Category: Greg Johnson

A Purebred Son of Europe

As much an Aryan as the good and great Professor Hart, no doubt.

So, here we see a Jew named Letzter complaining about ancestry testing variability, even though, as we shall see, he is benefiting from parental privilege.

The thing I find interesting is the 23andMe results – he tests as 100% Ashkenazi Jewish, which the company labels as “100% European.”  A purebred son of Europe!  More of a purebred than Spencer and Johnson, eh?

Now, the alert reader is probably wondering – if the Ashkenazi genepool is ~ 50% (modern) Middle Eastern, how can someone who is 100% Ashkenazi be 100% European?

Well, let’s trace the “logic” of 23andMe here, and the “logic” of those that take such test results seriously while onanistically and breathlessly discussing the data on Amren comments threads.

First, we have a specific narrow ethnic group being well represented among the parental (or reference) samples used to determine genetic affiliation.

Second, a member of that group gets tested, and since he is essentially being compared to himself, he gets a result of 100% membership in that group (*).

Third, 23andMe decides to label that group as “European;” hence, the individual is “100% European”- obviously nonsense from a genetic-historical perspective.

This tells us two things about ancestry testing as offered by the various companies:

1. The results obtained are exquisitely sensitive to, and dependent upon, the available parental populations – the choices of the reference samples used.

2. The superficial interpretation of the results, particularly for normie and Nutzi nitwits, is going to be influenced by the choice of labels that a company decides to use for given ancestral components.

Considering the second point, 23andMe could have just as easily labelled Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry as “Middle Eastern,” or perhaps (and most accurately) given it its own category separate from both European and Middle Eastern.

More importantly, consider the first point.  A thought experiment – what if there were no Jewish parental population samples, and Ashkenazi Jews had to be analyzed using non-Jewish parental populations?  Then, instead of being “100% Ashkenazi Jewish,” such Jews would get results indicating they are a mix of Middle Eastern, Southern European, and Eastern European.

I trust that people with a triple digit IQ see the underlying problem here, and why parental privilege is such a big issue with these tests.  A person’s fundamental results, and the public perception of “purity,” is going to drastically differ dependent upon whether their narrow ethny (or ethnies) is included as a parental population or not. When Ashkenazi Jews are included as parentals, people of such ancestry will get results such as “100% Ashkenazi Jewish” (*) – labeled as “100% European” – but if the Ashkenazim were not included as a parental population, then those same people, with their same genomes, would now be interpreted as mixtures of various other groups.

Thus, the outcome of the measurement is fully dependent upon how the measurement is conducted – Bohr and Heisenberg could have fit in well with 23andMe and the other testing companies.

And idiots who take the companies’ reporting of results at face value, without considering all of these points, are just that – idiots.

*Yes, the first iteration of Letzter’s results had his Ashkenazi percent in the “low 90s.” That is still remarkably good and indicative of someone with parental privilege, a person deriving from a specific ethny well represented in the parental population base. Consider that for the somewhat broader British/Irish category, also well represented as parentals, Derbyshire got only ~ 70%, although the strong representation of other Northwestern European samples covered him very well at the regional level. If 23andMe had a well-represented specific English category, Derbyshire’s main ancestry percentage would have been higher.  

The bottom line is that “low 90s” for a single ethnic group is a great match, and 100% obviously cannot be improved upon.  Derbyshire’s results are not as good from the single group perspective, but from a regional/subracial basis, he’s also a parental privilege beneficiary – his entire ancestry is covered by groups represented as parentals and labeled in the “European” category.  

As an extremely important aside, I would strongly suspect that both Derbyshire as well as Letzter would have a very low “unassigned” percentage at the highest (90%) confidence level of the 23andMe test. Such a low percentage would indicate that there is excellent parental population coverage for the person’s entire ancestry. The difference between, Letzter and Derbyshire is that the good parental population coverage for Letzter is highly specific (Ashkenazi Jewish) while for Derbyshire is its more diffuse with broader groups (British/Irish and other closely related Northern and Western European ethnies). The relatively greater advantage for Letzter is indicative of both the obsession with Jewish genetics (and thus the availability of Ashkenazi parentals) and the high level of distinctiveness of the Ashkenazi genepool.  

