Author: eginotes

The Alt Dumb

More stupidity

First, it’s “castor oil” not “ricin oil” – the latter would do something else than simply give someone the “runs.”  Ask Georgi Markov about that – oh, wait, you can’t – he’s dead.

Second, the Dominican Republic is mostly mulatto, not mestizo.  There is no doubt some Amerind blood there, but most of the non-White ancestry is Negro. Are these frat boys ignorant about everything except alcohol?

They dared criticize Scandinavians?  Blasphemy!  These guys are going to have their Der Movement membership cards revoked!  For shame! What will Hermansson think?

We’ll see what Trump does, but, yes, the ONLY good thing about The Cuck Emperor is causing chaos and balkanization.

And it seems to be that The Fat Emperor is simply pushing on both sides in order to see where he can get the best deal.  After all, that’s what a good businessman would do and Donald is, of course, a stable genius.  Pushed by the System, he floats the idea of a DACA amnesty, with a full illegal amnesty as a further possibility. Will the base accept it?  Could he take the heat?  He then gets massive pushback, with his mental status questioned by Mudshark Annie (who apparently has an order or magnitude more testicular fortitude than Der Touchback himself) and so starts his usual routine as Backpedaler-in-Chief.  The man has no innate ideology or convictions of his own, other than his own ego and self-aggrandizement

I didn’t hear the word “Jew” in this otherwise excellent video.  I guess it was all those nasty hora-dancing Romanians who invented the entire “abolish the White race” meme.

Advertisements

None Dare Call It Hypocrisy

Well, actually, I dare.

I see it as highly hypocritical that the same “movement” “leaders” – all the quota queens – endlessly complain about being “deplatformed” (and use that as part of their equally endless tin cup panhandling), while at the same time these “leaders” behave the same way with respect to racialist dissidents who honestly critique the “movement” and its “leaders” – “ban” them, essentially “deplatform” them from the central media centers of (what passes for) “movement” discourse.

It is important to clear up some matters lest I be accused of hypocrisy or inconsistency.  First, I do agree with the argument – made, for example, by Bowery at Majority Rights when he and I were both participating at that blog – that freedom of association trumps freedom of speech.  I further made the argument at my own blogs that freedom of speech does not obligate anyone to host any specific type of speech at their own forum; again, freedom of association is above freedom of speech, as long as that speech has somewhere else to go. So, yes, I agree that a blog owner can “ban” anyone they want from their site, and that “banned” person can go and set up their own blog and do their own thing elsewhere on the Internet.  After all, that’s ultimately why this blog exists (and, if I remember correctly, for example, Majority Rights was established after its founders were essentially declared persona non grata at Gene Expression).  I have also argued, in like sense, that a blog can be viewed as a form of political warfare, and so why should political soldiers benefit their enemies by facilitating those enemies’ dissemination of their ideas?  There is no obligation to host your enemy.  Very good, but is a fellow racial activist really an “enemy” because they criticize some of your ideas and actions?  Because they state that you should be held accountable for mistakes (according to your own declared standards of behavior)?  Are fellow activists the functional equivalent of SJW leftists?

It is also true that there is a difference between being banned from a blog (or a set of blogs) and having a major (albeit privately owned) company, which is functionally equivalent to a public utility, banning its use by an entire class of people based on, for example, their political views.  However, the “why should you assist the enemy?” argument cuts both ways here.  The owners of Amazon, Twitter, PayPal, etc. can argue – why should they be obligated to support their enemies?  Oh, you say that they are so successful that they are equivalent to public utilities and so they must be obligated to serve everyone.  Very well.  Imagine the same principle is turned inward to the “movement” – some “movement” blogs, sites, groups, and organizations are so successful (within the “movement” itself) that they are equivalent to “movement” “public utilities” and so they must be obligated to serve all racial activists, even those they disagree with.  I’m sure that violation of freedom of association would be rejected, even though in principle the argument is the same (adjusted for scale between society-at-large and the “movement”).

I’m not making a legalistic argument in this post; instead, I’m making a moral one, based on principles, and based on character and integrity (or the lack therefore in Der Movement).  The basic truth is that these “leaders” are endlessly whining about being deplatformed by private companies, and they behave the same way to racial activist dissidents they do not like.  The scale is different, but the basic principle is the same, and most of the arguments as to why private companies should be obligated to interface with, and serve, the “movement” as a whole can be made to argue that the “movement” as a whole needs to interface with the dissidents within its ranks.

