Category: hypocrisy

God Emperor Update

In all cases, emphasis added.

Given the links between support for Trump, immigration control, Der Movement, right-wing populism, and System resistance to all of the preceding, news concerning Trump and his shockingly inept and disorganized “leadership” is of course relevant to White EGI.  Hence, this blog will continue to turn a critical eye toward Der Movement’s beloved “God Emperor” regardless of the worshipful fanboy crowd that whines in dismay about “blackpilling” (or whatever other juvenile phrase they utter in between picking up diseased sluts in bars or drinking hard liquor in loft apartments [or in their parent’s basements]).

Read this.  Even IF the quotes are false, the underlying truths behind them remain the same.  What here is practically false?  Not much, I believe.

The New York Times published an essay Wednesday that the newspaper said was written by a “senior official” in the Trump administration, supporting a central claim in Bob Woodward’s forthcoming book: members of the president’s staff are actively working to subvert him.

Spencer is one of the few people in Der Movement willing to utter any (even mild) criticism of the lumbering idiotic vulgar ignorant buffoon Trump:

I wonder what would have happened if Donald Trump had appointed people who actually believe in his agenda?

Indeed.  But, hey, Trump has only “hired the best people” like he promised, eh?  And it’s “mission accomplished” over MAGA, no?  Interesting that the Big Mac-guzzling dullard Trump thinks it’s “mission accomplished” when he’s actually accomplished practically nothing, and his own staff is actively sabotaging him.

The unnamed official painted a portrait of a divided White House because of misgivings over the behavior of President Trump himself.

“The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations,” the author of the piece wrote. 

Of course he doesn’t “fully grasp” this, or anything else.  Unlike the liars of Der Movement, some of whom would wish to rewrite history whenever they rarely do criticize their bloated god Trump, EGI Notes has been critical of Trump from the very beginning.  When others foamed at the mouth that “Trump is the last chance for White America” and designated Trump as an “American Caesar” leading the USA to an “Indian summer” of “greatness” and “demographic stability,” it was the “crazy and bitter” Ted Sallis who was telling you that Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon, couldn’t be trusted, etc.  Who was right?  Who was wrong?  Who is always right?  Who is always wrong?

“The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making,” the author states. “Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.”

Yeah sure: those are “conservative ideals.”  No doubt, eh?  Let’s consider each in turn.  Free minds.  So, “conservative Republicans” support free speech and free dissident expression in the USA and throughout the world?  They speak out against, and pass legislation against, deplatforming and social pricing attacks?  They oppose Internet censorship?  They oppose “hate speech” laws, particularly those extant in Europe that certainly shut down all those “free minds?” They’ve spoken up in defense of the rights of Der Movement?  Free markets.  Well, sure, if it is Big Business making money off the destruction of America, then the GOP is all for it, but how “free” are the markets with Chinese protectionism and currency manipulation?  Free people.  Oh, so the GOP opposes the EU throwing people in prison for speech and political beliefs?  They’ve spoken up against that?  They oppose the persecution of Fields by Antifa Jeff Sessions?  They think that the Right should be free to assemble in public without being attacked by Sessions’ leftist thug pets?  Get back to me about all of that, please.

“The individual behind this piece has chosen to deceive, rather than support, the duly elected President of the United States,” Sanders said in a statement. “He is not putting country first, but putting himself and his ego ahead of the will of the American people. This coward should do the right thing and resign.”

Trump then returned to Twitter, where he offered a more succinct criticism of the official who had written the essay.

Twitter.  There’s a problem right there – a President who does nothing except tweet like a teenage jackass.

The “good old boys network” continues to roll along, as both Coulter (one of the boys, no doubt) and Derbyshire (likely of lower testosterone levels) continue to support the vile Antifa Jeff Sessions.

Both of these retards should consider that there are people on the Right who oppose Sessions not because of the “Russia investigation” but because he is an inert do-nothing for anything and everything except to persecute rightists and to voice support for leftist domestic terrorists.  Indeed, his past in Alabama, discussed here previously, showed him in bed with the SPLC against White activists.  I’ll go along with “Zman” here and consider quota queen Jeff as an establishment “mole” doing what he can to wreck right-wing populism.

As to all the supposed “good” the lifeless Sessions is “accomplishing” re: immigration, nothing prevents Trump from filling the position with someone else as good or better in that regard.  Do it now, when the GOP still controls Congress…but, then again, reading the above, it is clear the GOP would likely sabotage any future rightist appointments. 

Regardless of these practical matters, it is still right and proper for those on the Right to criticize that which deserves to be criticized.

