Category: miscegenation

Der Movement Marches On, 1/8/20

It’s Der Movement!

Read this. That’s not the first time this has happened to Taylor. It seems every few months he’s writing an article telling us how his “faith in people” and “trust in people” was violated by some journalist who “lied.” In fact, this seems to occur over and over and over again, and yet he doesn’t learn to avoid the media, it doesn’t occur to him he has the option of refusing to deal with them.  When I criticize the judgment of “movement leaders,” remember this.

And notice that Johnson has nothing to say about those incidents, while criticizing others for being “in bed with the press.” Johnson is very good at playing the “movement” political game, which will be discussed as part of a forthcoming piece.

Laugh at this – about a paper I discussed here long ago. Emphasis added.

Not surprisingly, there has been gene flow over the centuries back and forth between East Asia and Europe. For example, a couple of my friends in high school who were of European descent, one Hungarian, one Russian, had slightly East Asian looking eyes.

By golly, with evidence like that, why does Sailer even need to look at population genetics papers?

A 2015 paper in Scientific Reports (thanks to iSteve commenter Anti-HBD)…

Anti-HBD?  A commentator with the King of HBD?

…looked at current (not ancient populations) and tried to estimate admixture by treating the French as representative Europeans and the Dai of Southern China (and also of Laos and Thailand) as representative East Asians.

EXACTLY what I have criticized such papers and especially the testing companies about. The results of “admixture estimates” are going to depend fully on what populations are chosen as the references.  Gee…French are treated as “representative Europeans.”  Let’s guess that other Frenchmen sampled will turn out to have very low levels of “admixture” – at which point Der Movement will foam at the mouth about “French racial purity.”

Quantitating and Dating Recent Gene Flow between European and East Asian Populations
Published: 02 April 2015
Pengfei Qin, Ying Zhou, Haiyi Lou, Dongsheng Lu, Xiong Yang, Yuchen Wang, Li Jin, Yeun-Jun Chung & Shuhua Xu
…we detected gene flow between Europeans and Asians were prevalent for most populations including even those from west-northern Europe and East Asia which have been generally regarded as less admixed. . .

It’s of great benefit to all humanity, no doubt..

. . . CEU populations mostly originating from France and Germany had a small fraction (0.7 ± 0.8%) of genetic material from EAS. 

Shocking!  I mean, if you use French as the population representing “European,” who would have ever guessed that other French samples tested would have low admixture?  If you essentially compare people to themselves (other co-ethnics), would you expect otherwise, you morons?

People from Great Britain such as British (GBR) and Orcadian inherited 2.5%–3.8% from ancestral EAS. Finnish (FIN) and Russians inherited significantly more genetic material (>12%) from ancestral EAS, which is consistent with their historical record of admixture with Mongolian populations. 

Durocher I’m sure will tell us that the British, Orcadian, and Finnish results are of great benefit to all humanity.

Admixture proportions for some CSA are relatively small, for which Kalash has 20.7% EUR ancestry…

Der Movement: “But, but, but, they look White…”

In addition, Russian and Finnish populations show ~13% Asian ancestry.

The Finnish data are, of course, of great benefit to all humanity.

Keep in mind, however, that 2015 was a long time ago in population genetics . . 

Which is why these guys keep on dredging up Cavalli-Sforza data from the early 1990s.

Laugh at this, emphasis added.

I take solace in the fact that the pain we are feeling at every new blustering Tweet — the embarrassment, the cringe that reaches to our very core, continuing on into the subatomic level…

Not that long ago Johnson was telling us that Trump is a man of “genuine greatness.”

So what should White Nationalists do about this horrible blunder?

Make bigger blunders themselves?

First, we take stock: there are some things we can do…

Fail.

and some things that we can’t.

Succeed.

We have a shrinking number of beleaguered outposts on the internet from which we can speak the truths that the establishment denies. And despite all the attempts to deplatform us, our audience and our credibility are growing. This is where we need to concentrate our efforts. No matter what Trump’s blunder leads to, we can turn it to our advantage by using it as an opportunity to speak forbidden truths.

Truths like that Der Movement is a money-making enterprise full of Quota Queen grifters.

The bloody-minded stupidity of the Republican grifters

Pot meet kettle.

We lack the numbers, money, or legitimacy to constitute a voting bloc, so pretending that we are going to punish Trump by throwing the election to the Democrats just makes us sound like hysterical fantasists, which undermines the credibility that is one of our biggest assets.

