Category: ethnonationalism

Hypocrisy vs. Democratic Multiculturalism

Salter right, Counter-Currents wrong.

First, please note the hypocrisy of Counter-Currents here (yes, I know – using “hypocrisy” and “Counter-Currents” in the same sentence is a perfect example of redundancy). That site is the premier focal point of ethnonationalism in Der Movement, strongly promoting atomized ethnic identities.  Then they run an article criticizing Irish and Italians for identifying ethnically instead of racially.  Inconsistent much?  Oh, they’ll argue that they refer to Europe with respect to ethnonationalism and Cuomo lives in America, not Italy – but so what?  Isn’t the basic principle the same?  And what about Gerry Adams?  He’s an Irishman from Belfast. According to ethnonationalism, he’s Irish, period.  Why critique him then for eschewing some sort of pan-European “Whiteness?’’  Or is it that the ethnonationalism of Counter-Currents has a purely personal, and not ideological, basis and thus has no underlying political consistency?  

Second, if we consider approaches to “democratic multiculturalism” then we can say that what Cuomo did was not 100% wrong.  Maybe 90% wrong, but not 100%.  First, he was in error in making an issue out of a non-issue: “Fredo” is not an ethnic slur; indeed, Don Trump, Jr. is labeled as such, and he’s of German-Scottish-Czech ancestry.  Second, Cuomo was even more in error in making it an ethnic rather than a racial issue – instead of complaining about an Italian-specific grievance, it should have been put into the context of being attacked for being a member of an European ethny, an anti-White attack, or at least, an attack against White ethnics.  Or, even if it was put in the language of an ethnic-specific grievance, race could have been introduced in the context of (truthfully) asserting that similar remarks (if we assume the remark actually was offensive, which it was not) would not be made to Blacks and Jews, etc. There are many approaches to a strategy of democratic multiculturalism that benefits Whites as a whole, and not just making it a narrow ethnic appeal to victimhood. Of course, this gets back to the first paragraph above – race-based approaches ultimately have to reject petty nationalism and the whole ethnonationalist mindset.

The key to “democratic multiculturalism” is to delegitimize multiculturalism by making it a tool for majority interests.  As Salter states, multiculturalism as practiced in the West consists of minority group mobilization coupled to majority group atomization and the complete neglect of, and opposition, to majority group interests. Thus, any move toward majority group mobilization runs counter to the entire underlying premise of “Western” multiculturalism.

I have detailed a number of approaches, and responses to leftist reactions, with respect to “democratic multiculturalism.” I urge serious and strategic thinkers – by definition, not individuals who are committed members of Der Movement, Inc. – to consider the overall strategy as well as the specific tactics described to help achieve the goals of that strategy. Remember the saying – “if everyone is my brother I have no brother.” By analogy, if everyone, particularly the majority, partakes of multiculturalism, then there is no multiculturalism. By that point, it is pure sociopolitical chaos, heightening the contradictions of the System, which is what we want (or should want). The key is for people to participate specifically and openly as Whites, to make it clear that this is majoritarian multiculturalism, and not merely atomized White ethnies pretending to be non-White grievance groups. There’s nothing wrong with noting a specifically ethnic component of your complaint, as long as it is in the context of it being a White ethnic group.  Again, a pro-White Cuomo, in response to a real (and not imagined) ethnic slight, could call out the slight as an anti-Italian slur BUT at the same time note that the reason why such slurs are acceptable to the Left is because Italians are a White ethnic group (contra the Nordicists, but that’s another issue), and that Italians are attacked as part of the System’s anti-White bias.  And the same holds for the Irish or any other European-derived ethny. So, the problem is not an ethnic-based complaint, the problem is when the complaint begins and ends with ethnicity, and is not broadened to include race. Ethnicity should simply be a wedge to leverage the issue of race into the conversation. It’s not anti-Italian or anti-Irish bias that is to be presented as the real issue, but anti-White bias manifesting in particular cases as attacks against Italians or the Irish.

By the way, as an aside, this is what Hampton believes “looks very White.” Now, there are of course some Hispanics who are White – people who have no New World admixture and are essentially the same as their European ancestors, as well as some people with very low levels of New World admixture that is not significantly higher than those White Americans whose “Indian Princess” stories are in fact true. So, “White Hispanics” do indeed exist; unfortunately for Hampton, Jessica Alba obviously is not one of them (or at least, does not look like one of them – and it is by physical appearance that Hampton made his comment to begin with).

