Odds and Ends, 4/23/24

In der news.

People, including on the Dissident Right, underestimate how much someone’s ideology is a part of their personal identity, and therefore how hard it is for people to substantially change that ideology because that is in essence a rejection of self. Yes, of course, some people do change. But much of that change is within a socially acceptable spectrum – someone goes from being a traditional leftist liberal in youth to a kosher conservative aracial civic nationalist conservative when older, in both cases rejecting the importance of race and of a deep civilizational bond. Dissident Righters who did make the jump from aracial to racial belieeve it is common or possibly could be common just with the right “memes and explanations.” They don’t realize that they are the exception to the rule, and to get White people, including aracial civic nationalist right-wingers, to make the jump to racial nationalism is a tough nut to crack, even with their vaunted (and biased) “polling data.” This is particularly true given how repulsive, retarded, and reactionary Der Movement is. Who would de facto question their personal identity for that?

I wonder – how many of the “young Italian-Americans” supporting stupid and destructive ethnic ideas are actually ethnic Italians? Likely no more than half (maybe less). No offense to anyone but it is my belief that membership in any specifically ethnic organization (of whatever ethnicity) should be strictly restricted to purebreds. Hybrids can be supporters, but they cannot be allowed to make or influence policy. Besides the fact that they are not of the group and that they may have divided loyalties, there’s other behavioral issues at play. Someone of mixed ethnic ancestry who identifies with one part of their ancestry may try and over-compensate and be a complete jackass, promoting bizarre hyper-ethnic memes that cut off the ethny from membership in large groupings. Try-hard hybrids cannot be allowed to do this.

Please watch from about 5:50 to 6:30, for a mention of Richard Spencer and Unite the Right, with Tucker Carlson saying that Spencer is “a liberal who hates Christianity.” Now, no doubt some anti-Spencer midwits in the Dissident/Far Right will see that as a good thing (“take that, Spencer”) as well as having nothing to do with them. Unfortunately for them and the “we’re winning” delusion they peddle to gullible donors, the mass of right-leaning “normies” out there make no distinction between Spencer and the anti-Spencers. Like it or not, the fine distinctions that people “on the inside” of the Dissident Right make between all of the actors (past and present) in the “scene” are unknown to all of the Carlson viewers out there, who bin all of these people together as “bad, anti-Christian freaks who are against Christianity and are not true ‘conservatives.”

So, when Carlson and his guest “diss” Spencer they are also “dissing” everyone else on the Dissident Right, who are not “winning” but losing badly. And if they don’t like the damage that they claim Spencer has done, they should focus their attention on the “movement” system that enabled the rise of Spencer. But, alas, they cannot do that because the same system enabled their own meritless rise.

The Quota Queens say I am some sort of apologetic advocate for Italians; this is the reality.  Also, please read this.

A Gab correspondent has told me that he tried to answer the anti-Italian comments at Amren and so far the comments seem censored.  Comments were something like:

Hey Nonracialistsupremacist, aren’t you Truthgiverofhumanity, that South Asian commenter who really loves blonde women? It’s interesting that a non-White would come to a site like Amren to promote Nordicism. Whatever could be the reason?”

Why is Amren running an article that attacks Italians when all Europeans are under threat, and White racial unity is needed now more than ever?

Will these comments eventually get through moderation? If not, why not? Regardless of that, Italians take note of the endless hostility toward you from Der Movement.  No, it is not your imagination; Der Movement really does hate you.

The Quota Queens continue to deny the affirmative action program, even though the Amren scenario makes quite clear that it would be impossible for a full-blooded Southern Italian to ever have a top leadership role in Der Movement, regardless of their qualifications. On the other hand, inept WASPs are continuously propped up.

Italian-Americans (and other White ethnics, but particularly Italians) who are interested in pro-White activism have a choice – they can be humiliated subaltern low caste stepandfetchits for Der Movement or they can help build a New Movement in which all persons of European ancestry are respected. So far, they choose the former and reject the latter.

An Example of Why I’m Anti-Italian

Welcome to Der Movement.

Welcome to American Renaissance:

Emphasis added:

When I was in France, I encountered two bullies. They were both of Italian descent. One had been held back not one but two grades. He was essentially going through puberty while the rest of us had a couple years to go yet. That’s a little like going up against someone on steroids because the testosterone hasn’t kicked in for the younger ones yet.

When I got back to the United States, the first bully I met was an Italian-American. If you want to know what got me wondering about genetics, it was that. Was it cultural or something in the genes? As I started to have a negative view of all Italians, I made friends with two guys who had regular Anglo-American names. When they invited me into their homes, I was surprised to discover that both their mothers were of Italian descent. I started taking a more nuanced view.

