Category: hypocrisy

I’m an Indigenous Swarthoid

A riposte.  Red font emphasis added.

This is what the “movement’s” fetish with “racial purity” has given us.

I warned all of you fetishists:

The concept of (absolute) racial purity was originally a racialist meme, one which had particular relevance in the New World environment of the intermingling of highly distinct racial groups (European, Amerindian, and Negro), Negro slavery, and fears of miscegenation. However, today, in the age of genetics, racial purity has become an “anti-racist” concept, a meme of the anti-White Left, a weapon to be wielded against the concept of racial preservation. The leftist argument goes like this:

Premise 1: The reality of race and the legitimacy of racial preservation depends upon absolute racial purity.

Premise 2: Absolute racial purity does not exist (as scientific studies tell us).

Conclusion: Therefore, there is no such thing as race, and racial preservation is illegitimate and irrelevant.

So, this is a logical argument that comes to a false conclusion because of a faulty premise: Premise 1. Premise 2 is however correct. Genetic studies tell us that groups heretofore thought “pure” are likely the result of ancient mixes of other groups.

But, hey, don’t listen to me. Instead follow the great and good Durocher and Ash Donaldson. Victory awaits!

It is also funny how “there is no such thing as indigenous peoples” applies to Europeans, but not to, say, Amerindians or Australian Aboriginals. Curious, that.

 “There’s no such thing as a Dane or a Swede or a German.” 

Hmmm, how about: “There’s no such thing as a Jew or a Nigerian or a Chinamen.” Mr. Netanyahu, tear down that wall!  Nigeria, hand over your land to Bushmen and Hottentots!  China, hand over your territory to all who wish to invade; after all, your national existence is an illusion!

I have, of course, dealt with the question of “what is indigenous?”  See here.

A simple one sentence definition: A group is indigenous when it is the oldest extant group inhabiting a territory in which the group underwent ethnogenesis.

Of course such groups are not “pure” – why should they be?  And why should fast talking Jews and their Goyishe kop puppet liars stop the analysis at “Africans and Russians?” Why not Homo erectus?  Why not self-replicating RNA molecules floating around in the primordial soup?

And by the way, you stupid bastard, ancient steppe peoples were not genetically equivalent to modern Russians.  They were not “Russian” any more than a Cro-Magnon from Provence was “French.”

In my case, I’m an indigenous swarthoid and damn proud of it!  Skin darker than a Nigerian and nostrils wider than an Angolan!

Derb the racial hypocrite.

Twenty years ago, my mother was bedridden and near death. It was one of the last times I was with her, perhaps the very last time—I’m not sure. She was drifting in and out of awareness, sometimes just saying things out loud—random things, clear and coherent but not connected to each other.

So I was sitting there by the bed and heard her say: “I don’t mind dying. At least I knew England when she was England.”

Yeah, Derb, if your mother was still alive, would she see England in the faces of her grandchildren?

Trump will monitor the situation!

There is no truth to the rumor that Greg Johnson, being taller than Richard Spencer, scorns Spencer as an incompetent manlet.  No truth at all!  But, hey, focusing on a bagel dwarf and “incels” helps distract from things like this.  At this point, I think these guys are just trolling us. They can’t still be serious about racialism, can they? I mean, it’s a joke, right?

Yet, Taylor can’t be there because he’s banned from the EU.  The whole thing is curious.

Advertisements

Mote and Beam

In der news.

Nordicists think alike:

Durocher – “Individual and ethnic amour-propre is a powerful motivator in the face of emotionally hurtful facts and hypotheses.”

Ash Donaldson – “I seem to have struck an emotional nerve with you and a few others.”

These no-character specimens love to use psychological projection. In fact, THEY are the ones who are so emotionally over-sensitive they avoid facts – including peer-reviewed published scientific papers – that absolutely refute their beliefs, and THEY are the ones who refuse to acknowledge similar published work indicating racial admixture in their favorite European ethnic groups.  They engage in the most unethical and fundamentally dishonest gaslighting imaginable – peddling lies as “truth,” mocking those who expose their lies as “emotionally sensitive,” while hysterically omitting any mention of published data that demonstrates the falsehood of their own doctrine.  

Perhaps Der Movement should stop agonizing so much over this picture, and start worrying more about this one.  Mote and beam, eh?  Let’s not strike any emotional nerves, shall we? After all, Siberian/East Asian-derived ethnic amour-propre is a powerful motivator in the face of emotionally hurtful facts and hypotheses.