Advertisements

Alt Right Decay and Other News

More odds and ends.

I must have missed all of this when I was offline. Very interesting.

Please note the mention of July 22, likely related to this.

I mean, how much does Sallis have to be right over and over and over again before all you rank-and-file activist retards (yes, that’s appropriate if you don’t change your ways) wake up and realize that all your leaders are pitifully inept and morally obtuse?  It’s one defeat after another (and I’m not even going to get into Kessler being publicly humiliated by his father, since he’s living with his parents and obviously too dense to realize that if they oppose his views he probably shouldn’t be podcasting out of their home, particularly when they are there) – they are all hopeless.  They are pure – PURE – affirmative action appointments, and it are all of you, dear retards, who are the ones doing the appointing.  Keep it up and soon the “movement” will end up consisting of two guys wearing clown suits, throwing pies in each others’ faces, as the Guk audience laughs it up.

And, no, Greg, being a purebred mountain wop didn’t save you from being the middleman in another “movement” fiasco.  These Stepandfetchit Shabbos Suds never learn. You’re just not “leadership material.”  You are just a lowly pawn, not a Quota Queen.  No, not a “general,” maybe a “lieutenant.”  But only the latter as long as you keep your girlfriend around.

Also see this.

Eulogy for the Alt Right: this is absolutely hilarious, Semitic gold.  Oy vey!

Altright.com: stick a fork in it. 

Who was it who termed the Alt Right as “Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism?”  Who was it who criticized the immaturity of all these nitwits?  Who predicted (and hoped for) the collapse of the “Alt Right brand?”  Who was it who warned that equating White nationalism with the Alt Right was a deadly mistake (at the same time that others, who now make believe they were always disdainful of the Alt Right brand, were writing that “the Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all”)?

Readers of this blog know the answer to those questions, eh?

Outrageous hypocrisy: this from someone advocating Europeans ethnic cleansing each other. Is it wise for any of these types suggesting that their ideological opponents are motivated by personal issues?  One can point the finger in many directions as far as that goes.

And this reminds me how amused I was with people taking sides in the Greg Johnson vs. Richard Spencer feud.  From my perspective, the two of them are the same.  As a Jack Vance character would say: “it is all one.”  These are all failed leaders killing your race, my race, our race.  And YOU allow them to.  Can you look at yourself in the mirror?

Let’s rewrite:

“Remember you are an Englishman and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life.” — Cecil Rhodes, British imperialist, 1910

New: 

“Remember you are ethnically an Englishman (or of related stock) and have consequently won automatic elevation to leadership of Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise)” – Ted Sallis, disgusted Nutzi swarthoid, 2018

Another cogelite.  Colored is as colored does: the South-South alliance continues.

Mission accomplished!  Trump believes he’s made American great again, already, you know, with continued unchecked Third World immigration, both legal and illegal, Antifa rioting in the streets with impunity, a Far Left Attorney General, his own sky-high disapproval ratings, White dispossession on schedule, and a Left culturally triumphant at every step.

But, hey, he pardoned Jack Johnson so, as he says, mission accomplished!

Never forget that Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise) labeled Trump “the God Emperor” and while that designation may have been tongue-in-cheek, the statements that he was “the last chance for White America” and an “American Caesar who will stabilize White demographics” were not.

Red Chile: More racial delusions – another retarded Amren article on race.

Chile has never lost a war, and today its technologically advanced, well equipped, and well trained military is feared and envied by its neighbors.

Yes, that feared Chilean military.  How about a war with a European nation and we’ll see how that turns out?

In the 19th century, Chile decisively defeated its two northern neighbors Bolivia and Peru…

Another great moment in military history; the campaigns of a Caesar, Napoleon, or von Manstein are nothing compared to that.

Chile is 88.9 percent white, 9.1 percent Araucano Indian, and 2 percent other—almost entirely composed of other much smaller Amerindian nations.

And then he cites population genetics studies that demonstrate that most of those “Whites” are actually mestizos.

A Chilean who is 50 percent Italian, 25 percent Basque, and 25 percent Greek would be considered white as well—though his skin may be darker than a Chilean who is actually less European, such as one who is 10 percent Araucano, 10 percent Incan, 50 percent Spanish, and 30 percent Belgian.

Gasp!  OMG!  Note the word “may.”  Yes, and an Englishman “may” have skin darker than a light-skinned Korean, and a planet in the Andromeda galaxy “may” be made of yellow cheese.