Sure!  Being always wrong, about just about everything, builds credibility. Lying and gaslighting on a continuous basis builds credibility.  Talking about a “race war” “kicking off in the summer of 2021” doesn’t make you seem like a hysterical fantasist, no sir!

Right now, the United States is in the intolerable position of being merely a plaything of Jewish interests. 

Sounds just like HBD.

A comment for Derbyshire:  

Dave
White/Asian hybrids are crazy and stupid, like they have a race-riot going on inside their heads. Burn the rice, pay the price:
Michael Fay — “You mean spray-painting cars and stealing road signs is a serious crime in Singapore?”
Elliot Rodger — “I have a BMW! Why are beautiful women I won’t even say hi to not jumping on my dick?”
Daniel Holtzclaw — “Wow, ever since I became a cop, black hookers are really eager to suck my willy. What could possibly go wrong?”
Matthew de Grood — “Must…kill…vampires…”
Miriam Weeks — “I love choking on pornstar cock, it’s so empowering!”

Is there any actual evidence that Fred West had any non-English, or at least non-British, ancestry?  Other than “looking distinctly like a Gypsy?” I realize to Der Movement, subjective opinions about physical appearance equate to actual objective genealogical/genetic ancestry, but for the rest of us, where’s the evidence that West was a “minority?”  What about his wife, by the way?  Maybe West was an alien, but if so, I cannot find any evidence online to support that claim – and the TOO article certainly did not supply such evidence.  That’s yet another example of Der Movement’s gaslighting on race and ethnicity.

Long after Salter and I critique Kaufmann, the likes of Zman wake up.

Marry Your Own Kind?

Lies and hypocrisy.

Here we see an article that perfectly reflects the HBD-Nordicist-ethnoimperialist alliance, an article that perfectly encapsulates HBD lies, pseudoscientific ignorance, and rank hypocrisy.  Excerpts, emphasis added:

We can marry whomever we want. Anti-miscegenation laws are gone, and social norms have been relaxed. “Empowered” women, sexual liberation, and lesbianism mean there are fewer white women available or desirable as wives. White men are looking elsewhere, especially to Asian women.

Especially for the Alt Right, eh?  Didn’t a representative of the Alt Right openly write online that dating Asian females was a “rite of passage” for the Alt Right?

There is a bitter backlash from white women who resent this, but nobody wants to marry a bitter woman. 

Misogyny! Womanizing gigolos like Greg Johnson and James O’ Meara, who preach to us about sexual mores, won’t like that.

The “manosphere” is full of complaints about white women, so why should a white man marry one? I was married for eight years to an Asian….

From a HBD perspective, you started on top.

…and for 25 years to a half Asian (three children)…

Thanks for producing mixed-race racial enemies, you scum.

…and am now ten years into a successful marriage (two kids) with a white woman. 

Serial monogamy – sounds real omnidominant to me.

Marrying your own kind — after choosing carefully — makes the most sense.

Choose carefully!  Third time’s the charm.

I have read widely on evolution. 

And learned nothing.

Survival of the fittest means differentiation and competition. The strategies that work best win out.

In Race, Evolution and Behavior Philippe Rushton applied r/K strategy to races. We evolved different reproductive strategies because we occupy different niches. Northeast Asians — fighting a harsh but predictable climate — became the most K selected. Africans, in a benign but unpredictable environment because of disease and predators, remained the most r selected.

Rushton was exposed as a fraud by his fellow HBDer Dutton.  But, hey, continue to push a discredited narrative.

Families reflect these differences. Asian “tiger moms” invest a great deal of effort in each child. 

Hardcore science.

Asian wives tend to feel obligated to feed their husbands, whether they like them or not…

After all, “Rosie” cooks meals for Derb and Jared “with her own hands” (as opposed to “her own feet”).

On the other hand, libido is weaker among the K-selected Asians. The newspapers carry stories of young Japanese and Chinese of both sexes who have no interest in sex. They are more likely to be faithful, but perhaps less likely to be satisfying partners. 

Is that because the “women” have the bodies of pre-pubescent boys and the “men” make Peewee Herman look like a Mr. Olympia winner?

Africans on average have measurably higher levels of sex hormones…

Lie.

…mature earlier, and tend to have higher sex drives compared to Asians, but they don’t feel the Asian sense of obligation to spouses and children.

