Category: Asians with typical Negro behavior

Reagan, Spencer, and Dutton, Oh My!

In der news.

Watch this.  Now, I’ve criticized Reagan as one of the original Man on White Horse frauds, and his domestic policy was a complete betrayal of his voters.  Essentially, to the extent he was sincere about any of it (Who knows?  Maybe like Trump, the divorced and remarried Hollywood Reagan was as much an insincere fraud as New York values Antifa Don Trump), he sacrificed his domestic agenda to achieve his foreign policy and defense spending goals.  Let’s put that aside for the moment, and just concentrate on the ability to fulfill the obligations of being a President of the United States – acting the role (Reagan was an actor, after all), and representing yourself, your nation, and your ideals (even if insincere) before the world. Compare Reagan’s televised address linked to above with the behavior of Trump.  How would Trump have responded in a similar situation?  Several blustering tweets, written as if by a brain-addled ten year old?  Speeches about how George Washington’s army conquered airports?  Comments about his “big hands?”  What?  

Actually, Reagan was the last President who was in any way truly Presidential.  Bush Sr. was a whining elitist with no charisma, a man who – despite his war record of physical courage – had no moral courage at all.  Clinton was a disgusting pig and a transparent carnival barker. Bush Jr. was almost as big a vulgar retard as Trump.  Obama, given a free pass because of his race, was an empty suit, a cipher who thought that reading off of a teleprompter with his chin elevated would compensate for his total lack of substance.  What a complete disgrace.  Oh, for the days of Milliard Fillmore!

Very cognitive, very elite. Colored is as colored does.  If a Negro did this, the HBDers would be up in arms; but as regards this, it is move on, move on, there’s nothing to see here.

Colored is as colored does.  Black, Brown, Yellow, Red – what’s the difference?

Is there a point to this, other than Spencer confirming himself as a Type I jackass?  I don’t know, me, I’d rather mock someone for a failing they have control over – for example, running the Alt Right into the ground despite all of the opportunities presented by the post-2016 world – rather than for a failing they do not have control over – for example, being short.  I could be wrong about this, of course, so perhaps a drunken podcast or two can clear up this issue for me.

Do the HBDers support HR1044?

Advertisements

PCA, Sea Turtles, Vance and Wolfe

In der news.

Some of the points made here are supported by the West Eurasian PCA here.  In particular, I refer to the relative closeness of Ashkenazi Jews to some Southern European groups being due to not only the Southern European admixture in the Ashkenazi genepool but also the Ashkenazim’s Eastern European admixture, which “pulls” those Jews closer to Europeans than where they would have been were they simply a Middle Eastern-Southern European mix.

Most of the non-Ashkenazi Jews pictured in the PCA are closer to non-Jewish Middle Eastern populations than are the Ashkenazim, since those other Jewish types not only derive a fraction of their ancestry from those other (non-European) host peoples but they lack that minority portion of Eastern European admixture that “pulls”  the Ashkenazim in the direction of the upper left. Turkish Jews are relatively close to the Ashkenazim but “pulled” a bit more toward the upper right, where Turks are. Note the upper right location of the Iranian samples, away from any Europeans, a fact for those who believe there is little difference between Iranians and Europeans.

Vicious Chinatrix stomps on sea turtle nest.  Colored is as colored does.  If a Negro did this, the HBDers would be hyperventilating over “low IQ violent African behavior,” but if a Holy Oriental – and a female to boot – does it, move on, move on, there’s nothing to see here.

The Jack Vance channel. Scifi/fantasy for Type IIs.  As is the work of Gene Wolfe.  Type Is can keep their Tolkien. But this Type I has a different opinion.

The Strong Horse is Not My Little Pony

It’s all connected.

When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, they will naturally want to side with the strong horse. When people of the world look upon the confusion and atheism of the West, they see that Islam is the strong horse.

And what does White nationalism have to offer?  Guess what: The Strong Horse is not My Little Pony.  How is it possible for  White nationalist “leaders” to be so blind, deaf, and dumb to image?