Because of the large presence of Mediterranean whites, the genotype and phenotype of whiteness in Chile do not correlate as neatly as in the Anglosphere. The result of this is that Chileans have a “big tent” view of whiteness…

You see what is going on here.  All sorts of Latino and NEC mixed-racers eagerly try and grasp onto “Med” coattails to prove how very “White” they are.  Here’s the bottom line: compare a “White” Chilean to the base parental populations from Europe – mostly Spanish and Basque, but perhaps some Italians and others as well, and get back to me.  Oh wait, it’s already been done, with the cited population genetics papers.

And as far as the pictures go, Navarro and Vidal are clearly non-White, by any European standard (including swarthoid ones), so I’m not sure what the point is there, except to confirm that the “big tent” view of Whiteness of Chile does not correlate to anywhere in Europe, not only the “Anglosphere.”

In Bed with the Press

A bit of inconsistency.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Remember when Johnson was criticizing activists for “giving time and access to journalists?”

What is the point of giving time and access to journalists — whom we should regard as enemy combatants — just so they can decorate the same old boilerplate about “hate” with a few fresh facts to make their mental poison more palatable?

But when the journalist is named Patrik Jonsson (no, I’m not making this up) and when the chance comes to critique Richard Spencer, the time you will give!

More than a few blame Kessler – and the Charlottesville protests.

“The people at Unite The Right who were doxxed, injured, arrested, harassed, fired from their jobs, shunned by their families, and in one case driven to suicide had a lot of illusions stripped away from them. A lot of them are understandably bitter,”…

They’re bitter, but it’s understandable, unlike Sallis, whose bitterness – after more than twenty years of dealing with “movement” failure – is “crazy.”

…says Greg Johnson, editor-in-chief of the alt-right website Counter-Currents, who says the movement has dramatically contracted due to poor leadership…

I agree on that.

…and strategically unsound activism like the Charlottesville rally. “A huge number of people who attended and who watched the disaster from a distance simply disappeared from the movement…. But most of them will be back when the movement offers them a new way forward.”

A new way?

Here, Johnson provides the entire interview.  Let’s take a look.

How would you describe the size and strength of the Alt Right movement now versus a year ago at Charlottesville?

We have to distinguish the Alt Right from the larger white Identitarian movement. The greater movement is growing, driven largely by the conflicts and alienation created by increasing diversity. The Alt Right has dramatically contracted, largely because of bad leadership and strategically unsound activism like Unite the Right and Richard Spencer’s college tour: basically any sort of event that involves announcing our plans

Like announcing the date and city of private meetings so leftist activists can go from hotel to hotel looking for attendees.

…and presence in advance to the enemy, which makes us vulnerable to criminal antifa harassment, and that burns up large amounts of money on legal bills and travel.

The people who have left the Alt Right have not, however, gone back to the political mainstream. Once we change minds, nobody changes them back. Instead, these people are watching and waiting for a new brand or vehicle to mobilize them.

A new brand leading to another dead end.

What was the impact of the Unite the Right Rally on the Alt Right movement?

It divided the Right. The problems were predictable, and the people who predicted them (people like me) gained credibility. The people who did not predict them, or who dismissed and shouted down criticism, have lost credibility and followers.

Hmmm….so people who make sound predictions about problems and issues have credibility, but those who do not make such predictions, or who make wrong predictions (Trump as an American Caesar solidifying White demographics and stabilizing the System) lose credibility? 

Many people went into the rally with several illusions.

First, they believed that the event had far-sighted and intelligent organizers who cared enough about the marchers to anticipate problems, inform them of dangers, and have contingency plans in place in case things went wrong. That turned out to be false. It is not that the organizers were stupid…

Well…

…but they did not communicate or work well together, with predictable results.

Second, they believed that the police would do their jobs, not collaborate with criminal antifa mobs to create violence. At Unite the Right, every injury including the death of Heather Heyer, is ultimately the fault of the city government of Charlottesville for allowing violent Leftists to riot.

Third, they weren’t serious. They thought this was a game. They thought that we were on a roll, and nothing could stop them. They did not anticipate the personal consequences of participating.

The people at Unite the Right who were doxxed, injured, arrested, harassed, fired from their jobs, shunned by their families, and in one case driven to suicide had a lot of illusions stripped away from them. A lot of them are understandably bitter.

Understandably bitter.  Unlike the “crazy and bitter” Sallis.

A huge number of people who attended and who watched the disaster from a distance simply disappeared from the movement. They disappeared from social media. But most of them will be back when the movement offers them a new way forward.

Yet another failure.

Unite the Right and subsequent events of its type were a kind of crazed potlatch ceremony, in which people danced around a bonfire while the movement’s capital – social capital, money, institutions, webzines, etc. – laboriously accumulated over years, was immolated by narcissistic e-celebs who tried to transmute it into mainstream media publicity.

