Category: blogging

Ted Sallis News

And other news.

Given recent events and trends, followers and general readers of my blogs should bookmark or otherwise make note of Ted Sallis News:

Thus, if EGI Notes and/or Western Destiny were to suddenly vanish, then the situation and contingency plans would be discussed at the Ted Sallis News site. In the unlikely event that anything happens to the completely innocuous Ted Sallis News site, then try tedsallisnews2, etc., following the general pattern.

The whole situation is ludicrous, but that is the state of America 2019. And for the morons and the mendacious who argue that “private property rights” mean that service can be denied for political reasons (does that apply for food, electricity, heat, etc. as well?), we can explore the issue of “the sanctity of private property.”

If a person’s “private property” includes real estate, then can a home owner refuse to rent or sell to Blacks or Muslims?  No. Somehow, the “sanctity of private property” dissipates in that instance. What happens if a wealthy person wants to leave their estate to, say, the National Alliance in their will? What if the will instead includes using the estate to set up a college scholarship available only to White students? You can use Google and look up the results of such attempts.

So, it seems like “private property rights” can be abrogated in favor of a perception of “the public good.”  And guess who decides what “the public good” is (and is not) – members of the Jerry NadlerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony Weiner physical beauty crowd.

Freedom!  Democracy!  The Rights of Man!  The Sanctity of Private Property!  Leering Levantines Laughing in Your Face!

Another horrifically bad Counter-Currents essay, this time by the juvenile retard Jef Costello. Victory!  Victory!  Send in those “D’Nations!” Victory!  What the William Blake-Great Red Dragon-Francis Dolarhyde imagery has to do with any of it is anyone’s guess.

Looks like prime Antifa recruitment material right here.

Michael Polignano’s name is currently (as of today) not up as the webzine editor (or any other major player) at the Counter-Currents site.


Sunday Follies


First, I will note for the readership that [posting frequency will have to decrease somewhat here for the time being, due to me being busy with other aspects of life.  Hopefully, quality will be maintained.

Second, even though I am busy, I am slowly working on a genetics-related post that requires some data generation at me end, which in turn requires a lot of tedious formatting.  I don’t know how long that will take, but stay tuned.

Third, the gamesters are always good for descriptive paradigms about the sexual marketplace; this courtesy of Roissy (emphasis added):

Previous research has indicated that men generally rate slimmer women as more sexually attractive, consistent with the increased morbidity risks associated with even mild abdominal adiposity. To assess the association of women’s waist size with a more tangible measure of perceived sexual attractiveness (as well as reward value for both sexes), we examined the association of women’s age and waist circumference with an index of men’s erectile function (IIEF-5 scores), frequency of penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI), and sexual satisfaction in a representative sample of Czechs (699 men and 715 women) aged 35-65 years. Multivariate analyses indicated that better erectile function scores were independently associated with younger age of self and partner and women’s slimmer waist. PVI frequency was independently associated with women’s younger age and women’s slimmer waist. Sexual satisfaction was independently associated with men’s younger age and slimmer waist for both sexes. Better erectile function, greater PVI frequency, and greater sexual satisfaction were associated with women’s slimmer waist, independently of both sexes’ ages. Possible reasons for the waist effects were discussed, including women’s abdominal body fat decreasing their own desire through neurohormonal mechanisms and decreasing their partner’s desire through evolutionarily-related decreased sexual attractiveness.

Landwhales: flaccidators.

Attractive yeastbuckets: erectors

Science speaks.

Note at the end that Strom warns against Jewish-influenced “pro-White” groups, and mentions the “Alt Lite.”  Very well, Kevin, I agree with you on all of that.  But, pray tell, when will you critique the Alt Wrong?  You know to whom and what I refer, don’t you?  I suspect you may even read this blog from time to time.  Don’t you know of pro-Jewish “pro-White” groups and leaders?  Don’t you know about the dangers of the pro-Jewish and pro-Asian “HBD race realists?”  Don’t you know of entities where fast-talking Jews have promoted the idea of a multiracial “White separatist state?”  Don’t you know we’ve been advised to support “the racial status quo?”  Don’t you know we’re encouraged to admire – nay, inter-breed with! – Asians?  Any comments on that, Kevin?  We’re waiting.  Do your race a favor, make a distinction between genuine racial science and the HBD cult, and call out the Alt Wrong as the dangerous cul-de-sac that it is.

