Fairly easy practical activism.
Vulnerabilities for the System abound, if only there was a crafty and strategic opponent willing to exploit those vulnerabilities. Consider Title VI and academia – coupled to the whole affirmative action scam about admissions – all tailor-made to infuriate White students and their families. It is no coincidence that a major focus of “reverse racism” lawsuits have centered on the educational system. In addition to what Title VI can do, Title VII can bring the focus of anti-White discrimination and hypocrisy to the broader arena, and Title IX can focus on anti-male discrimination and hypocrisy. The three “titles” together constitute a weak point, a chink (sorry, Derbyshire) in the System’s armor.
Salter stated that – from the standpoint of a majority being displaced and replaced – the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does, thus ensuring the relatively painless race replacement of the majority. However, as stated above, Democratic Multiculturalism is not stable for the System in the long run, as the whole idea of multiculturalism is empowering minorities and disempowering the majority. A concerted effort of the majority to demand fair treatment under multiculturalism, according to its own standards, would destabilize the entire multicultural system and heighten the contradictions.
I suggest that White Americans file “multicultural” complaints non-stop, to “monkey wrench” the whole multiculturalist establishment and make it untenable. Of course, the complaints must have a solid basis in reality; they cannot be fabricated out of nothing. However, in today’s “woke” America, it will be very easy – almost trivial in fact – for Whites, particularly White men, to find something legitimate to complain about that is relevant to this approach. Certainly, one must take into account context. Is your position (e.g., as an employee or student) secure enough so that you can make the complaint without undue harm being directed back at you? After all, you want the complaint to be a net positive. If there is a mechanism for anonymous complaints and if you believe that this approach is best for your situation, then go that route. If an anonymous option is not available, then consider costs and benefits, and if the context is such that you think it best to move forward with the complaint, then do so. Remember that there are federal (and in some cases, state) laws in place outlawing retaliation against those who file discrimination complaints. That does not guarantee protection of course, but it is another legal weapon in your arsenal. If you make a legitimate discrimination complaint and can demonstrate retaliation, those responsible for the retaliation could (in theory) find themselves in significant legal difficulty.
Are you a college/university student? Any discrimination against Whites? Use Title VI. Against men? Use Title IX. Given what goes on at colleges and universities these days, there would likely be a weekly abundance of choice legitimate complaints that can be filed. If you work in academia, as a professor for example, not only do you have Title VI and IX in your arsenal, but Title VII as well. With respect to Titles VI and IX, keep in mind that virtually every school of higher learning receives federal money in some form, so those rules will apply. Remember that student loans, among other things, are included in the definition of “federal money” or “federal funds” so, again, virtually every college and university in America is covered. Title VII is a more general rule against employment discrimination.
If you work in any other field, then Title VII alone should cover employment discrimination with respect to anti-White and anti-male activities. Virtually all CRT, DEI, multicultural-diversity training or other activity will be, virtually by definition, anti-White and/or anti-male, and so Whites should file complaints about such activities non-stop. The more the better!
Now, if you go the legal route, beware of situations like this. However, filing complaints, either internally via Human Resources (or other internal departments related to diversity and discrimination), and/or externally with the relevant government agencies, is your right under the law and is independent of filing a legal action, so the caveat associated with that link would not apply (as long as no legal action is filed). However, as noted above, the targeted entity may attempt retaliation against you (even though that is technically illegal). Keep in mind that while internal complaints can be anonymous in some cases (depending on the school or employer in question), government complaints, insofar as I am aware, will require you to use your name. If you file a legal action against the entity, you would need to be public as well.
The minimal outcome of your complaints would be to use up the time and resources of whatever department/agency the complaint is made to, and will most likely annoy the (most likely, leftist) person(s) dealing with it. If the complaint is not taken serious or acted upon, that is further evidence for anti-White (and/or anti-male) discrimination, exposing the contradictions of the System, and could be a basis for legal action (as long as you remember the warning mentioned above). If the complaint is fully taken seriously, the positive outcomes from the perspective of democratic multiculturalism and disrupting the System are obvious. The most likely outcome of your complaint is that the relevant entity or government agency will go through the motions of an “investigation” and “determine” little to no basis for your complaint. If your complaint was legitimate (which, as I stated, it must be), then this outcome basically conflates with “the complaint is not taken serious or acted upon” and you can go from there. Again, at minimum, you are using up multicultural resources, bringing anti-White and anti-male discrimination into the discussion, provoking further racial division, stimulating societal chaos, and “monkey wrenching” the multicultural apparatus. You are also getting the satisfaction of responding to discrimination against you, rather than just quietly fuming about it, or complaining on some irrelevant forum.
The key here is to have many Whites do it. If a significant fraction of Whites pursue this strategy, the benefits of even a minimal response to the complaints will be amplified. If the System, overwhelmed by such complaints, declares that anti-White (and anti-male) discrimination will no longer be considered, then they expose themselves to the White public, racial division is enhanced, and we will observe a “heightening of the contradictions.” Regardless of the exact outcome, it would seem that burying the multicultural apparatus under an avalanche of (legitimate) White racial complaints can only have some kind of long-term positive outcome.
There will always be nitwits who oppose such activity – it is not flashy enough for them, not sexy enough, not charging the ramparts with their Viking battle axe. They will write moronic comments about “whining and complaining dishonors our ancestors” as they sit on a computer in their parents’ basement, scrolling through panhandling grifter “movement” sites as part of their hobbyist “activism.” Ignore such people. Leveraging the multicultural system against itself is “low hanging fruit” that needs to be grabbed – it is ripe and ready.
eginotes 
You must be logged in to post a comment.