Kevin MacDonald, writing in Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition…

Time to bring in the HBD Nordicism.

…pushes the practice back further. He links it to the individualism of the hunter gatherers of preagricultural Europe. 

You forgot “high trust.”  Like Hubert Humphrey and Greta Thunberg,

Each individual rose on his own merits in the “Männerbund,” or brotherhood of men. 

Cue James O’Meara and Jack Donovan.

Dr. MacDonald proposes that monogamy was the standard in these societies. 

How about serial monogamy?

The upshot is that romantic love is a Western notion, and we white people evolved the mental equipment to make it work. We believe in love. 

Evidence?

The children of a mixed marriage are . . . mixed.

Thank you for that insight.

I had hoped my children would inherit their mother’s Asian work ethic and conscientiousness and my drive and curiosity. I was disappointed. Is this common? Anecdotally, I do not see as many successful mixed-race Asian Americans as one would expect.

That’s hardcore scientific empiricism right there!

Only one of my mixed-race children inherited the sense of romantic love I got from my parents. 

After all, “romantic love” is a strictly genetically deterministic behavioral trait, right?  Essentially, this individual is implying that his children are some sort of error.  What do they think about that?

There is unlikely to be a statistical study of the characteristics of Asian-Caucasian “mixers.” It is hard to imagine a more politically charged research thesis. Moreover, a rigorous statistical study would be very hard to construct. And there is the question of which Asians? Profs. Lynn and Vanhanen find that the average intelligence in Asian nations varies by as much as 20 points.

What HBD flim-flam would be complete without mention of The King of Pseudoscience, Tricky Dick Lynn?

Look in the right places. Find religion. 

Christianity – that makes no racial distinctions for marriage.

If you are a woman, you should attend American Renaissance conferences, where you will find many like-minded men. 

John Derbyshire?

You will find younger people in identitarian groups. Don’t just attend — take leadership roles. Learn to speak publicly. If a person’s first impression is looking up at you on a podium, he might continue looking up at you.

And engage in “measured groveling?”

You can expect the commenters on articles at American Renaissance to be on your wavelength. 

Tinfoil hat wavelength.

The logical choice for me was to look elsewhere. While there are substantial white populations in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, and southern Brazil, the largest number by far are in Europe. Women in just about every less-developed or recently-developed country, whatever their race, are less affected by cultural disease than women in the United States and Western Europe. Moreover, an American income is also more attractive to them.

I consider the Visegrad countries — Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and the Baltics to be recently developed. Although their standards of living approach those of Western Europe, the people remain traditional. I am continually encouraged by their resistance to the dictates from the European Union that they take immigrants. They are standing their ground, asserting that they are Christian countries and want to stay that way. The former members of the Soviet Union — Russia itself, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine — might properly be considered underdeveloped. Average monthly salaries are less than $1,000. Though Western culture is making inroads, these peoples are still better marriage prospects.

And here we have the ethnoimperialism.  Eastern Europe is just a grab bag for racially superior Northwest European Inner Hajnal men to invade, live in, and engage in “mate poaching” (any complaints, Jeelvy?) in, taking the native woman.

Although most people think going abroad means American men looking for foreign brides, it works the other way. The men in these countries are more traditional. They tend to be more courtly, more inclined to observe the traditional courtesies such as opening doors. They can fix things. They expect to marry, the major constraint being whether they can afford it. At the same time, the characteristics now called “toxic masculinity” haven’t been beaten out of them. A white woman looking for a real man — with both the advantages and disadvantages — could do worse than Eastern Europe.

And, yes, obnoxious, overweight SJW Inner Hajnal women can invade Eastern Europe to find some hunkie dupe.  

But, hey, if we believe MacDonald’s latest flim-flam, and believe that every nuance of behavior is genetically determined, then what happens when you mix those Individualist Northwest European Inner Hajnal superiors with inferior collectivist Outer Hajnal Eastern Europeans?  Won’t you dilute all those “romantic love hunter gatherer” genes?

Further, if we should marry our own kind, and if you believe that Eastern Europeans are “the same kind” as Northwest Europeans, then what’s the justification for the sort of petty nationalist ethnonationalism that the Amren-Counter-Currents alliance promotes?  You can’t have it both ways. Complete hypocrisy all around. They’re different enough for petty nationalism, but when it comes to living in other people’s nations and taking natives for spouses, then they are “the same kind.”  These guys praise the Reed Johnson Act, but Eastern Europe is The Promised Land for Northwest European Manifest Destiny.  Hitler wanted to dispossess the Slavs; modern Hitler worshippers want to take Eastern European housing, spouses, etc.

