The new Yellow Peril: a racial-psychosexual peril.
I have repeatedly warned that Asians will pimp out their women to White males, so as to influence the sociopolitical behavior of those males to Asian advantage. In the Clash of Civilizations. Asians weaponized their women to leverage White male Yellow Fever Fetishism (*) to subvert the West from within. And why not particularly subvert the more nationalist bastions of Western resistance? If even “fascists” and “racists” are obsessed with their Asian honeypots, the whole point of a White Western dissident movement becomes meaningless, as “White activism” becomes hijacked by cunning yellows just so low grade beta and omega White males can get laid with what passes for women from the Orient.
In some cases, this Honeypot Approach is an organized, intentional, top-down strategy to undermine the White West; however, in many cases it is a self-directed, unorganized, bottom-up phenomenon – the instinctive strategy of an invasive organism to evade the immune response of the host, and to subvert the host’s ecology so as to better serve the invader (just like what the Jews do, also both in directed ad undirected fashions, although the Jews do it differently, and typically do not use their women, for obvious reasons). So, we cannot merely view this as all being state-sponsored honeypot operations (no doubt the strawman representation of my views that will be propagated by the HBDers and other race mixers – “look at that paranoid Sallis, he’s nuts; my wife is not a Chinese agent”), but also, to a large extent, as an innate and instinctive tendency of the group, sometimes occurring with no overt direction at all, the (in some cases, subconscious?) realization that the best way to subvert the host, to make way for the invader, is for the invading women to seduce, distract, and subvert host males. Later, when the host is sufficiently weakened, and immune responses against the invader repressed, invading males can begin to have access to host females (and we see increasing numbers of Asian male-White female couplings, but these are still less numerous than the reverse; first because the White West has not yet been fully subverted by the Yellow East, and, second, because of racial differences in perceived masculinity and femininity, which make White females gravitate to the Negro when these females are inclined to race-mix).
So, we have Chinese “nationalist maidens” and Japanese “shady ladies” infiltrating White nationalism, leading weak sweaty White males to onanistically declare that “Asians can make great allies” and that we need “Chinatowns” in White ethnostates, and that Chinese girls with guns will be “the border guards of the West.” One needs not merely theoretically speculate about the Honeypot Approach; it has actually occurred and it is currently occurring.
And we can thank the Type I activists for this.
Favorite East Asian export:
Type I: women
Type II: Gigantor
Type I: science
Type II: pseudoscience
Type I: Land of the Gods
Type II: Yellow Peril
Finally, look at this absurd squid ink from precisely the sort of White male who has been racially compromised by his “preferences.”
Lim’s piece is indeed important, and the reason should be obvious to anyone who’s not an Asian fetishist child porn apologist. It’s not a question of whether the incidence of White male-Asian female relationships is lower among “race purist” Alt Righters compared to the general White male population. The question, Derbyshire, is why “WN “race purists” are involved in any inter-racial relationships and/or for those who no longer partake, why they feel it necessary to justify and defend their bizarre past preferences (or let’s call it as it is – fetishes). You see, my dear Derb, the incidence of race-mixing among “race purists” should be ZERO, and any incidence greater than ZERO is a legitimate topic for critical analysis.
*Oh, it’s just a “preference,” right, Derb? So, there’s also no such thing as a “foot fetishist” – it’s just a “foot preferencist.” What a buffoon this Derbyshire is.