However, when I learned about the existence of the mafia, it didn’t surprise me at all. No, I don’t believe all Italians or Sicilians are criminals, but people like Joe Pesci were very much like what I encountered. They acted like Pesci’s character in Lethal Weapon (a bit of a clown, sort of wimpy) when outnumbered but like Pesci’s character in Goodfellas (psychopathic) when in a group of their own kind.

Comments:

There are two races. Those who are White/Nordic & those who are brown/Non-Nordic as well as a mixed-race which is a combination of the White/brown races.

There’s the “Italians aren’t white” meme,

I live in NYC. The Italians are more rough/criminal/masculine. I love their food

do find it annoying that they describe themselves as Italian first and American second. Their love of the Mafia also disturbs me.

Or Pelosi. or DeBlasio, or “Dr” Jill Giacoppa Biden. There’s a whole website dedicated to Italian American Democrats.

the bad kids in my town were probably Italian first

The Italian bullies this guy had, who were most likely brownish Southern Italians, & the Black who harassed him with a block of ice are shows that any shade of brown people love to prey on fair colorful Whites especially when they’re defenseless.

I loathe, loathe, loathe Italians. An ethny who all act like jackasses, create bad impressions, but then, the rest will NEVER take concerted action to defend their ethny.  The most you’ll get is a lone random comment on Amren.  After all, why DO anything to defend your ethny, why DO anything to become a force in pro-White activism, and in Italy why defend the homeland from invasion, when you can sing on balconies, obsess over food, drink wine, chase women, act like juvenile jackasses, mimic Trump with all blustering talk and no action, and be all around contemptible weaklings and lazy hedonistic cowards.

About Amren itself – yes, yes, they’re just “telling the truth.”  Funny that they won’t do it about Jews though, amirite?

More Biased Science

How can you oppose biased science when you alienate, ban, and blacklist STEM allies?

Amren is disturbed. I have written about leftist bias in science, particularly in population genetics, many times.  For example:.

I have often written how the science of population genetics has been corrupted by leftist, “woke,” “anti-racist” political bias, and thus everything coming from the mainstream (more so the interpretations rather than the data, but data can also be suspect if it was created by flawed and/or biased modeling) has to be taken with a very large grain of salt.

I have often read articles warning about “racists” “misusing” genetic data and have had “scientists” at conferences tell me to my face their political concerns about this field, including their own work.

Recently, I was reading nonsense about the “misuse” of ancient genomics data by “bigots” and the need for “scientists” to use such studies and their findings (or, more properly, biased interpretations of the findings) to “fight bigotry.”

It is not the place of science and genuine scientists to promote or oppose any ideology or belief system.  Once that occurs, we are no longer talking about science but about politics and the so-called “scientists” are actually politicians, who have given up any pretense of objectivity. They should not be trusted and their perfidy is corrosive of the entire scientific enterprise, which is supposed to be based on disinterested, unbiased, and apolitical analysis and the pursuit of objective truth. And who are these people to judge what is moral or not, and then to have the temerity to apply their subjective value judgments to distort the pursuit of scientific truth? What arrogance!  What if they are wrong and their opponents are right?  Why not just present the data and leave value judgments to politicians and philosophers?

Obviously, biased science is both unacceptable and dangerous and must be opposed, and I have been opposing it for decades, as someone who is part of the STEM community myself.

But there are two basic problems with respect to how the Right impedes the ability of people like myself to oppose leftist politicization of real racial science.

First, the Right, and in particular the Dissident/Far Right, focuses on irrelevant issues, makes stupid comments, misinterprets data, and in general makes it easy for the Left to ridicule and oppose the Right’s foolishness. Why obsess over Neanderthal ancestry when such ancestry is also found in various types of non-Negro Coloreds?  Why fetishize lactose tolerance and chugging gallons of milk when a significant fraction of Europeans (yes, even some Northern Europeans) are intolerant, while some Coloreds are tolerant?  Why promote false “racial purity” narratives, which I have opposed and debunked? Why make absurd claims about PCA (that I also have debunked) or a variety of other absurd misinterpretations and laughable distortions?

The Right makes it easy for the Left to attack “racial science” because much of what passes for “racial science” on the Right is essentially pseudoscience, irrelevance, misinterpretation, lies, and other nonsense. And the infiltration of the HBD cult into the Dissident Right has only made the situation worse.

