenotypes.  We find the following in his classic Crime and Punishment:

His face wore that perpetual look of peevish dejection, which is sourly printed on all faces of Jewish race without exception.

I’m sure everyone knows the look to which he refers – consider Anthony Weiner or Ruth Bader Ginsburg as examples. Or one can envision the great Professor Hart cursing at David Duke as another example of the phenotypic trend in question.

Behold the female: The Inventor!

Holmes, now 35, and Theranos’s former chief operating officer, Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, have a pending criminal fraud case against them in a federal court in San Jose, the heart of Silicon Valley. If prosecutors have their way, the two may go to prison over charges that they defrauded investors, doctors, and patients.

Agency, agency!  Remember – we got to get girls interested in STEM careers!  Who knows what we are missing out on!  And we need more South Asian cognitive elitists as well!

I admit to feeling some degree of schadenfreude over the collapse of Theranos.  Even some rightist, anti-feminist women I know were getting all excited over Holmes, and now I get to rub their faces in it.  Petty and malicious? Well, after all, “movement leaders” have called me “crazy and bitter,” so it all fits.

Of course, “there is no such thing as race;” and “we are all biologically, genetically the same,” and yet we need “diversity” in genetics studies because…genetic differences in human populations (that just happen to track most closely with race).  But don’t you get any nasty ideas that you can explain health disparities by these differences, no sir, it’s all due to dat dere “racism.”

Couple thoughts on Spencer
1. Who else called Trump better?

Answer: Ted Sallis. When Spencer was yelling “Hail Trump!,” I was writing (for months by that time) that Trump was a fraud, a buffoon, a race cuck, a huckster.  The new revisionist history – “Spencer was right about Trump all along.”  No, he wasn’t.

As bad as Pierce was, he was still a whole lot better than the “leaders” we have today.  Pierce – who had a physics PhD and briefly worked in academia and in industry before becoming a full-time activist – at least had some degree of intellectual heft and gravitas.  What we have today is nothing more than a bad joke.

Speaking of jokes, while I identify more with Rorschach in The Watchmen, I can’t disagree with The Comedian – “It’s all a joke.” Indeed it is.  Can anyone take our current society seriously?  The pathetic, mewling, weak White race seriously?  Der Movement seriously?

Turn On, Tune In, Drop Out

In der news.

In contrast to this leftist advice, the rightist version:

Turn On: Focus your energies on your own life, your own family, your own health, and your own career.

Tune In: Keep track of “movement” goings on by reading blogs, websites, etc.

Drop Out: Drop out from Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise). Do NOT actively participate in “movement” “activism” until such time that the “movement” and its “leaders” prove themselves worthy.  Also drop out of mainstream politics and culture until such time that it is no longer anti-White.  

First Ride the Tiger, then when the time is right, Kill the Tiger.

More leftist hypocrisy – We are told that it was wrong for Senator Anning to strike teen-aged “egger” Will Connolly in self-defense because Connolly is a “child.” However, it is the height of moral righteousness for people, including wealthy celebrities, to advocate violence against the teen-aged Nick Sandmann because of a perception that Sandmann was “smirking” at some obnoxious Indian (feather, not dot). OK, got it.

A S. Italian cooks lasagna.  You know those wops like that stuff.  Bop, Bop, Bop!

So pontificates a former illegal alien whose marriage has brought in more non-White blood to America.

Oh the horror!  Females have “agency” because…Joan of Arc.  

See this, emphasis added:

Mr Meener

out of all non whites I do not mind chinks japs etc. they stay among themselves cause no trouble. women are hot and ultra feminine. they want to imitate us not destroy us. also who the f#ck wants non whites to assimilate? so they can bang your daughter? let them stay in their own areas

Once again, Sallis is right.  Asians pimp out their women to influence White males to hold pro-Asian attitudes.

How Asians win awards.  Let’s take another look at those PISA scores as well, shall we?

Settled fact – White ethnics are worse than Blacks:

I definitely never intended to say America had always been a country of immigrants and never a nation. It could even be argued that southern whites are still (barely) a nation. The fatal blow was struck by the hordes of diverse (white) immigrants in 1880-1920 who ended up being far more destructive soldiers against the American nation than the blacks ever were or could have been.

This gamester idiot was comparing northern cities (Boston, New York) with an entire general region of the country (the South) to make the “argument” that founding stock Americans did demographically better surrounded by Blacks than by the dreaded White ethnics.  Let’s switch that around and compare the general regions of New England or the Mid-Atlantic with individual cities such as Atlanta or Birmingham.  Dat right!