And as regards the piece of trash who wrote the article, he spent his prime years in inter-racial marriage, producing mixed-race children, and then, in how old age, married a younger Eastern European woman, depriving some Eastern European man of a potential mate.

More Movement Stupidity, 12/29/19

More nonsense.

Mission accomplished for Devlin’s Counter-Currents article – slavish China worship.  Yes, China is real innovative and all.  That’s why, on an almost daily basis, we read news reports of Chinese stealing Western science and technology.

Copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal.

It doesn’t matter though…HBD is ALL about enslaving Whites to Jews and East Asians and the treasonous e-rag Counter-Currents is doing its part to promote the Jewish-Asian agenda.

FINALLY!  Someone gets it!  Read the thread.  Kinship and survival, and then advancement – not HBD. Collective action, not sweaty pontificating about “individualistic high trust northern hunter gatherers.”  Superiority that is earned, not a racial birthright, and defined by a fighting spirit ending in victory.

The year 131sigh.  Doesn’t Strom know that he’s embarrassing himself?

The comments here are quite remarkable.  Women complain about “misogyny” while practicing misandry. What else is new?

Translation of this: She wants a White man.  Cue Derbyshire breaking out in a cold sweat.

Can Der Movement reform itself?  The pot calls the kettle black,eh?

Many say President Trump has been betrayed. He’s got bad advisers, he hired the wrong people, his daughter and his son-in-law are screwing everything up. Charlie Kirk and TPUSA are co-opting the youth movement and getting money from conservative donors. The Never Trumpers sabotaged him from day one and prevented “his” people from getting in the Administration. We’re like Russian peasants, moaning, “Oh, if only the Tsar knew!”

Hello Greg Johnson!

We’re kidding ourselves. The conservative movement won’t be reformed from within and neither will the Trump Administration. They are what they are.

And neither will Der Movement.

Is the solution to create a new nationalist party? It’s been tried before. In 2000, Pat Buchanan ran a third-party campaign but it didn’t get anywhere.

And of course, nothing’s changed in 20 years,right?

At the time, Donald Trump heaped abuse on him, saying he was “intolerant” of blacks and homosexuals and that he was “in love with Adolf Hitler.”

He, at least Trump is sincere about his radical liberalism, right Johnson? Trump is a genuinely great hardcore leftist.

I propose two objectives. The first is to offer a nationalist critique of conservatism, not to save it from itself, but to discredit it. If “the movement” changes and joins our ranks, well and good. If not, we must relentlessly critique it.

Rewrite:  I propose two objectives. The first is to offer a nationalist critique of Der Movement, not to save it from itself, but to discredit it. If “the movement” changes and joins our ranks, well and good. If not, we must relentlessly critique it.

Conservatives are vulnerable because they are not serving the interests of their constituents. We know from the 2016 campaign that national populist ideas are more prevalent among ordinary Republicans — and many white Democrats — than the staid program of Conservatism Inc.

Quota Queen “leaders” are equally vulnerable.

There are some good people in “the movement.” However, the movement itself is largely a grift.

Hood is talking about “conservatism” there, but it really applies to Der Movement, Inc., a money-making enterprise.  Give those “D’Nations” so the likes of Johnson and Brimelow can live there coastal, blue state lifestyles – remember, those who give live in the Golden Age today!

They live in fear of journalists and they need to keep the money flowing. Joe Sobran said it best years ago: “It was all a game, or a way of making a living.”

Rewrite: They live in fear of Far Right criticism and they need to keep the money flowing. Ted Sallis said it best years ago: “It was all a game, or a way of making a living.”

Conservatism Inc. probably can’t be reformed, and it has formidable defenses against takeover from within. How we respond requires some counter-intuitive thinking.

The same applies to Der Movement,Inc.

From an intellectual perspective, we should be hammering Donald Trump, and I have…We were there from the beginning…

MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!  Thise milk jugs are waiting – start chugging!

Should we vote for President Trump? I won’t tell anyone what to do. Frankly, my position now is we must see how the campaign develops.

