Category: American Renaissance

Race in Der News: 7/16/17

Stupidity in der news.

An Amren commentator gets dangerously close to uncovering the truth behind Silk Road White nationalism:

R Sagan  American Tax Payer • 15 hours ago

Don’t forget that Chinese female spies are actually trained to marry White men (no joke) to infiltrate the culture and steal resources. Way to go race-mixing White guys!

Chinese infiltrators are also sucking up many spots in our best universities because we need “diversity” and Asians have 300 IQs and are the model minority or whatever. Thanks cuckservatives!

Chinese workers are hired by overly trusting White people, who subsequently get everything in their company stolen from under them. Way to go businessmen!

Let me add: cunning Asiatrices are allowed to infiltrate White nationalism and wreck said nationalist activism for Asiatic advantange.  Way to go thirsty beta male White race traitors!

Looks exactly like Dolph Lundgren!  No, wait, it’s an Afro-Arab slave, who replaced real Romans, and whose descendants are the modern degenerate Afrowop!  No, wait it’s a (likely well-off) middle-aged man, unlikely to be a slave, so – it’s a med conspiracy!  The reconstruction was altered in response to ‘an offer you can’t refuse.”  No, wait…


Related to that last story, fossilized “movement” dogma alert:

…that’s who the ancient Greeks and Romans were — in fact Whiter than present day Greeks and Italians.


Which led to the following comment:


Dorian28 • 2 hours ago
So Collin, what evidence can you present that the Ancient Greeks where ‘whiter’ than modern ones?
If you look at artwork from the oldest Greek civilization, they are entirely brunettes or having olive skin:
http://www.greek-thesaurus

No worries, I’m sure Colin has read dat dere March of the Titans and Who We Are, and no other evidence is required!  


The Alt Right is nothing more or less than the same Old Movement dressed up in Beavis-and-Butthead style to be more palatable to the Millennial/social media crowd.  These nitwits wouldn’t recognize an original idea if it was staring them right in the face.

A Mendacious Middle Easterner

Another Hart attack.

Read this nonsense.

By this I am not suggesting that Jews are naturally unpatriotic because they are not Christians. The theological differences between religious Jews and religious Christians are minor compared with the differences between believers and non-believers, and orthodox Jews tend to be politically conservative. There are also many who are not religious but who still love and honor the United States, but this is not necessarily true of many atheists and agnostics.

 
Wow! A Jew states that he doesn’t believe that Jews are “naturally unpatriotic!”  Who would have ever guessed?  I mean, why let several thousand years of anti-nationalist, anti-patriotic, anti-majoritarian, and otherwise subversive Jewish behavior, in every land they have ever dwelt (nay, festered) in, including the United States of America, convince you otherwise?  Why let the Jews’ advocacy of anti-White and anti-American causes, their leadership of the “Civil Rights Movement” which ruined America, their leadership in overturning our demographics through the 1965 immigration act and through migrant cheerleading, their constant hostility to any manifestation of White identity whatsoever, their Israel-first identity and foreign policy preferences – why let any of that make you think otherwise?
 
Then he makes a moronic comment about “theological differences” as if that matters, or should we say maybe it does matter since both Jews and many “religious Christians” are in favor of open borders and the demographic eclipse of Europeans worldwide.  
 
Next we are told that “orthodox Jews tend to be politically conservative.”
 
OK.  First, most Jews are not orthodox.  Second, the wonderfully conservative orthodox Jews supported Clinton over Trump by a comfortable margin, albeit a bit less than their less religions co-ethnics. Third, even “conservative orthodox Jews” will in general hardly be reliable allies for any sort of Far Right White identity movement.  Fourth, those “conservative orthodox Jews” sure don’t have a problem exploiting America’s social welfare system, even to the point of being accused of welfare fraud.
 
Then Hart completes his outrageous screed by stating that “many” – we have to presume he is still talking about Jews here – who are not religious (Hart?) “still love and honor the United States” – but the real problem, you see, are all those “atheists and agnostics.”
 
So, according to the fantasy world of Hart, Jews – including secular Jews – are well-known for their upstanding patriotism and love for America, orthodox Jews are rock-solid conservatives wearing MAGA yarmulkes, while the real problem are all those (goyisch) “atheists and agnostics.”
 
What a despicable mendacious blot on humanity is this Hart.  But what about those who give him a forum?
 
