With a bit of Silk Road News thrown in for good measure.

We have Silk Road News here as well as Rotten Orange News so why not Alt Right News? Let’s every so often chronicle the cesspool contagion that is well on its way to destroying racial nationalism.

Let’s see: a police officer handcuffs a White man for mildly insulting a bizarre yellow Asian female. The Alt Righters justifiably are outraged about it.  Very good, I agree.  But, alas, since an Asian is involved, in comes raging anti-White hater “Kumiko” to critique the Alt Righters. “Nothing really happened,” after all, the “handcuffs soon came off.”  Err…the handcuffs should never have been put on in the first place, based upon the mere fact that a bizarre Asian – as different from Europeans as a gray alien from deepest space – felt “insulted.”  That’s the outrage – that we’ve reached a point of White Man Inferiority in America that such a thing could have ever happened.  But, no, you see, according to the Silkers, let’s have the authorities harass White men based on the momentary hurt feelings of their Yellow Masters.  Right?

Do we need any more evidence that Silk Road White nationalism is ALL about the subjugation and humiliation of Whites, particularly White men, to Asians, particularly Asian females?  However, in the Silker Paradise, the Asian female would be marching around in black boots, holding a rifle, and thus could arrest White men directly without the need for an intermediary.

The retarded alien makes moronic arguments – since the Alt Right “wants to create a police state (Sallis: do they?), then it is appropriate for a White man to be handcuffed for making a mild joking insult.”  How about that the Far Right in general want a sane  ALL-WHITE society in which no bizarre alien Asians are present, and the police have better things to do than enforce conversations between young people who are joking around?

“Kumiko” does make the admission that she does not understand Whites – correct for after all we are practically different species – and has scaled back “involvement in WN” (except for jumping whenever there is lese majeste against Asians from uppity White men) – that makes good sense since this arrogant Asiatic had no business being involved with WN in the first place.

Someone needs to tell the hypocrite Roissy that “playing with gizmos” (that he advocates for [presumably White] males) is a beta not alpha endeavor. Hey, when I was young, I was taking apart radios to try and figure out how they worked, experimenting with magnets, etc. – and I’m no nihilistic hedonist “alpha shitlord.”   Someone also needs to tell this champion of Christianity that his self-described “preying on” vulnerable urban females is not exactly consistent with a Christian ethos.

I see that the typical “movement” stupidity of labeling opponents as “Jews” (some idiot way back even called Pierce of all people a Jew – “rabbi Pierce!”) is taken hold in the Alt Right, which makes sense since the Alt Right is nothing more or less than Der Movement for Immature Millennials.  So, Friberg is called a Jew, and morons on AltRight.com comments threads call each other Jews.  Oy vey!

Having Jorjani as a prominent Alt Right figure has led to the usual debates there of “are Iranians White” with one moron showing distribution of NRY lineages as if single locus markets have any significant racial relevance whatsoever.  “White” is subjective in any case – Iranians are not European, they are not Western, they are Asian NECs who have been enemies of Europe ever since the days of Ancient Greece.  This whole thing is just more “unprincipled exceptions” – Jorjani needs to be explained, just like others tried to explain Enoch’s (ex?)wife with a sudden switch to “Jewishness is mostly cultural.”

Now, having an assimilated half-Iranian as a (sincere) participant in the “movement” (albeit perhaps not in a high position) wouldn’t really be a serious problem if (1) the person in question wasn’t always emphasizing their Iranian-ness and promoting Iranian interests, and (2) their presence didn’t prompt others to make false equivalences between Iranians and Europeans.

Unfortunately both caveats do not hold in this case, indicating that an error in judgment was made. And before anyone asserts that this is another example of “Spencer’s bad judgment” they should reflect that the other side of the ongoing Alt Right feud also wanted to bring Jorjani into their fold. So, it is not “Spencer’s bad judgment” but rather “the Alt Right’s bad judgment” – although “Alt Right’s bad judgment” is a profound redundancy.

And before anyone asks what all these “News” categories has to do with the EGI focus of this blog, I reply that if you believe, as I do, that racial nationalism is required to promote “European EGI” then any threats to that racial nationalism – e.g., the Alt Right (including “game”), Silk Road White nationalism, slavish Roissyian Trumpism – are all highly relevant subjects for critical analysis.

Silk Road News: Meet Nathan Yau

Only delusional Silkers would be surprised by any of this.

Mumbo-Jumbo Nation

Posted June 24, 2017 at 11:53 am | Permalink

Nathan *Yau*, from UCLA, has been for quite some time leveraging his “Flowing Data” website to either celebrate the demise of everything hated by the Left or to point out all the things they still have to destroy.

Here’s the guy in Amazon:

In the latest installment of his series “how to hate europoids with an intellectual spin” he explicitly “like(s) the evaporative quality coming up in the southwest.”

“Percentage of white people”

Deliciously ambiguous, so that he can always say he was referring only to the aesthetic aspect of it. It’s a pity, though, that his long history of maps devoted to Leftism and (barely restrained) Racism exposes him.