WN 2.0: Effeminacy, childishness, weakness, silliness.  

Could it be that young White men with fundamentally healthy instincts are frustrated because “leaders” are promoting Bronyism and endorsing non-White liberal Presidential candidates?  Can we “understand” these shootings by pointing out that “movement leaders” have completely failed in every way possible, even to the point of becoming cringeworthy embarrassments?  Yang Gang!  Tulsi Coconut!  My Little Pony!  Pepe!  Kek!

Do the folks shown here support The Yang Gang?  We went from Caesar, Charlemagne Napoleon, and the Waffen SS to that.  That should be condemned, not encouraged.

The absolute worst aspects of WN 1.0 are infinitely superior to anything WN 2.0 has to offer.  Given the choice between James Mason foaming at the mouth over Charles Manson or Buttercup Dew mincing around over cartoon ponies, I’ll take the former, thank you very much.

Back to the San Diego shooting.  Great timing numbnut…right after the Congressional hearing.  Could it be any worse? I mean, the confluence of Type I Nutzism and affirmative action does wonders for the “movement.”  Let’s have some more posts about how brain structure proves the superiority of particular ethnies, said superiority no doubt well represented in “movement” “activism.”  But as bad as these people are, the “leaders” are worse. The more sensitive members of the rank-and-file likely look upon Der Movement and see nothing but a barren wasteland of hopeless despair, populated by freaks, weirdos, perverts, Bronies, incompetents, fetishists, and grifters.  So, in response, these young men have as their role models are racialist mass murderers.  Wonderful.  So much winning!

We need to give activists another choice than that between being a “shoot-‘em-up” Nutzi or being an effeminate Brony with more estrogen that a slumber party of teen-aged girls.

Note also the fellow’s disgust with The God Emperor – demonstrating that a disgust with “leadership” (in that case, Presidential) is fueling these episodes.  Another “movement” fail – obsessing over the fat fraud Trump instead of building a real infrastructure.  

These young men should be taking the advice I have been giving for young (and all) activists – take care of yourselves first, get an education, build your career, make money, save, if you want a family than go in that direction – build a real life.  Do not sacrifice yourself for a grifter-freak “movement” or even for “the race” – a mewling omega race of weaklings and losers – unless you can accomplish something that will definitively and significantly enhance your genetic interests.  This fellow Earnest should have finished his education, built his career, saved his money, and then participated in activism in a sane and sustainable fashion. But, alas, misled and let down by “leaders” and in a state of desperation, these types lash out.

How’s that Arctic Alliance coming along, Derbyshire?  That is in my opinion indirectly connected to the shooting as well. Racialists in the rank-and-file are likely disenchanted by rice burners and mustard dippers being spokesmen for Der Movement, and maybe they are also tired of all the money donated being flushed down the toilet, so folks can gamble, watch movies, and sit comfortably on lawn chairs.

On the other hand, I see this as probably being a net positive, even if it was a bit silly and juvenile – non-violent protest that shows the SJWs that their “safe spaces” may not be so safe from dissident opinions after all.

What has happened as a result of Trump’s election is a good example of how difficult it will be to put through a pro-White policy to address the demographic disaster that is unfolding even if a nationalist-sounding politician is elected. From the very beginning of Trump’s administration, he has been beset with investigations and lawsuits, and there has been a torrent of hatred and invective directed at him in the media and on social media like Twitter and Facebook. Comparisons of Trump with Hitler and Nazism have been routine, during the campaign and since he became president. This is unprecedented in American history. Trump has been unable to get any good immigration-related legislation through Congress because of unanimous Democrat opposition and significant opposition from Republicans. And the courts have routinely ruled against him in the many jurisdictions with liberal judges.

But, hey, our victory is just around the corner.  No, wait, in 50 years.  No, wait, we have 200 years.  Well, whatever. Just send in dem dere “D’Nations!”