It will take the movement years to recover from the bad decisions of 2017. I doubt that Richard Spencer and his various operations like the National Policy Institute will recover at all.

Spencer, Spencer, Spencer…

What are the factions within the movement, and what is the dynamic between those factions?

There are too many to keep track of, really. But the most important factional difference today is Richard Spencer and his three remaining supporters versus the rest of the movement. 

Spencer, Spencer, Spencer…

Many people contributed to the disasters of 2017, but I think Spencer will end up taking all of the blame…

Spencer, Spencer, Spencer…

…since his past associates and allies – The Daily Stormer, The Right Stuff, Red Ice, Arktos Media, Identity Evropa – have backed slowly out of the room, and he is the last man left holding the Alt Right banner.

Who promoted the idea that the Alt Right is White nationalism?

Have goals and priorities changed in the last year? If so, who/what is driving that shift?

A dual consensus is building.

(1) We need to focus on what was working well for us before Unite the Right and the Spencer tour, namely metapolitics and also street actions on the European Identitarian model, which are not announced in advance and thus do not attract criminal violence from antifa.

(2) We need to get away from self-marginalizing neo-Nazi goon squad buffoonery. Adopting foreign ideologies and symbols is not a solution to rootlessness but a symptom of it. The way forward for white identitarians everywhere is to graft their movements on the political traditions and symbols of their homelands.

Traditions and symbols that have failed and led us to the current fiasco.

In the United States, we had immigration and naturalization policies that were committed to maintaining a white supermajority until 1965. We had two mass deportations of Mexicans in the 20th century, neither of which led to genocide. Every policy necessary to Make America White Again was already the law of the land at one time or another. We simply need to bring back and perfect these policies.

Bring back policies that have failed and failed again.

There has been a shift toward private versus public events. Does this new tack mean that antifa has been successful? Or is it just pushing the movement underground where it can grow more rapidly without being thwarted?

Antifa violence is merely pushing the movement underground where it can grow more rapidly without being thwarted.

I have always organized private rather than public events to protect our attendees and venues from criminal Left-wing violence. Antifa is only successful because their lawlessness is enabled by collaborators within the system who wish to crush dissent. Antifa are just the paramilitary arm of the Left-wing oligarchy. But this varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. When the government does its job – as it did at the American Renaissance Conference at Montgomery Bell State Park in Tennessee in April of 2018 – political dissidents can gather in a safe, non-violent environment.

I do believe that the overall shift toward private meetings will foster more rapid growth, for three main reasons.

First, people who have something to lose are hesitant to attend public events. Private events can, of course, have infiltrators and cranks. 

Never fear!  There will be extreme vetting!  If you’re Swedish, a self-declared movie critic, or the girlfriend of some random guy – it’s all good, you’re in!

But they are generally safer. This means that more people will be willing to meet for fellowship, education, and collaboration. Which means our community will grow stronger and launch new initiatives.

Second, large public events which attract people from all over the country and the globe are very expensive. If only 1,000 people attended Unite the Right, the costs of travel, food, and lodging alone probably topped half-a-million dollars. I know of a number of people who came from as far away as Scandinavia to attend. Then after the event, there were the legal bills, medical bills, loss of income, etc. Unite the Right probably set the movement back a cool million dollars. 

How many millions of dollars has VDARE set the movement back?

Enough to employ 20 full-time content creators at a comfortable middle-class living standard for a year. 

Anyone in particular in mind?

All of that money went out of the movement into the system. All for a public relations catastrophe.

Where’s the VDARE money going?

How much money was spent on Richard Spencer’s college tour? Easily tens of thousands of dollars per event. Were any minds changed? At what cost? How many people got disgusted with the movement and ending up withdrawing? Those are costs as well. Online propaganda changes far more minds for far less money.

Give to Counter-Currents!  And above all, give to VDARE – living in the leafy suburbs is expensive for the happy penguins.

Movement leaders need to persuade our people to spend their money more wisely. 

Oh, indeed.

Once we do that, we will see increased effectiveness in the realm of propaganda and renewed movement growth.

Finally, there will be public protests on the European Identitarian model, in which disciplined groups with tightly honed messages and optics assemble for protests and photo-ops, without announcing their plans in advance to allow the enemy to plan counter-protests. They document their events themselves and distribute them through the world-wide web, rather than depending on the enemy media. This sort of propaganda of the deed is highly attractive and will bring large numbers of people into our movement. Identity Evropa is taking the lead on this. But they are also under legal attack for participating in Unite the Right. If worse comes to worse, however, they can simply dissolve, rebrand, and rise from the ashes of Charlottesville.