See this.

THIS MONTH marks the 50th anniversary of the publication in The American Mercury of Dr. Revilo Pendleton Oliver’s After Fifty Years, in which he assesses the near-total failure, over the previous half-century, of White Americans to keep their freedoms and their country as of the year 1969. After Fifty Years was not only an article: It was also made into a short film narrated by Dr. Oliver, made to coincide with the launch of the National Youth Alliance, predecessor organization to the National Alliance, one of the sponsors of this program. Within the next month, too, it will be 25 years — a quarter century — since we lost this great man.

Over the next few weeks, we will be introducing you to the masterful works of Revilo Oliver, and then we will be re-assessing the situation facing our people, another half-century on, under the title After 100 Years.

I do not know whether it is a coincidence or not, but, in any case, I’m gratified that, after I challenged Strom about Revilo Oliver’s After Fifty Years and what Strom’s group proposes to do to end the endless cycle of “movement” failure, this series of works are planned. Let’s see what happens.

We should stop spending money on Colored parasites and wars for Israel, and spend more on our nuclear deterrent and on space exploration.

Instead of blaming health problems on “Big Pharma” vaccinations, perhaps you should pin more blame on “Big Food Companies” and the fatsos with no self-discipline to stop stuffing their faces and guzzling sugary drinks and beer.

The weakling fraud backs down again.  He’ll monitor the situation!

If women are naturally eugenic then how did Spencer reproduce?  Seriously though, I’d advise Richard to worry less about some micro-dwarf being tackled in a bagel shop and worry more about his own devastating failures of leadership. In that manner, we may observe some improvement as he moves through his 40s.

Tacos and Eggrolls

Celebrity phenotypes.

Steve Sailer has a shtick where he likes to bring up esoteric points to demonstrate how much smarter and more informed he is compared to all us peons. One of these points was the Hispanic (Mexican) ancestry of baseball Hall-of-Famer and war hero Ted Williams, who most people probably just assume was a typical British Isles-descended White American. 

The question – was Williams’ Mexican ancestry essentially White or did it have considerable New World admixture?

Williams’ paternal ancestors were a mix of Welsh and Irish. The maternal, Mexican side of Williams’ family was quite diverse, having Spanish (Basque), Russian, and American Indian roots.

Putting aside the question as to whether the “Russian” ancestry was actually ethnic Russian and not Jewish, we can ask how much “American Indian roots” there were.

I prefer actual genetic assays to subjective snap judgments about ancestry based on physical appearance, for example, from photos.  However, in the absence of anyone taking a biopsy from Williams’ frozen body, we will have to depend on the tried-and-true “movement” method of “look at dem dere pictures” to make a judgment on this issue.

And here.  I have seen another picture of Williams’ mother in which she looks remarkably mestiza; however, unfortunately I cannot find it online to link to here.

Williams’ Mexican grandmother and uncles.

A young Williams, looking phenotypically appropriate for a zoot suit riot.

An old Williams, looking like any random elderly White guy.

Note that the change in racial phenotype with age shown above is not unusual; I’ve seen that before, particularly with individuals with discernible admixture.  It seems that different ancestries are more predominantly reflected in physical appearance at different points in a person’s life.

I’m comfortable in stating that Williams’ maternal line reflected sufficient New World admixture (likely majority Amerindian admixture) to be phenotypically discernible. This background was also discernible in the young Williams, but he looked more typically “White American” as he aged. The admixture likely was not very large, but present. Given all of this, and Williams’ record as a fighter pilot and war hero, would he – as a single individual – have been assimilable in a White ethnostate? I would say yes, considering that his admixture was likely at a low level and that there are White Americans who have some low level Amerindian ancestry, but issues like this should be on a case-by-case basis. What applies to the “Teddy Ballgame” case is not necessarily going to apply to most (or many) half-Mexicans who would be less assimilable for one reason or another. But some of them, certainly, may be assimilable.

Let’s consider David Bromstad again.

Picture of David Bromstad with his parents can be seen here.

Their ancestry:

Aged 45, the designer celebrity has mixed ethnicity as his father is of Norwegian descent and mother is of Swedish and German descent.