What an idiot.  After telling us how Trump tricked all the rubes in 2016 and subsequently betrayed his base, now we “must see how the campaign develops.”  That’s great.  And if Trump feints right once again, I assume all the Alt Right suckers will support him?  And, hey, didn’t Johnson state that Trump was “toast in 2020 no matter what” and will “lose in a landslide?”  What’s the point then?  Oh, now the “no matter what” no longer applies, and Johnson now asserts that Boris “Turkic” Johnson’s victory makes Trump’s reelection more probable.  The earlier comment goes right down the memory hole.  After all, what’s is more Orwellian than Der Movement?

The Last Chance for White America?

Notice they cannot admit being wrong.

A symbol, not substance.  Not bad, although it could have mentioned the A$AP Rocky fiasco as another example of Trump’s feckless buffoonery. Two further points. Are any of these fellows EVER going to publicly admit to being wrong about their hysterical “Trump is the last chance for White America” nonsense, as well as admit that Strom and I were right about Trump?  And is Johnson going to consider this brief Amren video as an example of “small-minded” “movement” whining about Trump?  

But, but, but…I thought Trump was “the last chance for White America.”  Listen to the whole thing, concentrating on the criticisms about Trump. Once again, note how these people are unable to admit how horribly wrong they were about Antifa Don Trump, and how EGI Notes was right.  Also, once again – will Johnson criticize his buddies at Amren for “small-minded” complaining about Trump?

And then the other shoe drops. MAGA! Pepe! Kek!

The Yang Gang!  Spencer!  Johnson!  

HBD in action!  “Razib” Khan:

My wife has two great-grandparents who were born in Norway.

But, hey, you fetishists, the real danger is dem dere dumb wops and hora-dancing Romanians. Nice Bengali Brownsters mating with Northern European women and producing mongrel offspring is all part of the HBD Jeurasian plan, so it’s all good!  Let’s mate and mix Khan’s spawn with those of Derbyshire, and then the consequent output can mate with some Jews!  HBD!

The fundamental difference between the EGI Notes and HBD perspectives is perhaps best exhibited by the reaction to this.  EGI Notes says the Legionaries were heroes; the HBDers scorn them as hora-dancing non-Jewish, non-Asian Romanians.  Me, I prefer Codreanu to some leering Levantine media manipulators, or to some disease-ridden Oriental human photocopiers, but, hey, what do I know? There’s no accounting for taste. If the HBDers prefer Jews and Asians, who are we to say nay?  But, alas, they should go their own way and not infiltrate into White racial nationalism.

Speaking of HBD, this is part of a comment left by a virulently pro-Asian HBDer from Amren comments (emphasis added):

The Democratic Party I love is the party that existed from the inauguration of Franklin Roosevelt in 1933 to the assassination of John Kennedy in 1963. The civil rights movement was well intended. I supported it as a child, a teenager, and a young adult. I am disappointed with the black response.

See this.  Might is Right is a classic Type I fetishist screed, so it’s no wonder one of its (part Iranian?) advocates does the usual Type I stupidities. When are the Type Is going to finally sit down, shut up, and let Type IIs lead the way?  Answer – they won’t.  Ever. It’s up to the Type IIs to just lead the way regardless and push the Type I retards out of the way.

Is this a German? That’s Goebbels’ nemesis, the “German” Jew Bernhard “Isidor” Weiss. Another picture of this HuWhyte Ultra-Aryan is here.  The HBDers and “race realists” weep.

Happy Barbarossa Day 2019

Comments and clarifications.

I am sure some on the Far Right are upset at the advice given here.

Some clarifications may be in order.  Some will protest the comments at the end.  What? You can’t advocate on behalf of Whites even in the corporate world or in academia? I did not say that; what I am saying is to be prudent.  If you are a tenured professor – and I am talking about real, rock-sold tenure here – then, yes, if you wish, publicly speak out, but you should still expect to be targeted.  

However, to engage in overt activism in the early stages of your career?  Would folks like MacDonald and Duchesne ever have been given tenure to begin with had their activism started from the first days in academia?  What do you think?

The same principles apply to the corporate world.

My advice about the military is even more obvious. The Nutzis will scream that Colored gangs and extremists are allowed, but that’s the point isn’t it?  Why doesn’t Der Movement ever take its own rhetoric seriously, take it at face value?  If you always proclaim that the System is anti-White, is genocidal, is unfair, then why be surprised at examples of all of that being true?