Even apart from the issue of how the company decides to label ancestral components, the validity of 23andMe results at the lower confidence levels is, in my opinion and consistent with logic, going to be correlated to the amount of “unassigned”  ancestry at the highest confidence level.  Indeed, for those people with low  “unassigned” at 90% confidence, it is very likely that their 50% and 90% confidence results will be quite similar – an obvious impossibility for those people getting in the range of ~ 30-50% “unassigned”  at the 90% level.

Advertisements

Joan of Arc(hed Eyebrows)

And Spencer’s elbowing.

Another Greg Johnson Joan of Arc here.

Yeastbucket express!  Diabetes?  Is the yeast feeding off the excess sugar?

Excellent gamester comment:

The question of women boils down to aptitude, Women’s Aptitude. How skilled are they really?
Historically, most men thinkers have slammed women’s ability to think. There have been a lot of ways to categorize this, from “they’re like children” to “they’re intellectual copycats”. But I think the best way is this:
When I go around in my life, I listen to other people talking. Countless times I’ve heard guys discussing things like computers, business, music. I can’t recall ONCE — NOT ONCE — hearing two women discussing a world of ideas. If the world of ideas is a beach with waves of thought coming in, women are far inland in the jungle.

In this thread, the Left tries to justify “punching a Nazi.” The questions I would ask them are as follows. Since even leftist “watchdog” groups label the Nation of Islam and the New Black Panther Party as “hate groups,” how come no Antifa heroes ever attempt to sucker-punch (or elbow) a Black nationalist leader? How come they don’t try and break up a Black nationalist meeting or rally? How come they don’t physically confront all those “Black Israelites” screaming on street corners?

Cutting through the hand-waving (or silence), the answer to all those questions is two-fold. First, the violent left is not against “hatred, bigotry, and fascism” – they are simply anti-White.  Second, and more importantly, they are rightfully afraid. They know if they try any of that they’ll get a big Black fist in the face (likely worse), and, after they get out of the hospital, the same “White supremacist system” that ignores or supports attacks against the likes of Spencer would indict, convict, and imprison them for assaulting a Negro leader, after which they can end up in the prison hospital for surgery to repair a torn anal sphincter.

So, no viral videos of Black nationalists being elbowed in the face.  So how about this – NO ONE gets elbowed or sucker-punched or whatever for expressing their political opinions?  I mean, yes, for now, the System protects its street shock troops, but no one can say what the future holds.  Think of it as enlightened self-interest.

Questions for Eric Kaufmann

Questions.

Read here.

…the second meaning of whiteshift is this longer-term one. You’re going to get this very rapidly rising mixed-race population that will become the majority and will take over the consciousness, memories, and myths of that current ethnic majority.

Questions: What if Whites do not want to be replaced by “this very rapidly rising mixed-race population that will become the majority?”  What if they do not want to “expand Whiteness” to include people who are, by definition as “mixed-race,” not White?  What if they want to preserve themselves, and their genetic interests, as they are today?  What is wrong with that?  Other than your own preferences, of course.

Like the Jews, for example, have different DNA in them.

Questions: Why do you lie about this?  Yes, there are minor groups like Ethiopian, South Asian, and Chinese Jews that do indeed “have different DNA in them.”  But the major Jewish groups are quite similar, genetically, with similar lineages.  What’s your lineage, by the way?

There’s no question whites are advantaged economically, politically.

Questions: If Whites are so “advantaged” economically, what about Jews and Asians? You agree that Whites are being demographically replaced. You agree that Whites, unlike other groups, are not being allowed to express and defend their racial interests.  Thus, how are they really “advantaged” politically?

For example, a lot of those individual measures, like I don’t want my kid marrying an African-American, or I’m against interracial marriage, or I don’t want a black boss, in the survey data, it’s very low now. It’s not perfect. It will take a little bit more time before we get rid of it entirely.

