Category: Black Privilege
Holidays.
It’s sort of ironic that these two holidays fall on the same day this year, as the former doesn’t much affect the population focused on by the latter (note this population has two holidays all to themselves – this one and MLK, demonstrating Black Privilege), but, it is what it is.
And other news.
So Schilling gets passed over again because of his rightist political views, while an over-rated mulatto with the fielding range of a barnacle and a White guy lucky enough to play in Colorado get elected. Most amusing are those SJW sportswriters who assert that they wouldn’t vote for Schilling because of his “hate” but would vote for bobble-head hominid Barry Bonds. Black Privilege and all.
More evidence that Sallis is always, ALWAYS right – yet another example of the ethnonationalist-Nordicist-HBD alliance. One of Counter-Currents’ Andrew Fraser wanna-bes writes:
Everything that Stoddard wrote has stood the test of time.
If by “everything” you actually mean “virtually nothing” about “racial science” then you’re absolutely correct.
His division of European races into what he called Nordics in northern Europe and Mediterraneans in Southern Europe are reaffirmed by recent DNA studies.
Sure! There’s plenty of DNA studies talking about that; I must have just missed them all. There is a PCA-based clustering between Northern and Southern Europe in the DNA sense, but no one is talking about a disjunctive Nordic/Mediterranean split in the scientific literature – the word “Nordic” in particular is not used.. And it is not just nomenclature; while clustering is possible, genetic differences are for the most part clinal, not disjunctive. Further, looking at the rest of that Counter-Currents essay, no one is calling Balkanoids “Alpinid” – where is “Alpinid” in the “recent DNA studies” I wonder?- as most of those Balkanoids are more in the Southern European cluster (the Polish and Russian “Alpinids” in contrast are in the Northern European cluster). By the way, are Stoddard’s views on Ancient Rome supported by “recent DNA studies” – you know the ones that cluster Roman Ice Age and Republic samples among current Southern European populations? Oh, I forgot, Der Movement is making believe that study doesn’t exist.
The real reason this guy is getting all hot and bothered over Stoddard:
Stoddard was from a prominent New England family. His immigrant ancestor was Anthony Stoddard, father of the Puritan minister Solomon Stoddard. He was also related to Sir George Downing, for whom Downing Street in London is named, and Jonathan Edwards, the minister who preached the famous sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. Theodore’s father was John Lawson Stoddard, who wrote and lectured on his travels and also wrote hymns and poetry. His mother, Mary Brown, was born in Maine. Stoddard men frequently married women with esteemed families as well – many were physicians. Theodore’s direct ancestors were New England thinking men, not soldiers or pioneers. A look at his family tree also shows a pattern of his male ancestors marrying older than the norm.
His ancestry is of great benefit to all humanity! Just like John Lindsay.
Were it not for Stoddard, we may not have known there was ever a problem in the first place.
Sure! Without Stoddard we would never have noticed all those non-White faces in Los Angeles, New York, London, and Paris! What a hysterical idiot – or we can just say “a current Counter-Currents writer.”
The diseased cogelites are at it again. Ever notice that the high, high-IQ Land of the Gods is an over-crowded, diseased, polluted, chaotic dystopia whose major contributions to human progress include copying the ideas of others and spreading viral pandemics?
Ah, the wages of HBD:
Jett Ruckersays:
January 21, 2020 at 8:33 am
My SO is an intelligent, fair-minded, loving Jewish woman (I’m a Gentile male). She admits respect for my Holocaust revisionism, but never expresses agreement with it outside us (I don’t often express it face-to-face, but I do write and publish it, under a pseudonym). But she often comes to my defense because of her hatred of the accusatory, violently condemnatory tactics typically employed by advocates of the regnant Holocaust narrative. She vigorously defends freedom of expression, even if she doesn’t always exercise it herself.
So, God bless her, she often appears to be siding with me, and she’s not shy about being seen that way.
That’s at TOO of all places. Hey, no problem! Maybe he can write for Unz!
Hey, would your “devout Christian” father approve of you using Eastern Europe as your private brothel, you ethnoimperialist hypocrite?
The Master of Disaster. He’s of great benefit to all humanity, no doubt – at least, non-White humanity.
In an announcement made by the university in June 2017, Dutton was found to have conducted scientific misconduct due to plagiarism.
In the grand tradition of Andrew Hamilton!
The article discussed IQ tests done on Finnish conscripts, and a table of the IQ test results had been compiled by a student for a master’s thesis which was not attributed.
