Category: history

The Rudolf Hess Restitution Commandos

And other news.  Emphasis added.

Laugh at this oldie but goodie from Der Movement:

Feb. 13, 1981
Nazis Set Deadline to Get $7 Million for Hess’ Release
BONN (JTA) — A group of neo-Nazis calling themselves the Rudolf Hess restitution Commandos have set a Feb. 14 deadline to kill two Jews at random unless they receive $7 million for a fund to free Rudolf Hess from the Spandau Prison in West Berlin. Hess, 86, who was Hitler’s right-hand man at the Deputy Fuehrer, is now the only prisoner in Spandau.
The neo-Nazi group made its demand in letters dated Jan. 30 and mailed to Salzburg, Austria, to the governments of the four Allied powers which administer the prison — the United States, Britain, France and the Soviet Union — a West German government spokesman said.
The neo-Nazi organization said the $7 million it is demanding would be “a gesture of goodwill” and should be paid to the “Freedom for Rudolf Committee,” an organization formed by Hess’ son, Wolf-Ruediger Hess, 43, a Munich architect. No comments were available from the younger Hess.

I don’t know – maybe it would have made more sense just to directly demand Hess be freed in exchange for not killing Jews instead of asking for “$7 million for a fund to free Rudolf Hess from the Spandau Prison in West Berlin.”  Or was that an early “movement” ploy for “D’Nations?” Who knows the minds of these early day Quota Queens? When I first heard about this back in 1981 my immediate reaction at that time was the same as it is now, but I suppose that a swarthoid simpleton like myself cannot understand the grand 4-D chess moves of my big-brained superiors. Alas, needless to say, they didn’t get the money, Hess was murdered (“suicide”) in prison, and none of these “Commandos” actually went ahead to “kill two Jews at random.”

1981, 2019: It’s all one.  Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

Where’s the wall?  Billions of dollars to coddle and care for mongrel invaders, nothing for real enforcement.  And of course Trump will sign it – did you ever doubt it?

Never forget that the Amren crowd were telling you that Trump was “the last chance for White America;” thus:

For President Trump, black criminals are more important than public safety. He’s soft on crime and has broken another promise. Worse, with George Soros-backed progressive district attorneys winning elections, we’re likely to see a lot more “broken windows” in the future—and a lot more crime.

This blog, on the other hand, correctly labelled Trump as a fraud and a Negrophillic race cuck before the election.  But, hey, keep on supporting Amren and ignoring EGI Notes because, well, you know…

Come now, Hood, surely your man Trump has the courage to stop this disaster? He’s the last chance for White America, isn’t he?

Let’s translate all of this rambling into words readers of this blog can understand: A “movement leader” was wrong; Sallis was right.  Wasn’t that easy?


Burr, Wild Bunch, Vance

Odds and ends.

Recommended reading.

I’m no fan of Burr’s proto-SJW views – including and particularly his ridiculously positive views about women – but he nevertheless was the most Faustian of the Founding Fathers.If you read the book, you’ll also see he had “big balls,” as the phrase goes.  His downfall was due to two facts – one, that all his energies went to his own personal self-aggrandizement with no underlying greater objective; and, two, he wasn’t very detail-oriented. or realistic about the motivations and limitations of others.

Nevertheless, the type of dynamism of this Faustian and ambitious individual is something we could use in the “movement” today if – and only if – it is put into the service of higher goals (racial interests) and not purely selfish objectives, and if Burr’s other flaws also did not manifest in whatever modern heir he would have among racial activists.

If the White race is doomed, then at least let us go out like this.

“They struggle to defy their destinies” – the essence of Jack Vance summarized in 54 seconds here.

Of course, Mazirian the Magician is only one tale of several that make up The Dying Earth, the latter being the more modern title for the collection of short stories (Spoiler alert below*).  But the Type Is prefer hobbit holes, orcs, and “the battle for Middle Earth.” There really should be a study done on preferences regarding sci-fi/fantasy – is it personal psychology, ideology (e.g., Traditionalism vs. Futurism), or ethnoracial (e.g., Nords vs. Meds)?

*Spoiler alert!   The highwayman doesn’t end well, the hopeless quest does end reasonably well, the “lovers” (who are at the time not “lovers” at all but presumably become so after the story ends) end up victorious, and the woman is cured of her curse.

