Oil drillers and mustard dippers should be ostracized as well.
Issues of miscegenation are important for EGI, as well as for parental and familial kinship. Dissuading relationships across wide racial lines is therefore a good thing. I note that Roissy is celebrating an example of “shark shaming” – White women who date Coloreds (“mudsharks”)* being ostracized by White men.
Now, such “shark shaming” is a good thing, so why not extend it to the opposite sex direction as well? Shouldn’t White women ostracize White men who date (or marry) Colored women? The outrageous hypocrite Roissy joyfully discusses his Negro and Oriental sex partners, and indeed claims that White men can “increase their SMV” by miscegenation; yet he supports “shark shaming.”
True enough, since women are the rate limiting step in reproduction, White female miscegenation is worse than that of White males. But “worse” implies degree, not a Manichean good/bad distinction. In other words, just because White male miscegenation is “not as bad” as that of White females, it doesn’t mean that White male miscegenation is good. It’s bad as well, and the “oil drillers” and “mustard dippers” should be ostracized as well.
Can we expect anything else from Roissy? This is the same liar who peddled the ludicrous idea that Trump won Pennsylvania, and hence the election, because of the endless caravans of Amish horse and buggies descending upon voting centers, while the reality was (and was pointed out here, with evidence cited) that the difference in Pennsylvania was all of the rust belt Micks, Wops, and Polacks from Joe Biden country who eagerly flocked to a candidate portrayed in the media as a “racist” and a “fascist.”
What else do expect from a HBD gamester but lies and hypocrisy?
*Does this include Ann Coulter? If not, why not?
First, Roissy said that having Sessions as Attorney General alone would justify having Trump as President.
Now we have this:
Trump’s instincts about Sessions were right; he’s a Boomer cuckservative who will fold when the fight gets going.
Of course, some of us have been criticizing Sessions for months.
Note to reader: Leave Roissy to have his race traitor sexual relations with Negresses and Asiatrices and get the real news from sites like EGI Notes.
As a Freedom of Association absolutist…
That’s great. Absolutist. Which means an absolute right to associate, or not associate, with whomever you wish, with no restriction or coercion whatsoever.
But what happens if people decide that they do not want to associate with, live in the same society with, race-mixing Derbyshire and his Chinese wife? What if people decide that they do not want to live in the same America as the entire Derbyshire clan, including the mixed-race children?
Well, then it seems absolutism descends into relativism:
Derbyshire’s entire argument boils down to this thesis: “Yes, miscegenation is bad, but only a small number of people are doing it, so it’s fine for me to do it. And if you have a problem with that, then come over to my house and I’ll punch you in the face.”
If “absolutism” stops at someone’s personal self-interests, then it is not genuine absolutism. It is hypocrisy.
Nonsense from a certain weasel-faced hypocrite.
Christianity is the religion of the higher IQ, the more empathic, the bigger-souled, the guilt-based (inner morality); it’s a religion for a people whose impulse is to transcend their human failings and better themselves, rather than to embrace their will to filth and stamp a seal of approval on their avaricious barbarity.
You mean, like: rejecting hedonistic nihilism and promiscuous sex? You mean like getting married to a woman of your own race and not miscegenating with Negresses with “gravity-defying asses” or with Asiatrixes with wandering fingers? You mean like “love thy neighbor” as opposed to snarky “shiving?” This Roissy has to rank among the most outrageous hypocrites on Earth.
Now of course there are exceptions…
Meet Jimmy Wideassmann.
I’m of the opinion that a religion is less an influence on culture and society than it is a manifest revelation of the genetic foundation of the people who profess belief in it.
Regrettably, Christianity, like its people, has “out-evolved” itself — it evolved to where it was always logically heading…
So, if Christianity was “always logically heading” to self-destructive Universalist cucking then (1) what good is it?, and (2) what does that say about the “genetic foundation of the people who profess belief in it?” If we’ve all “out-evolved” our adaptive instructs, what now? Should we just lay with the aforementioned Negresses and Asiatrixes and leave saving society to “the anti-poolside chumps?”
Those who think the White West can be unyoked from Christianity and not just survive but thrive are fools…
That makes me a fool then. Or maybe someone who believes we need to move on to the next High Culture.
Christianity can no more be excised from the West than charity, empathy, genius, poetry, and high trust can be cut out from Western societies without permanently altering the character of the people. Discarding Christianity is taking a hatchet to a part of the essence of European man and expecting him to walk off the operating table unchanged…
But, Jimmy, if Whites have evolved past adaptive fitness and are riding the Cuckstianity horse into genetic oblivion, maybe some operating table change is drastically needed?
My opinion: Christianity must be mercilessly destroyed. Crush the infamy!