Questions: Why do you define perfection by getting rid of these attitudes?  Aren’t you displaying your hidden anti-White biases by defining perfection in terms of White dispossession and White liberalism?

However, I don’t say that in every case the mainstream parties should go there. Like George Wallace, for example, on segregation.

Question: Why?

General question: Isn’t your book all about just slowing down White dispossession so as to make it more palatable to Whites, to accommodate them to their own demise?

Secondary question: Given Suvorov’s Law of History, don’t you understand that your “throw them a bone” strategy may backfire against your leftist interests? 

Another issue:

Ron Unz?

Messiah or Naughty Boy?

Also:  comic book art, McSpencer, and other items.

Watch this. If you want the executive summary, start watching from 27:50. The video also punctures some fantasies about the Oriental Gods. HBDers weep bitter tears.

This is another example of Sallis being right. After Rushton died, Johnson censored my negative comments about Rushton from Counter-Currents (I was not “banned” from that platform at that time) when there was a Rushtonite hagiography going on there.  After all, we are not allowed to question the dogma – and “Rushton was a messiah” is part of the dogma. However, Dutton (“one of the boys”) researched Rushton’s life and work, and Dutton’s conclusions about Rushton are even harsher than mine were. Sallis right, Johnson wrong.  You can copy and paste that last phrase to explain just about everything.

Trump is “going to look into it.”  Who knows, perhaps the horse is Jewish.  Just look at its nose!

From September 2016:

…if Der Movement is co-opted and subsumed by the Alt-Right, and if the Alt-Right itself is co-opted by the HBD Alt-Wrong, then White Nationalism becomes effectively replaced by a cult worshiping Jewish and Asian IQ. This need not be immediately overt and obvious, a shallow facade of cardboard racialism could be put up as a front, with the ironclad edifice of Jewish/Asian supremacy setting the agenda just behind that facade and manipulating all the “latrine flies” against their own racial interests.  That is not far-fetched if you consider that the described scenario represents what is already going on in certain precincts of the “movement.”

And now, years later, we see Alt Right heroes throwing their lot in with the Jewish anti-WN HBDer Unz.  Prediction correct.

All of this bears close watching, close monitoring.  I would advise a double strategy: on the narrower, intra-Alt Right level, the WN Alt-Right needs to fully and definitively separate from the HBD Alt-Wrong. 

Instead, after the collapse of the Alt Right, they allowed themselves to be bought off for thirty shekels of silver.

On the broader “movement”-scale level, there needs to be a critical mass of quality activists who remain separate from the Alt-Right (although there may of course be cooperation between these activists and the hardcore WN Alt-Right action).

They didn’t listen, did they?

If that doesn’t happen, I fear that all the eggs in that basket of deplorables will end up being clones of Humpty Dumpty.  And we’re all headed for a great fall.

Which took place.  Sallis prescient again – or is using “Sallis” and “prescient” together in the same sentence a superfluous redundancy?

This is hilarious, and not much different from this.

In my opinion, this is the single greatest panel in comic book history. 

Now, the Jew Kirby has (with justification) been given great credit for his work.  However, Joe Sinnott as the inker has been relatively neglected in all the praise and Sinnott’s role needs to be explicitly acknowledged.

Some artist-inker combinations work well; others do not.  Kirby-Sinnott was classic; Bucker-Sinnott was excellent as well.  But Sinnott did not gel well with John Buscema, and I believe Buscema eventually requested his younger brother Sal to do his inking. Sal Buscema eventually became an important artist for Marvel, perhaps ultimately eclipsing John.

This brings up another issue. Artists, at least Marvel artists in the Silver and Bronze ages, all had distinctive styles, in some cases, very highly distinctive styles.  Kirby, for example. Think Ditko, Trimpe, Tuska, and others.  Probably none were as distinctive as Sal Buscema. I immediately knew that Sal Buscema was the artist of a comic book just from a brief look at some panels. Truth be told, at that time, I was not a fan of Sal’s art, particularly with respect to The Incredible Hulk, for which I was used to the art of Trimpe; in general, at that time, I preferred the smooth and rich lines of Kirby (with Sinnott) and the similar “roundness” of Trimpe, as opposed to the harsh lines and clenched-fist faces of Sal Buscema.