PopGen June 2019

Two papers.

The first:

In many species a fundamental feature of genetic diversity is that genetic similarity decays with geographic distance; however, this relationship is often complex, and may vary across space and time. Methods to uncover and visualize such relationships have widespread use for analyses in molecular ecology, conservation genetics, evolutionary genetics, and human genetics. While several frameworks exist, a promising approach is to infer maps of how migration rates vary across geographic space. Such maps could, in principle, be estimated across time to reveal the full complexity of population histories. Here, we take a step in this direction: we present a method to infer maps of population sizes and migration rates associated with different time periods from a matrix of genetic similarity between every pair of individuals. Specifically, genetic similarity is measured by counting the number of long segments of haplotype sharing (also known as identity-by-descent tracts). By varying the length of these segments we obtain parameter estimates associated with different time periods. Using simulations, we show that the method can reveal time-varying migration rates and population sizes, including changes that are not detectable when using a similar method that ignores haplotypic structure. We apply the method to a dataset of contemporary European individuals (POPRES), and provide an integrated analysis of recent population structure and growth over the last ∼3,000 years in Europe.

That’s interesting, I suppose, but what is really needed from population genetics is two things.  First, global assays of genetic kinship.  Second, application of genetic structure and genetic integration (e.g., Gillet and Gregorious) to human genetic data. These things are consistently not being done. Is it because they are viewed as uninteresting to the field, or is it because the findings would be politically unpalatable to the field?

Author summary
We introduce a novel statistical method to infer migration rates and population sizes across space in recent time periods. Our approach builds upon the previously developed EEMS method, which infers effective migration rates under a dense lattice. Similarly, we infer demographic parameters under a lattice and use a (Voronoi) prior to regularize parameters of the model. However, our method differs from EEMS in a few key respects. First, we use the coalescent model parameterized by migration rates and population sizes while EEMS uses a resistance model. As another key difference, our method uses haplotype data while EEMS uses the average genetic distance. A consequence of using haplotype data is that our method can separately estimate migration rates and population sizes, which in essence is done by using a recombination rate map to calibrate the decay of haplotypes over time. An additional useful feature of haplotype data is that, by varying the lengths analyzed, we can infer demography associated with different recent time periods. We call our method MAPS for estimating Migration And Population-size Surfaces. To illustrate MAPS on real data, we analyze a genome-wide SNP dataset on 2224 individuals of European ancestry.

I’m not going to judge the validity of this approach without more data; however, any cursory look at current population genetic studies illustrates how the “testing companies” are behind the cutting edge of methodology.

Largely speaking, the spatial variation in inferred dispersal rates and population densities is remarkably consistent across the different time scales (Fig 4). In the MAPS dispersal surfaces, several regions with consistently low estimated dispersal rates coincide with geographic features that would be expected to reduce gene flow, including the English Channel, Adriatic Sea and the Alps. 

In general, geographic barriers have historically impeded (but obviously not abrogated) gene flow.

In addition we see consistently high dispersal across the region between the UK and Norway, which may reflect the known genetic effects of the Viking expansion [22]. 

See more on this below.

These features are consistent with visual inspection of the raw lPSC sharing data (S4b Fig). The MAPS population density surfaces consistently show lowest density in Ireland, Switzerland, Iberia, and the southwest region of the Balkans. This is consistent with samples within each of these areas having among the highest PSC segment sharing (S4a Fig). The MAPS inferred country population sizes are also highly correlated with estimated current census population sizes from [36] and [37] (S5 Fig) which can be mainly attributed to the fact that lPSC segments are highly informative of current census population sizes (Fig 5).

And then:

We do note the lower estimated dispersal rates between Portugal and Spain compared to the rest of Europe in the analyses of longer PSC segments (5-10 and > 10cM), and the higher estimated dispersal rates through the Baltic Sea (> 10cM segments), possibly reflecting changing gene flow in these regions in recent history.

I’m not sure what to make of that Iberian data.  I’m not aware of any significant geographical barrier there, so is that an example of political barriers affecting gene flow?  The data of this paper call into question “testing companies” using generalized “Iberian” or “British/Irish” ancestral categories.

