Category: hypocrisy

Der Movement in Der News, 6/26/20

Sallis right again.

From a Counter-Currents article, I was alerted to this Amren book review.  The review is fine as far as it goes, but it ends on an interesting note (emphasis added):

Author Marisa Abrajano, whose origins we can only imagine from her name and appearance, teaches political science at UC San Diego. Zoltan Hajnal also teaches at UC San Diego. Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower. White Backlash is published by Princeton University Press.This is the perfect symbol for our degenerate times. Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are, and are published by one of the country’s most prestigious academic presses. We have work to do.

Now, if Abrajano is some sort of Hispanic, that individual’s ethnic activism in favor of “Latino” immigration makes sense. But note the implication that White Americans of Hungarian ancestry are also “foreigners” who are, naturally, expected to “tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are.”

That’s quite remarkable.  First, all it takes is irritation over an obnoxious book to let all of the Anglo animus toward White ethnics come flowing out. Brotherhood of Europeans indeed! Second, is there any evidence that Hungarian-Americans in general harbor grudges against America’s founding stock and wish to tell them “how benighted and deserving of oblivion” they are?

On the other hand, there is voluminous evidence that Jews, in general, actually do have such attitudes, and have actively engaged in anti-White and, more specifically, anti-Anglo activism for a century or more (e.g., see all of MacDonald’s work on that issue).  But alas, if “Zolton Hajnal” was instead named “Moshe Finkelstein” we can very much doubt that the same comment about “foreigners” would have been made in that case. And, did the ancestors of “racial status quo” Weissberg and “multiracial White separatist state” Hart come “over on the Mayflower?”

It has been the contention of EGI Notes that Der Movement has nothing to offer to White ethnics (and here “White” excludes Jews), and Der Movement does nothing but continue to support that assertion.

Side note – Hey!  I thought that the “HBD race realists” loved anyone named “Hajnal.”  Isn’t “Hajnal” a holy name among HBDers?

Then we have VDARE’s recent problems with web site hosting.  Readers of this blog, knowing my frequent harsh criticism of VDARE and Brimelow, may be surprised that I fully support VDARE in this case (*).  But you should not be surprised, since I am a vigorous supporter of free and unfettered expression, and my vision of the Internet is as an open marketplace of ideas – a “free for all” where views are openly aired and critically examined. VDARE should be able to do their thing, and I mine, and then we’ll see who makes the better arguments.

Indeed, it are some of my cowardly critics who are the ones afraid of free debate, not me.

And I do not want to hear excuses for web hosting companies that “they are privately owned entities and can do what they want.”  Besides the fact that these companies form a de facto monopolizing cartel, the fact is in today’s America, people do NOT have the right to do with their private property what they want. If you are a real estate property owner, try advertising rent to “Whites only” and “no Blacks allowed” and then get back to me about “private entities can do what they want.” And don’t give me nonsense about “immutable categories” being protected either, since, even if we disregard evidence of a genetic basis for political views, the fact is that religion is also an officially protected category as well in the sense that you cannot rent to, say, “Protestants only” with “no Catholics or Muslims allowed.”  Religion is not immutable or else converts and apostates would not exist. With respect to “identity,” for many people politics trumps religion, so that’s no excuse either.

*But perhaps if those hundreds of thousands of dollars per year had instead been going to build a legal infrastructure and free speech-friendly web hosting, this problem wouldn’t have occurred in the first place.

I agree with this.

Odds and Ends, 6/10/20

Good CvH speech and other news.

This is a good von Hoffmeister speech.  Note that he rejects “twigs and branches” “hobbit hole” reactionary “traditionalism” and supports a technological and futurist approach forward for Whites.

He’s also correct about “testing” – particularly given all the problems identified at this blog. I would only quibble that instead of saying “look White, identify as White” – which can include all sorts of NECs – merely say “of European descent,” i.e.., ancestry from of one (or more) of historical European ethnies.

But, overall, I strongly endorse the speech and recommend that readers share it far and wide.

By the way, is CvH “sane” and “decent” enough for Johnson to debate?  While it is true that only Sallis is qualified to defend Sallisism, since Johnson runs from that, what about CvH then?  Or is he, like Woods, “not up to it?”

They could, for example, debate pan-Europeanism vs. petty nationalism as well as technics-oriented futurism vs. hobbit hole “traditionalism.”  However, I cannot speak for CvH and do not know if he has any interest in debating Johnson or anyone else.  I merely suggest that if Johnson is too cowardly to engage with the Sallis Groupuscule, then these issues can be addressed by a “pinch hitter” or “designated hitter” who has significant, albeit not total, overlap with Sallis.

I’ve been saying that for years, Quota Queen.

If you really want to see Gaslighting Greg’s deficiencies on display, see this.

What a retard.

Odds and Ends, Memorial Day 2020

In der news.

Re: 5/23/20 FMA livestream. Greg Johnson doesn’t have the discipline to work out at home and he also needs a trainer at the gym.

A personal trainer must be paid. Where does the money come from, all ye rank-and-file supporters and donors?  How many of YOU have a private trainer at a gym?  Does it bother you that those you give donations to live better than you do?