Tell me again that there is no affirmative action program in Der Movement.  By the way, are the Full Metal Jerkoff shabbos sud stepandfetichits paying attention?  Hey guys, you wrecked your military careers for nothing – actually, for less than nothing, for people who despise you and consider you lower than Negroes.

Hey, it’s not 20-20 hindsight at EGI Notes, where all you suckers were told before the election that Trump was a fraud, a race cuck, and a buffoon.  But, no, we can’t listen to the low caste Sallis, instead we’ll all sit enthralled and starry-eyed as the Quota Queens shuck and jive.

Dat dere Traditionalism!  He’s right.  That wonderful “Tradition” led us to the disaster of today.  Then again, we know that Der Movement loves to make the same mistakes over and over again, so why not Tradition?

This linked here is a reasonably good video, and I agree with most points.  Not with the optimism at the end though.  We’re done – unless a New Movement arises and replaces the clownshow of Der Movement, Inc., a money-making enterprise.

Roissy is demented:

I pray for the Trump Rampage.

Sure…the “rampage” will include Trump enthusiastically signing an executive order banning “White supremacism,” and his first MAGA victory will be shutting down Chateau Heartiste, the domain name of which will be given to a Feminist-SJW-Open Borders-Antifa organization.  All Hall the God Emperor!

Yet another violent Sicilian.  Bop, Bop, Bop!

Terrorism and the Mendacity of the Left

They promote terrorism by excluding ideological opponents from participation in the political process.

Amren, 3/18/19.  That you saw before at Sallis, 3/16/19.

The best way to prevent terrorism is to allow dissidents to fairly participate in the political process, politics being broadly defined to include all activity related to power and influence and their acquisition. Conversely, the best way to promote terrorism is to exclude people from the political arena, leaving them no alternative than to engage in violence.

The Left has systematically excluded the Far Right from access to the political process. Let’s consider White Nationalists. These people are deplatformed, censored, their leaders physically attacked with impunity, meetings shut down, speeches prevented, and rallies attacked, and in some countries merely expressing these ideas are illegal (what some want in America as well).  In Australia, a Senator, an elected official, was physically assaulted in an act of political violence (*), and the Prime Minister of that nation supports the assault, praises the attacker, and wants the victim legally persecuted because he struck back in self-defense – all for the crime of being a “nationalist.”

In general, this repression preceded the acts of terror being used to justify the repression and to justify further repression. Things similar to the Australian “egging” have always occurred on a regular basis before New Zealand – always attacks by the Left against the Right.

The Left claims that White nationalism needs to be suppressed because random acts of terrorism have occurred; the reality is that those acts of terrorism have occurred precisely because White nationalism has been suppressed.  Cause and effect are reversed as a part of typical leftist gaslighting.

Also note that leftist terrorism is never invoked as a rationale to ban Far Left political parties or to legally persecute leftists. Islamic terrorism is met with calls for “more understanding” and “more integration” – no one is banned or deplatformed. Islamic parties exist in Europe. Despite terrorist attacks in Europe, those parties are not banned. No Antifa show up at rallies or meetings of those parties. And Antifa itself is not persecuted; curiously enough, the government of the allegedly “racist fascist” Trump coddles Antifa and legally persecutes Antifa’s victims. Antifa itself celebrates Marxist mass murderers and terrorists. Indeed, despite being characterized by political violence and terrorism in the 1960s and 70s (never mind the horrors of communism), the Left is now dominant in the Establishment of what used to the West.

On a more fundamental racial level in the USA, acts of violence by BLM supporters have not resulted in targeting of that movement by the System; instead, BLM gets support. The Zebra murders did not result in the banning of Black Muslims; no one dares deplatform or censor them, and the idea of their rallies being broken up by Antifa is comically ludicrous, as is the idea that some soyboy would dare ”egg” any Black nationalist leader.

It only White nationalism that is held responsible for rare acts of lone wolf violence, and that is because White nationalism was already repressed before the violence – the violence, which is a result of the repression, is used to not only retroactively justify the past repression but to proactively justify even more repression.

Let’s put it this way: What came first – Richard Spencer having to cancel his college speaking tour or the New Zealand attack?  What came first – deplatforming and censorship or the New Zealand attack?  What came first – an endless series of cancelled Amren and VDARE meetings, or the New Zealand attack?  Shall I continue?