Three Times Sallis Has Been Wrong

Three errors of judgment.

I criticize the quota queens for never admitting when they are (constantly) wrong, and long time readers of this blog know that, in contrast, I openly admit when I am (very rarely) wrong.

For newer readers, I will now openly admit three examples of Sallisian error.

1. I was wrong about Trump’s election; I freely admit that I paid too much attention to Establishment opinion polling and “spin.” Mea culpa.

2. I was also wrong in thinking that Der Movement could be a vehicle for pursuing White racial interests: I was proven very wrong in this, as discussed in my “After Twenty Years” post.  In my defense, I had realized that the “movement” had serious problems as far back as around the year 2000 (or even earlier),and the Legion Europa project of the early 2000s was an attempt to offer an alternative, but that failed.  I was foolish in retrospect, however, to think that, after this failure, Der Movement could be reformed from within.  It is beyond redemption.

3. I was wrong as well to believe that various “movement” “isms” could be compatible, so that ethnonationalists and Nordicists could also be, at the same time, pan-European, with a nested set of interests – focusing primarily on their more narrow ingroup if they so chose, but still showing interest in, and solidarity with, the broader European population.  Subsequent history has proven me to be in error.  This was a mistake on my part, an error in judgment.

In my defense with respect to this, in theory it is possible for ethnonationalists and Nordicists to also be pan-European, if they are rational in their “isms” and view relatedness in a concentric manner.

But that’s theory.  In reality, in the real world, with irrational people, with fetishists and their dogma, it is practically not possible.  If I was less naive, I would have realized that, so that is another black mark against my judgment.

Now, if you believe that these errors of judgment disqualify me as a dependable commentator, that is certainly your right, but you must then also admit that:

A. I, unlike Der Movement’s “leadership,” am at least able to admit when I’m wrong.

B. If my rare errors are disqualifying, then the quota queens’ constant errors must be an order of magnitude more disqualifying, unless of course they have affirmative action protections in this regard.

Fundamental difference: the rare times I am wrong, I openly admit it; the endless times Der Movement is wrong, its “activists” and “leaders” won’t admit it, not one single time.

Not Dead Yet

Still around.

As what will no doubt be a disappointment to “movement” ”leaders,” the “crazy” and “bitter” Ted Sallis is not dead; the lack of recent activity here has been due to digital problems, stemming from the decaying infrastructure of Third World America.

Never forget: America is a dead country with no future.

And, no, voting for the likes of Trump is not “going to save us all.”  Even if Trump was really an “American Caesar who is going to save White demographics” the fact remains that a subsequent President could undo all that good; further, a significant change in the political representation in Congress could very well lead to a Trump impeachment.  Thus, even if a pro-White President was elected, but with the rest of the System in place, do you really believe anything racially useful could get done – and stay done?

No; instead, electoral politics are for three main purposes:

1. Propaganda, education, and recruitment, as well as a focal point around which to build infrastructures that could also be used for other, more fundamental, purposes.

2. Promoting chaos and balkanization – heightening the contradictions.

3. If any Far Rightists get elected, they can use whatever power and status they have to provide some support and “cover” for more “vanguardist” metapolitical activism.

Meanwhile, getting back to the main point of the post – I’ve been away, but I’ve still been around.  This enforced break has been useful to get away from “movement” stupidity for a while, and some reorientation hopefully can result, a “silver lining” so to speak.

One last note: Burn in hell, John McCain, rot in hell for all eternity.

Business Not Personal

Stating the obvious.