Advertisements

WWI: The Lie to End All Lies

Contra Johnson’s thesis.

Let’s consider Johnson’s absurd thesis that WWI (and II!) had nothing to do with petty nationalistic competition between European nation states, but instead was due to “empires.”

I will now consider this, excerpts follow (emphasis added) with some comments:

The early years of the 20th century saw tremendous growth in Europe of both population and prosperity. With arts and culture flourishing, few believed a general war possible due to the peaceful cooperation required to maintain increased levels of trade as well as technologies such as the telegraph and railroad. Despite this, numerous social, military, and nationalistic tensions ran beneath the surface. As the great European empires struggled to expand their territory, they were confronted with increasing social unrest at home as new political forces began to emerge.

Nationalistic tensions. Well, everyone seems to recognize this reality except Johnson and his band of liars.  The idea that “empire” was a major driving factor is ludicrous.  Consider: In WWI, the British, French, and Russian empires were allies, even though in past decades and past centuries, these empires were in conflict.  What changed?  Simple – the national interests of the states in question. The fact that they were empires were incidental. There were conflicts of national interests, and imperial considerations were just one manifestation of those national conflicts of interests. By 1914, the rise of Germany was the threat that brought together the convergence of British, French, and Russian interests.  Empires or no empires, the shifting constellations of national interests would have existed and led to war.

Rise of Germany

The main issue.

In the resulting Treaty of Frankfurt which ended the war, France was forced to cede Alsace and Lorraine to Germany. The loss of this territory badly stung the French and was a motivating factor in 1914.

Indeed.  A territorial dispute – local European territory not colonial – was a motivating factor in the rush to war.  Petty nationalism, conflicts between neighboring states, historical enmity and revanchism – all in the mix.

Building a Tangled Web

As we’ll see, the “tangled web” of alliances – Johnson’s vaunted “temporary solutions to temporary problems” – led to the war that helped wreck the White world.

With Germany united, Bismarck began setting about to protect his newly formed empire from foreign attack. 

Empire?  Johnson starts breathing heavily. Unfortunately for him, “empire” in this context is the modern German nation state, cobbled together from an amalgamation of smaller entities.  So, at what point is today’s ethnonationalism merely a current interpretation of past imperialism?  Freedom for Bavaria!

“A Place in the Sun” and the Naval Arms Race

An ambitious leader and the grandson of England’s Queen Victoria, Wilhelm sought to elevate Germany to equal status with the other great powers of Europe. As a result, Germany entered the race for colonies with the goal of becoming an imperial power. 

In other words, Germany’s pursuit of a real empire was a result of petty nationalist competition with Great Britain and France.

These efforts to obtain territory overseas brought Germany into conflict with the other powers, especially France, as the German flag was soon raised over parts of Africa and on islands in the Pacific.

Petty nationalism started the process.  Overseas conflicts were a manifestation of this.

A global power, Britain moved in 1902 to form an alliance with Japan to curtail German ambitions in the Pacific. This was followed by the Entente Cordiale with France in 1904, which while not a military alliance, resolved many of the colonial squabbles and issues between the two nations.

Suddenly, “colonial squabbles” lost their importance in light of the German threat.  If the nations of Europe had been confederated, none of this would have occurred.  Instead we got Johnson’s “temporary alliances.”  Followed by a world war.

This pan-Slavic sentiment was backed Russia who had signed a military agreement to aid Serbia if the nation was attacked by the Austrians.

Yet we are told by some (commentators at Amren) that pan-Slavism is an acceptable alternative to pan-Europeanism.

Turning to their ally, the Austrians inquired regarding the German position on the matter. On July 5, 1914, Wilhelm, downplaying the Russian threat, informed the Austrian ambassador that his nation could “count on Germany’s full support” regardless of the outcome. This “blank check” of support from Germany shaped Vienna’s actions.

Always the troublemakers.

Behind the scenes in Berlin, German officials were eager for a war with Russia but were restrained by the need to make the Russians appear as the aggressors.

Surprise!

The Dominoes Fall

While the German military clamored for war…

I’m shocked, shocked I say.

Early on July 31, Russia began a full mobilization of its forces in preparation for war with Austria-Hungary. This pleased Bethmann-Hollweg who was able to couch German mobilization later that day as a response to the Russians even though it was scheduled to begin regardless. 

My being shocked continues. 

Though it was unlikely that Britain could have remained neutral if France was attacked, it entered the fray that next day when German troops invaded Belgium activating the 1839 Treaty of London. 