Then you wonder why folks get frustrated and do stupid things?  And on cue:

Greg Johnson

Posted April 28, 2019 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

What is more useful: envisioning the creation of white homelands as being easy or hard? Because the harder it seems, the fewer people who will consider it possible or desirable.

Let’s give people unrealistic expectations, let’s have the typical “victory euphoria” (even for future victories) – yes, as long as you all send in the “D’Nations.” Remember, things objectively are absolutely terrible, but if you send in money, you’ll be living in the Golden Age today!  Better Gold than Tungsten, eh?

On other notes – 

Jack Vance:

A man desiring a girl will set upon her and beat her black and blue. No one would think to interfere. If the girl approves, she comes the same way again. When he rushes forth to pummel her, she throws herself on his mercy.

Jack Vance was, apparently, not a beta male, a white knighter, or a potential Brony.

Thursday Thoughts

On activism.

Attention, Greg Johnson; comment from YouTube:

LaserGuidedLoogie

1 day ago

Tell us again how “WN 2.0” is doing it better, because you know, “we are all so much smarter guies!”

WN 1.0 guys figured out 20 years ago:  You don’t talk to the enemy media.

WN 2.0 is a joke, and WN 3.0 is a plan for pathetic failure.  WN 1.0 was a failure as well, but at least it didn’t pretend to be anything other than it was – a tiny group of Nutzi freaks.

Does Hood really believe this is a realistic possibility?

Interesting comment:

Publius

I recently watched the movie “a beautiful mind” for the first time in a long time and it got me thinking. The greatest mathematical achievement that any scientist could achieve would be to solve the problem of the prisoners’ dilemma. The whole civilized world knows what is needed (Just look at the comments on any web location where comments are permitted), but anybody who acts is a Lonewolf who goes straight to jail or death by cop. No one man can do anything. How can a person act and have faith that 100 million brothers will act with him simultaneously?

I have written about this before.  Even though the great mass of Whites are useless cucks, and our situation is grim, there is likely many more people who could be on our side, but are, practically speaking, not, in the sense of being completely inactive.

Whites are atomized, not knowing who is a friend or an enemy, racial-politically speaking.  If you were to speak out, would any of the “six percenters” come to your aid? Is it possible to organize all (or any) of this unused human material, when everyone mistrusts each other?  If everyone is waiting for “the other guy” to get something started, then obviously nothing will ever get started (the current “movement” tragicomedy does not constitute such a “something’).  This is one reason the System cracks down on any public expression of pro-White attitudes, and why pro-Whites are deplatformed, and why the System uses a private army of leftist thugs to physically attack people like Spencer, and do so with impunity.  They are afraid that once a nucleus is formed (once again – this is NOT the current Der Movement), then all sorts of possibilities emerge that would not be conducive to the long term stability of the multicultural System.  

And, by the way, this is why all of the infiltration that Johnson so blithely shrugs away is so destructive, even though the direct and immediate impact was not so great. Besides the issue of revealing the horrifically bad judgement of “movement leaders,” and besides the public humiliation for the “movement,” it also reinforces the narrative that fellow Whites cannot be trusted, that your potential allies may be infiltrators, and that it is better to just hunker down alone (snug in your hobbit hole, perhaps?) and do nothing.  The damage done by Hermansson and Lewis was incalculable.

Once again: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.  Even if every Jew in America were to disappear tomorrow, South Asians would fill the gap as the verbally-adept hectoring anti-White elite, with East Asian providing the technical “muscle” for the anti-White pan-colored alliance.  But, isn’t that what HBDers like Sailer want?  Wouldn’t his buddies from GNXP object to any skepticism about a Camp of the Saints invasion of America from the Ganges?  

This is interesting, but remember that Crick was a scientist, not an HBDer.  Ultimately, it was about facts and the truth, not politically-motivated “just so” stories to push a Jewish-Asian agenda at the expense of Whites.