However, in the intervening years, my view has changed, and I now view Sal Buscema as an outstanding artist, one of the Marvel Pantheon, with a style more realistic than that of the more “roundness” artists – although in some ways I still prefer the latter. I still am not a fan of Sal Buscema’s depiction of the Hulk specifically, but in general Sal’s art was excellent.  

Further, this is all in contrast to the horror seen in comic books today.  In general, the art today is terrible, and in some cases unbelievably bad, and the stories are unimaginative and mostly SJW.  

Listen to this. So, it seems that the hypothesis – broached here – of a possible falling out between Spencer and Friberg is essentially not correct.  Assuming that is so, we come back to the question of Johnson’s sudden embrace of the Yang Gang – can it just be Johnson’s ego about UBI?

Spencer is correct about the power of censorship – and he’s more realistic than some folks who say “all will be well, just send in the ‘D’Nations” – and I note he admitted that the Alt Right never took any of it seriously.  Too many drunken podcasts, I suppose.  Spencer is being a bit naïve about “speed limits” for the rules of censorship.  Eventually the “speed limit” will be adjusted to eliminate all pro-White content.  What then?

Spencer is correct that Trump will likely do nothing about deplatforming and censorship, but I disagree that the “Alts” has much to do with Trump’s election, and, as stated above, he’s being stunningly naïve to believe that social media/tech regulation would leave loopholes that can be exploited by pro-Whites.

Spencer about AIM and infiltration – absolutely correct.  Friberg makes a good point about how “hate speech laws” exerts selective pressure to force the Far Right to tighten their propaganda and arguments, but this argument – and Spencer’s agreement with this – only goes so far.  Eventually, the laws will be adjusted to narrow the opening for discourse to such an extent that you’ll be left only with the safety valve of mainstream conservatism.  You cannot adjust forever without exerting pressure of your own. I’ve made suggestions about that on this site; this post is not the place to discuss those details.

About the Ukraine – look, at that time I supported the Ukrainian nationalists, but I was not under any illusions about their long term independence from the Neocons. On the other hand, Putin’s Russia is multiculturalist as well, and given the Ukraine’s tragic history I thought it appropriate to at least give the Ukrainian Right a chance to make things right – even if there was little chance of success.  Maybe that was just foolish nativete on my part. I’m not perfect.  Are you?  And would the Ukrainians be better off losing their soul and becoming part of a growing Eurasianist-Yellow/Brown-Islamic empire?

The Way of the World organizing – good idea in theory, but the “rules” put in place for safety will not work in my opinion. The Left is too skilled at infiltration, and the Right is too dumb to prevent it, for all of this to effectively function.

Trump takes decisive action!  After all, that’s why his base voted for him, right?

Is it possible for the “movement” to be this stupid?  Is it possible for water to be wet?

Wops, Kikes, and Retards, Oh My!

Der retardation.

One of the distinguishing characteristics of the ignorant and retarded “movement” is that it gets fixated on particular memes and will repeat these endlessly, regardless of the facts. First, it was the delusion that Quentin Tarantino is a population geneticist and that True Romance is a peer-reviewed scientific publication.  More recently, I suppose that some Type Is breathlessly examined PCA plots of West Eurasian ancestry and noticed the relative proximity of Ashkenazi Jews to Southern European populations.

Der Movement:

ie: I don’t consider relatively unmixed Northern Germanic-Italians and Sicilians that are 90% racial Jew the same race.
Neither do I consider “Iberian” Irish and then the native Briton / “Scots-Welsh” stock that makes up part of the political Irish category the same sub race. Not to mention the purer Nordic lines that run in-between.

Der Science:

See here.

And here.

And also here.

Der Phenotype:

Der Duce.

Note to “movement” – Northern Italians are not “Germanic.” Sicilians are not “90% racial Jew.” Der Movement is 90% retarded. Even the commercially available ancestry tests that are enriched in Northern European parental populations and deficient in the Southern European equivalents are not showing any significant “German” ancestry in Northern Italians or “Jewish” ancestry in Sicilians or other Southern Italians.