Some recent Der Movement correspondence leads me to state that my (sometimes harsh) criticism of (White) racial nationalists is business, not personal (*).  And, of course, I’ve already stated, multiple times, the over-the–top rhetoric that accompanies some criticism is tongue-in-cheek and not to be taken purely seriously.  But the serious criticism, which should be taken at face value, is business: a different view of ideology and of the direction that the “movement” needs to move. There is always – even if weak – an underlying attitude of all belonging to “this thing of ours” and therefore at least some minimal “professional courtesy” is in order (again excluding the obviously sardonic mocking of “movement” Nutzi lunacy).

With respect to individuals who are not racial nationalists, my criticism may very well be personal as well as business – Derbyshire is a classic example.  These people are beyond the pale of respectability as defined from a racial nationalist perspective, there is no underlying sense of community, and some of the harsher criticisms are not necessarily tongue-in-cheek.

All of this would seem to be (at least intuitively) obvious, but I suspect it is not.

* Similar as explained in this swarthoid movie.

Random Observations, 12/31/16

Four items.

I encourage the reader to listen to Europa Terra Nostra podcasts.  One thing that struck me while listening to their latest is how different serious European nationalists are from their LARPing American counterparts.  While the Americans bloviate about Kali Yuga, sub-fractional admixture percentages and varied misinterpretations of population genetics and ancestry testing, gnostic esotericism, the cephalic index of Julius Caesar, pussy-pedestalizing “game,” Hitler worship, juvenile trolling, self-interesting happy penguin money-grubbing, moronic feuding with baked alaskas, and other stupidities, the Europeans are engaged in thoughtful political organizing, pan-European cooperation, how current events affect the nationalist cause, and implementing real-world conferences that out-do their American counterparts in seriousness and accomplishment by an order of magnitude. Granted, the Europeans could talk more about long-term objectives (if such is not illegal due to EU “hate laws”) and they need to incorporate into their worldview Salter’s ethnic genetic interests concept (which is serious real-world biopolitics based on kinship, not the EGI talisman of Der Movement); but still, even with those deficiencies, what a world of difference between folks who want to get things done (ETN and APF) and folks who are play-acting (Der Movement).

Next, for new readers, something I have discussed before – my opposition to comments sections on blogs.  Unmoderated comments descend into the sewer, they are full of stupid trolling, typical “movement” obsessions, feuding and flamewars, a form of Gresham’s Law in which the bad comments and commentators drive out the good ones (look at Majority Rights, for example). Moderated comments seem to be better (although that depends on the site owner) but there’s a problem there as well, beyond that of the time and effort wasted doing the moderating. Moderated comments leave the site owner open to suspicions of intellectual dishonesty.  As an example, assume that two commentators, Jim and Mark, are engaged in a debate in a comments thread.  Jim espouses a view favored by the site owner; perhaps Jim is the site owner.  Mark, on the other hand, puts forth an opposing viewpoint. After some back-and-forth, Mark makes a devastating refutation of Jim’s position, effectively disproving the validity of the Jim/site owner viewpoint.  Except that Mark’s comment never makes it online, the site owner censors it through moderation, leaving Jim and Jim’s position to have the last word. Such things can happen (and have happened).  If Mark is serious about his position, he should express his views on his own blog.  Indeed, if someone has many valuable comments to make on someone else’s blog, that material would be better suited as the foundation for their own blog.  In a “movement” with such rigid memetic conformity as Der Movement, the more intellectual diversity, the better.  More blogs expressing more viewpoints is better than an unmoderated sewer, or a moderated censored “discussion” skewed in the direction of the site owner’s preferences and viewpoints.  Create more groupuscules!  Ted Sallis is a groupuscule of one, in opposition to Der Movement; you, dear reader, may be so included to create your own little memetic nexus of self-expression. Blog rather than comment.