That is why political violence and terrorism by the Left and/or Coloreds is never met with banning, deplatforming, censorship, denunciations by the US Congress, hysteria by the Australian Prime Minster, any of it.  It’s not the rare acts of violence by isolated Nutzi types that really bothers these people.  That’s just an excuse; again, it’s a rationale to justify their pre-existing hostility toward the ideology of White nationalism and the people who believe in it. On a deeper level, it is a rationale to justify their pre-existing hatred of White people and the desire to see Whites demographically and cultural replaced.

*”He was only ‘egged’ so it is no big deal,” the Left says.  Really?  What do they think would happen if they tried to “egg” a US President?  One could imagine the screaming if an Alt Righter “egged” Her Majesty AOC. Forget about people – imaging the anguished screaming if a Nutzi “egged” the statue of Saint Martin of King.  Look, it doesn’t matter if you believe that “it is not a big deal.” The attack on Anning was a physical assault in the service of political ideology; hence, it can be termed terrorism.  

Also see this.

Whither Jewish Genetics

Labels do not represent reality.

Gee…now that Amren has covered this, what about this (emphasis added):

Recent genomic studies that have identified a component of distinctive ancestry for Jewish individuals have largely focused on Ashkenazi Jews sampled in the United States in relation to the broader European-American population [7, 8, 9, 10], finding most recently that individuals with even partial Ashkenazi ancestry can be detected on the basis of principal components analysis [10]. Our study furthers the results of these studies by showing that a distinctive component of genomic ancestry extends to Jewish populations more broadly.

A simple explanation for the clustering of the Jewish populations is that this pattern is the consequence of shared ancestry with an ancestral Middle Eastern group…Bayesian clustering with Structure assigns the Jewish populations and the Palestinians to the same cluster (Figure 2), and by the relatively close placement of the Palestinians and the Jewish populations in MDS plots of individual distances (Figure 5). This genetic similarity, which is supported by several previous studies [12, 65, 66], is compatible with a similar Middle Eastern origin of the Jewish populations and the Palestinians.

I guess not.  More likely is perhaps an analysis of the hora-dancing genes of Romanians.  As I’ve said before, it is the inconsistency I find objectionable. If you want to talk about Iberian ancestry, all well and good, but then you should talk about Jewish ancestry as well.  If you focus on the former while always studiously ignoring the latter then people will justifiably question why.

Also, consider this – some ancestry testing companies, including 23andMe, label Ashkenazi Jewish genetics as “European;” thus, to them, 100% Ashkenazi Jewish = 100% European.  In other words, a Middle Eastern ethnic group that has some European admixture, a group with genetic similarity to Palestinians, is considered “European” (presumably because the most recent historical location of this ethny was scattered among the peoples of Europe, just as are the Roma).

On the other hand, authentic indigenous European ethnies that are not adequately represented by parental population samples are described as a mix of mostly European with some “admixture,” despite the fact that it would make more ethnic-historical sense to label the genepools of those ethnies as “100% European” than it would to label the Palestinian-like Ashkenazi genepool as “100% European.”

Thus, a company has adequate Ashkenazi parental population coverage (Jews are always analyzing their own genetics, so there’s plenty of data for Jewish genetic normalization) and decides, arbitrarily, to label this ethny as European, so – presto! – they are “European,” while other populations that are indigenous to Europe, and whose genepools should therefore be described as European, are instead represented as composites of whatever populations that happen to be in the company’s parental sample base.

It is a complete inversion of reality, absolute madness.

On the great Jack Vance – a thousand times better than Tolkien.

The God Emperor is kosher indeed. MIGA – Make Israel Great Again

This will, of course, do nothing but make the HBD Alt Wrong support Trump all the more.

Hey, Strom, do you still think that “Putin is playing a deep game?”

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Sallis: Right, right, he’s always right.

But, ah, it really doesn’t matter, does it?

The thing that annoys me about all these fellows is that they can never admit being wrong.  That hints at some flaw of character.  Perhaps they believe that admitting error shows weakness, but I believe the opposite – a refusal to admit obvious error is what demonstrates weakness.

Speaking of the syndrome of grossly mistaken hero worship, here’s cuck nagger Steve King.

And speaking of always being wrong, the “movement” – having learned nothing from Nixon, Reagan, Ron Paul, Putin, and Trump – is now championing Tulsi – The Yeastbucket on Pacific Island Coconut Tree Syndrome.

Der Movement’s affirmative action program is real and it is destructive – thanks a lot readers for enabling it.