Now, let’s consider the reality – as opposed to sweaty ethnic fetishism – carefully.  Europe follows the general paradigm “genes follow geography” as regards the clines observed in the PCA plots much beloved of Nutzis whose lack of scientific understanding rivals that of a race-denying SJWs. Southern Europe fits into this pattern. Thus, Southern Italians are, as expected, shifted more to the Near Eastern direction than are Northern Italians, consistent with deriving a bit more ancestry (mostly ancient) from that direction, as shown here.

Meanwhile, Ashkenazi Jews derive 40-65% of their ancestry from the modern Middle East, 35-60% from Southern Europe, and 15-25% from Eastern Europe (I think that 40-40-20 or 45-40-15 percentage splits seem most reasonable). Those obsessed with PCA plots will remember that the areas of Eastern Europe from which Jews are expected to derive ancestry (e.g., Russia and Poland) are significantly shifted in PCA (to the “northeast”) compared to Southern Europeans (note – these Jews may possibly also derive a small bit of ancestry from German sources as well).

So, what do we have with the Ashkenazim?  We have a group that is a mix of Southern European (SE) and modern Middle Eastern (ME), but with significant Eastern European (EE) admixture shifting them in a more “northeast” direction compared to what one would expect from a simple SE-ME mix. So, the net result is that the Ashkenazim are pulled in the direction of being relatively close to Southern Italians (including Sicilians), Maltese, and other Southern European groups – although, typically, the Jews are still, on average, shifted a bit away from the European groups. Given the tripartite admixture pattern of the Ashkenazim, and the distinctiveness of the Eastern European component, the end result is exactly what one would expect. Only a raving retard would interpret that as “Sicilians (or any other Southern Europeans) are 90% Jewish” (for which no evidence exists whatsoever).  Instead, it is that the EE admixture in the Jews pulls them close enough to the European direction as to make proximity to SEs possible.

And all of that is besides the point that the modern Jewish genepool, and the phenotypic characteristics derived from it, are the consequences of centuries of the endogamy and selective pressures that occured in that community after these admixture events. If you were to mix representatives of today’s SE, ME,and EE populations in proportions similar to the original Ashkenazi formulation, you would not magically get “racial Jews.”  

And do you really believe that Irish sub-types that you think are “different races” are going to significantly differ in genetic composition and racial affinity?  Are you really that stupid? 

One of the tragedies of the Internet is that it empowers individuals with the intelligence of roadkill to believe that they have something useful to contribute to human progress. I suggest that they go back to masturbating over Kemp’s science fiction novel March of the Titans, which is nothing more than a riff off of The Iron Dream.

Speaking of Jewish ancestry.

Sieg Heil!

Based Poland.

The analysis showed that 1.8% of Polish haplotypes may be of Ashkenazi origin…

For those of you who take ancestry testing companies seriously:

Mazel Tov!

“We don’t know who that Jewish person was, but we know it was on his mother’s German line.”

Also see Germany and Poland here.

So much winning!  Who is President again?  By the way, another grand victory for WN 2.0. Greg. Question – if Trump is impeached, indicted, convicted, and sent to prison, will the same speculation be appropriate for him?  He’s no “dandy,” to be sure, but his lard-inflated buttocks may be seen as womanly by other inmates, so who knows?

Calling Out WN 2.0

Sallis right again…we’re all shocked, eh?

This is WN 2.0.  Read that article.  All of it. I urge my readers to study every word of that article.  Some laughable highlights, emphasis added:

McHugh says she was in Connecticut — at the home of VDare’s Peter Brimelow. DeAnna was close with them, and McHugh would sometimes spend time there, even babysitting his children, she said. 

Remember MPC talking about the “spic nig cycle?”  This is the “kid-bucks-Alt Right cycle.”  Have children, use them as props for fund raising, integrate into the Alt Right, use Alt Righters to babysit your children, use the children as fundraising props, rinse and repeat endlessly.