Wait a minute!  Didn’t Johnson say above that folks who did not predict the Unite the Right disaster have lost credibility?  Doesn’t that include Identity Evropa, who participated in the rally?

What do you think of Unite the Right II?

Jason Kessler is a likeable, sincere, and intelligent guy. But he has trouble accepting defeat. We don’t need Unite the Right II. Isn’t doing the same thing and expecting a different result a definition of insanity?

Come on, now!  “Kessler” like “Heimbach” is a Germanic-sounding name, and thus, obviously well-suited to join the “Anglo”  Johnsons, Spencers, and Taylors as “leadership.”  We must remember what’s important!  Definition of insanity?  The utter madness of Unite the Right II?  Who cares!

HBD and the Rushton Case

Continuing my discussion of the Rushton fiasco.

Let’s continue our analysis of the Rushton case and what it says about HBD.

An important point that needs to be made: just because Rushton was a disgusting and despicable excuse for a human being, and, according to Dutton, fudged data and interpretations, does not logically imply that r-k theory as regards humans (or more properly, hominids – or australopithecines?) is not correct in its broadest sense.

The thing is, contra fawning “movement” fanboys, the whole r-k theory isn’t particularly innovative or earth-shattering.  It is actually quite obvious. Indeed, back in the 1980s – many years before I ever heard of Rushton and his work – I was reading an ecology textbook, came across a discussion of r-k life strategies, and immediately – emphasis on immediately – realized that this can apply to “humans” as well, with Blacks and Hispanics being “r” and Whites and (East) Asians being “k.”

Now, Rushton certainly deserves credit for coming out and publicly stating the hypothesis, and credit he does get here for that.  The problem with these HBD types is that they fall in love with their own theories, and descend into laughable pseudoscience, and sometimes outright fraud, in order to hysterically defend those hypotheses, rather than subject them to rigorous hypothesis testing, as the Popperian scientific method would suggest.  No, these guys are hyper-Kuhnians, and will defend the dogma at all costs.

An example is the IQ-GDP correlation, what Lynn has been banging the drum about for decades.  The idea that there would be a correlation between national IQ and national GDP – just as there is between individual IQ and personal income/wealth – is obvious, even trivial.  But – and this is a big but – that’s at a very coarse-grained, looking from a distance, view.  When one looks more fine-grained, looks at the details, looks up close, one finds exceptions, many outliers, cases that defy the dogmatic explanation, alternative mechanisms that sometimes better explain the data, etc.  Upon rigorous testing, the strict interpretation of the hypothesis is proven wrong, the hypothesis, in its most strict and fine-grained sense, is falsified.  However, it remains valid as a very general principle, and has some utility in that sense.  But that’s not good enough for these types, with their absurd spin, invented just-so stories, ignoring of contradictory data, “estimates” of IQ rather than reproducible direct measurements, and absolute refusal to even admit the possibility of being wrong about even the most trivial cases.  That’s pseudoscience, that’s HBD.

The same applies to r-k.  In the very broad sense, it is probably true – but even then requires constant and rigorous testing – but it obviously breaks down when one looks at the details.  In some cases, in some details, in some traits, Negroes may be k-selected, and Chinamen r-selected; rather than admit this, Rushton ignored the facts that “went against the general trend.”  Like all HBDers he never even considered the possibility he could be wrong, and never really took opposing views seriously.  The opposition you see was “politically motivated” and “personally motivated” – as if the same could not be said about Rushton himself and all the other HBDers themselves.

Life is messy – Rushton’s life is a perfect example: compare the details of his personal life to what his work was about and to the ideals fervently believed in by “movement” Rushtonites.  It’s almost as if Pierce had married a Jew, or Duke was discovered to have half-Black children.  I won’t even mention the actual realty of Strom Thurmond here.  Life is messy and so life science – including social science (if it is even really a science) – is messy as well.  Let’s not pretend it isn’t and by so doing leave open vulnerable spots in our views that can be attacked by the Left.

The ultimate problem is that HBD in its stupidity and pseudoscience smears genuine racial science, since the two are conflated by the Left and by the general public.  Thus, when Rushton is (justifiably) discredited, it reflects badly on all of us, not only where it belongs – solely on the HBD scum.

If the Right had any sense of being right (no pun intended) they would denounce Rushton, not only for what the specifically did but also because of the damage the inevitable revelations have on the cause.  His work needs to be critically examined more than ever, and that work shown to be based on fraud and/or bad science should be denounced and withdrawn.