The military has always been a reflection of the nation as a whole. America 2019 is a White-hating, crazed, Far Left SJW Dystopia. The US Military 2019 is therefore likewise to be expected to be a White-hating, crazed, Far Left SJW Dystopia. What is so difficult to understand?  The military has made clear that it considers WN to be among the worst things ever, it will not tolerate WNs in its ranks, and it will weed these WNs out and dishonorably discharge them.  It seems that they would rather have a thousand Osama Bin Ladens in the military than a single Richard Spencer.  Very well.  It is what it is.  We do not have a draft; it is a volunteer force.  No one is making you sign up.  It is your choice.  If you choose to join a System institution that is anti-WN, and that makes clear it is hostile to expression of White racial interests, then you have to conform to those requirements.  Isn’t that obvious?  From the day you join to the day you leave, you have to reject WN, reject racialism, reject the “movement,” and follow the paradigm of “equality,” “diversity,” and “multiculturalism.” That’s your obligation for your service.  If you don’t like it or can’t do it, then don’t join.  If you join, then that’s what you have to do.  Once you leave you are of course free to follow whatever path you wish, but while in uniform you simply cannot be WN or any sort of pro-White activist. If you don’t have the self-discipline to understand and actualize these simple requirements, then you are not military material to begin with.  The essence of being in the military is obeying orders (except if you are a German soldier in WWII and then, mysteriously, obeying orders is a war crime); if you cannot do so, do not join. Arguments that the orders are “illegal” (even if true) will avail you nothing; good luck trying to argue that in military court.

I am not saying that the situation is right or fair or tolerable. I am merely saying that is the way it is, and you have to live your life in the society as it is. If you want to change that, then, by all means, be an activist, but then don’t sign up for the military, and don’t expect to be a successful businessman, academic, or accepted in a college, university, professional school, etc. Have realistic expectations of the outcome.

I give you advice based on what is best for YOU; the Quota Queens give you advice based on what is best for THEM.  I have no agenda; my advice is disinterested.  I’m not asking for your “D’Nations” nor do I try to convince you that giving money will make you “live in the Golden Age today.”  I’m just trying to advocate prudence and to prevent young White men from making errors they will regret long afterward.

The Quota Queens may rail against this reality, but let us consider.  When young White men get kicked out of the military because of “hate,” and have that on their record for life, will the Quota Queens offer these men jobs?  Will they share their “D’Nations” with them?  Or will they just shrug, fire off a dismissive tweet or two, and go back to shilling for shekels?  

Now, of course I believe that WNs should be able to freely join the military and advocate their politics. But that’s not the world we live in.  And whose fault is that?  The Quota Queens squandered decades of time, millions of dollars, and countless man hours of effort from their followers, achieving absolutely nothing.  Blame them, don’t blame the messenger who merely tells you what is what, and advises you on how to best deal with it.

An antidote to Yellow Supremacy.

This is HBD:

Notwithstanding his early death following cerebral edema, martial artist and actor Bruce Lee may be seen as a successful case of Chinese-European crossbreeding. To what extent does the miscegenation between a white man (or woman) and a Chinese woman (or man) prove to be—generally speaking—more eugenic and healthy than the one between a white and an Arab or a Black?…Thus, as intelligence continues to increase in China and decline in Europe and the United States, China is likely to emerge as the world’s superpower in the second half of the 21st century.

Yellow Supremacy.  Jeurasian mongrelization. Who has been warning you about this? That’s right, the “crazy and bitter” Ted Sallis. HBD is the vicious enemy of White racial interests.  The mantra of the HBDers: You’re all doomed, Whitey, so just surrender to the Yellow Man, and race-mix yourself out of existence with flat-chested, buck-toothed Chinatrices.

When is this trash Lynn going to drop dead anyway?  Rushton and Brand are waiting for him in hell. And why is that effeminate French toothpick always given a forum on ostensibly pro-White sites?

Ted laughs:

This is bait-and-switch by an administration that didn’t deliver on its main campaign promises, and yet another sign the Trump administration isn’t a nationalist new beginning for the GOP. It’s one last gasp of Conservatism Inc. and one last grift of its supporters.

Hey, Hood, what websites were calling Trump “the last chance for White America?”  And who was calling him a fraud for the past three years?  Dishonesty by omission.

What a buffoon.  Perhaps the worst writer in the history of pro-White activism.

Race Denial Incoherence

And other news.