Gee…what happened to the “Chinese mother?”  Bromstad’s sister, by the way, has a more typical Northern European appearance, also putting the “Chinese mother” lie to rest.  Thus, the phenotype of Bromstad and his mother would most likely be the result of a combination of genes present (presumably at low levels) in the genepool of the relevant ethnicities. Bromstad inherited more than his fair share of the “eat with dem chopsticks” genes while his sister did not.

It may be unfair to blame Mom Bromstad alone for her son’s atypical phenotype; see here.

These are all good pictures for Durocher’s forthcoming Unz Review essay about East Asian/Siberian admixture in Northern Europe.

We can be confident that is forthcoming, right?  Or maybe not – after all, Durocher’s reluctance is understandable given the sensitivity of the topic. Individual and ethnic amour-propre is a powerful motivator in the face of emotionally hurtful facts and hypotheses. However, as I like to say, the science is coming, ready or not, whether people like it or not, whether these fit with the current ideological fashions or not. I am confident that the progress of science and free discussion on the Internet will lead to an increase in human consciousness and apprehension of the truth. Right, Durocher?

I’m sure I can be forgiven for the plagiarism of the last paragraph above; after all, it is helpful so as to ridicule the hypocrisy of Der Movement.

A Duel of Wits

Between unarmed opponents.

See this.

There is some good here, but also considerable nonsense. If the characterization of Richard Spencer’s racial views is correct, then Johnson’s racial views are sounder from an empiricist-materialist standpoint. However, there is much lacking here from a more hardcore scientific standpoint (the wages of “Traditionalism” I suppose). 

The whole “transplanted brains” scenario is absurd and meaningless intellectual masturbation.  What could one do? There are racial – and subracial (cue Durocher’s heavy breathing) – differences in brain structure that can be identified via imaging methodology.  If one were really determined to obtain a definitive identification, a small brain biopsy can yield DNA to assay for genetic ancestry and thus prove whether or not the brain tissue was of Negro origin. As far as the ridiculous question as to why build a community on race instead of other characteristics, I point both interviewer and interviewee to Salter’s On Genetic Interests. Adaptive fitness is the ultimate interest of evolved organisms (such as humans), and any group that promotes their ultimate interests will outcompete and replace those who do not. And, after all, one can always form these narrower communities within your racial group while preserving EGI, but the opposite is not possible.  One can form your little group of Tolkien fans among Whites in an all-White ethnostate, but a multi-racial Tolkien group that is not stratified by race (by definition, if it is multiracial and stratified only by Tolkienism, it will not be stratified by race) will constitute a loss of genetic interest.  Smaller groups within a White ethnostate will retain the advantages of a concentrated EGI; on the other hand, smaller groups of Whites in, say, a multiracial Tolkien Fanboy state, will suffer as a result of a loss of EGI, itself a consequence of the multiracialism of such a state. In the latter case, the situation can be retrieved only by racial separation – so why not  divide on the basis of race to begin with?

Stupidity about gender-specific nations also fails – I remember Bowery writing (correctly) long ago that gender/sex is not a genetic interest.  A man has more genetic commonality with female relatives and co-ethnics than with male non-ethnic strangers. One could subdivide a racially pure state by gender (for what purpose?) but the racial stratification must come first if one is concerned with biological fitness. If you are not concerned with fitness, fine, but that’s not an evolutionarily stable situation. You’ll end up in the dustbin of genetic history, replaced by more ethnocentric others. These are reasonably obvious arguments.  I would also point out that sexual reproduction has evolutionary advantages via increased genetic diversity. No doubt that a sufficiently advanced technology could artificially impose independent assortment and recombination on a single-sex artificial reproduction regimen, but, again, for what purpose?  While eliminating the yeastbucket requirement would no doubt be advantageous in many ways, what would be the sexual outlet for such an all-male society?  Widespread homosexuality?  I’ll take a pass on that. There are probably some things best left unchanged in human nature and the division between two sexes for reproduction is likely to be one of those.