Rushton: The Rotten Empire Strikes Back

The pushback, lies, and spin about randy Blackjack Phil begins.

Absolute HBD scum try to salvage the reputation of the execrable race-mixing fraud Rushton by giving Dutton’s book bad reviews at Amazon.  Two examples are below, with my response.

This is a scholarly abomination, in which one of the worst “scientists” of recent times, Edward Dutton, endeavors to savage the reputation of the great J. Philippe Rushton. Dutton has hardly written a thing that wouldn’t cause anyone with an IQ over 115 to feel embarrassment for him. He is a blight on the HBD world with his sorry attempts at hereditarian research. Rushton, despite whatever personal flaws he may have had, left psychological science an original, important, and seminal body of theoretical and empirical work. By contrast, it seems Dutton’s sole notable effect in life has been to sully HBD with inane, maladroit, and logorrheic text. One must wonder how such an incompetent sees himself fit to accuse as fine a scientist as Rushton of academic misconduct.

First, and most importantly, is what Dutton wrote true or not?  If it is, then all this hysterical Type I defense of Rushton – himself the “scholarly abomination”- is so much hot air.  Second, how is it possible for anyone to “sully” HBD, when it is a laughably stupid pseudoscience, a pro-Jewish and pro-Asian political movement masquerading as “science?”  It’s no coincidence that so many HBDers have Jewish or Asian wives, girlfriends, or family members.  Rushton and his Jewish wife.  Derbyshire and Brand married to Asians.  Ray’s son involved in a relationship with an Asian.  Sailer once suggesting he had Jewish ancestry (his wife investigated his biological parents, according to a Sailer post from many years ago).  Hart and Levin are Jewish.  I don’t know about Lynn, but if he doesn’t have some sort of Jewish-Asian ties, he’s the exception that proves the rule.  Third, if Dutton is such a terrible scientist and an incompetent, then why does the “great man” himself – Richard Lynn – coauthor work with Dutton?  Does this reviewer consider Lynn to be a “scholarly abomination” as well (if so, perhaps the only good judgement shown by this reviewer)?

This book is trash. I knew Phil Rushton for a number of years, and he was a kind, honorable man, and a brilliant researcher.

Yeah, that’s great. But are Dutton’s accusations true?

Vintage Der Movement, Inc.  Hide from the truth.  Defend the good old boys network.  And be incredible hypocrites.  The hypocrisy is at many levels.  These guys like to quote Jefferson about valuing truth above all things and needing truth to be known by the world, but when it comes to criticizing Rushton (or Jews), then all of a sudden truth is out the window, and personal loyalty (or political expediency or monetary donations) is valued above all else.  In other cases though, personal loyalty is jettisoned, not for the sake of truth, but to peddle HBD lies.  The value of truth and of loyalty is on a sliding scale – as Sailer would say: Who?  Whom?  To defend a corrupt quota queen HBDer like Rushton, the personal loyalty triumphs and truth goes out the window.

Der Movement Inc. is absolutely despicable, utterly corrupt, skin-crawlingly loathsome, disgustingly degenerate, horrendously hypocritical, and based on a foundation of lies and corruption.  How could a cause so right and so pure be sullied by such absolute trash, such moral turds?

Monday Movement Roundup

In all cases, emphasis added.

Consider this:

Snidely Whiplash

Posted July 28, 2018 at 10:23 am | Permalink

His grandfather was a Mexican revolutionary who rode with Pancho Villa.

He’s also something like 3/8 Indian, he won’t specify which tribe, probably because the usual suspects would make trouble for them and he doesn’t want that to happen. He’s said in the past that he’s visited the Rez, knows the leaders, and would qualify for tribal membership if he ever decided to apply. He’s also 1/2 or so Anglo, of founder stock. He uses his mixed race, as said above, for rhetorical impact whenever he’s called a White Supremacist.

Vox lives in Italy since the US government malicious prosecution that ruined and jailed his father.

Let us assume all of the above is true.  I do not know definitively if it is, but let us say it is true in its fundamental basics, if not all the fine-grained details.

If Snidely’s comment is basically true, we have someone who:

1. Claims that WN is impossible in America because of all the squabbling ethnicities (as if this was 1918 rather than 2018, and that most White Americans were not ethnic mixes)

2. Is an Anglo-Mexican-Amerind mix, or something similar

3. Lives in Italy, despite not being ethnically Italian, or even part-Italian

I mean, you just can’t make this stuff up.  

Who knows?  Maybe Italy can’t have a cohesive nationalist government (and a Five-Star-League collaboration is laughably distant from such a government) because of all these non-Italians living there, disrupting the organic solidarity of the nation.  Same principle, no?  

