The maladaptive race.
Strom is correct that we are not going to vote ourselves out of this mess. He is wrong, however, that the solution si to buy our way out with the discredited currency of Pierce-ism.
What we need is clear-head realism coupled to a sane, fact-based, and racially progressive memetic product. In other words: a New Movement.
The “Mr. Hyde” of Der Movement rambles on.
My colleague Andrew Hamilton…
The two worst writers in Counter-Currents history.
But, as I have written elsewhere, many (though certainly not all) of the early racial theorists’ hypotheses have actually been confirmed by later genetic studies.
The anti-Semitic Christian-Socials proposed a vigorous affirmative action program…
Der Movement has a long history of promoting affirmative action, I see.
To be continued . . .
There’s more? Durocher’s review will be longer than the book.
As his Jewish friends would say, Johnred has lots of “chutzpah.”
Leave me in my country to enjoy the culture I grew up in and am familiar with: Modern, Western, not-very-religious, sexually egalitarian, easy-going, English-speaking social-democratic culture.
Excuse me Mr. Derbyshire: you live in the USA, but you are a (former) illegal alien who grew up in England. Your wife – whom you brought into my country – grew up in Red China. Where do you find the nerve to pontificate on the sort of culture we should have here?
Let me tell you about the American culture I grew up with: where no one had ever heard of, or even imagined, child porn, much less made apologies for it, and where it was more or less openly acknowledged that any White man married to an Asian woman was a socially maladapted loser unable to attract a mate of his own race.
Can we all once again enjoy that culture that we used to have?
Self-defense is a minimal criterion for superiority
Typical Nutzi types on forums trumpet the “superiority” of certain European ethnies. Well, it’s certainly good to have high self-esteem, but the bottom-line is that superiority is not a birth-right, but needs to be earned – earned by each generation in turn.
In our time, European women are disrespected and sexually assaulted in broad daylight and in the middle of the street and no action is taken. It’s not because European men are not willing to defend them. It’s because European governments, with their guns, laws, and police, are on the side of the migrants.
Insanity keeps on rolling along.
Two of the “movement’s” favorite countries, Germany and Austria, are behaving in a manner that we can term, to borrow a phrase from Bernie Levanters, “pathological.” Actually, it should be the opposite: those nations that take in refugees should be those facing sanctions and legal action. I also like the women-baby pictures used by the media to depict refugees and migrants, most of who are actually violent young men.
Building upon a post from yesterday, we observe Bernie’s “pathological” delusion continues. Details about what Trump said about “cheering Muslims” are irrelevant to the main issue, shown by opinion polls, that a significant fraction of American Muslims support radical Islam. That’s a fact that off of Sanders’ Middle-Eastern flim-flam cannot change. Sanders can babble all he wants about economics; the emptiness of his analysis was exposed by yesterday’s post here.
Hillary the liar. Is she “pathological” as well, Bernie Asiatic? Interesting that the reality is that ISIS mentions airstrikes in their recruitment, yet the System continues to promote airstrikes despite that. The reason was also discussed in yesterdays post. The System is a ratchet that moves ONLY in an anti-White direction. Any major decision of the System can be predicted based upon whether it helps or harms Whites. If it helps, it will be opposed. It it harms, it be will promoted. That’s it.
And here we see Ayn Rand fan Paul Ryan. The support in the “movement” for racially destructive Jewess Rand could be baffling, but then I remember the stupidity of the “movement” – it’s infatuation with “libertarianism” and its obsession with particular racial phenotypes that the Jewess cleverly used to describe the sociopathic “heroes” of her stories, to make those “heroes” more appealing to the types of nitwits who believe that the poisonous memes of a Jewish hag have a deep positive meaning for “our cause.”
That’s why I reject a “big tent” (real) movement – one has to oppose evil and stupidity, not embrace it. I mean, the “movement’s” ultimate hero, Saint Adolf, also rejected the “big tent” and followed a rock hard ideology, supplanting and/or assimilating rivals. Interesting how the “movement” rejects that sound advice from their hero, but will accept ludicrous racial theories about “drooping Czech moustaches.”