Those pesky treaties and alliances again.

On August 6, Austria-Hungary declared war on Russia and six days later entered into hostilities with France and Britain. Thus by August 12, 1914, the Great Powers of Europe were at war and four and a half years of savage bloodshed were to follow.

Thank you, petty nationalism.

Comment left at Counter-Currents:

HungarianFashionista
Posted September 29, 2019 at 12:59 pm | Permalink
(Health warning: The first 30 minutes of this podcast contains a large dose of WW1 Entente propaganda.)
I wish Western nationalists would stop pontificating about and lecturing Eastern Europe. We take care of our corner of the white world, and you take care of yours, that should be the rule in nationalist politics.

They should stop pontificating about Southern Europe as well, a topic about which they clearly know nothing.

We take care of our corner of the white world, and you take care of yours, that should be the rule in nationalist politics.

You would think that “ethnonationalists” would inherently understand that, but, you see, in reality they are ethnoimperialists.  For example, the British-Saxon hybrid John Morgan believes he has the right to live in Hungary, despite not being an ethnic Hungarian, while pontificating about Hungary and lecturing to Hungarians, all the time lauding the alleged virtues of “ethnonationalism.”  It’s “ethnonationalism for me but not for thee” for these imperialistic invasive hypocrites.

Let’s Count the Lies

Counter-Currents represents the greatest Far Right threat to White racial interests.

After the roll call of suckers (i.e., “donors”), we observe a defense of petty nationalism; thus:

1. Johnson complains (with respect to pan-European unity) about “permanent solutions to temporary problems.” There’s two issues with this. First, some of these “temporary problems” are such that they are likely to last for generations, and likely longer; the threat of China is one example. Temporary?  Second, and more fundamentally, why does the idea of confederation or “Imperium” have to be in the context of negativism – responding to some sort of threat?  Why can’t it be about Actualizing a High Culture, as Yockey had as the fundamental foundation of his Imperium idea?  Something else positive?  Space exploration?  High Technics?

2. Then there is the “idea” that the “war threat” of petty nationalism is over, there is no threat of “brother wars” at least in Western Europe – so those concerns are of little worry.  Right…we have Johnson talking about “ethnic cleansing” among Europeans, we have hardcore Nordicism, we have the British fuming over Polish plumbers while embracing Commonwealth Desis and Negroes, we have the ethnoimperialist hypocrisy of certain European ethnies (and Far Right activists) thinking they have the right to colonize the lands of other Europeans. What if the “national interests” of a “sovereign nation” in Europe includes making an alliance with China against a competing European nation?  Do we then descend into Johnson’s war and ethnic cleansing?

3. Johnson’s comments about WWI are completely ahistorical – or perhaps just more Johnsonian gaslighting. No, the cause of WWI was not because there were conflicting empires.  It was, ultimately, about national competition between Great Britain and Germany, the inherent conflict between the rise of Germany and British decline, and then there was the fear and hatred of France for Germany – French revanchism.  And then Johnson has the nerve to talk about WWII and “empires” – while WWII was a PURE example of petty nationalism, of German hegemony and Hitler’s desire to take other people’s lands, of British “balance of power” politics, of French hysteria about Germany, about Italy’s grasping for a national power not based on the actual quality content of people and state, etc. Johnson is being fundamentally dishonest here. How can his donors give money to support his gaslighting?

While I do not agree with everything here, the fundamental thesis is likely correct.  It was the (petty) nationalism of Germany that precipitated the crisis – although I believe others should share the blame; I cite the petty nationalism in other European nations as contributing as well.  But Germany as the focal point makes sense. Just like they wreck Europe today with their self-righteous pathological altruism, back then they wrecked Europe with their aggressive lunatic nationalism. That’s all blasphemy of course for a “movement” that literally worships everything “Germanic.” In any case, Johnson’s thesis about the world wars is a stupid as his thesis about Trump.

4. It is also an outright like that a pan-European confederation would abrogate local sovereignty.  Yockey denied this, I have frequently discussed this – Johnson and his crew of merry liars simply ignore all of this.  

And the rest of the podcast was superficial and imbecilic.  Johnson – “people like us practically work for free” – what a liar, after he talked about the $59,000 he raised so far from his suckers this year.  Some bloggers do indeed work for free but not you, liar.

And can you believe Morgan talking about people living in other people’s nations when this hypocritical invader violates the sovereignty and ethnic homogeneity of the Hungarian people?