Note to Richard Spencer: I agree with all you now say about the Alt Lite (and I was indeed saying it months before you), but what about really taking out the heavy memetic artillery and tackling the Alt Wrong?  You know, the guys who threw you under the bus because Hailgate offended all those HuWhite Jews of the West, and the guys who sniggered with their Jewish correspondents about the possibility of you getting shot.
 
They are the real problem on the Right, not the Alt Lite milksops.

Something Good About the Alt Right vs. Alt Nuts

Boots on the ground vs. self-absorbed egoism.

First, the good news.


Kinetic beauty.

The Alt Right can get “boots on the ground” and they stand up to leftist thugs (Alt Right god in action).  They should be praised for that.  If they can attract youth with their juvenile jackassery, fine too, But the problem occurs when they have delusions of grandeur – if they would just stick to being the youth wing of racial nationalism (while toning down the jackassery to a level just enough to attract youth and no more), fine.  But they are not “the movement” regardless of their fantasies (see Alt Nuts below).

Further, while Identity Europa may identify (no pun intended) as ‘Alt Right” there is a difference between a more serious group like them and the online lulzing jackasses (and Presidential jackasses).


Also, how much of the limited Alt Right success has been due to their own efforts, and how much has been circumstance (Trump, etc.)?


Another good thing is the stated intention of the Alt Right to ditch the Alt Lite. Can they do the same for the Alt Wrong?


The Alt Wrong is once again promoting the ultra-Aryan Haalstat Nord Hart – who after all, has consistently demonstrated being a non-bitter and loyal supporter of Amren and, indeed, the “movement” without the slightest disruption or controversy.  Those HuWhite Men of the West are always the most conciliatory, discreet, and well-spoken of convention guests!


Now for the latest Alt Nuts episode.


For and by young White men.

Yes, nothing wrong with that, but:


DO NOT PRETEND TO SPEAK FOR THE ENTIRE RACIAL NATIONALIST “MOVEMENT,” THANK YOU VERY MUCH!


Stick with your juvenile millennial jackassery and stop the pretensions of memetic hegemony.  We older White men have our own agenda, which, believe it or not, doesn’t include obsessing over a cartoon frog or screaming about “Kek.”

For every step forward, the Alt Right takes two steps back, mostly due to their navel-gazing obtuseness and lack of measure.  Get over yourselves please…and quickly.

Putting Our Feed Down Indeed

More madness.

I don’t “have a dog in this fight.”  I really don’t know anything about Friberg, but I used to have a productive interaction with Johnson and Counter-Currents and I’ve repeatedly stated I think Spencer has great potential as a White nationalist leader.  No doubt both are displeased with my criticisms of the “movement,” particularly the Alt Right, but I say (or write) what’s on my mind.

Putting all that aside, this latest “movement” feud is pathetic and all-too-typical.  It’s the usual “he said, she said” type of back-and-forth sniping, contradictory statements, gossip, and feuding based on personality and squabbling over limited resources rather than principled disagreements over ideology.  It’d embarrassing, it makes the Left laugh at us, it’s airing “dirty laundry” for all to see, and it exemplifies all the reasons I have zero confidence in the way things are run in the “movement.”  

Who is right?  Who is wrong?  Who knows? Who cares?  The “movement” madness train rolls on, without end. All these guys make comments about my “insanity” and “bitterness” or whatever – that’s on my part mostly tongue-in-cheek ridicule of Nutzi stupidity.  On the other hand, this long-running Johnson-Spencer feud is not tongue-in-cheek, it’s all too real.

It reminds me of the types of infighting in business – “office politics” – or in academia – “departmental politics.”  When resources are limited, this nonsense starts.

What are the resources in play here?  One is leadership and status.  Well, it would be better to at least struggle for leadership based on some concrete ideological differences, rather than personality and ambition.  Yes, yes – there’s that Big Europe vs. Ethnonationalism bit, but I wonder (as do some commentators) how much of that is a cause of the clash and how much of it is actually an effect.  Leadership?  Leadership of what exactly?  And, guys, if you really want to exhibit real leadership, you’d settle your differences and present a more united front against the anti-White forces.