Here we see one of the several Asian females who pry their way into pro-White activism taking advantage of the latent (and in some cases, not so latent, eh?) yellow fever extant there:

Chinese Nationalist Maiden

December 30, 2016 – 8:46 am | Permalink

By traditional Chinese standards, anyone who does not respect social relations (mom, dad, grandpa, grandma, ruler) is evil. Clearly the Jews are not respecting Specter’s family relations here, and undoubtedly assume the role of moral villains. Chinese don not respect people who are like this, and Whites should not either lest they be taken advantage of.

Traditional Chinese standards = rigid social conformity.  Sorry, Whites are different, and do not need Chinatrics (or Japotrices for that matter) pontificating to us.  Who is “Specter” by the way?  Can you even get Rich’s surname right?  And, yes, Whites shouldn’t be taken advantage of, including by Asiatrices peddling, in one form or another, Silk Road White nationalism. I’m not surprised though that this creature finds a congenial home at TOO. To HBDers, China is The Land of the Gods, after all.  Although I doubt any of these pontificating Asiatrices actually live in their ethnoracial homelands. Isn’t ruining White EGI by their presence an example of Asians taking advantage of Whites?

So, here we see two more candidates for leadership positions in Captain Chaos’ upper Midwest ethnostate of Cuckmerica.  In addition to Romney as dictator, Lindsey Graham can be in charge of immigration and homeland security, and McCain can be Secretary of State. Lulz.

Against Silver, 7/3/16

Spencer beware, don’t let Radix become another Majority Rights.

Silver on Radix comments on me thus: 

I’ve never known to him merely heartily disagree with someone. He permits people an inch of disagreement and no more. If they step an inch farther beyond their allotted bounds he denounces them as furiously as if they’d stepped a mile farther.

He’s mentally unstable/ill is my guess. What other conclusion can you really draw about someone who’d say:
Durocher, the enemy of the White race. Durocher: the lowest form of filthy scum imaginable. Durocher: an embarrassment to the great French people. Durocher: the human turd. A prime objective of any White ethnostate will be hunting down scum like Durocher for trial, with the ultimate penalty as the outcome.
Admittedly, he was particularly unhinged in that self-contained passage, but his site is peppered throughout with sophomoric claptrap like “dedicated anti-white activist Durocher”, “Play the piano, Durocher, play it well” [ie we’ll string you up with piano wire], “Any sane White ethnostate would put Durocher on trial and execute him.”
Truth be told, I didn’t realize how bad he was until I ctrl-f’d his site for those statements just now. He’s never had anything nice to say about me either, but in my case it’s somewhat justifiable (not that I like it, but in the sense that our values diverge so much and I’ve irritated him enough that it’s unsurprising). But there’s minimal daylight between his own position and Durocher’s, when you get down to the brass tacks. You really have to be quite sick in the head to savage someone on your own side like that.
I think the fact that he established himself early on as an EGI maven is the only things that keeps him ’employed’ (so to speak) in the minds of Alt Righters and WNs (like Greg Johnson)

Right…hey, I thought I was only writing about “testing?” Now, it’s EGI. Interesting that Johnson for example would publish my work on a wide variety of topics, including comic books, but I guess that’s only because we’re really interested in the ethnic genetic interests of Galactus vs. the Red Skull. My work, my output over the years speaks for itself. 
Readers unaware of Silver should study this, and particularly this, as well as this, and especially this.
Of course, Silver neglects to quote from his own unhinged ravings, such as: 

Who cares what that shiteating asshole thinks? Are you that goddam thick, Dave Johns, that you can’t understand what a pure, unadulterated asshole that vermin is? Are you that damn thick that you can’t realize the only reason he can’t fairly characterize my position is that I mock his absurd attempts to whiten himself with his “tests”? That the whole reason he’s such a grouch is that he feels vulnerable about his whiteness and feels compelled to savage and ridicule anyone and everyone even a smidgeon less white than what his exacting standards require, even though doing so is not remotely required for advancing a pro-white agenda (*), and is, in fact, counterproductive? Are you that damn thick? Sadly, I think the answer is yes, you are that damn thick. Try this, Davey boy: think for yourself. If you can pinpoint anything I say (now, not one year ago—which is the only thing shiteater has to go on) which you think compromises white interests, let’s have you bring it up. Otherwise, pay attention to what I actually say; not to what self-interested shiteaters claim I say.