Basically, I see the behavior of the “leaders” as being one of cowardice – fear of engaging with dissident critics and those critics’ ideas – as well as the prima donna sense of entitlement that derives from being products of the “movement’s” affirmative action program – how dare anyone criticize them!  Why should they stoop to answering critics?.  Low character hypocrites: behold the Type I Quota Queen “Leadership” of Der Movement: fearfully hiding from those who would critique their flawed ideas and those who would hold them accountable for their failures.

Note: Someone may point out that my own blogs have traditionally never had comments sections.  That is true.  First, I’m not a fan of such sections, the signal-to-noise ratio is poor; most “movement” comments threads of full of asinine Type I activists, trolls, fetishists, defectives, and “antis.”  Second, and even more importantly, unlike our “fearless leaders,” I am not a full time professional activist (living off of supporters’ donations). I’m merely a part-time amateur; I simply do not have the time to deal with comments; to my mind, it is more important, and more prudent, to invest my limited time in producing new content.  However, our heroic leaders are indeed full time activists with free time aplenty, they are people who believe that comments sections have value, so there is obviously a difference between my blog and theirs in that regard.

American White Nationalist Definitions

Definitions of WN.

Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism: The American Alt Right.

Silk Road White nationalism: The idea that Whites should be an enslaved subaltern low caste serving the interests of their Asian overlords.  Asians will colonize the West, and the borders of the West will be guarded by Chinese girls with guns.

Yarmulke and Chopstick White nationalism: HBD race realism. The Alt Wrong.

Tin Cup White nationalism: Most of American White nationalism; Der Movement in general.  This is best represented by the Happy Penguins and the Ethnonationalist ethnic cleansers.

Poolside White nationalism: Hello, Roissy.  Nihilistic hedonism, with a bit of race-mixing thrown in for good measure.  “Game” – pure “pussy pedestalization.”

Sieg Heil and Pass the Beer White nationalism: Nutzis in general.  “White nationalism 1.0” for the most part. Type I activists.

Yet More SLC News, 1/11/18

More stupidity.

In Trump We Trust!

The Predictable “movement” – antics that have a 100% certainty of occurring – once again runs true to form.  Let some article about Southern Europe appear and the crazed ethnic fetishists (*) come out to play.  Interestingly, none of these people have a problem with David “chopsticks” Bromstad looking more Asian than Yukio Mishima, or Bjork looking more like a geisha than a typical Japanese woman.  Just wave your hands around and say “Ladogan” and it’s all alright.

Holy not a hapa. Indeed, it’s a holy surprise.  Got some egg rolls with that chop suey?

If you let Bromstad into a White ethnostate, you might as well let in the entire Derbyshire family – “Rosie” and the kids.  Why not?  The kids look more White than Bromstad does, and “Rosie” could pass for his sister.

Can you imagine if Bromstad was ethnically Russian?  All the fetishists would be undergoing orgasmic spasms over “Mongols.”  Alas, he’s not, which is why his Wikipedia page was vandalized with dishonest nonsense about a “Chinese mother.” Question: would Bromstad get a free pass into a “extremely vetted” Alt Right event?  After all, he’s got two things in his favor, only one of which is his actual ethnic background.

Then people wonder why there aren’t more White ethnics involved in racial activism. It’s a mystery, it all is.  Let’s ask Munro while dancing the hora (long may it turn).  Jews and Chinamen are, by the way, A-OK.  They’re Aryan cognitive elitists, part of dat dere Arctic Alliance (that alliance being most typically consummated in the bedroom, between a socially awkward omega White male and an Asiatrix with the physique of a 12-year old boy).

Not a Russian.

Not a Russian.

*Now backtracking a bit under pressure from other commentators and adding a “I’m part wop” shtick to the routine –all of which I’m sure would both have occurred if other commentators didn’t object.  The fact that there was some minor pushback – good.  Doesn’t change the fact that these things occur EVERY time a “movement” article about Southern Europe shows up (to a lesser extent about Eastern Europe as well).

SLC News: Trump and the Alt Right

A Stable Genius. Dumb Alt Right frat boys.

A Stable Genius: Yeah, Donald Cuck, it doesn’t quite have the same meaning when you say it about yourself.

The big news.