Then there’s money.  Well, how about focusing your ire at the Alt Wrong instead of at each other?  From what I’ve read, the “happy penguins” of VDARE and, also, Amren take the lion’s share of “movement” funding.  And each of you have legitimate beefs with the Alt Wrong (besides just ideological differences).  Spencer should remember that it wasn’t just Greg who critiqued him over “Hailgate” – Brimelow and Taylor couldn’t “throw him under the bus” fast enough.  And let’s not forget Brimelow musing out loud at VDARE about his cheering up a Jewish correspondent with the idea that Spencer is likely to “get shot.” Johnson should remember his comments about how disgusting it is that Derbyshire is getting support from “movement” sources – that’s the Alt Wrong that’s propping up Derbyshire, at the expense (literally) of actual pro-White activists.

Problem is that the Man on White Horse Syndrome affects the “movement” internally as well as externally, so we have “rock stars” and “dignified elders” that we are supposed to not criticize.  Well, that’s another “movement” dogma I reject.

Anyway, this whole thing is pathetic.

Get over yourselves, guys.  Please.

And for another self-satisfied navel-gazer, enter Jack Donovan.

“Wolves Nationalist,” Right.  Is that gray wolf, red wolf, or werewolf?  And then we see the usual fossilized “movement” dogma/ethnic fetishism in the comments section.

And then you wonder why I can’t take any of these fellows seriously?

Who Has Been Right?

Who’s been mostly right?

Let’s get one thing out of the way: Der Movement was right about Trump’s chances of winning and I was wrong.  Now that we got that one aberrant item out of the way, let’s get to the “meat” of the issue.

Der Movement invested an enormous amount of intellectual and moral capital in Donald Trump the man, labeled “the last chance of White America” aka the “God Emperor” who is going to save us from demographic displacement. Someone else – who might that be? – clearly asserted that Trump is a vulgar, ignorant buffoon, a pro-Jewish and pro-Negro cuck, who is not worthy of the breathless onanistic support of racial activists.  Unlike Der Movement and its slavish hero worship and Man on White Horse Syndrome obsessions, I made a clear distinction between Trump the man – a disaster – and Trump the campaign, Trump the movement, Trump the right-wing populist.  I made clear that the only real reason to support Touchback Trump was the perception – not reality, but perception – that Trump is a “racist fascist” thus inducing racial chaos and balkanization in America.

The outcome?  Trump has been constantly cucking, betraying his base, but, because of leftist hysteria and perceptions, political violence and chaos has skyrocketed.  Sallis right, Der Movement wrong.

I also made the point that Trump’s supporters were more important than Trump himself – and, yes, we see Trump’s supporters battling leftist thugs in the streets while Trump himself wimps out on a constant basis.  Sallis correct once again.

I have been warning about Silk Road White nationalism and the trend of Asians pimping out their women to pathetic beta activists in order to further Asian racial agendas.  Lo and behold we have Chinese “maidens” and Japanese “shady ladies” infiltrating and subverting White nationalist blogs. Surprise!

[We can ask how these “shady ladies” find the time to not only run their own Asian supremacist blog, but also leave long and rambling posts in the AltRightosphere.  Do they have a (White) sugar daddy supporting them? Spoiled rich kid living off daddy’s money? Or, perhaps, just like the Russian government is said to pay Internet trolls, China does the same?]

I warned against the Alt Lite/Alt Wrong, and was very sharp toward the Alt Right because of the Alt Right’s “big tent” embrace of the aforementioned elements. Then we saw the Alt Lite/Alt Wrong throw Spencer under the bus, re: Hailgate and chuckle with the Jewish friends, giving consolation to Jews that “Spencer is likely to get shot.”  Absolutely disgusting – Brimelow and Derbyshire leading the list of speakers.  Do you need any more indication on why the Alt Wrong is wrong?

Back online in the very early 2000s, I was critical of the clownshow of the National Alliance even before Pierce died, and we see the utter collapse of the organization since then.

I was sharply critical of Marine Le Pen and mainstreaming and we saw Le Pen go down to a catastrophic loss, and mainstreaming also lost in The Netherlands, Austria, and Australia. Der Movement, on the other hand, exhibited delusions about Le Pen and are still pontificating about “how well” Le Pen actually did, even after her shocking “blow out loss.” Sallis right, Der Movement wrong.

This is a question of judgement.  Who, dear reader, do you trust? Should you trust? Will you trust?

Rotten Orange News: Trump Chumps the Chumps

Introducing Rotten Orange News.

Rotten Orange News: Stories that chronicle Der Movement’s humiliation by the betrayal of their latest “man on white horse.”

Let’s not deport those “dreamers.”  After all, White American citizens don’t have their own dreams; no, they have to live the nightmare of the illegal invasion just so that insectivore-faced Ivanka can bask in her moral righteousness.