Retarded comment:

inq

Posted September 28, 2019 at 8:59 am | Permalink

“How can Europeans band together to defend their collective interests while preserving their independence and sovereignty?”

They have already done it – it is called NATO.

The next step is to accept the inevitable and disband the UE supranational structure that has been designed to fail and nowdays even threatens to blow up the US/Europe NATO by actions of the same two countries that were responsible for the UE idea in the first place.

Err, idiot, Johnson and his colleagues oppose NATO.  Did you listen to the podcast?

The despicable hater of Southern Europeans Ash Donaldson:

Ash Donaldson

Posted September 26, 2019 at 11:37 am | Permalink

Yikes, Islam is “right about women”? I seem to have boarded the wrong train. Islam and Globohomo are equally worlds apart from the natural relationships between men and women among the Celts, Germans, and Slavs before universalism took root. God (or Gods) save us from all this nonsense about the sanctity of the Muslim womb.

“Celts, Germans, and Slavs”…after all dem wops are just Globohomo Muslims, all of dem dere two foot tall scurrying swarthoid roaches. Counter-Currents promotes Donaldson because Counter-Currents hates Southern Europeans.  Let’s put the cards on the table. Keep on sending in those “D’Nations” you shabbos sud stepandfetchits.  Keep on sending money to people who openly hate you: Johnson, Morgan, Donaldson.  Hey Donaldson, you declare yourself the enemy of Southern Europeans, then they’ll reciprocate.

From the breathless Counter-Currents review of Donaldson’s trashy novel (emphasis added):

Southern Europe has its place in From Her Eyes as well. Despite often appearing as Christian villains, the Romans play a big part in the narrative, since Donaldson and the characters themselves rely heavily on Roman sources such as Plutarch and Tacitus. The ancient Greeks are remembered perhaps more fondly, with Xenophon, Herodotus, and the Delphic Oracle figuring prominently in the story. Aethelstan’s adoptive father is named Leonidas, after the Spartan King who faced the Persians at Thermopylae.

Leonidas is also where the Slavic connection comes into play. Leonidas was Hungarian by birth and took part in the defense of Budapest against the Muslim invaders as a teenager.

Putting aside that Hungarians are not Slavic, you idiot, well, yes, Southern Europe does have a role to play here – as villains, as historians commenting on those noble Celts and Germans, as folks who give their names to others (Leonidas the Hungarian – laughter).  So – what?  Essentially, Southern Europe’s role here is the same as that of Muslims and Negroes, enemies of Ash Donaldson.  Enemies of Counter-Currents as well. But, again, when you declare someone as your enemy, don’t be surprised when they respond in kind.  I hope that any Italians, Greeks, Iberians, Balkan peoples, etc. reading this blog post understand full well that Counter-Currents and Ash Donaldson are your enemies.  Not because you ever did anything to them; simply because they hate you for what you are. There is nothing you can do, therefore, to end their implacable hatred for you, so you may as well return it.

More news:

See this.  Strom’s criticism of Trump is good, as well as his open declaration that Trump’s right-wing populism during the campaign was simply a calculated ploy to win votes – something that everyone today realizes and admits, except those whose egos and pocketbooks are tied to lying otherwise.

Strom knows full well that he is not the only person on the Far Right who was openly skeptical about Trump as far back as 2016-2016.  I frequently cite Strom as a fellow Trump-skeptic; it would be good if he would return the favor.  I say that not out of pettiness or ego, but out of principle.  If you guys want your racial nationalism to be successful, then you should support those who show good judgment, and criticize those who do not.  Indeed, we have some on the Far Right who today still lie that Trump was “sincere” and “a man of genuine greatness.”  Surely, Strom knows this.  Why doesn’t he call it out?  

Strom’s comments about socialism are also correct, and akin to my own ideas on the subject, discussed at this blog previously.

See this.  That’s good, but note two things.  First, it is the administration of Donald “the last chance for White America” Trump that is doing this; can any of the slavish Trump supporters on the Far Right admit that they were wrong about him?  Second, we note that it is the ADL that is opposed to Amren and to White advocacy and who uses lies to achieve their goals. It’s not Romanians or Italians organizing to shutdown Amren, but a certain other group.  Are we learning yet?

Well, well, well….  Blasphemy!  Remember as the Quota Queens tell us:  #Greta is right!

What Do They Really Mean by “Ethnonationalism?”

What they really mean.