Shockingly, Zman makes good sense here:

This is why civic nationalism is a dead end movement. It’s trying to reanimate an Enlightenment concept that was killed off by the post-war cultural revolution of the last fifty years. Reviving the old notions of civic identity is about as promising as reviving the monarchy in Germany. Thinking about it is a nice escape for those struggling to face the reality of identity politics, but that’s all it is, a fantasy. The world created by the Left is a post-nationalist world and therefore a post-citizen world.

Paying attention, Breezy?

This is incorrect.  What the Alt Right was really all about: Pepe, Kek, Beavis-and-Butthead drunken podcasts, Trump worship, complete misunderstanding of population genetics, covering typical fossilized “movement” dogma with a veneer of “youth culture” juvenile jackassery, cosplay rallies – in other words, WN 2.0.

Merry Christmas 2018

In all cases, emphasis added.

Read here.

And what is Christmas without Brimelow using his young children as props for some implicit tin cup panhandling?  Although here it is more implicit and more indirect than usual:

So I more than ever want to wish a Merry, and blessed, Christmas to our readers, writers and especially donors—God bless you, every one.

Donors are especially blessed; after all, you make things like this possible!  Now, that’s some moral seriousness, to be sure!  What better way to spend “movement” donations?

Notice how Asians rank here.  Closer to Blacks and Hispanics than even to Jews.  Colored is as colored does.  Asians: A more intelligent form of Negro.

I have mixed opinions about Taleb’s criticism of the worth of IQ.  On the one hand, I agree with him that some people over-rate the importance of IQ.  After all, I am one of the leading Far Right critics of HBD and the Alt Wrong, and I have criticized the HBDers’ fetishistic obsession with IQ.  There are indeed “intellectual idiots” out there – consider how many academics are dogmatic leftists, spouting the most absurd nonsense.  We also have such types on our side as well. So, yes, IQ is not a complete measure of human worth, and a high IQ does not automatically equate with success.  Note the extreme deficiencies of high-IQ Jews and Asians, as well as high-IQ Whites who cannot understand fundamental realities in the midst of their demented intellectualized fantasies. But…

On the other hand, Taleb goes too far.  Just because something is over-rated does not mean it is not vitally important.  Just because something is not sufficient does not mean it is not necessary.  The entire modern world has been built by high-IQ (European-derived male) individuals, and low-IQ areas are cesspools of filth and degradation.  The following riposte to Taleb is also cogent:

It’s funny to see someone with a genius level IQ like Taleb (a talented quant and professor) literally deny the importance of the metric, when he himself no doubt has a very high IQ, and would not have the cognitive abilities or success he enjoys without it.

It’s easy to be a contrarian and take a controversial position that focuses attention on your views; it is more practical to see the positive and negatives of different human traits.  Ironically enough, Taleb’s own criticism of IQ is precisely the type of intellectualized theorizing, independent of real world common sense, that he rails against. A pragmatic view would be that IQ is fundamentally important but incomplete; it is simply one component of a person’s mental toolkit, only one part of their cognitive and behavioral portfolio.  Taleb instead takes an impractical, rigidly dogmatic approach to the subject and he is wrong for doing so.

To put it in juvenile Alt Right language: Taleb is “sperging out” as badly as any IQ-obsessed ivory tower intellectual.

What is Rudolph’s cephalic index?  Durocher, get out your calipers!

Hey!  I thought – according to Roissy and his commentators – that Whitaker was a “Bane” who was going to properly do The God Emperor’s budding. Trouble in paradise?  Say it ain’t so!  Fake news!  Trust the phyzz!

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Zman writes about the Neocons:

A sleazy dimwit like Goldberg accusing anyone of being mean spirited or stupid reveals a breathtaking lack of self-awareness. That is the very essence of the neoconservative, when you look at the shabby cast of characters flying the flag. Bill Kristol has been wrong about everything for decades, yet he shamelessly waddles around lecturing everyone, as if he is brilliant wise man. A normal man, possessing even a shred of decency, would be in hiding now if he had the record of Bill Kristol.

