More precise points to be made.
Since this is an important topic, I’d like to follow up on my last post and get more into the “female question” with somewhat more seriousness and reflection.
Certainly, women have a place within racial nationalism. It’s their race too. But some points to ponder:
1. We can debate whether or not to accept reformed mudsharks (*) but certainly CURRENT mudsharks should be anathema. Why should we even have to debate something so basic?
2. Women need to be held to the same standards as men with respect to handling the “rough and tumble” world of dissident politics. We’ve all been insulted. I certainly have been over the years (often in vulgar terms – remember Silver?), including being insulted by Johnson himself (questioning my sanity). Certainly, there have been ethnic-based insults. Whatever. Johnson has been viciously attacked himself over his personal life. Anyone of any prominence in the “movement” – even a lower-level person like myself – has been subjected to harsh criticism. Deal with it ladies, or move on. Don’t expect to be pampered- in the “movement” zoo, it’s not going to happen, the chimps are going to be flinging their turds around on a regular basis.
3. If I’m going to eschew male Alt Lighters and other nitwits, I’ll do the same for females as well.
Look, it’s a question of character; the basic problem with Der Movement, Inc. – besides the fossilized dogma – is a question of character. There’s too much emphasis on quantity over quality, too much eagerness to accept anyone, any validation, any sign of acceptance, no matter how flawed and tainted. I don’t care if a race-mixing female posing as some sort of nationalist has “hundreds of thousands of followers.” If the person in question is of flawed character, then that’s just multiplication of the flaw. That’s adding zeroes to an already corrupted number.
If that’s “misogyny” then so be it.
*The white-knighting riposte here would be: “what about Spencer, Anglin, and Enoch” (or some other male activist with a history of dating/marrying, say, Asians or Jews)? Three points. First, those are your heroes, not mine. As far as I’m concerned the entire “movement” should be flushed down the toilet. Second, why leave out Derbyshire? He considers himself Alt Right, and as part of the VDARE crew, is dipping into “movement” largess. Why does Derbyshire always get a free pass? Third, like it or not, female miscegenation is more damaging since women are the bottlenecks for reproduction. But, yes, I don’t excuse males who mix, but, fine, we can have an amnesty for the past. This still doesn’t excise CURRENT miscegenation.