Brimelow, a former financial journalist, was once a mainstream conservative and National Review writer; he had gone further and further to the right over the years, eventually founding the website VDare, named after Virginia Dare, the first English baby born in North America. Just a year after first coming to DC for a full-time job, she was weekending at Brimelow’s home.

A second job, I suppose.

And the emphasis on genetics and IQ was appealing as well. “They see it almost as a moral value”…

Almost?

The emphasis on intelligence confers the whole enterprise with a pseudo-intellectual veneer, and it also provides white supremacists with a way to elide accusations of white supremacy. According to their argument, they can’t be white supremacists because they say that Jews and people of East Asian descent have a higher average IQ.

No, they are self-declared Yellow Supremacists instead.  And avid Judeophiles.  That’s HBD, that’s the Alt Wrong faction – a major faction at that – of WN 2.0, all Jews and Asians, all the time.

DeAnna was a member of the Wolves of Vinland, a group based near Lynchburg that was focused around a neopagan theology based on self-improvement and feats of strength, as well as coded white nationalism. The idea was to cast off the bounds of modern Judeo-Christian society and find a way back to pre-Christian northern European culture. 

They should have invited Steadman to blow his Viking horn. Shorts optional.  Patrik Hermansson could have been brought in to oversee the extreme vetting.

McHugh sometimes accompanied DeAnna on weekend trips down to the Wolves’ headquarters for what they called a “moot” — a ceremony in which the assembled Wolves would smear ash on their bodies around a fire and give what McHugh described as “dramatic speeches” about self-sufficiency and relying on the other group members. They would then sit around the fire and drink beers.

Whether any of this has anything to do with WN – is that a moot point?

And the alt-right did too. She was like their queen.

Another Joan of Arc, right Greg?

So, that is the wonderful world of WN 2.0, so much better, so superior, compared to WN 1.0.  Let’s see now. We have:

The libertarian-Alt Right axis that has wrecked American White nationalism

Millennial jackasses and intellectual vapid morons

Boomer and Generation X grifters making money (and getting babysitting) from the whole endeavor

Yeastbucket “queens” groveled over by thirsty beta males

Wanna-be Viking “pagans” doing their Type I thing, emphasizing “self-sufficiency” while drinking beer (was it home brewed?).

HBDers worshipping Jewish and Asian IQ 

And then McHugh herself, another low-life scum who is not content to quietly leave racial activism, but who has to sit down with the enemy, betray past friends and confidences, and slander and smear authentic activists via projection of her own faults and motivations.

Let’s hear more now from the grifters how superior WN 2.0 is to WN 1.0.

Trump with some of his favorite people.  How about the people who actually voted for him? Ah, who cares about them, right?  Let them die from opioids, get attacked in the streets by Antifa, get outsourced, get replaced by “high-skilled” immigrants, and if they defend themselves, well, there’s always the DOJ to put them in their place, amirite?

MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

Yes, Richie, and Der Movement as well.

So much winning!

Johnson bans yet another commentator.  If only he was as intolerant with Hermansson and Lewis.

The Strong Horse is Not My Little Pony

It’s all connected.

When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, they will naturally want to side with the strong horse. When people of the world look upon the confusion and atheism of the West, they see that Islam is the strong horse.

And what does White nationalism have to offer?  Guess what: The Strong Horse is not My Little Pony.  How is it possible for  White nationalist “leaders” to be so blind, deaf, and dumb to image?

WN 2.0: Effeminacy, childishness, weakness, silliness.  

Could it be that young White men with fundamentally healthy instincts are frustrated because “leaders” are promoting Bronyism and endorsing non-White liberal Presidential candidates?  Can we “understand” these shootings by pointing out that “movement leaders” have completely failed in every way possible, even to the point of becoming cringeworthy embarrassments?  Yang Gang!  Tulsi Coconut!  My Little Pony!  Pepe!  Kek!

Do the folks shown here support The Yang Gang?  We went from Caesar, Charlemagne Napoleon, and the Waffen SS to that.  That should be condemned, not encouraged.