Ahhh…Silver. First, you unmitigated fraud, much of the bombast on this site (and my other blogs) is a “put-on” and subtly “tongue-in-cheek.” I’ve said as much a number of times (*), but an outright liar such as yourself is either too mendacious or stupid to admit it. The misanthropic style – perfected to an extent that you believe it 100% serious – is mimicked from certain other race bloggers who you have praised in the past (because their obsessions assist in your underlying objectives) – proving that your criticisms of my alleged instability are personally/politically motivated. In my case, you see it as “mental illness” and in the cases of others they are just being “indefatigable,” don’t you know. 
Anyway, Spencer and all other race bloggers should be wise to Silver, who jumps from one racialist blog to another, leaving wreckage behind. The main case study is Majority Rights. Pre-Silver, it was an interesting blog that featured a wide number of bloggers and many, many commentators (some stupid, but some good). Post-Silver, the blog is a disaster: apparently, the only people blogging are the site-owner Guessedworker, Daniel S, and – believe it or not – a person claiming to be an East Asian female. There are maybe half-a-dozen regular commentators there now, and that half-a-dozen includes the aforementioned three regular bloggers (as well as someone – who I take it is Daniel S himself – leaving multiple comments under bizarre descriptive webonyms). 
Is Silver responsible for that? Yes (and GW as well for tolerating all of this). My analogy would be as follows. Imagine a class full of high-energy students, most of them good students, who if held in place by a properly strict teacher can produce solid academic accomplishments. Introduced into this class is a trouble-maker, a mischief-maker, a disruptor, who wants to ruin the teaching environment and turn the students against each other (and against the teacher). If the teacher is too weak and/or naive and lets the trouble-maker take control of the situation, then the classroom environment is ruined, no one learns, other trouble-makers are emboldened, and the serious students say “the hell with it” and transfer elsewhere. That is precisely what happened to Majority Rights. Spencer should go to the blog today, and then look back at the archives pre-Silver (say, 2005 and 2006) and compare. And then, if he’s smart, Spencer will kick Silver the hell off of the Radix commenting boards and never let it return. Don’t be another GW, Richard. 
And consider what Silver said about his one-time benefactor GW and of the wreck that the fraud Silver produced at a once excellent blog: 

Too true. What a damnable fool GW turned out to be. Even as early as 2005 and 2006 some were wondering whether he didn’t have a screw loose, but a great deal of quality material was being turned out in those days so the danger didn’t seem so obvious. The arrival of DanielS on the front page unquestionably signaled the end; I hope there’s a special circle of hell reserved for that lunatic.

Will he one day say the same about Spencer and Radix (after destroying that blog)?
And my hostility to Durocher? Because he’s a fraud (in more ways than one**), a “try hard,” a superficial “analyst” whose productions do more harm than good. In a sense, Durocher is – possibly – a cleverer, more serious, more strategic type of Silverian-style fraud himself. Similar patterns – the varying memes and personas (in more ways than one, eh?) – going from a moderate mainstreamer to a Hitlerian Nutzi, for example, or shifting from pan-European to Nordicist from post to post, making outrageous lies about population genetics. I don’t trust him and with each post my distrust only grows. Do I really think he should be “strung up with piano wire” or should he just be ridiculed? More likely the latter, but don’t tell that to lying scum like Silver. 
* For example, in October 2015, on my RLP blog I wrote: 

Public service announcement: one wonders if the foreign readers understand that the blog is a tongue-in-cheek parody of imbecilic “gamesters,” mendacious HBDers, and moronic American “movement” Nutzis.
Of course, the underlying memes are accurate and serious, but, at some point, all of the aforementioned groups are so tragicomic that ridicule is the best approach for deconstruction.

**That I’m the only one that seems to notice something laughably obvious is a fairly good indication of the absolute stupidity – and here I am 100% serious – of Der Movement.