Quinn:

In 50 years, when someone writes the history of our movement, Vox will get his own chapter. Maybe not the longest chapter. But no book on the Dissident Right would be complete without it.

Yes, and the book will be called: Endless Failure: How Rightist Incompetence Allowed for the End of the White Race and the End of the West.  It will be written by a gleeful Jew or a schadenfreude-enriched Chinaman.

I’m not happy to announce that Spencer has apparently learned nothing.

Rushton, Roissy, and Bezos Oh My

Another installment in the endless series of examples of why I despise Der Movement, Inc. and its fundamental dishonesty.  

In all cases, emphasis added.

In 1997, Rushton met graduate student Elizabeth Weiss—half-Jewish, half-German, and thirty years his junior—at a Human Behavior and Evolution Society conference. The following year, he filed for divorce from his second wife. He and Weiss were married the day the divorce was granted, in 2000.

“Half”-Jewish.  An HBDer marries a Jew.  Surprise!  It is going to be either that or an Oriental, eh, Brand, another HBD scum burning in hell.

According to Weiss, during their relationship, Rushton was very concerned it would be revealed that he had fathered a half-black child out of wedlock through an affair he had engaged in with a married black woman. ‘Phil told me that this son looked like him and he had behavioural issues,’ explains Weiss, ‘but that the mother did not leave her husband and, thus, the child’s last name was not Rushton.’

Dear God.  Gee…by the standards of the “great man” Pierce and his Turner Diaries, if Rushton were alive during Der Tag, he would have had to be strung up in the Day of the Rope, no? 

Dutton comments: “Obviously, cuckolding another man—passing on your genes while someone else does the investment—is an extreme r-strategy, as is attraction to those who are strongly genetically different from yourself.” One wonders whether this affair of Rushton’s might not improve his reputation in an age when disliking blacks is considered a more serious moral failing than adultery.

No, one wonders whether this affair might not damage his reputation among the Type I scum who worship at the HBD altar.  Rushton: oil-drilling race-mixer.  Rushton: inter-racial adulterer and cuckolder.  Rushton: hypocritical immoral scum of the first order.

Weiss also recalls that “one of Rushton’s ex-girlfriends, who spoke with an English accent, got in touch, remonstrating about the fact that he had ‘forced her’ to have an abortion, decades earlier. She left multiple phone messages on our machine.

That’s right – produce a mulatto, marry a Jew, but make your English girlfriend have an abortion.  Hey, “movement” – your hero Blackjack Phil is looking better and better, eh?

In 2001, Rushton’s estranged daughter Katherine tracked him down and got back in touch.

Weiss felt Rushton became obsessed with his daughter and assisted her in various ways which, for Weiss, put pressure on their relationship. In 2003, ‘We got into a huge argument, in which he threw me off a chair, and I left and had him served with divorce papers. After I filed, he emptied out our bank account (which is actually not allowed).’ Rushton attempted to use academic grant money, claims Weiss, to pay for the divorce.

If true: Theft and fraud.

However, Dutton also found evidence that Rushton incorrectly reported the data on testicle size, ignoring at least two sources which indicated that not only East Asians, but also Africans, have smaller testicles than whites. In a coauthored paper from 1987, Rushton even blithely dismissed the evidence that Africans have smaller testicles than Europeans as “contrary to the general trend.”

Disgusting scientific fraud.  Anyone who continues to peddle Rushton’s absolute trash is perpetuating scientific fraud.  If they didn’t know before, they know now.  “Contrary to the general trend,” my ass.  Disgusting liar.  Pathetic excuse for a scientist and for a man.

Dutton also produces evidence that Rushton misstates the case for a correlation between general intelligence (g) and slow life history (K). Such a correlation does indeed exist when species or subspecies are compared, but not when comparing individuals…

Misstates…intentional?

Another questionable aspect of Race, Evolution, and Behavior was its limitation to just three races. Although there is no unequivocal number of distinct human races, Dutton argues that, at a minimum, Australian Aborigines and Amerindians ought to have been included as well: Amerindians, e.g., are nearly as genetically distinct from Northeast Asians as are Europeans. Such an extension of Rushton’s study would have revealed further anomalies, however:

Rushton himself concedes that Native Americans are seemingly higher in Conscientiousness and lower in Extraversion than Europeans. Lynn finds that Native Americans are higher in psychopathic personality—in this context meaning very low Agreeableness—than African Americans. Native American life expectancy is about a year lower than that of African Americans.

In other words, Amerindians exhibit higher K than Europeans according to some measures, but lower K than Africans according to others.