President Trump on Tuesday appeared to endorse a sweeping immigration deal that would eventually grant millions of undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship, saying he would be willing to “take the heat” politically for an approach that many of his hard-line supporters have long viewed as unacceptable…in backing a broader immigration measure, Mr. Trump was giving a rare public glimpse of an impulse he has expressed privately to advisers and lawmakers — the desire to preside over a more far-reaching solution to the status of the 11 million undocumented immigrants already living and working in the United States. Such action has the potential to alienate the hard-line immigration activists who powered his political rise and helped him win the presidency, many of whom have described it as amnesty for lawbreakers.
“If you want to take it that further step, I’ll take the heat,” Mr. Trump told Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, who floated the idea during the meeting in the White House Cabinet Room on Tuesday. “You are not that far away from comprehensive immigration reform.”

OK, all together now: Cuck…Cuck…Cuck…Cuckadoodledoo!

Let’s hear more inane talk about 4-D chess, or Roissy raving about a “Trump neg” or some other insanely juvenile nonsense, while this balding, obese, Jew family-connected, Negro-loving, far-left, anti-White fraud of a cuck prepares to sell his supporters down the river. This is The God Emperor, the “last chance for White America,” the “alpha male,” the MAGA Man, the grand Man on White Horse, the “American Caesar who will secure real pro-White demographic change.”  In Trump We Trust!

Yeah, I’m calling all you Alt Right retards and Type I nitwits out, calling you out, you idiots.

Read this.

And this.

Listen to this nonsense.

There is something there about how this Alt Right crowd were the “first in the movement to speak the truth about Trump.”  Uh, well, that’s true only if you completely ignore both EGI Notes and Kevin Strom. Is it ignorance or mendacity?  I guess we can’t expect more from a podcast that sounds like it was recorded by a bunch of drunken frat boys after an alcoholic binge.

By the way, that was absolutely the worst podcast I’ve ever listened to.  These guys simply don’t care if everyone over the age of 30 (except Spencer himself) cannot listen to that without wanting to vomit.  If you want to know what I mean by “Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism” then listen to that podcast (on an empty stomach).  It has to rank among the worst things ever to appear on the Internet.

Hey, frat boys, not everyone listening to your podcasts have used marijuana.  Just like not all WNs have “exclusively dated Asian girls.”  Speak for yourself, Alt Right nitwits. These podcasts have become so incredibly bad, it’s frightening. The fact that Spencer cannot understand that his reputation is being damaged by this reflects poorly on his judgment.  Talking about pot – the podcasts sound like they’re put together by a bunch of 10 year olds stoned on pot collaborating with a bunch of drunken college freshman.  Embarrassingly stupid and moronic.

The response will be “if you don’t like it, don’t listen.”  Besides the point that there are a few good insights buried in the overall pile of horse dung, the fact is that the Alt Right has the pretense of representing the entire “movement,” so one needs to know what all the Grand Poohbahs of the Alt Right are up to.

Donald Trump: The Type I President.  A pure Type I!

Better late than never. Cuckadoodledoo!

A year and a half (or more) after Sallis and Strom, the Alt Right fanboys realize that Trump is a pro-Jewish beta race cuck.  Surprise!  Hail Kek!  The God Emperor!  In Trump We Trust!  Pepe! Pepe!

Note how they left Greg Johnson off the lists.  Look at some of the names there – absurd.  You know, whether or not you agree with someone or not, you need to admit that they are important if they indeed are.  Johnson is more important in the Alt Right than everyone except Spencer and Taylor.  How about acknowledging the truth?

Not acknowledging the worth of your opponents reflects poorness of spirit – well, after all, this is Der Movement, so what can we expect?

Look at this nonsense. Taylor is good at “uncovering hypocrisy” and then the author gently chides Taylor on the JQ.  But aren’t the two connected?  Jews and Asians good, White ethnics bad.  Critiquing Jews is “bad from a political standpoint and it distracts from the broader White-Black issue” but we can nitpick over Romanians (or Afrowops) – safe targets.  We are all about “truth” and we can quote Jefferson, but no talk even about Israeli population genetics papers about Jews.

It’s not the reticence to talk about the Jews that ultimately the problem here.  It is the combination of that reticence with the enthusiasm to, for example, viciously badmouth Romanians (living in Romanian by the way) – a European people who really do nothing to harm the West, as opposed to a certain Middle Eastern tribe whose antics have been well described for example in The Culture of Critique (but, but, but…Mao “wasn’t very Jewish”).