This is what we call Herrenvolk Logic – Dershowitz is for something, therefore it is bad.

Actually, I wouldn’t go so far as to make the vaccinations mandatory in the sense Dershowitz advocates.  Just shun the anti-vaxxers, limit their movements so they don’t spread disease, and hold them legally accountable if they do spread disease. If contact tracing demonstrates that an anti-vaxxer caused disease – that’s assault and battery if the victim survives and homicide if they die. Only fair, no?


And while we should reject vaccines because Dershowitz supports them, anti-vaxx vaccine skepticism is justified because of tweets from those medical and epidemiological experts Roosh and Michelle Malkin.  Dat right!

Questions for the anti-vaxx filth – Do you believe that the forcible quarantine of Mary Mallon (“Typhoid Mary”) was unfair? Did it limit her “freedom?”  Her body, her choice!  How dare Big Gummint tell her she can’t work as a cook!  Just because she was killing people means nothing. And, after all, anti-vaxxers tell us that viruses and bacteria don’t cause disease anyway!  So there!  We should worry instead about the “bullets flying everywhere” that are wiping out all non-human animal life on Earth!


More questions for the anti-vaxxers – If you or your children were to be bitten by a rabid animal, would you consent to the “jabbing” with rabies vaccine and rabies immune globulin? Yes or no? If your child were to get a deep puncture would for which the probability for tetanus was high, would you consent for them to be “jabbed” with tetanus vaccine?  If the inept and TROPICAL Chinese were to “accidentally” release smallpox from one of their laboratories, sparking an outbreak, would you consent to a smallpox vaccination?  Why do you tweet and retweet doctored and edited videos that maliciously and mendaciously make it sound that Gates and Fauci are promoting intentionally harming people with vaccines, when you damn well know that it is not true?  If people die as a result of your anti-vaxx lies, are you prepared for the moral and legal consequences?

If you would like to see a pictorial example of what anti-vaxx filth like Red Ice want – in the de facto, ultimate outcome, sense (not implying intention) – for your children, see this.  It doesn’t matter if it is intentional or not.  Criminal negligence is a crime.  Promoting disease by advocating against vaccination has real life consequences, including death. With freedom comes responsibility.  You can’t have one without the other.  

Jenner and Pasteur are spinning in their graves. The fruits of White genius flushed down the toilet by childish retards frightened of scary needles “jabbing” them.


In the past, parents could only dream that there would be a way to save their child who was bitten by a rabid dog, or to prevent their child from being paralyzed by polio, or disfigured or killed by smallpox, or killed by tetanus, or killed by diphtheria or measles – and now that this is possible, and that White genius has brought these gifts to humanity, hysterical retards are throwing it all away.


The real poisons are the maintenance medications, most produced in India and China, which The Great White Whales and their pudgy offspring gladly take because they can’t push away from the table and can’t admit their children are just dumb. But, hey, they’re nice pills and not scary needles, so who cares?  Pills don’t “jab” you.

The coming man  That’s “coming” not “cumming” – in case any men sexually harassing Pilleater were confused about that.

What you do is not debate it – just call it “shit” or “insane” or “indecent.” Then you have a “discussion” with folks who agree with you on everything and congratulate you on your willingness to “debate.”

Ripostes:

Patriotic Black Man

@BlackPatriotic

Replying to

@NewRightAmerica

Greg is clearly letting his Spencer hatred inform his Woods hatred.  I found out about Keith from a counter currents podcast

John Wilcox

@JohnWil48506230

Replying to

@NewRightAmerica

Not wanting to debate a willing opponent is always a good look. Also, wasn’t Bowden pretty clearly a third positionist?

This is particularly relevant:

Not wanting to debate a willing opponent is always a good look.

Johnson only “debates” two types – either morons he knows he can beat or people who basically agree with him. Why folks take this specimen seriously is a mystery;  well, actually not a mystery – affirmative action, faux intellectualism and a PhD (not “credentialism” in his case, of course), a lack of competition, etc.

I don’t know who this “Keith Woods” is, but if it is someone who Johnson is running from, there must be something useful there.


Very true.

Question – does morality also play a role in “movement” politics?  If so, what can we say about a person who doles out, or withholds, criticism based upon how influential the target is in the “movement,” and based upon the possible affect such criticism would have on the critic’s meeting invitations and “D’Nations?”

Is such a person immoral?  On the other hand, if a person speaks truth to power, even to the extent of being labeled “insane” and indecent,” are they moral?  Just asking.

Sallis is doing well (emphasis added).

And not all benefits are physical: anger can help with negotiating, too. A major flashpoint for aggression is the discovery that someone does not value your interests highly enough. It involves inflicting costs – the threat of physical violence – and withdrawing benefits – loyalty, friendship, or money – to help them see their mistake.

Everyone has interests.  If yours are not being taken seriously, why stand for it?  Why be an extended phenotype for someone else’s interests?

Quota King Ann Coulter.  Gee…what ever happened to In Trump We Trust?  Affirmative action means never having to admit being wrong.


