In der news.
See this. The title is moronic. Of course IQ is a phenotype, just like height, skin color, or any other trait – what else would it be?
The point is that the premise that obsessing over IQ as a “gateway” to racial identity politics is an assertion with no empirical evidence to support it. Similarly, people have long asserted that Amren is a “gateway” to more hardcore racial activism, also with zero actual data to support that contention.
The gateway hypothesis about IQ is Occam’s Butterknife in action. You see, first we convince the normies that group IQ differences are all important. Once we accomplish that, then we go back to them to say that, no, actually racial identity is more important, so forget about all of those high IQ Jews and Asians you were ejaculating over, let’s look at biological kinship and culture instead. It would seem to be more direct to just go to the issue of race. What? If someone is capable of accepting heritable IQ group differences then they would be incapable of accepting genetic (and cultural) differences between groups and the simple calculation that we have greater interests in those racially more similar to us? Nonsense.
The gateway hypothesis is simply an excuse to promote IQ. The IQ promoters fall into one (or both) of two groups:
1. Lynn supporters who embrace Jews and Asians while rejecting White ethnics.
2. White omega males who fantasize about being sodomized by an Asiatrix with a colonoscope-sized strap-on.
There is no third alternative.
Commentators who get it:
Debates about demographic interests (especially when talking about immigration) should be in terms of identity and not in (proxy) terms of merit (IQ, lawabidingness, family values, conservatism, religiosity etc.). If it is about race then we should talk about race. Otherwise Jews, Chinese and high-caste Hindus would be allowed to replace us. The taboo that race is not a legitimate group interest (but only for Whites that is) should be broken.
Whilst rediscovery of the discrepancy in intellectual capacity between Europeans and black Africans, which was well known in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, may be useful in certain arguments to do with affirmative action and crime, it won’t save Western peoples from hybridization and replacement. There is a practically unlimited supply of relatively high caste, intelligent South and East Asians who can be invited into our territories to displace white men and breed with middle-class white women, encouraged by full-spectrum miscegenation propaganda.
Correct.
Laugh at this. Link also here:
foxnews.com/media/former-wh-press-secretary-jen-psaki-blasts-republicans-woke-messaging-debut-new-msnbc-show
That is a particularly dumb “take” by the not-too-bright Psaki. Even if that poll can be taken at face value as an accurate gauge of what today’s Americans believe, do we decide what is right or wrong based upon a current snapshot of public opinion? If one were to examine majority public attitudes in the America of, say, 1950, I’m sure that there would be attitudes there that Psaki would strongly object to, and would say that she is happy (I am not) that those attitudes were changed.
I respect those who fight for what is right, and attempt to convince others, even if it goes against the weight of public opinion. That’s called leadership, and the same principle applies to taking unpopular stands within the Dissident Right as much as it does in America as a whole.
Lincoln’s Electric Cord speech. Once again, Nordicist And Anglomaniac misrepresentations (in this case from “Desmond Jones”) are corrected; it was non-British immigration from Northern Europe that first severed the connection between ethnicity and an American identity.
Note to younger men:
Once you are older and not so hormone addled, you will realize how you’ve been manipulated and exploited by milady, stealing the best years of your life from you, never to be returned. Don’t say you haven’t been warned and remember this in the years to come.
Conversely, we can realize why aging and old women are so bitter and nasty – they’ve lost the only allure and appeal they’ve had, and now they’re only sagging bags of unwanted flesh.
The Lipster is back at Counter-Currents (remember that I, and some of you as well, are “banned” there) beating the IQ drum and promoting the anti-Southern Italian Lynn acolyte Piffer. WN 3.0 and HBD go together like peanut butter and jelly.
Now, here is what the Lipster writes (emphasis added) about Black capabilities, and their cause, at another forum:
Apart from the torrent of diseases, Africa is also a victim of inconsistent rainfall. In fact, rainfall has been declining in Africa since the 1960s. Salvador Barrios, Luisito Bertinelli, and Eric Strobl submit that if rainfall did not recede, the gap in African GDP per capita relative to the rest of the developing world would decline by around 15 to 40 percent.
Another striking feature of Africa is that it contains the largest share of landlocked countries. These countries face substantially higher costs in trade and transportation. For example, research reveals that the cost of tradable commodities is more expensive for sub-Saharan Africa due to the region’s landscape and coastlines. In their study of economic growth in Africa, Tin Mang and Dwayne Woods conclude: “Geography is most favorable to economic production for Europe, next to America, then to Asia, and least favorable to Africa…. If it were not for the unfavorable physical environment, African countries would be better off economically than South American countries.”
In general, we are not implying that Africa’s challenges are impossible to solve. However, due to its unique geography, the region requires policies that account for its peculiar condition. As such, primacy should be accorded to improving transportation networks and reducing barriers to trading. Solving the problem of a harsh geography demands bold thinking and surely Africans are up to the task.
At Counter-Currents, he writes about heritable IQ differences and that Blacks are inherently cognitively inferior; elsewhere, he writes that Africa’s problems are primarily due to geography, climate, and disease, and that “surely Africans are up to the task” of the “bold thinking” needed to solve these problems.
WN 3.0’s Blacks are as fundamentally dishonest as its Whites.
You must be logged in to post a comment.