Is Rushton the only one who is a fraud and a thug?
Dutton stated in his response that the master’s thesis was attributed in his original version but Lynn had removed it.
So, Lynn is the fraud and thug? Another example of Sallis being always right, eh?
Lynn took responsibility for the incident…
Responsibility, but not accountability.
…however, the university did not investigate Lynn’s part because he has never been associated with the institution.
How about we investigate?
Are the juvenile costumes Dutton uses in his hysterically neurotic podcasts also plagiarized? If the Alt Right is Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism, then Duttonism is Beavis-and-Butthead HBD.
A British citizen, he is married to a Finnish woman, with whom he has two children.
Another ethnoimperialist. Isn’t it funny how the alliance also reflects similar personal behaviors?
Are the genetic interests of Finns served by this infusion of British DNA?
Scandza and other issues.
This is the reality we are rapidly headed to – with “thoughtcrime” now being about race.
Read this from CNN.
Bernsen said Johnson’s arrest, and similar actions “are part of how we prevent attacks, such as the one we saw in New Zealand, from happening here as well.”
Rewritten for realism:
Bernsen said Johnson’s arrest, and similar actions “are part of how we promote attacks, such as the one we saw in New Zealand, from happening here again and again, by preventing people from engaging in non-violent political activism and making them desperate.”
A question: Given Bernsen’s reasoning, can we prevent Islamic terrorism by arresting and deporting Muslims who enter the Norway?
Richard
Posted November 3, 2019 at 12:30 pm | Permalink
It’s becoming comical how Leftist media outlets such as the Commie News Network (CNN) have covered this story by continuing to defame Dr. Johnson as a “white supremacist” who was arrested at a “far-right” conference in Norway? Again, who are we trying to “rule” over?
Perhaps the ongoing false labeling and smear campaigns would justify legal action for defamation of character? Wouldn’t there be grounds for civil recourse since this involves the media rather than an online publisher such as in the case of Taylor v. Twitter?
Sue CNN. Johnson is not a “white supremacist.” Indeed, in my opinion, anyone involved with anti-White HBD, by definition cannot be a “white supremacist.”
More moronic “movement” madness:
Jb
Posted November 3, 2019 at 11:40 am | Permalink
This Just provides more evidence that the establishment is losing its grip and cannot win the arguments and therefore must resort to force/violence. nothing is more legitimizing to this movement then the violence from the establishment.
I suppose that stupidity falls under the “when handed lemons make lemonade” category, but it is asinine nevertheless. Being constantly defeated and humiliated is not legitimizing. Ultimately, only success is legitimizing. Victory is legitimizing. What happened to Greg is not.
SidVic
Posted November 2, 2019 at 8:34 pm | Permalink
Outrageous. Where have my Vikings gone?
There’s always Greta Thunberg, right fetishists?
Richard
Posted November 2, 2019 at 7:49 pm | Permalink
These outlandish actions against you further validate that we’re winning and unstoppable.
Yes sir! The “movement” is defeated and humiliated at every turn, has been on a downward spiral since Charlottesville Ragnarok, is being censored and deplatformed at every opportunity, and the sincere man of genuine greatness Antifa Don Trump has turned out to be a leftist fraud who has his DOJ persecute his own supporters. Certainly that is all validation that Der Movement is winning and unstoppable!
Some more delusion. Yes sir, police and Antifa on the defensive…until the next Scandza meeting, where they’ll just do the something again, and again be wildly successful. Come on guys, didn’t your hero Spengler say “optimism is cowardice?”
Read this. Johnson’s defenders will say that he wasn’t warned beforehand; he wasn’t banned from Denmark on his previous trip. True, but Antifa prevented him from getting into the Denmark conference. The probability was high that something would go wrong, particularly given the laughable failures of all the “extreme vetting” brought to us by all the big-brained societal consensus guys. Maybe they are just a little too much “high trust?” Scandza, Scandza, my high trust northern hunter gatherers for a Scandza!
Question: If a White football player had tweeted anti-Negro slurs and threats to Negro commentators, and tweeted in uniform no less, do you think the team reaction would simply be to settle the matter “internally?” Gotta love that Black Privilege, huh?
Lessons of the schoolyard.
I have written on this topic before, but it is useful to set down a brief but comprehensive summary of the problem. Therefore, here I make three arguments:
1. White Privilege, as defined by the Left as racially-specific advantages possessed by Whites, does not exist.
2. Even if White Privilege existed, it would be justified.
3. Attacks against Whites, re: White Privilege, are simply bullying against Whites because Whites, as a race, are a bunch of pathetic, mewling, cowardly weaklings.