Mudshark Annie is still waiting for Costello to serve her and Dinesh breakfast in bed.  Nighttime activity works up a hearty appetite.

Always remember – when high-T Quota King Coulter was doing her In Trump We Trust shtick, Sallis was calling Trump a vulgar ignorant buffoon. Who was right?  Who was wrong?  When are the rank-and-file Nutzis going to stop the affirmative action program?

Those two faced sneaky liars!  Giggles…and gives the words “ditzy” and “airhead” new meaning. Seriously though, how did we degenerate from William Pierce to this? Yes, I’m critical of Pierce, but how can you compare him to Sorority Girl White nationalism?  Please explain to me again how WN 2.0 is so superior to WN 1.0. I’m not getting it.


Well, of course. Why did any of you ever take that giggling retard seriously in the first place?

Sallis answers yes.  An associate of mine attended one of those Scandinavian conferences at which Miss Giggles was a speaker.  He said all speeches were good, except hers, which was unbearable.  When the conference speeches were put online I couldn’t get through two minutes of hers.

Again, when Babushka hits the wall, none of her beta (ex)fanboys will care in the slightest what she has to say, and they’ll pretend like she never existed.

Well, gee…Brazil’s flubro approach certain is working out well, huh?

While these criticisms of “movement” “rock stars” is necessary (and amusing), there are limits to what can be achieved through purely deconstructivist tactics. So, while such critiques will continue, they’ll be a bit targeted and perhaps less frequent.

There are some projects of importance required.  First, the ongoing project, the main thrust of the Sallis Groupuscle, is the defense and promotion of the fundamental Yockeyian vision of the Western or European Imperium (always keeping in mind that is perfectly compatible with Salterian EGI).

Second, a more in depth project to create the philosophical underpinning to the Sallis Groupuscle, including a critique and rejection of the adulation of Heidegger prevalent among the “traditionalist” faction, building upon analysis of certain existentialist principles, and justifying the Sallisian worldview.

Odds and Ends, 5/23/20

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.


The elegant John Simon unfortunately passed away last fall.  Simon, of Hungarian descent, seems to have been a good man:

In 1981, an ad in a Hollywood trade appeared accusing Simon of being “racist, anti-Semitic, misogynist, vicious and derisive.” It was signed by 300 artists, apparently upset that Simon’s review of Richard III complained that an actress in the show “should never be cast as anything but an itinerant gefilte fish with a nervous condition.”

Well, as we know, obesity is related to higher covid-19 risk.

Meet Ron Unz.

Born in California, to a Ukrainian-Jewish immigrant, Unz was raised in a Yiddish-speaking household. His mother, Esther-Laio Avrutin, met his father on an airplane heading for Israel. A professor from the Midwest, he later briefly became her lover when visiting her on a few occasions in Los Angeles. She unilaterally decided to have a child with him, but Unz’s father was already married and his wife opened a letter from Avrutin telling him about her pregnancy. She was an anti-war activist, who raised her son as a single mother, but Unz was given his father’s surname and soon moved back to her family’s home after her son’s birth.

What about the dangers of cheap Chinese labor?

Due to the Chinese state confiscating supply chains and ethnic Chinese shipping masks in the West back to the homeland, there were so few disposable masks, especially highly effective N95 respirators, available for purchase by Americans that hospitals were having terrible difficulty sourcing personal protective equipment. Perhaps some authority figures understood the reality and thus intentionally misled the American public to preserve crucial facemasks for healthcare workers.

Of interest.

Over the years, Johnson and Spencer have sparred. A lot of the conflict, according to alt-righters, had to do with personal style.(Spencer became the best-known face of the “frat” style, polo-and-chinos alt-right; Johnson has dispensed with such pretenses.) But the tension between them also underscored an ongoing debate about how best to save America from itself. Johnson was seen as the Socrates of the radical right. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy and, before publicly embracing the cause of the white ethnostate, taught at Morehouse College, which is historically black. In Johnson’s view, the far right had to win the war of ideas before it could move on to the “real world” battlefield. That meant books and articles, speaking engagements, conferences, symposia. He had a way of explaining things that made racism and Jew hatred sound like post-structuralism or supply-side economics—something that was once new or avant-garde or even suspect and, over time, acquired a large following.

Spencer was more of a would-be Vladimir Lenin. He also took ideas seriously; he had pursued a Ph.D. at Duke, in intellectual history, before dropping out and moving to D.C. But he was mostly uninterested in ideas divorced from action. He wanted to be in the middle of things. He had pondered a congressional campaign in Montana, where he usually lived. He felt let down by Trump. (“His administration,” Spencer said in an interview, “is not fundamentally different than a [Mitt] Romney administration—or even a Hillary [Clinton] administration. I never expected him to be me. But I expected him to do something.”) The feeling on the alt-right was that Charlottesville had been a disaster because it had left so many members demoralized and fragmented the movement. For Spencer, political outcomes mattered.

Some interesting Twitter comments:

Highbrow Gentleman

@Hibrowgent

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

So disappointing Greg. Stop being so petty.

Aureum

@Aureum_Kolovrat

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

Promoting a #DuggAnon style psyop propaganda from a source with no name is very low ball. 