The absolute worst aspects of WN 1.0 are infinitely superior to anything WN 2.0 has to offer.  Given the choice between James Mason foaming at the mouth over Charles Manson or Buttercup Dew mincing around over cartoon ponies, I’ll take the former, thank you very much.

Back to the San Diego shooting.  Great timing numbnut…right after the Congressional hearing.  Could it be any worse? I mean, the confluence of Type I Nutzism and affirmative action does wonders for the “movement.”  Let’s have some more posts about how brain structure proves the superiority of particular ethnies, said superiority no doubt well represented in “movement” “activism.”  But as bad as these people are, the “leaders” are worse. The more sensitive members of the rank-and-file likely look upon Der Movement and see nothing but a barren wasteland of hopeless despair, populated by freaks, weirdos, perverts, Bronies, incompetents, fetishists, and grifters.  So, in response, these young men have as their role models are racialist mass murderers.  Wonderful.  So much winning!

We need to give activists another choice than that between being a “shoot-‘em-up” Nutzi or being an effeminate Brony with more estrogen that a slumber party of teen-aged girls.

Note also the fellow’s disgust with The God Emperor – demonstrating that a disgust with “leadership” (in that case, Presidential) is fueling these episodes.  Another “movement” fail – obsessing over the fat fraud Trump instead of building a real infrastructure.  

These young men should be taking the advice I have been giving for young (and all) activists – take care of yourselves first, get an education, build your career, make money, save, if you want a family than go in that direction – build a real life.  Do not sacrifice yourself for a grifter-freak “movement” or even for “the race” – a mewling omega race of weaklings and losers – unless you can accomplish something that will definitively and significantly enhance your genetic interests.  This fellow Earnest should have finished his education, built his career, saved his money, and then participated in activism in a sane and sustainable fashion. But, alas, misled and let down by “leaders” and in a state of desperation, these types lash out.

How’s that Arctic Alliance coming along, Derbyshire?  That is in my opinion indirectly connected to the shooting as well. Racialists in the rank-and-file are likely disenchanted by rice burners and mustard dippers being spokesmen for Der Movement, and maybe they are also tired of all the money donated being flushed down the toilet, so folks can gamble, watch movies, and sit comfortably on lawn chairs.

On the other hand, I see this as probably being a net positive, even if it was a bit silly and juvenile – non-violent protest that shows the SJWs that their “safe spaces” may not be so safe from dissident opinions after all.

What has happened as a result of Trump’s election is a good example of how difficult it will be to put through a pro-White policy to address the demographic disaster that is unfolding even if a nationalist-sounding politician is elected. From the very beginning of Trump’s administration, he has been beset with investigations and lawsuits, and there has been a torrent of hatred and invective directed at him in the media and on social media like Twitter and Facebook. Comparisons of Trump with Hitler and Nazism have been routine, during the campaign and since he became president. This is unprecedented in American history. Trump has been unable to get any good immigration-related legislation through Congress because of unanimous Democrat opposition and significant opposition from Republicans. And the courts have routinely ruled against him in the many jurisdictions with liberal judges.

But, hey, our victory is just around the corner.  No, wait, in 50 years.  No, wait, we have 200 years.  Well, whatever. Just send in dem dere “D’Nations!”

Then you wonder why folks get frustrated and do stupid things?  And on cue:

Greg Johnson

Posted April 28, 2019 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

What is more useful: envisioning the creation of white homelands as being easy or hard? Because the harder it seems, the fewer people who will consider it possible or desirable.

Let’s give people unrealistic expectations, let’s have the typical “victory euphoria” (even for future victories) – yes, as long as you all send in the “D’Nations.” Remember, things objectively are absolutely terrible, but if you send in money, you’ll be living in the Golden Age today!  Better Gold than Tungsten, eh?

On other notes – 

Jack Vance:

A man desiring a girl will set upon her and beat her black and blue. No one would think to interfere. If the girl approves, she comes the same way again. When he rushes forth to pummel her, she throws herself on his mercy.

Jack Vance was, apparently, not a beta male, a white knighter, or a potential Brony.