Category: multiculturalism

Revisiting Putnam

No White racial solidarity.

Let’s again consider Putnam’s oft-discussed findings about diversity eroding societal trust and repressing social engagement and investment in public goods (similar to findings by others and a topic often brought up by Salter).

Putnam not only found that diversity decreased trust between groups but within groups as well. That latter finding is somewhat counter intuitive, since one could reasonably assume that increased diversity, and the consequent increased distrust between groups, would strengthen a tribal “us against them” mentality and therefore increase trust within groups. But the opposite occurred, at least with those examples Putnam studied. 

How can we interpret the counter intuitive finding that diversity erodes trust and societal cohesion within groups as well as between groups?  This depends on whether this “within group” problem applies to all groups, or only to Whites.  Perhaps those more familiar with the nuances of Putnam’s work – which I read some time ago and have no interest in revisiting as Putnam is a disgusting excuse for an academic who hid his findings for years and only published it with an accompanying screed promoting social engineering to grease the wheels of White dispossession (*) and my hypothesis here will require more data in any case for a fair evaluation – know more of this.

My hypothesis is as follows. 

If within group trust is eroded by diversity for all groups, then this phenomenon reflects a general human (or should I say “hominid”) trend to withdraw and “hunker down” when faced with diversity,

If the effect is restricted to Whites (which I believe will be the case if a careful quantitative study is done), then this is a strictly White mental phenomenon.  And how does this happen?  The hypothesis suggest the following.

One could speculate various mechanisms if this was the case, but consider – a la Ignatiev’s “Race Traitor” paradigm – that Whites are the only group in which large numbers of the group – including a majority of influential elites – act overtly against group interests.  Thus, there is no racial solidarity among Whites, no one you can racially trust unless you really know them – hence, when faced with diversity, Whites will mistrust other Whites because  – given the omega cuckiness of many Whites – one can never be sure whether a given White is “on our side” or “on their side.”  In a homogeneous White community this isn’t so much of a problem (of course political disagreements – including whether or not to import diversity – can precipitate such mistrust, but even so, in a homogeneous community such conflicts would be muted).  However, in the presence of diversity, Whites must tread carefully.  Is your White coworker someone you can trust to share your disgust over multiculturalism, or will they “report you to HR” because of your “bigotry?”

On the other hand, non-Whites (including Jews) can reliably depend on their co-ethnics showing ethic/racial solidarity, and siding with them against “the other” (and particularly against Whites). For Whites, a given fellow White is just as likely to be a Universalist cuck as they are to be someone sharing your beliefs.  

Thus, diversity erodes within group trust among Whites (and likely only among Whites) because Whites are ideologically split on this race-diversity issue, and many Whites are SJW “altruistic punishers, so that in diverse environments fellow Whites may pose a threat since they would identify with “the other side.”

Ignatiev would be proud.

*Salter rightly claimed in On Genetic Interests that for a majority being replaced, the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does work, since the workable multiculturalism will make race replacement more agreeable to those being replaced, while the pain of a failed multiculturalism may wake the majority up to prevent their dispossession.  Putnam is clearly on the side of those who want multiculturalism to succeed.

Advertisements

Propitious Times For The Sallis Strategy

The Sallis Strategy: Promote balkanization and chaos so as to make multiculturalism untenable, weakening the System, and making White survival more possible.

Why the Sallis Strategy is becoming more possible; excerpts, emphasis added:

To the surprise of no one who understands human nature, many whites didn’t appreciate being told that they had to die off for “progress” to be achieved. They didn’t like being derided by their betters as “bitter clingers” with their guns and Bibles, and they especially didn’t like being termed “deplorables” unworthy of compassion or consideration. In the last days of Hillary’s doomed campaign, its contempt for a huge chunk of the American population had become so blatant that one of her top celebrity surrogates publicly hailed the “extinction” of straight white men as a step in the right direction. 

Trump is no political genius. He made an appeal to working-class whites, who correctly felt that the Democrats viewed them with undisguised contempt and didn’t want their vote. 

Ethno-racial nationalism is an enormously potent political force; wise politicians know this and employ it cautiously. Nationalism arouses genuine passion and is a political motivator like no other, which it explains why a majority of white women voted for Trump, to the bitter consternation of outraged feminists. 

Moreover, once nationalism becomes the main political factor, there’s no putting that troublesome genie back in the bottle. Politics become tribal, ethnic conflicts waged at the ballot box rather than on the battlefield. Having done most of my scholarly work on multiethnic societies like the Habsburg Empire and Yugoslavia, I can attest that the fires of nationalism, once stoked, are only put out with great difficulty—and that ethnically diverse societies that play games with nationalism are living dangerously. 