Even within the framework of Rushton’s three-race model, East Asians are more often a poor fit than one would gather from reading his book. Neuroticism, e.g., is a form of ‘mental instability,’ so on the basis of Rushton’s theory we would expect Northeast Asians to be lowest in it. In fact, they are highest in it, and Africans are lowest.

Note that Brand and Ray made a big deal of the high “neuroticism” of Afrowops after the Schettino incident, and how it unfavorably compared to some of their favorite European groups.  While it is true that being neurotic is not good, it is also true that high neuroticism is associated with the East Asian HBD gods, while being low on the scale is a Negroid trait.

The reason for this appears to be the importance of social anxiety – a trait which comes under the umbrella of Neuroticism – in high K societies. In such societies, in their harsh ecology, you are more likely to survive if you can form a highly cooperative group and you will die quickly if you are cast out of this group. So it pays to be socially anxious.

Social anxiety seems to be a special form of neuroticism.  After all, aren’t the neurotic Afrowops stereotyped as gesticulating and gregarious, loud-mouthed and aggressive?

Another anomaly is that Asians have been greatly outdone by Europeans on measures of cultural achievement despite their higher average intelligence. Dutton cites a Japanese scholar who attributes this to Asians’ high levels of social anxiety, which allows them to develop cooperative groups, but also “renders them very low in inquisitiveness, openness to new ideas, curiosity . . . indeed any behavioural tendency that might ‘rock the boat.’”

No, the Asians are simply robots. Or insects.

Negative ethnocentrism, or distrust of foreigners, is another area where Asians fail to match the pattern predicted by Rushton’s theory. One would expect that K-strategists, being more trusting, would be the less hostile to foreigners. However, Northeast Asians are more negatively ethnocentric than either Africans or Europeans.

How about Jews?  Rushton could have asked his wife.

The examples of Rushton’s dishonesty he cites appear motivated either by bias in favor of his theory or a desire to conceal the less creditable aspects of his personal life or family history.

The reader needs to understand several things here:

1. After Rushton died, Counter-Currents invited people to write comments about Rushton and my critical comments – all basically saying the same things as suggested by the above evidence – was rejected by Johnson.  After all, the good old boys club have to protect each other, even after death.

2. Rushton was a prime HBDer and these revelations completely and 100% support my long-stated contention that HBD is a pseudoscience full of liars and cherry pickers, and that HBDers fudge the evidence, and always refuse to engage in the Popperian scientific method of rigorous hypothesis testing.  Instead, they are the “true believers” castigated by Harpending here – starting around the 8:00 mark.  (For those of you who would say that Harpending considered himself an HBDer – that may be true, but he really wasn’t.  He was an honest scientist and thus, regardless of how he self-labelled, was not an HBDer).

3. Der Movement will continue protecting the likes of Rushton and Lynn because their pseudoscientific garbage reinforces moronic “movement” garbage.

This is from race-mixing gamester Roissy:

And how fucking Orwellian is “Amazonians”? Krist, the hair is standing on the back of my neck. Jeff Bezos is a creep! And his company is staffed by sociopaths. Citizens of Amazonia thank you for your leadership on this cheap Indian H-1B labor open borders issue. Lord Bezos is feeling poor today! Your sacrifice lifts his spirits! Pay no attention to the wastage of your once high trust nation, a pittance to pay for His Lord Bezos’ Prime Happiness and your buttplug instant deliveries.

Right…..

A year ago, Roissy wrote:

And now we can add a very big name to the list of those men who have become transformed by the Trump Effect:

Jeff Bezos.

GAYASSERICA Bezos: [picture of Bezos]

Trumperica Bezos: [picture of a muscular Bezos]

Cinco Jotas theorizes based on this and other details of his personal life that Jeff Bezos is about to take a turn to the hard right. Physiognomy doesn’t lie, and it’s a proven fact that masculinity via the testosterone pathway predisposes a man to see the world through swole-colored glasses. Maybe we’ll read the cheesy nümale header at the Washington Post Op change from “democracy dies in darkness” to “from russia, with love, losers!”.

(IMO, I think Bezos is warming up to Trump, or warming himself up to out-alpha Trump, because he fears a bigly anti-trust Trump-led crackdown on his empire of SCALE.)

Here’s the thing – these quota queens are characterized by two basic traits:

1. They are always wrong

2. They never admit they are wrong and their cult-like followers never hold them responsible and accountable for being wrong time and again

Ultimate take home points:

1. Sallis is (almost) always right

2. Der Movement is (almost) always wrong

3. All you guys nevertheless support the “movement” and disdain Sallis, because, well, you know…