And what’s with this obsession with Rushton and Lynn?  Look, the broad theories of both of them are likely true, but that’s as far as it goes. R-K theory on race (that I independently came up with in the 1980s after reading an ecology textbook) is undoubtedly true on the general level of – Blacks and Browns have more offspring and invest less in them; Whites and Yellows have fewer offspring but invest more in them. And, as well, Blacks and Browns have faster life histories (earlier maturation and reproduction and earlier death) than do Whites and Yellows. If Rushton had stuck with that, instead of trying to shoehorn every racial characteristic (including penis size) into the formulation, he’d be more respected today. Likewise, Lynn is likely correct that there is a general association between national IQ and economic productivity (as measured by GDP) and general accomplishment; the problem occurs when he falls too much in love with his theory (as did Rushton with his ideas) and tries to fit every data point into the pattern, with ludicrous “estimates of IQ,” racial history fairy tales about admixture, and hand waving “just so stories” to explain anomalies. The problem, I suppose, is that the broad theories are a bit too obvious and common sense, plain to any reasonably intelligent and honest observant individual, and so there isn’t much “intellectual prestige” in merely stating the obvious.  Therefore, ego-driven “intellectuals” have to build castles of sand to demonstrate how very clever they are.

Counter-Currents commentary:

Craig
Posted July 1, 2019 at 8:07 am | Permalink
Yang was a joke who never should have had any support from the Dissident Right in the first place. Those who did have made public fools of themselves.

Craig, meet Greg Johnson. And Richard Spencer. And many more.

Also, what’s the big deal about Gabbard? Oh she’s good on foreign policy. But so is Trump. He not once, but twice, averted war by outmaneuvering the warhawks in DC. First with Syria and now with Iran. He’s the peace candidate you should be voting for.

There’s no reason to pay attention to any of these clowns with a (D) in front of their name.

Craig, meet David Duke.  And Richard Spencer.

Then there’s John Morgan:

John Morgan
Posted July 1, 2019 at 6:33 am | Permalink
Rep. Gabbard seems to be the least bad (notice I’m not saying good) of all these people. It’s also worth mentioning her connections to/support of Hindu nationalist groups in India like the BJP and RSS (since she is a practicing Hindu herself). This doesn’t necessarily equate to sympathy for nationalism for white people, but it suggests she may at least have the vision to not be completely averse to it. In practice that may not mean much, however. But as Mr. Hampton wrote, she has no chance of getting the nomination this time around, anyway.

You know she supports reparations for Negroes, right?

A one, a one, a one two three….

Ted Cruz at least spoke up about this.  Antifa Don Trump, The God Emperor?  Silence.

MAGA!  Pepe! Kek!

Readers of this blog know that I am no apologist for homosexuals (of either sex) but I’m no apologist for hypocrisy either.  I mean, really….  Apparently, “homophobia” – “vile” or otherwise – is perfectly acceptable in the service of “movement” feuds.  Perhaps, Antifa can be critiqued in other ways than their penchant for sending gay Asians to the hospital.

Oh Siberia!

Of interest to all Europeans, as Durocher would say.  Emphasis added.

Some papers unlikely to be focused on by The Unz Review or Raciology crowds.

Number one.

In this study we compare the genetic ancestry of individuals from two as yet genetically unstudied cultural traditions in Estonia in the context of available modern and ancient datasets: 15 from the Late Bronze Age stone-cist graves (1200–400 BC) (EstBA), and 6 from the Pre-Roman Iron Age tarand cemeteries (800/500 BC–50 AD) (EstIA). We also included 5 Pre-Roman to Roman Iron Age Ingrian (500 BC–450 AD) (IngIA) and 7 Middle Age Estonian (1200–1600 AD) (EstMA) individuals to build a dataset for studying the demographic history of the northern parts of the Eastern Baltic from the earliest layer of Mesolithic to modern times. Our findings are consistent with EstBA receiving gene flow from regions with strong Western hunter-gatherer (WHG) affinities, and EstIA from populations related to modern Siberians. The latter inference is in accordance with Y chromosome (chrY) distributions in present-day populations of the Eastern Baltic, as well as patterns of autosomal variation in the majority of the westernmost Uralic speakers [1–5]. This ancestry reached the coasts of the Baltic Sea no later than the mid-first millennium BC; i.e. in the same time window as the diversification of west Uralic/Finnic languages [6]. Furthermore, phenotypic traits often associated with modern Northern Europeans like light eyes, hair and skin as well as lactose tolerance can be traced back to the Bronze Age in the Eastern Baltic.

Number two.