Our estimates of dispersal distances and population density from the POPRES data are among the first such estimates using a spatial model for Europe (though see [30]). The features observed in the dispersal and population density surfaces are in principle discernible by careful inspection of the numbers of shared PSC segments between pairs of countries (e.g. using average pairwise numbers of shared segments, S4b Fig, as in [20]). For example, high connectivity across the North Sea is reflected in the raw PSC calls: samples from the British Isles share a relatively high number of PSC segments with those from Sweden (S4b Fig). 

This is consistent with what is mentioned above, compatible with the historically known gene flow from Scandinavia to the British Isles, particularly England, during the Viking age.

Also the low estimated dispersal between Switzerland and Italy is consistent with Swiss samples sharing relatively few PSC segments with Italians given their close proximity (S4b Fig). 

The Alps being one of the geographical barriers mentioned above.  This of course is not compatible with Der Movement dogma of Northern Italians being “Celto-Germanic Nordics.”

However, identifying interesting patterns directly from the PSC segment sharing data is not straightforward, and one goal of MAPS (and EEMS) is to produce visualizations that point to patterns in the data that suggest deviations from simple isolation by distance.

The inferred population size surfaces for the POPRES data show a general increase in sizes through time, with small fluctuations across geography; In our results, the smallest inferred population sizes are in the Balkans and Eastern Europe more generally. This is in agreement with the signal seen previously [20]; however, taken at face value, our results suggest that high PSC sharing in these regions may be due more to consistently low population densities than to historical expansions (such as the Slavic or Hunnic expansions).

Relative population density may be a driver of genetic history, and one ignored by Der Movement in lieu of more colorful stories about expansions and admixture.

Second paper:

The roles of migration, admixture and acculturation in the European transition to farming have been debated for over 100 years. Genome-wide ancient DNA studies indicate predominantly Aegean ancestry for continental Neolithic farmers, but also variable admixture with local Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. Neolithic cultures first appear in Britain circa 4000 BC, a millennium after they appeared in adjacent areas of continental Europe. The pattern and process of this delayed British Neolithic transition remain unclear. We assembled genome-wide data from 6 Mesolithic and 67 Neolithic individuals found in Britain, dating 8500-2500 BC. Our analyses reveal persistent genetic affinities between Mesolithic British and Western European hunter-gatherers. We find overwhelming support for agriculture being introduced to Britain by incoming continental farmers, with small, geographically structured levels of hunter-gatherer ancestry. Unlike other European Neolithic populations, we detect no resurgence of hunter-gatherer ancestry at any time during the Neolithic in Britain. Genetic affinities with Iberian Neolithic individuals indicate that British Neolithic people were mostly descended from Aegean farmers who followed the Mediterranean route of dispersal. We also infer considerable variation in pigmentation levels in Europe by circa 6000 BC.

Contra Duchesne, ancestry deriving from Neolithic farmers is not restricted to Southern Europe; it is just much more concentrated there.

The Meaning of D-Day

Refuting leftist lies.

June 6 brought us the usual leftist paradigms about how WWII means that physical violence committed against anyone to the right of Jeb Bush is justified.  We read comments like:

June 6 was the 75th anniversary of the greatest gathering of anti-fascists in history.

From the perspective of American involvement in D-Day, let’s rephrase that for accuracy:

June 6 was the 75th anniversary of a large group of men, involuntarily drafted from the population of a racially segregated nation, invading a European colonial power that was occupied by an European nation, the invasion setting forth from the territory of yet another European colonial power, led by a general who, upon later becoming US President, instituted “Operation Wetback” to deport Mexican illegals, and which had as its best general an Anglo-supremacist borderline racialist noted for making pro-German comments.

Apparently, that’s “anti-fascism,” 1944-style.

2019-style “anti-fascism” is, on the other hand, a bunch of smelly, masked, noodle-armed, wanna-be Marxist-Anarchist, middle-class and upper-class soyboys, with poor personal hygiene, allied with global capitalism and working hand-in-glove with the political establishment, sucker-punching genuine dissidents and then running away like hysterical menstruating schoolgirls.

Question: If WWII means that it’s OK to “punch Nazis,” do the Korean and Vietnam wars mean that it’s OK to “punch Commies?’’  Just pointing out the hypocrisy – EGI Notes is, of course, a militantly pacifist blog, oozing with the milk of human kindness, and this blog unalterably rejects and denounces any and all forms of hatred and violence. And don’t you forget it!