Rewritten:

A sleazy dimwit like [fill in the name of any “movement leader”] accusing anyone of being mean spirited or stupid reveals a breathtaking lack of self-awareness. That is the very essence of the Type I Quota Queen, when you look at the shabby cast of characters flying the flag.  “Movement leaders” have been wrong about everything for decades, yet they shamelessly waddle around lecturing everyone, as if they are brilliant wise men. A normal man, possessing even a shred of decency, would be in hiding now if he had the record of any of those losers.

Movement Monday

Yet another day in Der Movement.

Gamester commentator:

Hugh Jenniks
He took over just in time from RR…like Anglin said, “I wouldn’t be surprised if Tucker Carlson’s wife is arrested for being alone inside the house while Antifa were kicking her door in. Based on the precedent set by Rod Rosenstein’s Justice Department, getting attacked by Antifa is a federal crime.”

Just replace “Rod Rosenstein” with “Jeff Sessions” and you’ll be learning alright.

Zman is fundamentally dishonest:

thezman
I don’t know about that. They got grief from our side for allowing themselves to be easily lured into a trap and allowing themselves to be attached to losers from the old WN 1.0 world. That’s the lesson of Charlottesville. The way to avoid ending up like the losers from WN 1.0 is to not emulate them.

Liar.  Charlottesville was organized by WN 2.0.  The “losers from the old WN 1.0 world” showed up because the sniggering retards of the Alt Right – and their enablers among the “intellectual elite” (who should have known better but who wanted to ride the coattails of Pepe and Kek to promote themselves; more on that below) – engaged in activist imperialism, trying to co-opt the entire “movement” to their imbecility.  Remember: “the Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all” – at the same time promoting “the big tent.”  So, we all had to be subsumed into the “youth culture” of Pepe, Kek, cosplay costumes, drunken podcasts, chugging gallons of milk as a racial statement, a frat boy alcohol culture, and cult feuds centered on the likes of Spencer and Johnson.  WN 2.0 did not “emulate” WN 1.0; if anything, it was the other way around.  Everyone jumped on the Alt Right bandwagon.  I listen very carefully to Johnson’s various podcasts – Zman and Johnson are allies despite disagreeing on the Jewish issue – and Greg made quite clear that various “boomer” “movement leaders” threw their lot in with the Alt Right despite being unhappy about the whole Pepe stupidity. That’s the facts.  WN 2.0 wrecked the “movement” and instead of being accountable, they blame “losers from the old WN 1.0 world” rather than blaming themselves.  What a bunch of dishonorable low-life little worms the WN 2.0 crowd are.

And all of that is not meant to be a defense of WN 1.0, which was, and is, stupid, vulgar, and indefensible.  But I’m not defending WN 1.0.  Instead, I’m defending the truth.  And the truth, the facts, say that WN 2.0 collapsed because of its own innate stupidity and flawed leadership, not because a few Nutzis showed up at rallies.  

thezman
The anti-Semites, of course, focus exclusively on Jews, but our alien over-class is multi-racial. That means there are plenty of whites in it. Class plays a role, but most of it is a hangover from Cold Civil War, where sophisticated and educated whites worked hard to put distance between themselves and lower class whites.
A point I’m fond of making is that if whites get their act together and start thinking racially, the Jewish question loses all salience, other than for Jews who would have to confront the paradoxes and contradictions within Ashkenazim culture.

A point I’m fond of making is that Whites won’t be allowed to “get their act together” without dealing with the “JQ.”  Yes, the over-class is multiracial, but its driving force is who?  We all know the answer to that.  And this: “The anti-Semites, of course, focus exclusively on Jews” is so patently dishonest as to be breathtaking.  “Anti-Semites” do not “focus exclusively on Jews” – they simply acknowledge the importance of the “JQ” in the Great White Dilemma, which is, of course, a multi-faceted problem.