My advice, which has been for most part ignored, is to focus on the rock-solid evidence, and biopolitical relevance, of genetic distance, genetic difference, genetic kinship, and genetic integration/structure, and then apply all of that to ethnic genetic interests. No doubt the Left will attack that as well, but we would be on solid ground defending those concepts and the Left will be ultimately reduced to promoting ludicrous falsehoods such as that there are no genetic differences between human groups and that somehow adaptive interests do not apply to humans. But does the Right take my sound advice?  No. In fact, some retards on the Right do the Left’s work for them and actually attack the idea of ethnic genetic interests!  Do we need to wonder why our side always loses?  Do we need to wonder why it is so easy for the Left to attack the Right’s “racial science?”

Second, I am bemused by how the Quota Queens are outraged by the Left’s tactics and thus run articles about how leftist academics are planning to distort science in order to oppose “race science.” Dear Quota Queens – do you believe that alienating, banning, and blacklisting some of the few people on the Dissident Right with the scientific expertise to defend “race science” is good for the cause you allegedly support? How can you oppose biased science when you alienate, ban, and blacklist STEM allies (cough, Sallis, cough)? But, alas, those questions assume that your Fearless Leasers really care about the cause as opposed to caring about creating and maintaining an entertainment brand to support themselves off of the donations of retarded and lazy imbeciles.

WDR41: Sallis Defamed Again

Against Greg Johnson.

Following up on this.

Western Destiny Radio episode 41: Listen here.

Background material (in all cases, emphasis added):

The Nash VNN piece.

Goad’s reaction. One correction – the Trad News piece states:

Goad, who once confessed to paying a Black boy to suck him off…

Listening to the Luke Ford Show episode, Goad says that the Negro paid him, as opposed to what Trad News says. From the JP Nash VNN review is this excerpt from Goad’s writing that supports my understanding of the Luke Ford Show segment:

Some skinny black kid with glasses paid me five bucks for the privilege of letting him suck my cock on the concrete stairwell to a fluorescent-lit Norristown subterranean parking lot, and he had his eyes closed all worshipfully slobbering all over it and said I could fuck him if I wanted to but I said no, and the way he fawned over my bone…

But, of course, any association with me is what harms the reputation of “movement” “leaders.”

The Amren Romania article.

The Amren article about Zoltan Hajnal.

Author Marisa Abrajano, whose origins we can only imagine from her name and appearance, teaches political science at UC San Diego. Zoltan Hajnal also teaches at UC San Diego. Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower. White Backlash is published by Princeton University Press.

This is the perfect symbol for our degenerate times. Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are, and are published by one of the country’s most prestigious academic presses. We have work to do.

Hajnal speaking.  Foreigner?

General background.

Data leak.

Polignano tape.

Matt Forney statement.

Apparently Parrott has been “rehabilitated” by Counter-Currents, compare this:

Counter-Currents

@NewRightAmerica

He’s intelligent, but his intellect has been ruined by insanity. I regret tolerating him and people like Parrott as long as I did. Better people saw it as indecent. It harmed my reputation.

With this:

Angelo Plume (Telegram, YouTube) and Matt Parrott (Telegram, Substack) were Greg Johnson‘s special guests on the latest broadcast of Counter-Currents Radio, which was the fourth meeting of the Counter-Currents Book Club…

Lots of people seem to be a problem for Johnson; it’s all our fault it seems:

Alex,

I listened to the end of this interview, where I was discussed. Your claim that I told you in an email (an email that is conveniently lost on an old computer) that I am a homosexual is a flat out lie. (And anyone with ears can HEAR it in your voice.) I have our old correspondence. But I don’t need to check it, because I know that I said nothing of the kind, nor would I.

I wrote an article protesting the crude queer bashing on VNN. I republished that article in my CONFESSIONS OF A RELUCTANT HATER. If you want, you can use that as a fig leaf.

You admitted that you were being an asshole. Why not clear the air fully and just admit that you pulled that claim out of your ass in anger, because I was besting you in a debate? You speak of your political instincts and deride me for my lack thereof. Well, you constantly urge people to imitate the Jews: lie, cheat, and kill. That pretty much impeaches your credibility as a source right there. If that is what you mean by political instincts, I am pleased to be without them.

I have accused you, Brad Griffin, Sam Dickson, and others of narcissism, and I mean it in a very specific sense: narcissists lie, cheat, and even kill to project and maintain a false image of themselves in their own minds and the minds of others. They refuse to take responsibility for their acts, preferring to make others pay the price, because admission of responsibility would threaten their false self-image, their desire to always seem to be in the right. Such people are often called “sore losers.” M. Scott Peck simply describes them as “evil.”

I don’t see any value in associating with such people. I even have doubts about the wisdom of writing this, because even addressing you this way presupposes that you have a modicum of honesty and decency.

This is my beef with you: You are a very clever writer, but you aren’t honest, and it sabotages you and destroys your credibility.