Denier:  There is no such thing as race!  It is merely a social construct with no biological basis!

Realist: Then how do you distinguish those nasty privileged White racists from those nice and humble oppressed Blacks, whose lives, as we are told, matter ever so much?

Denier: Look, there are some people who happen to have dark skin and others who happen to have light skin – and that’s the only difference between them – and the former are placed in a “Black” socially constructed group that is victimized, and the former band together as a socially constructed privileged “White” oppressor group.

Realist: So the only difference is the skin color of these groups, a mere superficial element?  No other similarities within and differences between the groups?

Denier: That’s right.

Realist:  But there are people from, say, South Asia, who have skin as dark or darker than many Black Americans, and there are some people from, say, Northeast Asia, who have skin as light or lighter than many White Americans. So are Koreans and Japanese privileged Whites who are oppressing Black Indians and Bangladeshis?

Denier: No!  When I talk about “Whites” I mean, you know, Whites, and “Blacks” mean Blacks.  You know what I mean.

Realist: No, I don’t know what you mean.  Please explain.

Denier:  I mean that “Whites” are relatively lighter-skinned people of European descent who look like Europeans, while Blacks are relatively darker-skinned people who have African ancestry and look like people from sub-Saharan Africa.

Realist: So these “socially constructed” groups are based on people who look somewhat similar to each other and who derive from particular continents – continental population groups?

Denier: They are ethnicities, not races!

Realist: Putting aside that your “ethnicities” are based on continent of origin and physical appearance that goes beyond mere skin color, I ask – are English, Germans, Italians, Greeks, and Russians all the same ethnic group?

Denier: Whatever. Those are socially constructed groups – part of the “White” social construct.

Realist:  Again – are they all the same ethnic group?

Denier: No.

Realist:  So, we have different ethnic groups that are binned together because they look approximately similar and originate from the same continent.  Population genetics will show similarities at that level as well, in a global context.  Obviously then, this group of “Whites” – which we can call a race – has a biological basis and is not merely some sort of social construct.

Denier:  You’re a racist!  You should get elbowed in the face just like Richard Spencer!

This demonstrates the problem with ancestry testing companies.  Assume European ethny “X” that has some Siberian/East Asian admixture.  A testing company has “X” as one of its parental populations, well represented in their database, and as part of their “European” category.  A person of “X” ancestry – someone who has the same Siberian/East Asian admixture – gets tested, and since they match the “X” parentals, they get a result of “100% X,” which the company interprets as “100% European.” In this manner, the Siberian/East Asian admixture is hidden, because it is part of “X” ancestry and “X” is a “European parental population.” The individual, who may well look like they should be eating with chopsticks, goes on Amren comments threads to pontificate on their “racial purity.”

Now, you may argue that if “X” is an indigenous European ethny, and if the admixture took place long ago as part of the ethnogenesis of “X,” then it is fair to call all “X” ancestry as “European.”  Very well, but then you have to accord the same status to the ethnogenesis of other European ethnies, including the cringing subhumans from the South.

Just in time to fool the rubes in 2020.  The Republican playbook: Campaign Right, Govern Left.

So much winning!  Never fear!  Trump is monitoring the situation, monitoring very closely

It is staggering that all of the heroes of Der Movement (with a few exceptions) did not realize early on that Trump was a fraud and a buffoon.  With respect to being a fraud, we have all of the evidence: His Jewish family connections, his fondness for Negroes, his socially liberal “New York values,” and his past support for leftist Democrats. As for being a buffoon, his debate performances were clear indication of that; for example, his clownish ignorance when asked about America’s nuclear triad strategic deterrent (of which he clearly knew nothing), compared to his great interest in talking about the size of his hands.  Why did anyone take this fat retard seriously?

He won the election because many White Americans were desperately hungry for red meat right-wing populism, and were heartily tired of the GOP Establishment and the non-choice of elections. They took Trumpian rhetoric at face value. I supported his election because it was obvious that Trumpsim was accelerating the breakdown of America and disrupting the multicultural consensus. I also stupidly (or naively) thought that Der Movement would be able to take advantage of Trumpism to further the promotion of explicitly White interests. I should have known better; that foolishness is to my eternal shame.

Just like Derbyshire – someone with a sense of entitlement who believes that their entire social milieu should change to accommodate their (wrong) life choices.