Remember: the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.

Silk Road News: 6/24/17

More Asian perfidy.

Another law-abiding cogelite.

Duchesne’s work.

Duchesne found it hard to avoid the conclusion that today’s Detroit is no more part of the West than ancient Egypt had been under the rule of a tiny Greek-speaking elite. The same goes for majority-Chinese Vancouver, where the remaining Whites are being forced into small apartments as foreign Chinese millionaires buy up the city’s housing stock, pricing them out of the market. A city can no longer meaningfully be considered Western when the majority of its population is pursuing interests opposed to those of its European-descended inhabitants.

Question: are the snide remarks of Silkers about “Puerto Ricans in the movement” aimed at Duchesne as retaliation for Duchesne’s steadfast opposition to Asians colonizing Canada? After all, as we all know, Asians absolutely have the right to colonize Western lands, which is of course somehow consistent with “European EGI.”

Another member of the “evil party.”  Evil is as evil does, eh Silkers?

No problem!  Once we institute the Silk Road White Nationalism program, Asians living in White lands can have White slaves to toil for them!  It all helps “European EGI,” don’t you know!

Here’s an example when we should all support the police.

Resist the Alt Right

We need to fight this contagion.

Alt Right memetic imperialist:

Call yourself what you want, but you are part of the Alternative Right whether you like it or not. White nationalist? Your Alt-Right. Fascist? Your Alt-Right. National-Socialist? Alt-Right. Race-realist? Alt-Right. It’s a brand with recognition that is slowly appealing to the mainstream and making White Nationalist ideas tenable to people. But because you don’t like the predominance of younger people and youth culture, you defame the name and act like your too good for it. Your like a Hispanic person who says “I’m not Hispanic! I’m Colombian!”

Putting aside the grammar errors, let’s look at the content.  This is the most outrageous nonsense imaginable, a perfect example of the Alt Right’s memetic hegemony.

Let me be crystal clear: I am a national socialist White nationalist and I am NOT – repeat NOT – of the “Alternative Right.”  Don’t like “youth culture?” Look, the Alt Right is nothing more or less than the most superficial and intellectually shallow fossilized “movement” dogma dressed up in juvenile jackassery to appeal to the absolute worst aspects of social media and “youth culture.”  

I am unalterably opposed to this disgusting and disgraceful contagion of the racial nationalist ecosystem, I reject the Alt Right without reservation, and fervently hope for its quick collapse.

Arrogant retards like this semi-illiterate commentator should stop projecting his Pepe/Kek lulzing on sane and rational racial nationalists.  “”Too good for it?”  You’re (not “your”) damn right I am!

I hope that EGI Notes can be one nexus of the anti-Alt Right resistance among racial nationalists. I’d like to see more posts/thoughts from racial nationalists on building an Alt Right-free Movement.

Revisiting Putnam

No White racial solidarity.

Let’s again consider Putnam’s oft-discussed findings about diversity eroding societal trust and repressing social engagement and investment in public goods (similar to findings by others and a topic often brought up by Salter).

Putnam not only found that diversity decreased trust between groups but within groups as well. That latter finding is somewhat counter intuitive, since one could reasonably assume that increased diversity, and the consequent increased distrust between groups, would strengthen a tribal “us against them” mentality and therefore increase trust within groups. But the opposite occurred, at least with those examples Putnam studied. 

How can we interpret the counter intuitive finding that diversity erodes trust and societal cohesion within groups as well as between groups?  This depends on whether this “within group” problem applies to all groups, or only to Whites.  Perhaps those more familiar with the nuances of Putnam’s work – which I read some time ago and have no interest in revisiting as Putnam is a disgusting excuse for an academic who hid his findings for years and only published it with an accompanying screed promoting social engineering to grease the wheels of White dispossession (*) and my hypothesis here will require more data in any case for a fair evaluation – know more of this.

My hypothesis is as follows. 

If within group trust is eroded by diversity for all groups, then this phenomenon reflects a general human (or should I say “hominid”) trend to withdraw and “hunker down” when faced with diversity,

If the effect is restricted to Whites (which I believe will be the case if a careful quantitative study is done), then this is a strictly White mental phenomenon.  And how does this happen?  The hypothesis suggest the following.

One could speculate various mechanisms if this was the case, but consider – a la Ignatiev’s “Race Traitor” paradigm – that Whites are the only group in which large numbers of the group – including a majority of influential elites – act overtly against group interests.  Thus, there is no racial solidarity among Whites, no one you can racially trust unless you really know them – hence, when faced with diversity, Whites will mistrust other Whites because  – given the omega cuckiness of many Whites – one can never be sure whether a given White is “on our side” or “on their side.”  In a homogeneous White community this isn’t so much of a problem (of course political disagreements – including whether or not to import diversity – can precipitate such mistrust, but even so, in a homogeneous community such conflicts would be muted).  However, in the presence of diversity, Whites must tread carefully.  Is your White coworker someone you can trust to share your disgust over multiculturalism, or will they “report you to HR” because of your “bigotry?”

