Category: Roof


Behold der “movement.”
“AryanBlood1488” – the sort of name I would make up as a joke to sarcastically tweak the “movement’s” nose – but all too real. The “movement” (has long ago) become a parody of itself.  It’s time to pull the plug and start anew from first principles.  But then, if such an impulse existed within the “movement” – if such self-awareness existed – then all the problems would not have manifested in the first place. To quote a famous Negro – “the chickens have come home to roost.”  Such are the wages of affirmative action, which, as a hypocritical criticizer of that for Coloreds, is practiced by the “movement” with unerring consistency.

That’s Right

A correct statement.
Greg Johnson on Roof:

It is terrible. I can’t help but think our movement failed this kid by not giving him a more productive outlet for his idealism.

Next step: admission that the “movement” is an abject failure, cannot be “reformed,” and needs to be reconstructed from the ground up.

Question and Answer About the "Movement"

Answering a question.

Supposing some time in the near future a Dylann Storm Roof approaches any of the White Nationalist, Race Realist or Alternative Right websites and says, “Look, I am tired of seeing white nations lose territory to third world invaders, of our people being assaulted by pathological minorities, of the national media promoting the destruction of the white race. How can I do something constructive?”

What’s the answer?

The “movement’s” answer is what was described here:

Viktor Orban; affordable family formation; mainstreaming; Savitri Devi; cephalic index; Nordics of Ancient Greece and Rome; ZOG; Frankfurt School; human biodiversity; IQ; Greg Cochran, creative genius; Sailer ranting about irrelevant nonsense, such as Tom Wolfe’s weightlifting routine or Obama’s cigarette smoking habits; northern hunter gatherers; 0.001% admixture; man above time; man beyond time; man who can’t keep track of time; Ride the Tiger; Northern Europeans; Who We Are; Radio Derb; Brimelow talking about his children in irrelevant contexts; Indo-European migrations; Chinese with big brains and high IQs; number of times Hitler farted each day; Holohoax; anarcho-tyranny; high trust societies; Putin playing a deep game; March of the Titans; Kali Yuga; Age of Iron; Aryans from Atlantis; Khazar Jews; True Romance; Sailer mentioning at every chance that he was right but no one listed to him at the time; etc.

On Roof

Failed “movement.”
So, it seems the “hate crime” designation was asserted based on some evidence, which was not available at the time the story broke.
The real victim here is Roof himself, a young White left adrift from a degenerate multicultural System, who has ruined himself through a useless violent outburst.
The “movement?”  It has responsibility here, but not in the manner that the System will assert. The “movement” is not responsible for Roof’s disaffection, his beliefs, or his anger. The System itself is responsible for that.
What the “movement” is responsible for is for failing Roof and others like him, for not providing a constructive, non-violent, political/metapolitical outlet for his anger and energy. Now, while it is true that “higher matters” should be discussed at the higher levels of any real movement, you also need to have structures in place to engage those at other levels. Angry young Whites are not interested in cephalic indices, Kali Yuga, admixture ratios, Savitri Devi, the racial history of the Tocharians, or any other esoterica (both useful and useless) the “movement” dwells on endlessly. Nor are such people going to be properly developed as cadres through online “digital activism” only.
The failure of the “movement” – after so many decades – to produce any real movement of utility is a stark responsibility that it must accept.  It is, first of all, a failure of leadership, the abdication of duty and competent accomplishment that comes from the “movement’s” affirmative action program. But the lower levels are equally responsible, for it is said that any people have the leadership that they deserve. If the “movement” has an affirmative action policy, it is because that’s what the rank and file want, that’s how they accept or reject putative leaders (merit has nothing at all to do with it). So, the rank and file are in part responsible for the fact that their own leadership has failed them.  
As there is no interest in the current “movement” for change and reform, one can expect such sorry stories to repeat, and more lives like Roof’s to be wasted.