1. The argument that White Privilege does not exist can be briefly subdivided into three parts.
A. A people being demographically dispossessed in their own nations – even in their ancestral homelands of Europe – are obviously not privileged. Mass immigration into White nations, against the wishes of the populace and imposed by a hostile elite, is not “privilege.” It is genocide. Declining White birthrates and increasing White suicide rates are not signs of “privilege” – they are signs of oppression and despair. The opioid crisis among White Americans is not “privilege” – it is hopelessness and despair. The fact that most politicians in White nations are racially White means nothing, as most of them are openly hardcore anti-White. The question should be – whose interests do those politicians represent?
B. A people discriminated against de jure by law (affirmative action, hate speech laws in Europe that criminalize natives speaking up in defense of their own group interests) and de facto by political correctness, pop culture, and social pricing, is not “privileged.”
A people not allowed to organize on the basis of their own identity and in defense of that identity and its interests are hardly “privileged” – it is the complete opposite. A people whose racial spokesmen are attacked in the streets with impunity, mocked by the leftist establishment, ridiculed in their own nation by aliens, deplatformed by corporations, and selectively targeted by the legal system – such a people are the opposite of “privileged.” The English in Rotherham were, and are, not “privileged.” White Americans and Europeans who cannot safely walk the streets of their own cities are not “privileged.” Compare James Watson – reduced to selling his Nobel Prize after being “unpersoned” for merely suggesting the possibility of racial differences in intelligence – to Al Sharpton – whose activist career is summarized here – who was a friend of Presidents (Obama), speaker at political conventions (Democrat), a mainstream political commentator (MSNBC) – and we see the reality of Colored Privilege vs. the fantasy of White Privilege.
C. Although I disagree with Sailer about the census, he is correct about “The Flight from White.” You see, Whites are so privileged that groups petition to NOT officially be counted as White. South Asians previously successfully removed themselves from the White category, and the MENA group wants to do the same now. People with any hint of “Indian Princess” ancestry in their family trees are desperate to be seen as non-White. Whites pose as non-White, trying to “pass” in the other direction. It is a strange sort of “privilege” indeed that people are so very eager NOT to partake of; it seems that the “invisible backpack” is a burden too heavy for anyone to want to carry.
2. Even if it did really exist, White Privilege would be justified, because it would not be “privilege” at all, in the sense of an undeserved largess (which actually describes Colored Privilege). One would not call Bill Gates “privileged” at Microsoft – it is his company. The Chinese are not “privileged” in China – it is their own country. Likewise, Whites are not “privileged” in their own nations – instead, it are the alien peoples given advantages in White countries who are the ones truly privileged. And if White Americans are “privileged” because they have a higher per capita net worth than Blacks and Hispanics, then Jews and Asians are privileged even more. Oh, the latter have their goodies because of “intelligence” and “hard work.” Yeah, and Whites are pretty smart and hard-working too, by the way – building nations that Jews and Asians want to migrate to.
3. If accusations of White Privilege are absurd – and they are – why do they exist? It is the lesson of the schoolyard: those who are weak and allow themselves to be bullied will continue to suffer so. Accusations of White Privilege made in the context of White Oppression and White Powerlessness are a form of bullying from the Left/Colored Alliance. Because Whites are a race of pathetic mewling cowards and never push back against this bullying they can expect more of it, just like the boy who allows himself to be pushed around in the schoolyard can expect nothing but more abuse. If the boy fights back, even if he loses, the bullying will likely stop, especially if he gets some good “licks” in; bullies do not like victims who fight back, since they prefer the meek and powerless. The abusive bullying of Whites as a race will decline in proportion to the extent that Whites actively and explicitly defend their interests as a race.
Ironically, it is precisely because Whites are not privileged that they are accused of being so. If Whites had true privilege no one would dare bring it up in fear of the consequences. It is only because Whites are a subaltern low-caste group that they can be bullied and gaslighted by being accused of having “privilege” while they are in reality a vilified powerless group losing their nations and their future.
I suppose that the real, hidden meaning of “White Privilege” is the privilege of being born as someone of European descent, and all that means racially, and with respect to being a legitimate heir to the Classical and Western/Faustian High Cultures. There’s racial envy and resentment involved, and a desire to tear down those that the Guks view, at least subconsciously, as better than themselves.
eginotes 
You must be logged in to post a comment.