Hell, it harms my credibility even to address you. As a friend pointed out to me: “A man whose colleagues are Kevin MacDonald and Phil Rushton cannot also treat Alex Linder and Hunter Wallace as colleagues, because the latter are morally and psychologically, if not ideologically, the same as the kind of creeps who attack and harass MacDonald and Rushton. It is indecent to associate with such people, even to attack them.

Sound familiar?

Linder’s response.

Johnson’s penchant for feuding with others in the Dissident Right has not only been noticed by the Far Right but by its opponents as well; this from the SPLC:

…his criticism of various people or doctrines in the far-right movement has led him to very public feuds with other far-right personalities.

Patrik Hermansson:

American alt-right figure Greg Johnson admired the London Forum so much that he replicated the concept in New York and Seattle with closed conferences of hard-core activists addressed by leading speakers from the far right.

One sunny Saturday in June, I joined the list of speakers at one of these forums in Seattle. I had intended to attend as a guest but one week before the event Johnson contacted me and asked me to give the opening address, removing any doubt in my mind that I was now accepted as part of this movement.

David Lewis:

Back in January, I e-mailed Dr. Greg Johnson, organizer of Northwest Forum, Seattle’s hottest closed-door white nationalist convention, asking for an interview on the latest in regional racism. He turned me down. Thanks to the internet, the far right no longer needs the mainstream media to get its message out. Print, television, and radio lose their relevance when everybody’s just a click away from Pepe the Frog, Disney songs dubbed with racist lyrics, and pseudo-intellectual essays that somehow try to bring ancient Rome into all this.

Also thanks to the internet, it only took me about an hour to change my identity from David Lewis, Seattle historian, to Dave Lewis, Neo-Nazi film editor and aspiring book critic from Charlottesville, currently living in Los Angeles. This Dave Lewis has never been to Seattle, but has always wanted to attend Northwest Forum.

My film editor persona dangled a giant chunk of cheese in front of Dr. Johnson. In addition to being a racist, Johnson is also a huge cinephile who has published two books of “pro-white” movie reviews wherein he rants against Zootopia as “pure evil” but surprisingly enjoyed 8 Mile. The role of film editor also worked to my advantage because, despite a recent fundraising spike, the white nationalist movement still has a hard time attracting people with artistic or technical talent.

Dr. Johnson bit the cheese. Entry into Northwest Forum typically requires “extreme vetting,” which means meeting in person and getting a beer with one of the Northwest’s white separatist organizations like True Cascadia. But I didn’t even have to send in a photo after mentioning that, as a Charlottesville native (actually from Ballard), I was writing an essay titled Tear Down Lee and Put Up Lincoln: Abraham Lincoln, World’s Greatest White Nationalist.

Pilleater tape.

Listen to this.

Of relevancy given Johnson’s accusations about “mental illness” and the “little bitch” comment” –

Mike Polignano: “We had sort of sick codependency. I allowed him to speak for me instead of speaking for myself. Also after a while I began feeling like the bitch in the relationship, handling all the shit work and “housekeeping” chores needed to keep a business running while he engaged with the world and became the face of Counter-Currents.”

“Greg thought it wisest to lock me up in a mental hospital rather than trying to stay with me and understand my reality. He told the psychiatrists the loaded gun I kept in the house — which he knew about and was okay with my keeping for defensive purposes during a time we were receiving threats against our physical safety — he told the doctors I had no justification for having it.“

“I got committed, had my civil rights [and gun ownership rights] stripped away, and was forced to take antipsychotic medication under threat of state-sanctioned violence.”

See this:

Foreign students can apply to ELTE’s summer university to learn Hungarian and to get to know Hungarian culture. We know that Johnson and Zsutty took part in the course specifically to learn the language, which may indicate that they plan to stay in Hungary for a longer period of time…Johnson has been living in Budapest since he was deported from Norway in 2019, but Zsutty only joined him in 2023. Until now, they had been active almost undisturbed in Hungary, but during the ELTE course, one of the students found out who he was studying with, based on Johnson’s e-mail address, and reported it to the teachers….During the second week of the course, while reading a circular e-mail, one of the students noticed Johnson’s counter-currentses [sic] e-mail address and reported it to his fellow students.

Where are all the Hungarian ethnonationalists when you need them?

What I wrote at Gab on 4/12/24:

I see no reason why someone who “bans” me from their website should have the right to spam my Gab account, hence, Johnson is blocked here.

You can all laugh at the following ludicrous nonsense from Johnson. In response to RaceNatGoy (a reader of EGI Notes who follows me on Gab) making a comment defending my work, Johnson wrote:

Haha. This Ted Sallis praising himself with a sock puppet.