European population history has been shaped by migrations of people, and their subsequent admixture. Recently, ancient DNA has brought new insights into European migration events linked to the advent of agriculture, and possibly to the spread of Indo-European languages. However, little is known about the ancient population history of north-eastern Europe, in particular about populations speaking Uralic languages, such as Finns and Saami. Here we analyse ancient genomic data from 11 individuals from Finland and north-western Russia. We show that the genetic makeup of northern Europe was shaped by migrations from Siberia that began at least 3500 years ago. This Siberian ancestry was subsequently admixed into many modern populations in the region, particularly into populations speaking Uralic languages today. Additionally, we show that ancestors of modern Saami inhabited a larger territory during the Iron Age, which adds to the historical and linguistic information about the population history of Finland.

This model, however, does not fit well for present-day populations from north-eastern Europe such as Saami, Russians, Mordovians, Chuvash, Estonians, Hungarians, and Finns: they carry additional ancestry seen as increased allele sharing with modern East Asian populations

As shown by these multiple lines of evidence, the pattern of genetic ancestry observed in north-eastern Europe is the result of admixture between populations from Siberia and populations from Europe.

This individual may be interested in learning about these data.

The Meaning of D-Day

Refuting leftist lies.

June 6 brought us the usual leftist paradigms about how WWII means that physical violence committed against anyone to the right of Jeb Bush is justified.  We read comments like:

June 6 was the 75th anniversary of the greatest gathering of anti-fascists in history.

From the perspective of American involvement in D-Day, let’s rephrase that for accuracy:

June 6 was the 75th anniversary of a large group of men, involuntarily drafted from the population of a racially segregated nation, invading a European colonial power that was occupied by an European nation, the invasion setting forth from the territory of yet another European colonial power, led by a general who, upon later becoming US President, instituted “Operation Wetback” to deport Mexican illegals, and which had as its best general an Anglo-supremacist borderline racialist noted for making pro-German comments.

Apparently, that’s “anti-fascism,” 1944-style.

2019-style “anti-fascism” is, on the other hand, a bunch of smelly, masked, noodle-armed, wanna-be Marxist-Anarchist, middle-class and upper-class soyboys, with poor personal hygiene, allied with global capitalism and working hand-in-glove with the political establishment, sucker-punching genuine dissidents and then running away like hysterical menstruating schoolgirls.

Question: If WWII means that it’s OK to “punch Nazis,” do the Korean and Vietnam wars mean that it’s OK to “punch Commies?’’  Just pointing out the hypocrisy – EGI Notes is, of course, a militantly pacifist blog, oozing with the milk of human kindness, and this blog unalterably rejects and denounces any and all forms of hatred and violence. And don’t you forget it!

Joan of Arc(hed Eyebrows)

And Spencer’s elbowing.

Another Greg Johnson Joan of Arc here.

Yeastbucket express!  Diabetes?  Is the yeast feeding off the excess sugar?

Excellent gamester comment:

The question of women boils down to aptitude, Women’s Aptitude. How skilled are they really?
Historically, most men thinkers have slammed women’s ability to think. There have been a lot of ways to categorize this, from “they’re like children” to “they’re intellectual copycats”. But I think the best way is this:
When I go around in my life, I listen to other people talking. Countless times I’ve heard guys discussing things like computers, business, music. I can’t recall ONCE — NOT ONCE — hearing two women discussing a world of ideas. If the world of ideas is a beach with waves of thought coming in, women are far inland in the jungle.

In this thread, the Left tries to justify “punching a Nazi.” The questions I would ask them are as follows. Since even leftist “watchdog” groups label the Nation of Islam and the New Black Panther Party as “hate groups,” how come no Antifa heroes ever attempt to sucker-punch (or elbow) a Black nationalist leader? How come they don’t try and break up a Black nationalist meeting or rally? How come they don’t physically confront all those “Black Israelites” screaming on street corners?

Cutting through the hand-waving (or silence), the answer to all those questions is two-fold. First, the violent left is not against “hatred, bigotry, and fascism” – they are simply anti-White.  Second, and more importantly, they are rightfully afraid. They know if they try any of that they’ll get a big Black fist in the face (likely worse), and, after they get out of the hospital, the same “White supremacist system” that ignores or supports attacks against the likes of Spencer would indict, convict, and imprison them for assaulting a Negro leader, after which they can end up in the prison hospital for surgery to repair a torn anal sphincter.

So, no viral videos of Black nationalists being elbowed in the face.  So how about this – NO ONE gets elbowed or sucker-punched or whatever for expressing their political opinions?  I mean, yes, for now, the System protects its street shock troops, but no one can say what the future holds.  Think of it as enlightened self-interest.