Stonehenge: No, No, a Thousand Times, No!

In der news.

Read this; excerpts, emphasis added:

Researchers compared DNA extracted from Neolithic human remains found across Britain with that of people alive at the same time in Europe.
The Neolithic inhabitants were descended from populations originating in Anatolia (modern Turkey) that moved to Iberia before heading north.
They reached Britain in about 4,000BC.
DNA reveals that Neolithic Britons were largely descended from groups who took the Mediterranean route, either hugging the coast or hopping from island-to-island on boats. Some British groups had a minor amount of ancestry from groups that followed the Danube route.
Although Britain was inhabited by groups of “western hunter-gatherers” when the farmers arrived in about 4,000BC, DNA shows that the two groups did not mix very much at all.

I guess the “high trust hunter gatherers” weren’t that “high trust” after all.

The British hunter-gatherers were almost completely replaced by the Neolithic farmers, apart from one group in western Scotland, where the Neolithic inhabitants had elevated local ancestry.
Genetic analysis shows that the Neolithic farmers, by contrast, were paler-skinned with brown eyes and black or dark-brown hair.

No, no, a thousand times, no!

Towards the end of the Neolithic, in about 2,450BC, the descendants of the first farmers were themselves almost entirely replaced when a new population – called the Bell Beaker people – migrated from mainland Europe. So Britain saw two extreme genetic shifts in the space of a few thousand years.

Well, they’re certainly undergoing an extreme genetic change right now.  Anyway, at least they got rid of those swarthy Neolithics – except of course for Tom Jones, very “Silurian,” he is.

Der Movement’s reaction to this news.

In Trump We Trust! this.

In 2015 and 2016, we won enormous victories by attacking the enemy’s weakest points from a position of strength. In 2017 we suffered enormous defeats because we thought we could attack our enemy’s strongest points from a position of weakness. These defeats were entirely predictable, but the wrong people were making decisions.

Indeed, wrong people just like Greg Johnson.  Affirmative action cases, Quota Queens, wholly without merit.  And what were those “enormous victories” of 2015 or 2016?  Answer: None.  Nothing. This is wholly a figment of the Alt Right imagination.  As and far as “entirely predictable” goes, it was Sallis who predicted it, while Johnson and all the rest were firmly on the Alt Right bandwagon.

Since then, the consensus has been to return to what worked: metapolitics, which includes community building, online propaganda, and Identitarian-style activism, which aims to maximize impacts on the public mind while minimizing risks and costs to activists. We can’t outgun the enemy. We can’t outspend them. But we can out-argue them. We can be cooler, cleverer, and funnier.

You can be, but you’re not.

White Nationalists win every fair debate.

Except against Sallis. Indeed, Johnson is so good at debating that he “bans” people from his blog for writing things he doesn’t agree with. And as regards the Alt Right as a whole, certainly, screaming “Pepe! Kek!” is a debating style that rivals Lincoln vs. Douglas.

Second, the only way the establishment could censor and deplatform us completely is to shut down the internet…

Nonsense.  China doesn’t “shut down the Internet” but they do a pretty good job of stifling dissent.  Oh well, don’t worry about it…just send in those “D’Nations.”

How’s that Arctic Alliance coming along, Derbyshire? I mean, outside of your bedroom.

Listen to this. I like the part where Kersey says that “White nationalism” shouldn’t be used because it has been demonized.  We need a new label!  As if any term you come up with wouldn’t also be immediately demonized by the Left. 

An online comment to Durocher from a self-declared  “empathetic” minority –

I’m just a random nobody minority that likes to see what White Nationalists (whom I empathize) and White Supremacists are talking about, and one thing I find curious is how enthralled some are by Nordicism. Even the non-Nordics and overall “Euro-mutts” have this fantastical Nordic vision, which is really a channeling of Hitlerism (can’t even call it Nazism because it goes beyond the politic surrounding Germanic Nordicism, but pure obsession with what’s believed to be Aryan – and Hitlerism because he’s the closet to the ideology that most are familiar with).
It’s funny how a certain group of whites have committed to reducing anything good about white people to Nordics.