What do the likes of Johnson-Morgan-Munro-Deasy-Farrell really mean by the term “ethnonationalism?”

What they pretend to mean is something like this:

Ethnonationalism means that every ethnic group will have their own homeland for their exclusive use; every people will have their ethnically homogeneous nations in which they’ll be free of interference and invasion from other peoples.

Very well.

However, based on their behavior, their attitudes, what they do and what they accept, the real meaning is:

Ethnonationalism means that Northwest Europeans will have homelands for their exclusive use, homogeneous nations in which they’ll be free of interference and invasion from other peoples; at the same time, Northwest Europeans will have the right to live wherever they choose, including in other people’s nations, interfering with the ability of those other peoples to live in the manner they wish among their own kind.

Hungary? Certainly!  After all, Budapest is not for the Hungarians; instead it is an “open city,” available for colonization by the racial masters and betters of the lowly Magyars. Italy?  Certainly!  Live there, mock woppish ineptness, while, of course, bedding Italian women. Romania? Certainly!  Live there while writing the most offensively scurrilous screeds against the Romanian people and, of course, mating with Romanian women. Bulgaria!  Certainly!  Swagger through the streets like you own the place, desperately trying to avoid being traumatized by the faces of the natives (which “take some getting used to” – in their own country!). Iberia? Certainly!  Let’s get those dago wogs out of Britain, while allowing British expats to colonize Spain with their ethnically exclusive enclaves.

For these types, “ethnonationalism” is really ethnoimperialism; they want to be the feudal lords of a racial aristocracy. However, other peoples, who are true ethnic and racial nationalists, may have different ideas about this.

I’d also like to point out that this attitude of the ethnonationalists on the Right mirrors similar attitudes of “we’ll do whatever the hell we want” from their co-ethnics on the Left. Thus, we see some people who believe they have the right to forcibly dump Afro-Asiatic invaders into the living spaces of other peoples. The attitude is exactly the same.

Am I being unfair to any Far Right “activists?”  Well, they always have the opportunity to redeem themselves. Morgan, for example, can publicly admit to being a hypocrite, apologize, and leave Hungary, pledging never to return.  That would be a useful start in ending the hypocrisy.

A Pretentious Jackass

Let’s look at the “instant classic!”

Laugh at this. Excerpts, emphasis added:

Few things are as amusing to European nationalists as reading American wignat takes on European politics and government. 

Equally true:

Few things are as amusing to American White nationalists as reading European wignat takes on American ethnic relations, politics, and government.  

Amusingly, this author is a prime example of that. In general, the Europeans perceive America – White America that is – as being sort of like a transplanted Europe, in all of its patchwork divisions. They believe that 99% of White Americans are mono-ethnic, of unmixed ethnic ancestry exactly similar to Europe, each with their distinct national characters still intact, each completely segregated from the others, each with their isolated cultures, all squabbling among themselves as if it was 1919 or 1889 or 1849.  Granted, if the only thing you read are American Der Movementers, I can see where you may get that impression, but nevertheless it is absurd. I believe that European misconceptions about America are worse than the reverse.

Wignats, or wigger nationalists, are characterized by their low IQ, binary thinking, lack of nuance, and advocacy of solutions that have already been proven insufficient or ineffective to the predicaments facing whites. These people are often uninformed, misinformed, and ill-informed; they are quite susceptible to deception and manipulation; and they’ll often fall for fedposts.

So, either 99% of “movement” “leaders” and “activists” are “wignats” or the “wignat” behavioral suite is completely mimicked by non-“wignats” in Der Movement.  After all, the preceding sentences describe almost every “movement” hero you can imagine.

In their binary, unnuanced worldview, there are good guys and bad guys. Wignats struggle to comprehend the model of many overlapping, complementary, and contrasting conspiracies that better defines our world. They tend to believe that the camps of good and bad guys are monolithic and acting in concert, guided from some sort of higher authority. The view of men and nations as a mixture of good and bad, of purity and sin, confuses these boys, bless their hearts.

Sound familiar?  Good guys: Trump, Northwest Europeans, Hitler, high-IQ Orientals (for the HBDers); Bad guys: All other Europeans, the Jews (everything is the fault of the Jews – unless it’s the fault of the wops, or unless you are a HBDer and then the Jews are gods).

One of the silliest ideas to come out of this mindset is that Vladimir Putin is based and red-pilled…

He’s playing a deep chess game! (Right, Kevin?).