He actually is suggesting that RaceNatGoy and I are the same person. Can you  believe such nonsense?  Your “leaders” make unfounded, false statements with a smug attitude of complete certainty – is such poor judgment surprising given the Hermansson amd Lewis fiascos?

With the permission of RaceNatGoy, I reproduce in this blog post some of the Gab Chat messages I had with him, see this. I suppose that some irrational person (no names of course) may claim that I was direct messaging myself in that Gab Chat as part of a nefarious “insane” plot to establish RaceNatGoy as my dastardly “sock puppet” for future use. Of course, rational individuals will simply recognize that RaceNatGoy and I are different people, and thus Johnson’s “sock puppet” comment is just more poor judgment, laughable jumping to conclusions, and…wrong, wrong, they’re always, always, always wrong.

Here is a real sock puppet account to make things clear to everyone.

Greg Johnson expresses himself:

I think a lot of people who attack other people on the Right do so out of financial motives.

Oh, indeed, I agree. Consider Sallis vs. Der Movement. I ask for no money from anyone; Der Movement is noted for its fundraising and its dependence on supporter donations. Is this part of the reason they ban critics and duck debates? Interaction with critics would help legitimize and disseminate the views of those critics. There is likely an inverse relationship between the degree to which my views and those of other critics are accepted and the level of Der Movement’s  revenue streams via donations. Given the overall importance of fundraising to “movement” “leaders,” that outcome must be avoided at all costs. Thus, they defame me as “mentally ill” and keep their followers isolated from viewpoints, such as mine, that would make those followers lose confidence in the “leaders” (with the consequent drying up of donations).

Laugh at this:

To celebrate, any gift of $120 or above will receive:

At least one year’s paywall subscription (extension for current members; you can also gift paywall memberships to friends)

The Cultured Thug Mug!

Shipping to the US Only

The Jonathan Bowden Cultured Thug Travel Mug

(See above, pictured front & back — single-sided optional if you prefer a more subtle, less violent mug for your commute.)

But, hey, if anyone claims that Der Movement is simply an entertainment brand, then obviously – obviously! – they are simply a mentally ill insane jerky boy freak. It is perfectly natural for an “intellectual center of the Dissident Right” to be selling mugs for money, leveraging the memory of a deceased rightist.That is perfectly, absolutely acceptable, sophisticated, and classy, and don’t you forget it!  Get your cultured thug mug today!  Your package of privileges is expanding!

Don’t forget!

To thank donors who pledge at least $10/month or $120/year, we offer an ever-expanding package of privileges…

It is perfectly acceptable for a “pro-White activist site” focused on “metapolitics” to offer “an ever-expanding package of privileges.” Give generously today!  Enjoy your mug, you cultured thug!

Is “Hood” engaging in “sophistry” by shifting the “goalposts?”

Yet, what have we gained in the real world? Nothing. There are still no pro-white elected officials. Indeed, a local official who attended Unite the Right and was attacked by far-left groups was recalled by local Republicans who voted with the far-left rather than ignore the media. No Republicans fight explicitly for white interests, but this is not because they don’t believe in “identity politics.” They trying to ban speech against Israel and Jews, even though Jews mostly do not vote for them. Whites, and whites alone, are utterly unrepresented as a collective interest group.

There have been cutbacks to DEI programs, but the industry (and it is still an industry) is still vastly larger than in 2020. The money spread around just by Jeff Bezos’s ex-wife dwarfs all the money given to ever American nationalist group since the end of World War II. “Anti-racism” is still a great career. The likes of Ibram Kendi get MacArthur Genius Grants and cozy berths in academia, corporations, and government. Even AI is crudely anti-white. Top universities train intelligent young people in what could be called “offense archeology,” or discovering ever-more reasons to take money from whites and give it to blacks. Indoctrination and propaganda work. Generation Z is not “based.” Young Republicans are well to the left of their elders on race.

The entire West has shifted from “colorblind” to overtly anti-white, with “whiteness” defined as privilege, oppression, and exploitation. The Great Replacement goes on unchecked. No white men run a single government in the United Kingdom. America’s foreign-born population has grown by 15 percent in 12 years. Immigration is fueling the greatest population increase in Canadian history — against the wishes of most Canadians.

Of course, if you read the entire post, you will find “Hood” much too optimistic, and too willing to believe that his “movement” is on the right track.  I don’t expect any of those guys to write or say the full start truth – that Der Movement has been, is, and will continue to be a laughable failure, and that whatever progress is being made by ideas – but not in real world practical politics – is occurring despite of, not because of, “movement” buffoonery.