It’s more funny that lunatics like the plagiarist Andrew Hamilton actually declared that a “movement” fundamentally based on Nordicist doctrine is somehow “anti-Nordicist” (and I suppose the ADL and AIPAC are anti-Jewish).  Meanwhile, sane observers note that Der Movement and Nordicsm are virtually synonymous, and even Patrik Hermansson observed that HopeNotHate leveraged “movement” obsessions by choosing a Swede to do the infiltration. By the way, it was my pointing that out (and my call for accountability for failed “movement” “leaders”) that got me “banned” from Counter-Currents, in case readers of EGI Notes are unaware of that.  You can find that at the comments thread here.  Johnson cannot “fairly debate” that the “movement” got hoist by its Nordicist petard.

Der Movement’s Spenglerian Cycle

Welcome to the Interregnum.

WWII was a dividing line in American Far Right activism – all that went before (KKK, America First, Silver Shirts, etc.) was swept away in their old forms and all had to begin again.

Can we outline a Spenglerian cycle of the post-WWII Far Right activism?  The following is a crude outline.  Of course, there will be overlap; persons and groups do not fit neatly in only one era, but instead we will consider the period when the person or group and their ideas was dominant, or at least representative of the broader “civilizational” scope of that era of “movement” history.  And, of course, there will be overlap between American and European activism, as Yockey straddles both. And here I refer to racialist groups, not merely anti-communist hyper-nationalist groups like The John Birch Society or the Minutemen (the latter of which were interesting in their own right).

Spring: Francis Parker Yockey and Imperium.  The European Liberation Front. Post-war Mosely – Europe a Nation. From the end of WWII to Yockey’s death. New creative forms of racial-civilizational nationalism. An abortive attempt for Type II domination of activism.

Summer: Rockwell and the American Nazi Party.  The National Renaissance Party reaches its peak. The National Youth Alliance.  The rise of Carto. Evola – Ride the Tiger. From Yockey’s death to the full ascendance of William Pierce and the formation of the National Alliance from the ashes of The National Youth Alliance. The Type Is take charge permanently.

Fall: Pierce and the National Alliance. The original American Dissident Voices broadcast with Strom and Pierce. The rise of David Duke. Taylor begins American Renaissance. MacDonald’s trilogy. On Genetic Interests. The abortive attempt to renew a Type II Spring and Summer with Legion Europa.  From the early 1970s to the early 2000s. The death of Pierce – harbinger of the end. Type I domination with some Type II rebellion.  

Winter: Spencer, Johnson, the rise of “game” and the “Alt Right.”  Beavis-and-Butthead White Nationalism. Demented sicknesses like Silk Road White Nationalism. VDARE.  Derbyshire and Sailer.  The HBD menace.  Fossilized “movement” dogma. Arthur Kemp. A lack of any memetic originality coupled with contending self-interested leaders squabbling over scraps. Trumpism. The Interregnum we are now in. The Dark Ages for the “movement.” Type IIs to the monasteries to preserve civilization from the sniggering barbarian retardates.

Saturday News

In der news.

Watch this from 10:14 to 10:22 – the Silkers will spontaneously ejaculate over that, in a paroxysm of masochistic ecstasy.

More anti-vaxxer insanity exposed.

The System is unraveling and Der Movement has absolutely nothing to do with it.  It’s the Left that is energized, and the Colored Left will tear the nation apart, which is good.

Andrew Yang is a Chinaman who wants to buy off Whites with $1000 a month.  He’s using UBI to distract Whites from dispossession.  He’s the enemy.  And yet “pro-White leaders” and “activists” and ranting about “the Yang Gang” with the same onanistic fervor they brought to their “God Emperor.”  Well, at least the Princess Tulsi Coconut fad didn’t last that long.

If judgment could be measured like IQ, the Alt Right would be retarded.

Some get it right:

 3h3 hours ago
No doubt. But I find it inherently demoralizing that the altright is putting its faith in a Taiwanese man, who more or less agrees with the globohomo agenda.
He’s an intelligent and articulate man, with interesting ideas, but I’m not jumping on this bandwagon.
Evan McLaren
 3h3 hours ago
He’s getting what energy we have to spare for conventional political discourse, and he’s given us something to meme about. If people are placing faith in him beyond that, it reflects the same problem we encountered in 2016: immaturity and unseriousness.


My extensive analysis of ancestry testing companies is in the editing stage and should be posted soon, hopefully within the next week.