Additionally, Polish hostility towards the ideas and imagery of National Socialism is interpreted by these types as evidence that Poles aren’t as based and red-pilled as we’d initially thought. 

I don’t know – maybe Polish perfidy in getting (moderate) American racialists banned from the EU is sufficient reason to think that, you ignorant moron.

….anti-Nazism in Poland and other countries is a sign of patriotism and nationalism. 

Jared Taylor is not a Nazi, if you hadn’t noticed.

The wignat will repeat the slogan of “no more brother wars” but not understand that brother wars and betrayals did occur in the past and that the marks they left were deep.

The call of the ethnonationalist!  More intra-European conflict!  Cue Johnson and his “ethnic cleansing” among Europeans.

Many in the West hope that the Slavs and other Eastern Europeans will help them in their battle over demographic destiny. People like me will help.

We can do without your kind of help, thank you very much.

A significant number, however, are still bitter about the Second World War and our subsequent abandonment to Communism. 

Blame the Holy Ones for that. You know, the same folks who today demand you open your borders to the Third World.  And, no, I’m not talking about “the Jews” here.

Many others are disgusted with Western degeneracy and effeminacy and want nothing to do with the West. The wignat in this context is no better than the Boomer who shares the image of the crossed-out swastika and hammer and sickle, believing that the Poles carrying that banner support his brand of color-blind Boomer conservatism. Not only are the Poles not color-blind, but they’d. Not even fellow Slavs are welcome. In fact, speaking Russian in the streets of Warsaw is a good way to get your ass kicked.

Ban Jared Taylor from the EU, that’s a sign of Slavic machismo for you.

Polish support of the EU as a concept (though not in its current form) is understandable. It wants access to the EU labor market so that Poles may go to Western Europe, find work, and send Euros back to Poland, providing foreign currency to the government and helping relieve the pressure on Poland’s lackluster domestic labor markets. 

So, the Poles would “exclude the vast majority of white people from their in-group,” but then demand access to other White nations.  How is that better than Colored behavior?

NATO participation can be very easily explained by hostility towards and apprehension of Russia and Russian ambitions. Like I said, speaking Russian in Warsaw is a very good way to get yourself dragged into an alley and beaten to within an inch of your life. 

And speaking on behalf of White – including Polish – interests “is a very good way” of getting banned from the EU because of these wonderful Poles.

Waking up in a country bordering Russia is what I imagine my short and skinny neighbor feels like when he passes me. Sure, the large man next door whose hobbies include weightlifting, bare-knuckle combat, and target shooting is friendly and polite, but what if . . . what if . . .

What a pretentious juvenile jackass this Jeelvy is.

With all this in mind, it stands to reason that Poland would do anything in order to check Russian power and build up its own defensive capabilities if it is to defend its sovereignty. And sovereignty is important to the Poles. They’ve lived under foreign occupation for long enough to know. They, and all the other countries bordering Russia who would defy her will, value their sovereignty so much that they would break bread with the devil if necessary to remain masters of their own fates.

I suppose it as “the devil” who demanded that Taylor be banned from the EU?

What Poland wants is not very different from what Israel wants…

Banning White nationalism?

I believe we live in a period of history when American global hegemony and the American empire is facing imminent collapse. 

Because of all those disgruntled Scots-Irish warriors, right Jeelvy?

Poland has allied itself to the American empire, but it has not shackled itself to it. Unlike Israel, whose infiltration and lobbying operation has joined it at the hip to the American empire (the same can be said of Saudi Arabia), Poland will not necessarily share the fate of the American Empire because it can defend itself independently, even from a resurgent Russia. It can even form a regional alliance with the Baltic States, Finland, Ukraine, and its historical ally Hungary to counter Russian power. This is the “Intermarium” imagined by Poland’s inter-war geopolitical strategist Marshall Pilsudski. When the time comes, Poland has the option of decoupling itself from the West.

Why don’t they do this now? Because they prefer to “deal with the devil?”

Welcome to Eastern Europe, friends, a very low-trust society, where deceptions are many, overlapping, and make a mockery of the truth. International Jewry has had a ball with deceiving naïve, high-trust Westerners. Here in the East, we’re not only naturally suspicious of outsiders and especially Westerners, Jews, and Western Jews, we’re Jewier than the Jews in our business dealings. Expect to get overcharged for a service you’re never gonna get. And then get sued.

Gee, that sounds very appealing.  Gotta play into that “Outer Hajnal” stereotype now, don’t we?