Keep in mind the same Zman who rants against “anti-Semites” is buddies with Greg “drive the Jews out of our society” Johnson and is the same Zman who has written that “Mike Enoch” should have been the definition of the Alt Right:

The alt-right is a good recent example of this. What started as an edgy internet movement was plagued by old school nutters from the white nationalist subculture, as well as by loons who simply lack self-control. As a result, they became defined by guys like Chris Cantwell instead of people like Mike Enoch.

That is why I cannot trust this “Zman.”  

“High- trust hunter-gatherers,” I suppose.  They’d have no problems with Der Movement’s “extreme vetting,” though.  “Come on in!”

“Australian woman” = Asian female.  How’s dat dere multitculturalism working out for you, Aussies?  Tie me kangaroo down, mate. And don’t eat the strawberries.

HBD: Freddie Mercury, superman.

Parsi supremacism!  Move over, Jews and Orientals!

Der Movement Friday

In der news.

These DNA results put “one of the boys” in a new perspective, eh?  The quota queen mafia are intimately inter-related indeed.  And don’t worry Derb by your lack of “exoticness” (unlike Spencer and Johnson) – your offspring more than make up for you.

Speaking of the extended Derbyshire clan’s co-ethnics, we read the same old story: copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal. A people bereft of any spark of creativity whatsoever, a race of “human” photocopiers, utterly deficient of any originality, nothing.

Very cognitive.  Very elite.  More “k-selected” Northeast Asian behavior, eh?  Honorary Aryans, depigmented supermen from where the cold winds blow!  Hail Asia!  Hail HBD!  Hail cognitive elitism!

Trump…troops to the border.  So what?  If they won’t use force – including lethal force – to stop the invaders, it will end up being another defeat, another capitulation, another humiliation.  Don’t forget that in The Camp of the Saints, the French government did send out a ship to intercept (or at least investigate and gauge the sailor’s willingness to use force) the Brownster Armada, and, tried to feebly mobilize troops for the landing…all for naught.  No Whitey could be found to defend their nation. But, I’ll be fair.  Let’s see what happens.  Maybe Trump will stand firm and not one single “refugee” will enter the country.  I think it more likely they’ll be some sort of surrender and/or legal battle coupled with empty Twitter bluster (with Roissy cheering at all the wonderfully productive negs), but nothing at all accomplished to secure the nation and its borders.  How’s “the wall” coming these days?  How’s that “America First” foreign policy with no entanglements?  How’s the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server coming?  When will “the swamp” be drained? When is the crackdown on tech companies as public utilities?  When…oh you see the pattern by now.  But, hey, lots of tweets produced and lots of Big Macs consumed, so we’re all good!

Bit, if I’m wrong, I will admit it, as I always do the rare times I am wrong, unlike the quota queens, who refuse to acknowledge their constant stream of error.

Remember the Sallis Strategy is about destroying the GOP (with a few exceptions like King). The Sailer Strategy is for the GOP to dog whistle to get White votes (and do nothing for these voters after the election).  Sallis right, Sailer wrong – as per usual.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

What are the odds that Spencer is still in the “movement” five years from now?  Or, that’ll he last as long in it as I’ve had (and that despite the fact that Der Movement is openly and enthusiastically congenial to him ethnically, showering him with leadership opportunities, a situation diametrically opposite of that experienced by others)?  Someone can say that a person’s private relationships are no one else’s business as long as they do their “activist job” (no comment about how well they do that job), but that’s hypocrisy as well, since the private lives of other “movement” leaders are put under the microscope, including people engaged in a long-standing feud with Spencer. It is curious how Der Movement cherry picks what to get all exercised about and what not.  Just like the alleged homosexuality of “person A” is a big deal, while the long-standing rumors that “person B” is also a homosexual are completely ignored (albeit true enough that A creates the issue with their apologia while B does not).  Then we have folks waxing enthusiastic over Derbyshire, despite the, shall we say, “chink in the armor” of his own “movement” persona.  It’s all “Who? Whom?” as Breezy Steve would say.

Personally, while I have nothing against Spencer personally, it is hard to trust, or take seriously, a Far Right leader engaged in a long-term relationship with a liberal.