“However verboten discussion of White Nationalism is at present among polite Americans, it is unavoidable that this will become an issue in the future, with potentially explosive consequences.” 

Trump’s winning our presidential election heralds a new era in American politics. The Democrats decided to bet everything on their emerging “new” America, and lost big. Obama’s two terms have overseen the destruction of the Democrats as a national party: they control nothing in Washington now and their performance at the state level is nothing short of dismal. Democrats dominate our big cities, California, and the Northeast—and little else. Barack Obama’s real legacy is putting Donald Trump in the White House. 

Buckle up, it looks to be a bumpy ride ahead in the emerging era of competing American ethno-nationalisms.

Despite all the negatives of Trump the man, his election expands the range of possibilities; the times have never been more propitious to implement the Sallis Strategy.  Again: I agree with Salter – the only thing worse, from the perspective of a majority being replaced, than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does work.  What must be avoided at all costs is a “successful” multiculturalism that enables the peaceful and orderly race replacement of the majority population. Instead, what you want is for the process to be as messy and painful as possible, so that the majority realizes their peril and resists.  In other words: multiculturalism must be made NOT to work.

The new America must be defined by competing “ethno-nationalisms – polite talk for competing racial nationalisms – it must become a living hell of division, despair, bitterness, rage, balkanization, hatred, distrust, and unending boiling anger and frustration.  Group must be against group; the idea that “we are all Americans” must be thrown into the dustbin of history.  “Americans” of European, Asian, African, Jewish, Hispanic, etc. origins must hate and distrust each other, making a “coming together” impossible, making the multicultural consensus untenable.

Powerful forces will attempt to smooth over these difference to delay the collapse of multiculturalism sufficiently to ensure that Whites are a powerless minority.  We must oppose this; thus, Trump’s election and its meaning, and the short-sighted Left reaction to it (if they really wanted to save their multiculturalism, they’d support Trump’s civic nationalism,) provides real hope for the Sallis Strategy.   

We need to do everything to highlight the contradictions, encourage distrust and division, stoke anger, promote rage, open up the fissures to full-fledged balkanization, catalyze chaos, tear open the wounds of America and pour salt into those wounds and rub them raw and bleeding.

From the perspective of White racial interests, multiculturalism is hell on Earth; therefore, this needs to be actualized in everyday life for everyone to see.

MAKE AMERICA HATE AGAIN!

Sallis Strategy: The Center Does Not Hold

Chaos and division.

I must admit to being naive.  I believed the polls and was wrong about Der Touchback’s chances of winning (unlike Der Movement, I have no problem admitting when I am wrong), and now I am surprised about the rapid and ferocious Left reaction to Trump’s victory.  Yes, I am naive indeed.

The last few days have been eye-opening.  Not content to wait (like I had stupidly thought) for President Trump to actually do something (e.g,, an immigration crackdown) before acting like a bunch of jackasses, the SJWs took to the streets (and Twitter) in an eruption of stupidity, violence, and chaos-inducing tantrum protesting.  And it is continuing.  All those folks who voted for Trump are watching no doubt, and they cannot be pleased.

I on the other hand am pleased, as it fits in with the Sallis Strategy.  While wrong about the details, at least I was right (as were others) that a Trump victory would unleash forces of chaos, division,and balkanization in America. And the Left’s rage that “we will never accept this” and “never normalize this” holds out hope that this disunity will continue.  The specifically anti-White aspect of the protests, the vandalism, and the violence is also being noted by White Trump supporters.

Excellent.  Excellent.  What was that Putnam wrote on diversity eroding public trust and societal solidarity?  You’re seeing it action folks.  That “America is two nations” is not idle talk.  While unfortunately not true literally, it is increasingly true demographically, culturally, politically,and spiritually.

Now, I’ve been describing the “bottom-up” reaction of the Left.  But the “top-down” reaction is just as promising.  The elites have (so far at least) learned nothing from Trump’s surprising victory.  Instead of reflecting on White anger and resentment, they instead double down on their anti-White attitudes (as I’ve written many times – Hatred of Trump is a proxy for hatred of Whites), and spew forth venom (e.g., media, Reid, celebrities, various pundits) and excuses (it was Comey, not the fact that Democrats are overtly anti-White,* which led to Clinton’s historic defeat).