Brother wars are tragic. Yet in a sense, they are inevitable. The non-whites of the world are only a credible threat to whites in this day and age due to the decadence of the West and our unwillingness to fight back against their predations. However, in the fullness of time, there will be a civilizational resurgence, and that resurgent civilization will beat back the non-white menace with relative ease and turn its attention to worthier foes—other white people, at which point the cycle of degeneration will start again. Perhaps it is our fate to do this forever.

Thus speaks The Eternal Ethnonationalist.  That’s what ethnonationalism is all about, my friends, straight form the horse’s mouth – they WANT brother wars; they WANT “the cycle of degeneration” to start again. They just can’t wait. Maybe throw in a bit of “ethnic cleansing,” as well, right Greg?

In any case, we have to abandon sophomoric moralism and ideas about people halfway across the world being /ourguys/. We are descendants of the Indo-European aristocrats who fought each other to the death for pure prestige. It is in our nature to be warriors, and warriors seek out worthy foes. In the wake of our decadent age, victory and prestige await in combat. There’s never a dull moment on the steppes.

Pretentious jackass.

Then we have:

Greg Johnson

Posted September 9, 2019 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

Wignats:

1. Spencer

2. Parrott

3. Heimbach

4. Stryker

Rewritten for enhanced accuracy:

Wignats:

1. Spencer

2. Parrott

3. Heimbach

4. Stryker

5. Johnson

In Der News, 9/8/19

Race and “movement” news.

I have problems with how Greg Johnson answers the question: “Which ethnic groups are white enough to be included in white nationalism? – in his latest podcast.

First, if the only thing Greg cares about is that every ethnic group has its own homeland, then he should call himself a Universal ethnonationalist and not a White nationalist.  If it doesn’t make any difference if we talk about Greeks or Turks, Russians or Georgians – or, presumably, Danes or Nigerians – then why use the adjective “White” to describe the type of nationalist you are? Or do you actually have an identity affiliation with some groups more than others? If so, who are those groups, and why do they fit and others do not?

Second, when people ask questions like this, what they are really asking, in essence, is – Who is White enough to live in a White American ethnostate?  Who is White enough to be considered a “fellow White” by WNs?  Who is White enough to be welcomed as a “brother” (or “sister”) at your racialist conferences and forums?  That fits in with the previous question about Nordicism discussed in the podcast, and it should have been answered in a more thoughtful and comprehensive manner.  Yes, indeed, “White enough for what?” – that’s the entire point.  And the question of a Greek being a (White) American is also exactly the point; no one on the Far Right is arguing about Greeks in Greece. Yes, the Greeks are Greek enough to be in Greece; I doubt that’s what the question was addressing.  We all know what the issue is.  It is, e.g. – are Greeks White enough to be considered part of the family of White peoples? Superficial answers to questions do not constitute serious metapolitics.  If you declare yourself a “leader” and ask for $100,000 per year in “D’Nations” then you have an obligation to do better.

Third, I strongly object to the idea that an Imperium has to lead to a significant “blending” of peoples, with intra-European migration, assimilation, and mixing. This issue has been discussed by my work many times, and the fact that this comes up again clearly demonstrates the danger of activists who refuse to engage with opposing ideas, and who believe that “banning” people from their blogs obviates the need for critical thinking.

As far as Johnson’s claim (in the previous section of the podcast, concerning the topic) that he takes a strong stand against extreme Nordicism; I don’t know what comments he has been deleting, but four words suffice here:  Ash Donaldson, Andrew Hamilton.

But at least the Counter-Currents crew have the honesty to admit that Nordicism is still very much alive and well in the (American) “movement.” That contrasts to the following commentator:

Domster
Posted September 7, 2019 at 5:24 pm | Permalink
I am not sure why the podcasters are under the impression that Nordicism has any noticeable presence in our current iteration of the dissident right. It is a pretty rare thing nowadays. I don’t exclude the possibility that some old guard figures are of that persuasion, but overall it is quite rare nowadays.