Please do better. Greg if you disagree with someone then it would be most honorable to debate them instead of smear them with trash like this that sends our spergs down the rabbit hole.

Aureum, you had better watch out, before you’re called “insane” and “indecent.” Debate?  He don’t need no stinkin’ debate!

Well, I’m not optimistic either, for two reasons:

First, the only possible vehicle for complete redemption – racial activism – has been compromised by the incompetent Quota Queen “leadership” and their rank-and-file Nutzi followers, coupled to an inane and “insane” fossilized dogma.

Second, the dominant element among Europeans today is the “high trust northern hunter gatherers.”  While there are – contra the HBD liars – strong elements of pathological altruism in Southern and Eastern Europe, I’ll agree with the HBDers that it is strongest in NW Europe. Having the SJW Herrenvolk captaining the HMS Europa is leading to a bigger disaster than the Titanic.

I was very supportive of Trump during the 2016 election.

Indeed. And, at the same time I was referring to Trump as a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” who I endorsed solely because of the chaos he would bring in his wake (which he did).  Who was right? Who was wrong?

I agree, Greg (except for the invention part, see below). The problem is that some of the people you’ve feuded with can say the same about you.


The “invention” accusation is, unfortunately, a new low in “New Right” discourse.  It’s not enough for Johnson to call his critics “insane” and “indecent” – here he implies that some of them may have been “invented by the enemy.” Criticize him and you are – what?  A CIA asset?  A SPLC or ADL agent? A HopeNotHate operative (no, wait, that’s Hermansson)? A reporter for The Stranger (no, wait, that’s Lewis)?  


You see, disagreeing with someone, criticizing their behavior and ideology and actions, holding them accountable – that makes you a “horrible” person. Or an “invention of the enemy.” 


These types, who have an inflated sense of their own self-importance, have to personalize everything. As I’ve repeatedly written here – my criticism of people in the “movement” is business, not personal. I do not know them personally nor do I care to. Who knows? They may be kind to animals (except whales), generous to strangers, pleasant enough in private interactions, real salt of the Earth.  But if these people – particularly self-styled “leaders” – are in my opinion destructive to the cause, I’m going to call them out on it.  It’s “punching right” – which Johnson approves of (at least when he does it to others).  If the behavior is, in my opinion, hypocritical, mendacious, defamatory, etc., then the criticism will be harsh.  But, also, the thing is this – if the criticism is wrong, then refute it.  Ascribing mental illness to people and/or implying they are some sort of infiltrator or agent provocateur is not a refutation, it is merely ad hominem.


And I wish these types were a bit more paranoid about “invented by the enemy” when it came to Patrik Hermansson and Dave Lewis. That would have saved much trouble and embarrassment.  If you cannot identify real infiltrators but instead suggest that authentic activists are such – well, how does that refute my criticisms about your poor judgment?  Indeed, it does nothing but support and reinforce such criticism.  Do better.


Note that I do not make such accusations here at this blog. The closest to that is the endorsement of an investigation – and only an investigation – to determine if any HBDers have association (directly or indirectly, knowingly or unknowingly) with the Chinese government or any other such operatives.  An investigation is just that – a determination about something unknown.  It is wholly possible, and I’ve stated as much, that the HBDers are innocent. Very well. In that case, they should welcome an investigation. The endorsement of an investigation was based upon, in my opinion, credible similarities between (frankly, ludicrous) HBD essays blaming covid-19 on an “American bioweapon” and strikingly similar Chinese government propaganda about same. The suggestion that an investigation was necessary was not simply due to disagreement or feuding, but on those aforementioned similarities and the damage done by that propaganda to the interests of those trying to get to the truth of the matter.


The sad thing is that the people (assuming they themselves are authentic) making accusations against others have actually facilitated the very infiltration they warn about.


An observation from Twitter:

Hard Right Turn@FelineDivisionReplying to @NewRightAmerica 

Your obsession with Spencer is consuming you Greg. Why not just forget about him and do you?

More advice to be downwardly mobile from Counter-Currents:

The first question posed to Greg Johnson and Fróði Midjord during the recent Counter-Currents livestream was, “If you could re-live your twenties, what would you do differently?” Greg’s answer was direct, clear, and quite pertinent to those of us considering an academic career — in the humanities, at least. Short answer: Don’t. Good advice.

Yes, “good advice.” Let dem dere Jews and Asians get the PhDs. You stay in your parents’ basement, reading Counter-Currents (gotta pump up dem page views!), and sending in your hamburger flipper salary money as “D’Nations” to Greg and company. 


How’s that ethnonationalist Brexit thingee working out for you?


No worries, Germany can help Turkey dump them back into Greece.  Yes we can!


Careful, ETs ,those Faroe Islanders are hunting for you!  Avast!  Harpoons to the ready!


Should this book have been entitled Key Retards of the Radical Right?


Johnson:

But you have to draw a line somewhere, and clearly Spencer and Friberg do not belong. They are shallow, self-promoting, pseudo-intellectual poseurs.

Thus, the pot calls the kettle black.