These folks have learned nothing, and I doubt that they are capable of learning anything. Their racial animus toward Whites is so ingrained that any serious thought about the facts of the case becomes short-circuited – the idea that Whites have legitimate grievances are taboo.  They just can’t go there.  Instead talk about “White Privilege” and “White racism” (we wish!) and other nonsense.  In other words, the System is behaving in exactly the same manner that alienated White folks to begin with, the Left bemoans Trump’s victory and then they continue to do the same exact things which led to that victory in the first place.

And then we have the mendacious Sanders, who does utter the phrase “White working class,” but who forgets his own contemptuous dismissal of those folks during the election. Further, any economics-based “outreach” to White middle class and working class Americans is going to fail, since their alienation is not based solely, or even mainly, on economics – even those few leftists who take the election results seriously do not understand this. This is ultimately about Identity, about race and culture – White folks are not going to forget the Democratic Party’s hatred for, and abandonment of, Whites just because a few economic bones are belatedly thrown in their direction,  It’s far too late for that.

So, what we have is an unprecedented opportunity.  Der Movement, if it is any good, should be leveraging these events to promote division, chaos, despair, hatred, rage, bitterness, and balkanization throughout the land, fanning the flames of the fires started by leftist hysteria over Trump’s victory. A fraction of Trump’s supporters are ripe for recruitment – albeit recruitment by a real movement, one that is sane and that does not reject half of Trump’s White base.  The time is propitious for that, and equally propitious for other right-wing populist candidates to “strike while the iron is hot” and get into politics at the congressional, state, and local levels.  And also propitious for ordinary Whites to practise Salter’s democratic multiculturalism, which would unravel the multicultural consensus from the inside out.

The center does not hold.  It all falls apart for the System, but it will be too slow and possibly not enough in the time left if this “falling apart” is not helped along.  This will be a test for Der Movement.  This is the real “last chance for White America.”  

We’ll see if the caliper crowd is up to the challenge.

*Republican cucks are not much better (although they usually try and hide it), but in this election, the candidate was less of a cuck than normal.

VOTE TRUMP!

At the very least, if he loses, make it close.

Yes, Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negro-loving beta race cuck civic nationalist with a Jewified family, an overweight imbecile, a lazy and ill-prepared debater, an embarrassment of a political candidate, a blustering clown, and a crass jackass. Nevertheless, as SJW America perceives Trump as being a “racist fascist bigot,” a Trump electoral victory will do a fine job of destabilizing the multicultural consensus, balkanizing society, enraging the Coloreds and the Left, creating chaos, and weakening the System.  

Thus: VOTE TRUMP

EGI Notes Endorses Donald J Trump

Chaos, balkanization, division, mistrust, and despair.

It is already clear to the (few) readers of this blog that I support Donald Trump for President, even though I have an extremely low opinion of the man. However, I’d like to formally endorse Trump (who I intend to vote for – and I usually do not vote, for obvious reasons), and summarize my thoughts on the matter.

I support Trump solely because of the wonderful effect his campaign has had on the sociopolitical discourse in this country. Trump’s politically incorrect right-wing populism, coupled to the public perception of him as the candidate of “White racism,” has done more to impede America’s multicultural consensus that any other political phenomenon in my lifetime. Trump has unleashed forces that I am sure he – in his hazy and lazy dimwittedness – does not understand. Trump has been subjected to a withering abuse, more so than any other public figure in, again, my lifetime, but, unlike what the egotistical, navel-gazing Trump may think, that abuse is not really directed at him. Hatred of Trump is a proxy for hatred of Whites; piling on Trump is merely a more socially acceptable way for the anti-Whites to spew forth the venomous hatred of White people, White culture, and the very idea of White existence. Trump has stripped the mask off these people and exposed this anti-White hatred for all who have eyes – real eyes – to see. Trump has shifted the discourse in a more rightist and pro-White direction; even though I believe the Alt Right is delusional to think that they have “arrived,” it is still true that it was Trump – and Trump alone (not the Alt Right themselves) – that brought the Alt Right and its ideas to public attention (for good or ill – I think the Alt Right could be a net negative, but that’s another story). Trump’s rallies have been the occasion of organized political violence against his White supporters, adding to the instability and lawlessness of a decaying “diverse” American state. In summary, Trump’s campaign has encouraged: division, despair, chaos, balkanization, race hatred (mostly against Whites), cultural incompatibilities exposed, and mistrust across racio-cultural lines. Trump’s campaign also had the unintended side effect (of course ignored by Der Movement) of confirming the Lind “America’s Tribes” thesis, clearly identifying exactly which groups of White Americans are expected to support or oppose pro-White right-wing populism.