This person is obviously not a reader of EGI Notes, where I regularly chronicle Der Movement’s constant Nordicism. Indeed, in the absence of Nordicism, Der Movement ceases to exist, so fundamental is that worldview to its existence. Just peruse the posts at this blog under the labels “Nordicism” or “Sallis’ Law” or “Durocher” for some recent examples – or just read the comments threads of virtually any “movement” blog post about Southern (or Eastern) Europe (never mind a recent Counter-Currents contribution by the aforementioned Donaldson). This commentator is mendacious, clueless, or perhaps so habituated to Der Movement’s constant Nordicism that he/she/it no longer notices it – just like one can become oblivious to a foul smell if they are exposed to it long enough. The only excuse this fool has is that many Nordicists today avoid using that term to describe themselves; even years ago, Kemp (of all people!), in response to some of my own writing, denied being a Nordicist, despite the fact that he was (and still is, for those who still remember him) widely considered one of the “movement’s” leading Nordicists, with his “work” enthusiastically promoted by most Nordicists (some of whom became so breathless over it that one suspects it was onanism material for them).  That some may deny a label does not mean it is not true.  After all, we may assume Trump would deny being a retarded buffoon, but does that denial hold any water?

Well ,well, well…Sallis right again.  Read this, emphasis added:

German activists, refugee defenders and illegal immigrants have decided to enter Bulgaria and demolish the border fence.

We read this on the following page:

With this, the German tolerators plan to open the way for thousands of newcomers from Africa and Asia to Bulgaria.

We from the Bulgarian National Union – ND (SBNE) cannot consider it normal for German anarchists to be ordered on Bulgarian territory. The German trash traveling to Bulgaria must be stopped at all costs, because their intention to open the border is outrageous and offensive to all Bulgarians!

The management of the Ministry of Interior as well as the Foreign Ministry have already been notified and we expect them to take all necessary measures to prevent the entry of this group into the territory of the Republic of Bulgaria.

In the event that the above-mentioned institutions do not prevent this another hassle and arbitrariness towards the Bulgarian state, then we as Bulgarian citizens will take measures to protect our country.

Therefore,inform, gather people and resist. Show that Bulgaria is not Avramov’s home where anyone can enter and do whatever they want !!!

The German garbage departs today at 13:00 from Berlin and is expected to be in Sofia tomorrow in the early afternoon.

So, it’s not enough for the Holy Ones to sail the Mediterranean looking for Afro-Asiatics to dump into Italy (or Greece or Spain). It’s not enough that they physically crash their ships into Italian harbors to disembark invaders (akin to a military invasion).  In addition, they actually have the temerity to invade by land, to open the borders to the Third World flood – in someone else’s country.


Questions – has any Italian ship crashed into Hamburg to eject the flotsam and jetsam of Africa? Have any Bulgarians entered Germany to enforce open borders there?  Any swarthoid ships sailing the Mediterranean looking for migrants to dump into Norway?  Can we safely say the answer to all three questions is “no?”  Yes, we can.

“They all have to go back,” indeed.  

Some good news.  Of course, the good news is coming from a pan-Europeanist, as opposed to the litany of woe emanating from the ethnonationalist side of the Right.

9/5/19: In Der News

More “movement” nonsense.

The map, which was displayed on a posterboard, appeared to have been altered with a marker, extending the storm’s path to include Alabama.

He’s a man of genuine greatness!

Everything Zman writes here concerning dissidents against the System equally applies to dissidents against Der Movement.

One problem with Zman’s essay is that, as a whole, it implies that harsh criticism of the majority is reflective of an embittered (crazy and bitter!) dispossessed attitude, rather than a dissident attitude.  This is hair-splitting.  Was Solzhenitsyn wrong to harshly criticize the Soviet system?  Was he less a dissident for doing so? Or was he rightfully dispossessed from the traditional Russia by communism?  Can one be both dissident and dispossessed?  After all, Der Movement literally worships a book entitled The Dispossessed Majority – so….

In any case, I urge others to join me in creating independent centers of thought outside “movement” dogma.  As the Quota Queens spout their fossilized screeds while dancing through cemeteries in their swastika-soled boots, we real dissidents will formulate fresh perspectives on racial nationalism.

Ethnonationalism marches on.  So much winning!  It’s interesting how there’s a common thread in the bad judgment on the Right, internationally speaking.  In America, it’s the Type I Quota Queens; in Italy, it is the bombastic, loud-mouthed Type I ethnonationalist Northern Italian (Celto-Germanic Nordic!) hero beloved of the American ethnonationalist crowd. Failure after failure after failure.

Sure! “Elites” will be generated from, and support, a bunch of semi-retardates whose only consistency is utter failure, whose bright ideas include buying $50,000 worth of swastika-soled boots from China, and whose activism includes chugging gallons of milk while screaming “Kek.”  Who wouldn’t want to buy into that?