On the other hand, non-Whites (including Jews) can reliably depend on their co-ethnics showing ethic/racial solidarity, and siding with them against “the other” (and particularly against Whites). For Whites, a given fellow White is just as likely to be a Universalist cuck as they are to be someone sharing your beliefs.  

Thus, diversity erodes within group trust among Whites (and likely only among Whites) because Whites are ideologically split on this race-diversity issue, and many Whites are SJW “altruistic punishers, so that in diverse environments fellow Whites may pose a threat since they would identify with “the other side.”

Ignatiev would be proud.

*Salter rightly claimed in On Genetic Interests that for a majority being replaced, the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does work, since the workable multiculturalism will make race replacement more agreeable to those being replaced, while the pain of a failed multiculturalism may wake the majority up to prevent their dispossession.  Putnam is clearly on the side of those who want multiculturalism to succeed.

It Really Doesn’t Matter

In the end, it’s the Alt Right as a whole that is wrong.

Read this.

Let’s say Greg is telling the truth.  I really don’t know the facts, but I have no problem accepting this; when I was writing for Counter-Currents, Greg was always a “stand-up guy” with me, always reasonable, so I have nothing personal against him despite more recent disagreements about Der Movement, my critiques of Der Movement, and my disapproval of ethnonationalism. If Greg is proven correct and “exonerated” that’s great.

However, in my opinion, in the broad scheme of things, it really doesn’t matter.  As one commentator suggests, either side in this argument is demonstrating sociopathy.  Someone – whoever it is – prominent on the Alt Right is a destructive force.  And this destructive force has unleashed all the low level human material – all the stupid and vulgar comments and paranoid conspiracy theorizing on both sides, throwing people under the bus, the TRS antics (Did they really turn against Greg?  More important – what did an intellectual like Johnson ever see in a bunch of lulzing jackasses to begin with?), and earlier I watched YouTube videos from a certain miscegenating CC supporter, commentator, and podcast participant (who shall go nameless) – videos that were truly cringe worthy. This is the Alt Right?  It’s like a circus freak show, an embarrassment, someone has to make a stand against this pathological infection of racial nationalism.

The Alt Right is a completely juvenile cul-de-sac of retarded stupidity made more ludicrous by its delusions of grandeur. Yes, Spencer has promise as a White nationalist leader and, yes, Johnson is a leading racial nationalist intellectual, but both individuals – despite their differences – should agree on one thing: ditch the Alt Right, let it collapse into a morass of Pepe cartoons and Kek screams, and let’s move on to serious activism for godssakes.

Yes, if someone is “exonerated” all well and good.  For them.  The rest of us are still being dragged into the sewer by this Alt Right nonsense.

Fool’s Gold: Netherlands Conference and Misunderstanding Epigenetics

“Movement” stupidity.

Yes, a bunch of HBD/race realists and a “greed is good” “National Capitalist” bodybuilder whose YouTube channel tells us:

This is a channel dedicated to how glorious and magnificent I am.

Sharing some of my divine wisdom when it comes to obtaining an ultimate physique worthy of the Gods!

Yes, the new golden age is just around the corner!

Consider this moronic comment left by a fact-devoid gamester commentator:

Consider two factoids, in lieu of long, drawn out arguments:

1. An organism’s form: tissues, organs, systems – the whole architecture – is epigenetic (meaning beyond DNA). The difference in size and shape of a tulip and a blue whale has nothing to do with DNA and is wholly epigenetic. (Thus, you can have identical twins with the same DNA – one born with birth defects w/o any arms for ex., while the other can have a full body and be a pro athlete.)

2. Fascinating studies have been conducted in embryos whereby the DNA is extracted before first cell division. According to the “DNA is king” crowd, the organism should be absolutely dead right there. It’s not. The embryos can continue developing for hundreds of cell division, even forming early-stage tissues, before eventually it does die off.

1. This is completely and absolutely wrong, another example of the solipsism in Der Movement: just stating something makes it true, don’t you know. 

“Factoid” – Epigenetics modifies the expression of the genetic information encoded in the DNA, it does not replace it.

The identical twins example; such an occurrence would be exceedingly rare even if theoretically possible. It’s theoretically possible that epigenetic modifications of genes that control bodily development could cause birth defects (but why pray tell would it affect one identical twin in utero and not the other given they are in exactly the same environment?). So what? Maybe you’d get one in a million blue whales born without a flipper because of an epigenetic modification due to ocean pollution, but you sure as hell am not going to get a blue whale that looks like a mouse…or a tulip. DNA is the main player; epigenetics is the sideshow. 

Anyone with at least a room temperature IQ would realize that epigenetic modifications are modifications of DNA and of the RNA produced by the DNA; it’s not “beyond DNA” you rambling idiot but OF DNA.  Epigenetics is modifying the expression of genes encoded by DNA sequences, it is not some mysterious force floating around independent of those same genes. And what does the epigenetic modifications?  Acetylases, deacetylases, methyltransferases – enzymes that, like all other proteins, are encoded by…DNA sequences.