To summarize further: Salter says that for a majority being replaced, the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does work. Hence, making sure that multiculturalism does not work is imperative. Trump’s campaign has mightily contributed to a failing American multiculturalism and for that we must be thankful. Trump as President, regardless of what he may or may not do, would be a focal point for more anti-White hatred and this weaken the System’s multicultural consensus even more. Regardless of whether he wins, the more support he gets the more the deep racial and cultural divisions in America are emphasized. The point is not to “make America great again” but to “smash the System.” Trump is, inadvertently, doing a fine job at such smashing. But we need more.

For these reasons, I endorse Trump, even though I personally believe he is lazy and ignorant buffoon, an idiot with Jewish family connections, unread and unprepared, not very bright, hysterically undisciplined, a race cuck to the Negro – it is not Trump’s supporters who are the “basket of deplorables,” it is instead Trump’s myriad personal flaws that instead constitute the basket. But remember what Yockey said about de Gaulle: Europe may be saved by an idiot. Similarly, America may be put on a better path – a path of despair, division, misery, hatred, and multicultural untenability – by the idiot Trump.

My endorsement is made more difficult by the pitiful homoerotic pro-Trump hysteria in Der Movement. “Activists” – always eager for a “man on White horse” savior quick fix – have gravitated toward Trump (having abandoned Putin for the time being), and, also, the quota queens see in Trump a reflection of themselves.

Roissy writes:

Trump is the emblem of the shiv-right revolution, a reification of genuine hope and change. But the man himself is more than a talisman or mystical avatar to propel and strengthen the resolve of a righteous rebel alliance against the anti-White Empire. He is truly a great man, who rightfully belongs among the pantheon of Great American Men.

One could almost imagine an onanistic Roissy’s heavy breathing when he wrote that.

A typical comment from that blog:

And no one is forcing you to buy in to the Jewish-Marxist Media interpretation that his supporters are “deluding” themselves into thinking he is winning solidly.

Nobody thought he was “unprepared” or that he came close to losing until the Jewish-Marxist media set about with their usual unabashed hackery in the days after. See the instant polls on the night of, which at very least demonstrated tremendous universal enthusiasm among his supporters for his performance.

Only now that the satanic narrators have whispered for a straight week uninterrupted to Lew, “Give in to your fears,” it seems easier for the weak-willed like him to relent.

Sure! Anyone who faces the reality that the “God Emperor” gave one of the worst Presidential debate performances in history is simply a weak-minded puppet of Jewish “satanic narrators” – or maybe Jews themselves! Yeah, yeah – that’s the ticket! I mean, these guys are tragicomically delusional.

All these guys – including the outrageous hysterical idiots claiming that “Donald Trump is the last chance for White America – had really better hope Trump wins in that “Trumpslide” they’re always talking about, or, at long last, someone (me) will hold Der Movement accountable for all their feckless stupidity this electoral season.

 

Labor Day Special: Some Links on Economics

Truth vs. trolls shilling for predatory capitalism.


Of relevance see this about Wall Street pay and also this. Oh yes, all those stock analysts and managers really earn their keep.


In a Ted Sallis regime, all these fatcats would have their wealth confiscated and they’d be sent to do hard manual labor in work camps.  Oh, wait – “that’s communism!”  I don’t care what you call it – its right.  The excuse for the economics uber alles mindset is that “economic growth” enhances the standard of living and overall well being.  The reality is that benefits go to a small group of (mostly incompetent) bigwigs and race traitors, while the general population deals with declining real wages and an endless cycle of mini-boons followed by hollowing-out recessions, never mind the destruction of outsourcing, mass immigration, and overall homogenizing multiculturalist globalization.

It’s time to put the socialism back in national socialism.

Racial Politics in the News, 6/28/16

Two items.


A short-sighted gorilla.  Negroes are not too bright, so it doesn’t occur to this chimp that having sharply divergent racialized politics in America does not bode well for the multicultural utopia that some think is upon us.  What about the idea that White youth are liberal, and we just need to wait until the old Whities die off?  First, with the proper cultivation of balkanizing impulses, Multicultural America may not last that long.  Second, there is hope that the tendency for Whites to “move right” as they age will also apply to the current generation.

The bottom line is though that there must be clever and prudent leadership to take advantage of an increasingly racialized political scene in America,  We need far-sighted far-Right leadership, not the current crop of buffoons and idiots who are no more far-sighted than is your typical “ancestors evolved in the tropical jungle” Negro commentator.