The following is borderline libelous:

Those with a more paranoid bent would connect the dots between Friberg being an antifa and police informant and the fact that Teitelbaum is an American Jew and conclude that he is simply an enemy agent being puffed up as a movement mastermind, i.e., controlled opposition.

Of course, people can make all sorts of similar accusations against Johnson or anyone else.  It doesn’t mean the accusations are true…or not. Evidence?  Where is the clear and irrefutable evidence?

Minsc
Posted March 7, 2019 at 10:41 am | Permalink
Jorjani would’ve been a better choice for the section on emerging thinkers that the most of those characters…
Reply
Greg Johnson
Posted March 7, 2019 at 11:25 am | Permalink
Yes, Jorjani would have been a very good choice

Jorjani’s work is, in my opinion pseudoscientific claptrap. “The spectral!” I’m not surprised that Der Movement considers such an intellectual lightweight to be a “key thinker of the radical right.”


Conservatives are not the only ones afraid of free speech.


Here’s an exercise for the reader – name one (just one) prominent Quota Queen who is currently:

A) Fairly evaluating the ideas, paradigms, and critiques discussed at EGI Notes

B) Willing to engage with the “insane” and “indecent” Ted Sallis

C) Not participating in a cordon sanitaire of the Sallis Groupuscule


I’ll make it easy for you – there are none.  Not a single one.  Consider that even an anti-Sallis opponent like Silver believes that the Quota Queens (at least Johnson) should engage, much less more neutral people who undoubtedly agree with Silver’s assessment.


Who’s afraid of free speech, indeed?


Behold Durocher:

Guillaume Durocher says:
I shat a proverbial brick when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

Is the following more accurate? –

I had to be hospitalized for an intractable priapism when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

But, hey, if I label Durocher as a hardcore Nordicist that means that I am, of course, “insane” and “indecent.”  Where would I have ever got that idea from?


By the way, how did De Gaulle’s policy work out?  From looking at current France, it would seem that his underlings must have confused “Nordic” with “Arab and African.” Honest mistake.


A stupid yeastbucket, whose “contributions” to the “movement” are a silly podcast show and making “speeches” at conferences in which she giggles like a small girl caught “playing doctor” with an autistic and retarded boy, unburdens herself thus:

Lana
@LanaLokteff
10h
Pro-vaccine people really get psychotic defending their injections of sketchy substances. Look, knock yourself out and get all the jabs you want for all I care.
“My body my choice” except when..

Replies
Gotham Resistance
@Gothamresist

Replying to
@LanaLokteff
 and
@Tare1935
Never understood that. If they believe in the vaccines and believe they’re protected, why get so triggered if others choose not to

Let’s see. People object to open lies and pseudoscience, which smears the Right as scientifically illiterate, backwards, and alienates intelligent and rational people (and the same bent toward pseudoscience leads to HBD, Nordicism, “traditionalism,” etc.).


Let’s see. When the unvaccinated get unnecessary diseases it puts a strain on the healthcare system.


And most of all – vaccines are not 100% protective (that’s not how biology works), immunity can wane with age, and there are some people who cannot get vaccinated for legitimate reasons (children under age one year for MMR or folks with allergic reactions or whatever).  So, there are always going to be, in a given population, people who – through no fault of their own – will be not protected. However, given herd immunity, the chain of transmission will be stopped before any significant number of such people are infected. To have such herd immunity, all people who can be vaccinated should be; the overwhelming majority of these will be immune. Vaccination is a collective social good. Lowlife trash who refuse to get vaccinated are free riding on the immunity of others without contributing to it.  

If filthy scum like this were prevalent in past decades, we would still have smallpox.  We would still have polio outbreaks and iron lungs.  It is because of them (and immigration) that we still have measles outbreaks.


But, hey, let’s be fair.  Your body your choice.  Our choice too.  You get ill with a disease for which you chose not to be vaccinated against – no medical treatment. If you die, you die. Further – if you spread the disease to someone else who was vaccinated but who was one of the few not immune or someone who legitimately could not be vaccinated or an old person with waning immunity then you are legally on the hook for that.  At minimum – assault and battery.  If they die – homicide.  I’m sure if you kill an infant with your measles, the jury will be quite interested in your anti-vaxx polemics. Your psychosexual sweaty fear of being “jabbed” is worth killing someone, right?


Lana needs to demonstrate to us all the strength of her anti-vaxx convictions.  I suggest the following three-part program:


1. Get bitten by a rabid animal.  Make sure it’s a real good bite, plenty of foaming saliva getting in there.

2. Refuse to get “jabbed” for rabies prevention treatment.  No rabies vaccine and no rabies immune globulin. After all, who knows what questionable substances are in those jabs? Maybe even a dastardly microchip invented by Bill Gates or some sort of toxin implanted by a cackling Jew doctor.  No jabs!

3. Go home to your family and be a loving mother to your children. Plenty of close contact with them in the weeks or months ahead.  It’s all good!  What could possibly go wrong?


And it goes without saying that if your children were to be bitten by a rabid animal, you should, of course, refuse to have them “jabbed” as well.  Who knows what that Jew doctor is injecting?