It is also amusing to see stereotypes conformed – the huge White whale has a Black “husband.”  White fatties and Negroes – who would have ever guessed?  All that’s missing from this picture is a bucket of fried chicken and Captain Ahab.

Evidence Derbyshire Supports Race-Mixing

Answering lying scum.

A piece of utter filth commenting at Counter-Currents writes:

threestarsPosted May 31, 2019 at 10:43 am | PermalinkYou’re perfectly exemplifying the malaise Quinn is talking about. You’re maliciously strawmening Derbyshire, who NEVER advocated for race mixing with Asians and specifically said so himself on numerous occasions. If we were to shun every member of our movement or ally who was married or had sex with Jewish, Asian, or Indian women we’d be back to the dark days of barely articulate methheads raving about Hitler.

Let’s put aside the interesting statement (perhaps true for the Alt Right) that there would not be many activists left – apart from stupid drug addicts – if we shun race-mixers.  Also, we can put aside the implication that opponents of miscegenation are “barely articulate methheads” (I suppose they are slightly nuts latrine flies as well). Let’s focus on the claim that Derbyshire never advocated for Eurasian mongrelizaiton.

Really?  Derbyshire NEVER advocated for race mixing with Asians?  Of course, there’s different interpretations for “advocated.” Given the sensitivities involved and the gross damage done to racial interests by miscegenation, I consider a defense of, and supportive tolerance of, race mixing, coupled with praising the results of such mixing, to be reasonably equivalent to “advocating” – particularly when the person in question is a race-mixer themselves and represents the miscegenation ideal in the bedroom and the crib.

Let’s consider Derbyshire’s infamous “awkward squad” VDARE post, the one in which he essentially admits that he married a Chinatrix because he is a socially awkward loser with an unpleasant personality.  While it is true that he suggests that mass miscegenation may have “unforeseen consequences” and that opposition to such mass mixing could be legitimate, we note he never defines what level of admixture is too much, and then he proceeds to strongly defend European-Asian admixture, even to the extent of mass admixture that produces an evenly hybridized population. The relevant passages are as follows, emphasis added:

It can, I think, seriously be doubted whether, if there had never been large numbers of blacks in the U.S.A., anti-miscegenation laws would ever have been thought of at all.

As to Jared’s dire warnings about the dangers to mental and physical health faced by the offspring of mixed-race marriages—Pshaw! There are hazards of every kind in human reproduction.

I just last week read in a newspaper article that: “Twin and triplet babies have a five time greater risk of dying within their first year compared to single babies.” We all know that older mothers have higher risk of birth defects. Suicide rates are sensationally higher in some nations than in others, for reasons partly genetic. (The only three nations of Finno-Ugrian linguistic stock are all in the top 20 on that list.)

Should we not then have twins? Should we make our women breed early? Should we shun marriage with Finns, Hungarians, and Estonians?

I suppose some people would say so. Most of us, however, have in these matters what investment advisers call “a high appetite for risk,” and take whatever Nature feels like offering us with the partner we have chosen.

In the particular case of European-Asian matches, Jared and I both recently attended a lecture that included a genetic analysis of the Uighurs, a Central Asian people. They are very precisely half European, half Asian.

I have, as it happens, met more than the average number of Uighurs. They seem to me a fine sturdy people not notably lacking in intelligence or afflicted with any very noticeable personality defects. They are certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.

I say again: Pshaw!

So, first, he stupidly equates race mixing with having twins or triplets or mating with “Finns, Hungarians, and Estonians.”  Then – and here is the crucial part – he utterly rejects Taylor’s anti-mixing attitude (Pshaw!), and cites the Uighurs as an example of a wonderfully sturdy and robust product of very nice half-and-half European-Asian mongrelization.

He then even more stupidly defends miscegenation because the Uighurs are “certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.”  Last I looked the Han Chinese were in absolute zero significant danger from any Uighurs, who they are repressing quite nicely, and any non-significant danger from Uighurs likely has more to do with their religion than with their racial makeup.  And even if Uighurs were real troublemakers – what? – is that a defense of race-mixing?  Gee, racially mixed Blacks and Hispanics in America are causing White Americans all sorts of trouble, so let’s support European-Sub-Saharan African- Amerindian admixture.  I mean, they are all real sturdy and robust, so what’s the problem?

Take home message: Derbyshire is a supporter and a de facto advocator for European-Asian miscegenation, and filthy scum who claim otherwise are LYING to you.

I say again: Pshaw!