Border wall?  We don’t need no stinkin’ border wall!

Necon in foreign policy; Neocon in economic policy.

Impeach Trump…and the Alt Right

Let’s go a bit deeper here.

Here’s an excellent Counter-Current post that I’d like to comment on, in the sense that its points are more generally applicable than just about Trump. Emphasis added to the original.

Never betray your friends to court the favor of your enemies. If you betray your friends, the most principled and perceptive among them will drop you, leaving only the delusional and venal. That is not a good trade, given that the approval you gain is bound to be fleeting and contingent, whereas the contempt and distrust you create will be permanent. The people you betrayed may come back to you out of sentimentality or self-interest, but their trust and respect will never return. They will always regard you as a traitor.

Yes, that applies to Trump, but it applies more general to many precincts of the “movement.” One can, for example, think of “movement” leaders and “movement” sites that grovel to their Jewish enemies (and also grovel to White-hating Asians), while spewing contempt toward their own White ethnic supporters. No names need be mentioned (cough, Amren, cough), but such cases certainly exist.  Rewarding enemies while betraying friends is a lose-lose proposition.  And the problem is not only the act of betrayal itself that makes the traitor lose the support and respect of those betrayed; it is also the revealing glimpse of what the traitor really thinks of the betrayed; the concealed contempt that is uncovered, the casual indifference that the traitor feels as he/she “throws under the bus” their own supporters to court the favor of others who actually despise the traitors themselves.

We know he knew better, because of a long history of Tweets about Syria, which now make him look like a feckless hypocrite. So for him to fall for the warmongers this time frankly makes me question his intelligence, his character, even his sanity.

EGI Notes has been questioning those aspects of Trump all along.  When you label someone as a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a beta race cuck, tool of the Jews, inarticulate fatso, treasonous promoter of “touchback” immigration, etc. I think there’s no “hindsight” in any current criticism of Trump from my direction.  It’s all foresight (not that I’ll be given any credit for it, after all, I’m a crazed crank).

Trump has already convinced a significant percentage of the world that he is a dangerous madman. But the Syria pivot does not support that perception. It supports the conclusion that he is a mercurial, hypocritical buffoon who cannot be trusted to maintain his most basic promises. 

Buffoon, yes.

In short, Trump painted himself into a corner with his big mouth and adolescent fixation on Alpha posturing regarding Obama, and since acknowledging mistakes has never been Trump’s strong suit, it was child’s play for the establishment to spring into action and funnel him into launching airstrikes.

Does Trump base his policies not on a sober assessment of what is good for America, but simply on some sort of egomanical desire to one up and put down Barack Obama and his ilk? Granted, doing the opposite of Obama and Hillary is generally a good guide to policy. But you’d have to be an overgrown adolescent chimpanzee to run a country that way. Could this be why Donald Trump is idolized by rappers?

For the Alt Right, it’s Mourning in America. We believed in this guy. We liked this guy. And now he just seems stupid. Frankly, so do we.

I’ll give Greg credit for that honest admission. I was warning the “movement” for many months that they were going into another Man on White Horse obsession, and now the other shoe has finally dropped.

The Alt Right’s relationship with Trump was always a one-way man crush, based largely on projections. 

In the case of Roissy, more like a heavy-breathing, onanistic, homoerotic obsession.

Ending such a relationship is a healthy thing.

Hello, Roissy.

Now that the God Emperor has fallen to earth, we need to remind ourselves that Trump was never the end game. He was — and remains — an immense opportunity to smash the current globalist establishment and unleash nationalist, populist, and racialist forces that will be raging into the future…

That does sound familiar.  Where have we read that before? You know, it may sound to the reader that this is egotistical “tooting my own horn” but really it is just frustration. Hey, “movement” – it doesn’t matter if you dislike me, think I’m nuts, despise my ancestry, or whatever your problem is, but can you at least listen and consider that perhaps you should take into account the opinions of someone who has been right about things say. 95+% percent of the time.  Apart from not taking Trump’s electoral chances as seriously as I should have, I’m hardpressed to think of any major issue I’ve been wrong about.  That’s not ego, it is plain fact.

Note also that the Alt Right – even with “bodyguards” – gets attacked by leftist thugs right on the God Emperor’s doorstep.  Can the contempt and disregard of Donald J Kushnertrump be any more obvious?  And you guys need more bodyguards, it should be the leftists running away from you, not you from them.