The good news is that the nonsense of the Russess has a limited shelf-life. Once she hits the wall and looks like a babushka, no one will care in the slightest what she has to say. Give it time – perhaps less time than she thinks.  Age marches onward. Let us remember the well known MGTOW adage – when men get older, the look more and more like Sean Connery; when women get older, they look more and more like…Sean Connery.


In any case, those of us with a triple digit IQ and who are not hypocrites understand that in a society individual choices in many cases affect other people.  Indeed, isn’t that why we on the Far Right criticize “my body my choice” race-mixing? Don’t we oppose the idea that people can do whatever they want, even though it is destructive to the wider society?


Indeed, we all have societal responsibilities. The Millennials and Zoomers should reflect upon that the reason why they are not today pricked (not “jabbed”) against smallpox is because all we older people were so pricked, and the virus was eliminated (in the wild). If someone – an incompetent TROPICAL Chinese lab for example – were to release smallpox, would The Retarded Right refuse that vaccine as well?

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.


The elegant John Simon unfortunately passed away last fall.  Simon, of Hungarian descent, seems to have been a good man:

In 1981, an ad in a Hollywood trade appeared accusing Simon of being “racist, anti-Semitic, misogynist, vicious and derisive.” It was signed by 300 artists, apparently upset that Simon’s review of Richard III complained that an actress in the show “should never be cast as anything but an itinerant gefilte fish with a nervous condition.”

Well, as we know, obesity is related to higher covid-19 risk.

Meet Ron Unz.

Born in California, to a Ukrainian-Jewish immigrant, Unz was raised in a Yiddish-speaking household. His mother, Esther-Laio Avrutin, met his father on an airplane heading for Israel. A professor from the Midwest, he later briefly became her lover when visiting her on a few occasions in Los Angeles. She unilaterally decided to have a child with him, but Unz’s father was already married and his wife opened a letter from Avrutin telling him about her pregnancy. She was an anti-war activist, who raised her son as a single mother, but Unz was given his father’s surname and soon moved back to her family’s home after her son’s birth.

What about the dangers of cheap Chinese labor?

Due to the Chinese state confiscating supply chains and ethnic Chinese shipping masks in the West back to the homeland, there were so few disposable masks, especially highly effective N95 respirators, available for purchase by Americans that hospitals were having terrible difficulty sourcing personal protective equipment. Perhaps some authority figures understood the reality and thus intentionally misled the American public to preserve crucial facemasks for healthcare workers.

Of interest.

Over the years, Johnson and Spencer have sparred. A lot of the conflict, according to alt-righters, had to do with personal style.(Spencer became the best-known face of the “frat” style, polo-and-chinos alt-right; Johnson has dispensed with such pretenses.) But the tension between them also underscored an ongoing debate about how best to save America from itself. Johnson was seen as the Socrates of the radical right. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy and, before publicly embracing the cause of the white ethnostate, taught at Morehouse College, which is historically black. In Johnson’s view, the far right had to win the war of ideas before it could move on to the “real world” battlefield. That meant books and articles, speaking engagements, conferences, symposia. He had a way of explaining things that made racism and Jew hatred sound like post-structuralism or supply-side economics—something that was once new or avant-garde or even suspect and, over time, acquired a large following.

Spencer was more of a would-be Vladimir Lenin. He also took ideas seriously; he had pursued a Ph.D. at Duke, in intellectual history, before dropping out and moving to D.C. But he was mostly uninterested in ideas divorced from action. He wanted to be in the middle of things. He had pondered a congressional campaign in Montana, where he usually lived. He felt let down by Trump. (“His administration,” Spencer said in an interview, “is not fundamentally different than a [Mitt] Romney administration—or even a Hillary [Clinton] administration. I never expected him to be me. But I expected him to do something.”) The feeling on the alt-right was that Charlottesville had been a disaster because it had left so many members demoralized and fragmented the movement. For Spencer, political outcomes mattered.

Some interesting Twitter comments:

Highbrow Gentleman

@Hibrowgent

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

So disappointing Greg. Stop being so petty.

Aureum

@Aureum_Kolovrat

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

Promoting a #DuggAnon style psyop propaganda from a source with no name is very low ball. 

Please do better. Greg if you disagree with someone then it would be most honorable to debate them instead of smear them with trash like this that sends our spergs down the rabbit hole.

Aureum, you had better watch out, before you’re called “insane” and “indecent.” Debate?  He don’t need no stinkin’ debate!

Well, I’m not optimistic either, for two reasons:

First, the only possible vehicle for complete redemption – racial activism – has been compromised by the incompetent Quota Queen “leadership” and their rank-and-file Nutzi followers, coupled to an inane and “insane” fossilized dogma.

Second, the dominant element among Europeans today is the “high trust northern hunter gatherers.”  While there are – contra the HBD liars – strong elements of pathological altruism in Southern and Eastern Europe, I’ll agree with the HBDers that it is strongest in NW Europe. Having the SJW Herrenvolk captaining the HMS Europa is leading to a bigger disaster than the Titanic.

I was very supportive of Trump during the 2016 election.

Indeed. And, at the same time I was referring to Trump as a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” who I endorsed solely because of the chaos he would bring in his wake (which he did).  Who was right? Who was wrong?

I agree, Greg (except for the invention part, see below). The problem is that some of the people you’ve feuded with can say the same about you.


The “invention” accusation is, unfortunately, a new low in “New Right” discourse.  It’s not enough for Johnson to call his critics “insane” and “indecent” – here he implies that some of them may have been “invented by the enemy.” Criticize him and you are – what?  A CIA asset?  A SPLC or ADL agent? A HopeNotHate operative (no, wait, that’s Hermansson)? A reporter for The Stranger (no, wait, that’s Lewis)?  


You see, disagreeing with someone, criticizing their behavior and ideology and actions, holding them accountable – that makes you a “horrible” person. Or an “invention of the enemy.” 


These types, who have an inflated sense of their own self-importance, have to personalize everything. As I’ve repeatedly written here – my criticism of people in the “movement” is business, not personal. I do not know them personally nor do I care to. Who knows? They may be kind to animals (except whales), generous to strangers, pleasant enough in private interactions, real salt of the Earth.  But if these people – particularly self-styled “leaders” – are in my opinion destructive to the cause, I’m going to call them out on it.  It’s “punching right” – which Johnson approves of (at least when he does it to others).  If the behavior is, in my opinion, hypocritical, mendacious, defamatory, etc., then the criticism will be harsh.  But, also, the thing is this – if the criticism is wrong, then refute it.  Ascribing mental illness to people and/or implying they are some sort of infiltrator or agent provocateur is not a refutation, it is merely ad hominem.


And I wish these types were a bit more paranoid about “invented by the enemy” when it came to Patrik Hermansson and Dave Lewis. That would have saved much trouble and embarrassment.  If you cannot identify real infiltrators but instead suggest that authentic activists are such – well, how does that refute my criticisms about your poor judgment?  Indeed, it does nothing but support and reinforce such criticism.  Do better.


Note that I do not make such accusations here at this blog. The closest to that is the endorsement of an investigation – and only an investigation – to determine if any HBDers have association (directly or indirectly, knowingly or unknowingly) with the Chinese government or any other such operatives.  An investigation is just that – a determination about something unknown.  It is wholly possible, and I’ve stated as much, that the HBDers are innocent. Very well. In that case, they should welcome an investigation. The endorsement of an investigation was based upon, in my opinion, credible similarities between (frankly, ludicrous) HBD essays blaming covid-19 on an “American bioweapon” and strikingly similar Chinese government propaganda about same. The suggestion that an investigation was necessary was not simply due to disagreement or feuding, but on those aforementioned similarities and the damage done by that propaganda to the interests of those trying to get to the truth of the matter.


The sad thing is that the people (assuming they themselves are authentic) making accusations against others have actually facilitated the very infiltration they warn about.


An observation from Twitter:

Hard Right Turn@FelineDivisionReplying to @NewRightAmerica 

Your obsession with Spencer is consuming you Greg. Why not just forget about him and do you?

More advice to be downwardly mobile from Counter-Currents:

The first question posed to Greg Johnson and Fróði Midjord during the recent Counter-Currents livestream was, “If you could re-live your twenties, what would you do differently?” Greg’s answer was direct, clear, and quite pertinent to those of us considering an academic career — in the humanities, at least. Short answer: Don’t. Good advice.

Yes, “good advice.” Let dem dere Jews and Asians get the PhDs. You stay in your parents’ basement, reading Counter-Currents (gotta pump up dem page views!), and sending in your hamburger flipper salary money as “D’Nations” to Greg and company. 


How’s that ethnonationalist Brexit thingee working out for you?


No worries, Germany can help Turkey dump them back into Greece.  Yes we can!


Careful, ETs ,those Faroe Islanders are hunting for you!  Avast!  Harpoons to the ready!


Should this book have been entitled Key Retards of the Radical Right?


Johnson:

But you have to draw a line somewhere, and clearly Spencer and Friberg do not belong. They are shallow, self-promoting, pseudo-intellectual poseurs.

Thus, the pot calls the kettle black.


The following is borderline libelous:

Those with a more paranoid bent would connect the dots between Friberg being an antifa and police informant and the fact that Teitelbaum is an American Jew and conclude that he is simply an enemy agent being puffed up as a movement mastermind, i.e., controlled opposition.

Of course, people can make all sorts of similar accusations against Johnson or anyone else.  It doesn’t mean the accusations are true…or not. Evidence?  Where is the clear and irrefutable evidence?

Minsc
Posted March 7, 2019 at 10:41 am | Permalink
Jorjani would’ve been a better choice for the section on emerging thinkers that the most of those characters…
Reply
Greg Johnson
Posted March 7, 2019 at 11:25 am | Permalink
Yes, Jorjani would have been a very good choice

Jorjani’s work is, in my opinion pseudoscientific claptrap. “The spectral!” I’m not surprised that Der Movement considers such an intellectual lightweight to be a “key thinker of the radical right.”


Conservatives are not the only ones afraid of free speech.


Here’s an exercise for the reader – name one (just one) prominent Quota Queen who is currently:

A) Fairly evaluating the ideas, paradigms, and critiques discussed at EGI Notes

B) Willing to engage with the “insane” and “indecent” Ted Sallis

C) Not participating in a cordon sanitaire of the Sallis Groupuscule


I’ll make it easy for you – there are none.  Not a single one.  Consider that even an anti-Sallis opponent like Silver believes that the Quota Queens (at least Johnson) should engage, much less more neutral people who undoubtedly agree with Silver’s assessment.


Who’s afraid of free speech, indeed?


Behold Durocher:

Guillaume Durocher says:
I shat a proverbial brick when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

Is the following more accurate? –

I had to be hospitalized for an intractable priapism when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

But, hey, if I label Durocher as a hardcore Nordicist that means that I am, of course, “insane” and “indecent.”  Where would I have ever got that idea from?


By the way, how did De Gaulle’s policy work out?  From looking at current France, it would seem that his underlings must have confused “Nordic” with “Arab and African.” Honest mistake.


A stupid yeastbucket, whose “contributions” to the “movement” are a silly podcast show and making “speeches” at conferences in which she giggles like a small girl caught “playing doctor” with an autistic and retarded boy, unburdens herself thus:

Lana
@LanaLokteff
10h
Pro-vaccine people really get psychotic defending their injections of sketchy substances. Look, knock yourself out and get all the jabs you want for all I care.
“My body my choice” except when..

Replies
Gotham Resistance
@Gothamresist

Replying to
@LanaLokteff
 and
@Tare1935
Never understood that. If they believe in the vaccines and believe they’re protected, why get so triggered if others choose not to

Let’s see. People object to open lies and pseudoscience, which smears the Right as scientifically illiterate, backwards, and alienates intelligent and rational people (and the same bent toward pseudoscience leads to HBD, Nordicism, “traditionalism,” etc.).


Let’s see. When the unvaccinated get unnecessary diseases it puts a strain on the healthcare system.


And most of all – vaccines are not 100% protective (that’s not how biology works), immunity can wane with age, and there are some people who cannot get vaccinated for legitimate reasons (children under age one year for MMR or folks with allergic reactions or whatever).  So, there are always going to be, in a given population, people who – through no fault of their own – will be not protected. However, given herd immunity, the chain of transmission will be stopped before any significant number of such people are infected. To have such herd immunity, all people who can be vaccinated should be; the overwhelming majority of these will be immune. Vaccination is a collective social good. Lowlife trash who refuse to get vaccinated are free riding on the immunity of others without contributing to it.  

If filthy scum like this were prevalent in past decades, we would still have smallpox.  We would still have polio outbreaks and iron lungs.  It is because of them (and immigration) that we still have measles outbreaks.


But, hey, let’s be fair.  Your body your choice.  Our choice too.  You get ill with a disease for which you chose not to be vaccinated against – no medical treatment. If you die, you die. Further – if you spread the disease to someone else who was vaccinated but who was one of the few not immune or someone who legitimately could not be vaccinated or an old person with waning immunity then you are legally on the hook for that.  At minimum – assault and battery.  If they die – homicide.  I’m sure if you kill an infant with your measles, the jury will be quite interested in your anti-vaxx polemics. Your psychosexual sweaty fears of being “jabbed” is worth killing someone, right?


Lana needs to demonstrate to us all the strength of her anti-vaxx convictions.  I suggest the following three-part program:


1. Get bitten by a rabid animal.  Make sure it’s a real good bite, plenty of foaming saliva getting in there.

2. Refuse to get “jabbed” for rabies prevention treatment.  No rabies vaccine and no rabies immune globulin. After all, who knows what questionable substances are in those jabs? Maybe even a dastardly microchip invented by Bill Gates or some sort of toxin implanted by a cackling Jew doctor.  No jabs!

3. Go home to your family and be a loving mother to your children. Plenty of close contact with them in the weeks or months ahead.  It’s all good!  What could possibly go wrong?


And it goes without saying that if your children were to be bitten by a rabid animal, you should, of course, refuse to have them “jabbed” as well.  Who knows what that Jew doctor is injecting?


The good news is that the nonsense of the Russess has a limited shelf-life. Once she hits the wall and looks like a babushka, no one will care in the slightest what she has to say. Give it time – perhaps less time than she thinks.  Age marches onward. Let us remember the well known MGTOW adage – when men get older, the look more and more like Sean Connery; when women get older, they look more and more like…Sean Connery.


In any case, those of us with a triple digit IQ and who are not hypocrites understand that in a society individual choices in many cases affect other people.  Indeed, isn’t that why we on the Far Right criticize “my body my choice” race-mixing? Don’t we oppose the idea that people can do whatever they want, even though it is destructive to the wider society?


Indeed, we all have societal responsibilities. The Millennials and Zoomers should reflect upon that the reason why they are not today pricked (not “jabbed”) against smallpox is because all we older people were so pricked, and the virus was eliminated (in the wild). If someone – an incompetent TROPICAL Chinese lab for example – were to release smallpox, would The Retarded Right refuse that vaccine as well?